Effect of Lowering Diastolic Pressure in Patients With and Without Cardiovascular Disease

Sex Differences in Achieved Diastolic Blood Pressure and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Elderly Patients With Hypertension

BACKGROUND

Blood pressure profiles differ in males and females. Low diastolic blood pressure (DBP) is associated with increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). However, sex differences in achieved DBP and associated CVD risk remain unclear.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to examine sex differences in achieved DBP and CVD outcomes in elderly hypertensive patients.

METHODS

This study is a secondary analysis of the STEP (Strategy of Blood Pressure Intervention in the Elderly Hypertensive Patients) trial. The mean achieved DBP was compared between male and female participants. The association between mean achieved DBP and cardiovascular risk was evaluated as a continuous and categorical variable with a cubic spline model or Cox proportional hazards regression model.

RESULTS

A total of 8,355 patients were included in this analysis. Median follow-up time was 3.08 years (Q1-Q3: 2.97-3.25 years). Female patients achieved lower DBP levels than male patients throughout the trial duration (P < 0.001), and in each treatment group (P < 0.05 for all). Mean achieved DBP exhibited a J-curve association with cardiovascular risk in females, but not in males. Both female and male patients showed increased cardiovascular risk at DBP >81 mm Hg (females: HR: 1.10; 95% CI: 1.03-1.16; males: HR: 1.06; 95% CI: 1.01-1.11). Mean achieved DBP of <65 mm Hg was associated with increased CVD risk only in female patients (females: HR: 2.33; 95% CI: 1.01-5.34; males: HR: 0.87; 95% CI: 0.12-6.25).

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows in elderly hypertensive patients, females have lower achieved DBP. A J-shaped relation between achieved DBP and CVD risk was observed in female, but not male patients. Low achieved DBP is associated with higher CVD risk among females but not males.

Human Pinealectomy Syndrome and the Impact of Melatonin Replacement Therapy: 1-Cardiovascular Function

The purpose of this investigational study was to assess the cardiovascular effects of melatonin replacement therapy in pinealectomized patients. This was a prospective open-label, single-arm proof-of-concept study The study comprised 11 patients aged 16.7 ± 1.7 years, who had undergone pinealectomy, experienced no tumor recurrence, and exhibited undetectable salivary melatonin levels. A 6-month melatonin regimen (0.3 mg daily) was administered. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring was conducted at baseline, 3-month, and 6-month intervals. First of all, no hypertension was observed in pinealectomized patients. Over the course of the study, diastolic blood pressure progressively decreased, reaching statistical significance at 6 months. Pulse pressure exhibited a gradual increase, reaching statistical significance after 6 months. Short-term blood pressure variability increased significantly for both systolic and diastolic pressures. Morning systolic and diastolic blood pressure levels were significantly decreased by melatonin replacement therapy. Melatonin had no effect on the average heart rate or its variability. Melatonin-deficient pinealectomized patients were normotensive. Melatonin replacement in these patients led to reduced diastolic pressure, increased pulse pressure, and enhanced short-term blood pressure variability. These results are consistent with improved cardiovascular health. Furthermore, melatonin's temporal specificity suggests that it might enhance nighttime recovery, heightening reactivity during wakefulness. While melatonin is used as a dietary supplement for similar effects, caution is advised, and further research is needed to optimize its use in various health and disease contexts. Further, considering the study's limitations, more extensive research would strengthen these findings.

Analysis of Energy and Pressure in the Sinus with Different Blood Pressures after Bioprosthetic Aortic Valve Replacement

PURPOSE

To investigate the effect of changing systolic and diastolic blood pressures (SBP and DBP, respectively) on sinus flow and valvular and epicardial coronary flow dynamics after TAVR and SAVR.

METHODS

SAPIEN 3 and Magna valves were deployed in an idealized aortic root model as part of a pulse duplicating left heart flow loop simulator. Different combinations of SBP and DBP were applied to the test setup and the resulting change in total coronary flow from baseline (120/60 mmHg), effective orifice area (EOA), and left ventricular (LV) workload, with each combination, was assessed. In addition, particle image velocimetry was used to assess the Laplacian of pressure (∇ 2 P ) in the sinus, coronary and main flow velocities, the energy dissipation rate (EDR) in the sinus and the LV workload.

RESULTS

This study shows that under an elevated SBP, there is an increase in the total coronary flow, EOA, LV workload, peak velocities downstream of the valve,∇ 2 P , and EDR. With an elevated DBP, there was an increase in the total coronary flow and∇ 2 P . However, EOA and LV workload decreased with an increase in DBP, and EDR increased with a decrease in DBP.

CONCLUSIONS

Blood pressure alters the hemodynamics in the sinus and downstream flow following aortic valve replacement, potentially influencing outcomes in some patients.

Isolated diastolic hypertension and cardiovascular outcomes across different diagnostic guidelines: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

This systematic review aims to determine the impact of isolated diastolic hypertension (IDH) on cardiovascular outcomes.

METHODS

We searched only English language articles on PubMed and SCOPUS until July 31, 2023 to investigate the association between IDH and cardiovascular outcomes.

RESULTS

This meta-analysis of 19 studies evaluated the impact of different hypertension diagnostic guidelines (ACC/AHA: American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology; JNC7: Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure; NICE/ESC: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence/European Society of Cardiology) on hypertension-related outcomes. Studies had varying sample sizes (173 to 2,969,679 participants) and study designs. In cohort studies using JNC7 guidelines, IDH was linked to increased cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk (HR: 1.45, 95% CI 1.17, 1.74), CVD mortality (HR: 1.54, 95% CI 1.23, 1.84), and coronary heart disease (CHD) risk (HR: 1.65). In studies using ACC/AHA guidelines, associations with CVD risk and CVD mortality were weaker [HR: 1.16 (95% CI 1.06, 1.25) and 1.10 (95% CI 0.95, 1.25), respectively]. Subgroup analysis revealed differences in outcomes on the basis of age and sex. Cross-sectional studies did not show significant associations with JNC7 and ACC guidelines; NICE guidelines were not used in cross-sectional studies.

CONCLUSION

IDH is associated with an increased risk of CVD. Higher diastolic blood pressure cutoffs were associated with higher cardiovascular risk. This association varied by study design and effect modification by sex and race influenced the association.

Blood Pressure and Cardiovascular Risk in Women With Breast Cancer: The Pathways Heart Study

Background

Hypertension is an important contributor to cardiovascular disease (CVD) in breast cancer (BC) survivors; however, research on blood pressure (BP) and CVD outcomes in BC survivors is limited.

Objectives

The purpose of this study was to better characterize the association between BP and CVD in a large, longitudinal cohort of BC patients.

Methods

Women with invasive BC diagnosed from 2005 to 2013 at Kaiser Permanente Northern California were matched 1:5 to women without BC. Patient data were obtained from electronic health records. Multivariable Cox regression and penalized spline models were used to explore the linear and nonlinear relationship of systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) on CVD outcomes.

Results

BC cases (n = 12,713) and controls (n = 55,886) had median follow-up of 9.6 years (IQR: 5.0-11.9 years). Women with BC had a mean age of 60.6 years; 64.8% were non-Hispanic White. For ischemic heart disease (IHD), every 10 mmHg increase in SBP and DBP was associated with 1.23 (95% CI: 1.14-1.33) and 1.10 (95% CI: 0.98-1.24) risk, respectively, in women with BC. For stroke, every 10 mmHg increase in SBP and DBP was associated with a 1.45 (95% CI: 1.34-1.58) and 1.91 (95% CI: 1.68-2.18) risk, respectively. A U-shaped relationship was observed between heart failure/cardiomyopathy and BP. The associations between BP and risk of IHD, stroke, and any primary CVD were not statistically different comparing women with BC to controls, but risks varied by BC status for heart failure/cardiomyopathy (P for interaction = 0.01).

Conclusions

Women with and without BC showed similar risks for IHD, stroke, and any primary CVD suggesting similar BP targets should be pursued regardless of BC survivorship status.

Cardiovascular Risk in Patients With Treated Isolated Diastolic Hypertension and Isolated Low Diastolic Blood Pressure

BACKGROUND

The prognosis of high or markedly low diastolic blood pressure (DBP) with normalized on-treatment systolic blood pressure on major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) is uncertain. This study examined whether treated isolated diastolic hypertension (IDH) and treated isolated low DBP (ILDBP) were associated with MACEs in patients with hypertension.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A total of 7582 patients with on-treatment systolic blood pressure <130 mm Hg from SPRINT (Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial) were categorized on the basis of average DBP: <60 mm Hg (n=1031; treated ILDBP), 60 to 79 mm Hg (n=5432), ≥80 mm Hg (n=1119; treated IDH). MACE risk was estimated using Cox proportional-hazards models. Among the SPRINT participants, median age was 67.0 years and 64.9% were men. Over a median follow-up of 3.4 years, 512 patients developed a MACE. The incidence of MACEs was 3.9 cases per 100 person-years for treated ILDBP, 1.9 cases for DBP 60 to 79 mm Hg, and 1.8 cases for treated IDH. Comparing with DBP 60 to 79 mm Hg, treated ILDBP was associated with an 1.32-fold MACE risk (hazard ratio [HR], 1.32, 95% CI, 1.05-1.66), whereas treated IDH was not (HR, 1.18 [95% CI, 0.87-1.59]). There was no effect modification by age, sex, atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk, or cardiovascular disease history (all P values for interaction >0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

In this secondary analysis of SPRINT, among treated patients with normalized systolic blood pressure, excessively low DBP was associated with an increased MACE risk, while treated IDH was not. Further research is required for treated ILDBP management.

Effect of Blood Pressure Levels on Sinus Hemodynamics in Relation to Calcification After Bioprosthetic Aortic Valve Replacement

Coexisting hypertension and aortic stenosis are common. Some studies showed that elevated blood pressures may be associated with progression of calcific aortic valve disease (CAVD) while others showed no correlation. Flow dynamics in the sinuses of Valsalva are considered key factors in the progression of CAVD. While the relationship between hemodynamics and CAVD is not yet fully understood, it has been demonstrated that they are tightly correlated. This study aims to investigate the effect of changing systolic and diastolic blood pressures (SBP and DBP, respectively) on sinus hemodynamics in relation to potential initiation or progression of CAVD after aortic valve replacement (AVR). Evolut R, SAPIEN 3 and Magna valves were deployed in an aortic root under pulsatile conditions. Using particle image velocimetry, the hemodynamics in the sinus were assessed. The velocity, vorticity, circulation ( Γ ) and shear stress were calculated. This study shows that under elevated SBP and DBP, velocity, vorticity, and shear stress nearby the leaflets increased. Additionally, larger fluctuations of Γ and area under the curve throughout the cardiac cycle were observed. Elevated blood pressures are associated with higher velocity, vorticity, and shear stress near the leaflets which may initiate or accelerate pro-calcific changes in the prosthetic leaflets leading to bioprosthetic valve degeneration.

Association between diastolic blood pressure during the first 24 h and 28-day mortality in patients with septic shock: a retrospective observational study

BACKGROUND

Although the mean arterial pressure (MAP) target of 65 mmHg was achieved, diastolic blood pressure (DBP) was still low in some septic shock patients. The effects of DBP on the prognosis and optimal target for patients with septic shock are unclear. We sought to investigate the relationship between DBP and 28-day mortality in septic shock patients.

METHODS

In this retrospective observational study, we obtained data from the Chinese Database in Intensive Care (CDIC). We included patients with an admission diagnosis of septic shock and shock was controlled. DBP was measured every 1 h, and the mean DBP during the first 24 h (mDBP24h) was recorded. The primary outcome was 28-day mortality. Multivariable logistic regression determined the relationship between mDBP24h and 28-day mortality.

RESULTS

In total, 1251 patients were finally included. The 28-day mortality of included septic shock patients was 28.3%. The mDBP24h, not mSBP24h, was higher among 28-day survivors compared with non-survivors. 28-day mortality was inversely associated with mDBP24h (unadjusted OR 0.814 per 10 mmHg higher mDBP24h, P = 0.003), with a stepwise increase in 28-day mortality at lower mDBP24h. The 28-day mortality of patients with mDBP24h < 59 mmHg had an absolute risk reduction of 9.4% (P = 0.001). And mDBP24h < 59 mmHg was the remaining high risk factor inversely associated with 28-day mortality after multivariable adjustment (adjusted OR 1.915, 95% CI 1.037-3.536, P = 0.038), while mMAP24h and mSBP24h were not.

CONCLUSION

In patients with septic shock after initial resuscitation, we observed an inverse association between mDBP24h and 28-day mortality. The poor outcomes in patients with mDBP24h < 59 mmHg provide indirect evidence supporting a further DBP goal of 59 mmHg for patients with septic shock after MAP of 65 mmHg was achieved.

Association of low diastolic blood pressure with all-cause death among US adults with normal systolic blood pressure

Although the effect of intensive systolic blood pressure lowering is widely recognized, treatment-related low diastolic blood pressure still worrisome. This was a prospective cohort study based on the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Adults (≥20 years old) with guideline-recommended blood pressure were included and pregnant women were excluded. Survey-weighted logistic regression and cox models were used for analysis. A total of 25 858 participants were included in this study. After weighted, the overall mean age of the participants was 43.17 (16.03) years, including 53.7% women and 68.1% non-Hispanic white. Numerous factors were associated with low DBP (<60 mmHg), including advanced age, heart failure, myocardial infarction, and diabetes. The use of antihypertensive drugs was also associated with lower DBP (OR, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.26-1.83). DBP of less than 60 mmHg were associated with a higher risk of all-cause death (HR, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.12-1.51) and cardiovascular death (HR, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.00-1.79) compared to those with DBP between 70 and 80 mmHg. After regrouping, DBP <60 mmHg (no antihypertensive drugs) was associated with a higher risk of all-cause death (HR, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.21-1.75). DBP <60 mmHg after taking antihypertensive drugs was not associated with a higher risk of all-cause death (HR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.73-1.36). Antihypertensive drug is an important factor contributing to DBP below 60 mmHg. But the pre-existing risk does not increase further with an additional reduction of DBP after antihypertensive drugs treatment.

Blood pressure in heart failure management and prevention

Hypertension is a leading cause of heart failure and other cardiovascular diseases. Its role in the pathogenesis of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) differs from that in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Moreover, rigorous blood pressure control may reduce the incidence of heart failure. However, once heart failure develops, prognosis is affected by blood pressure, which may differ between patients with and without heart failure. Therefore, the association between guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) for heart failure and its uptitration must be considered for blood pressure management and should not be overlooked. Heart failure medications affect the blood pressure and efficacy per baseline blood pressure value. This review discusses the potential mechanisms by which hypertension leads to HFrEF or HFpEF, the impact of hypertension on incident heart failure, and the recommended approaches for blood pressure management in patients with heart failure. Comparison between patients with and without heart failure regarding blood pressure The association between CV events and SBP is linear in patients without heart failure; however, it becomes J-shaped or inverse linear in those with heart failure. The management of BP, including optimal BP or pharmacotherapy, differs between the two populations. ACEi angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, ARB angiotensin II receptor blockers; ARNi angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors, BB beta-blockers, BP blood pressure, CV cardiovascular, DASH Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension, GDMT guideline-directed medical therapy, HF heart failure, HFrEF heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, MRA mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, SBP systolic blood pressure, SGLT2i sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors.

Answering Clinical Questions Using Machine Learning: Should We Look at Diastolic Blood Pressure When Tailoring Blood Pressure Control?

Background: The guidelines recommend intensive blood pressure control. Randomized trials have focused on the relevance of the systolic blood pressure (SBP) lowering, leaving the safety of the diastolic blood pressure (DBP) reduction unresolved. There are data available which show that low DBP should not stop clinicians from achieving SBP targets; however, registries and analyses of randomized trials present conflicting results. The purpose of the study was to apply machine learning (ML) algorithms to determine, whether DBP is an important risk factor to predict stroke, heart failure (HF), myocardial infarction (MI), and primary outcome in the SPRINT trial database. Methods: ML experiments were performed using decision tree, random forest, k-nearest neighbor, naive Bayesian, multi-layer perceptron, and logistic regression algorithms, including and excluding DBP as the risk factor in an unselected and selected (DBP < 70 mmHg) study population. Results: Including DBP as the risk factor did not change the performance of the machine learning models evaluated using accuracy, AUC, mean, and weighted F-measure, and was not required to make proper predictions of stroke, MI, HF, and primary outcome. Conclusions: Analyses of the SPRINT trial data using ML algorithms imply that DBP should not be treated as an independent risk factor when intensifying blood pressure control.

Low Diastolic Blood Pressure and Mortality in Older Women. Results From the Women's Health Initiative Long Life Study

BACKGROUND

Recommended systolic blood pressure targets often do not consider the relationship of low diastolic blood pressure (DBP) levels with cardiovascular disease (CVD) and all-cause mortality risk, which is especially relevant for older people with concurrent comorbidities. We examined the relationship of DBP levels to CVD and all-cause mortality in older women in the Women's Health Initiative Long Life Study (WHI-LLS).

METHODS

The study sample included 7,875 women (mean age: 79 years) who underwent a blood pressure measurement at an in-person home visit conducted in 2012-2013. CVD and all-cause mortality were centrally adjudicated. Hazard ratios (HRs) were obtained from adjusted Cox proportional hazards models.

RESULTS

After 5 years follow-up, all-cause mortality occurred in 18.4% of women. Compared with a DBP of 80 mm Hg, the fully adjusted HR for mortality was 1.33 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.04-1.71) for a DBP of 50 mm Hg and 1.67 (95% CI: 1.29-2.16) for a DBP of 100 mm Hg. The HRs for CVD were 1.14 (95% CI: 0.78-1.67) for a DBP of 50 mm Hg and HR 1.50 (95% CI: 1.03-2.17) for a DBP of 100 mm Hg. The nadir DBP associated with lowest mortality risk was 72 mm Hg overall.

CONCLUSIONS

In older women, consideration should be given to the potential adverse effects of low and high DBP. Low DBP may serve as a risk marker. DBP target levels between 68 and 75 mm Hg may avoid higher mortality risk.

Integration of a multicomponent intervention for hypertension into primary healthcare services in Singapore-A cluster randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Despite availability of clinical practice guidelines for hypertension management, blood pressure (BP) control remains sub-optimal (<30%) even in high-income countries. This study aims to assess the effectiveness of a potentially scalable multicomponent intervention integrated into primary care system compared to usual care on BP control.

METHODS AND FINDINGS

A cluster-randomized controlled trial was conducted in 8 government clinics in Singapore. The trial enrolled 916 patients aged ≥40 years with uncontrolled hypertension (systolic BP (SBP) ≥140 mmHg or diastolic BP (DBP) ≥90 mmHg). Multicomponent intervention consisted of physician training in risk-based treatment of hypertension, subsidized losartan-HCTZ single-pill combination (SPC) medications, nurse training in motivational conversations (MCs), and telephone follow-ups. Usual care (controls) comprised of routine care in the clinics, no MC or telephone follow-ups, and no subsidy on SPCs. The primary outcome was mean SBP at 24 months' post-baseline. Four clinics (447 patients) were randomized to intervention and 4 (469) to usual care. Patient enrolment commenced in January 2017, and follow-up was during December 2018 to September 2020. Analysis used intention-to-treat principles. The primary outcome was SBP at 24 months. BP at baseline, 12 and 24 months was modeled at the patient level in a likelihood-based, linear mixed model repeated measures analysis with treatment group, follow-up, treatment group × follow-up interaction as fixed effects, and random cluster (clinic) effects. A total of 766 (83.6%) patients completed 2-year follow-up. A total of 63 (14.1%) and 87 (18.6%) patients in intervention and in usual care, respectively, were lost to follow-up. At 24 months, the adjusted mean SBP was significantly lower in the intervention group compared to usual care (-3.3 mmHg; 95% CI: -6.34, -0.32; p = 0.03). The intervention led to higher BP control (odds ratio 1.51; 95% CI: 1.10, 2.09; p = 0.01), lower odds of high (>20%) 10-year cardiovascular risk score (OR 0.67; 95% CI: 0.47, 0.97; p = 0.03), and lower mean log albuminuria (-0.22; 95% CI: -0.41, -0.02; p = 0.03). Mean DBP, mortality rates, and serious adverse events including hospitalizations were not different between groups. The main limitation was no masking in the trial.

CONCLUSIONS

A multicomponent intervention consisting of physicians trained in risk-based treatment, subsidized SPC medications, nurse-delivered motivational conversation, and telephone follow-ups improved BP control and lowered cardiovascular risk. Wide-scale implementation of a multicomponent intervention such as the one in our trial is likely to reduce hypertension-related morbidity and mortality globally.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Trial Registration: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02972619.

Ambulatory diastolic blood pressure: a marker of comorbidity in elderly fit hypertensive individuals?

BACKGROUND

Masked diastolic hypotension is a new blood pressure (BP) pattern detected by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) in elderly hypertensives. The aim of this study was to relate ABPM and comorbidity in a cohort of fit elderly subjects attending an outpatient hypertension clinic.

METHODS

Comorbidity was assessed by Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) and CHA2DS2VASc score. All subjects evaluated with ABPM were aged ≥ 65 years. CCI and CHA2DS2VASc score were calculated. Diastolic hypotension was defined as mean ambulatory diastolic BP < 65 mmHg and logistic regression analysis was carried out in order to detect and independent relationship between comorbidity burden and night-time diastolic BP < 65 mmHg.

RESULTS

We studied 174 hypertensive elderly patients aged 72.1 ± 5.2 years, men were 93 (53.4%). Mean CCI was 0.91 ± 1.14 and mean CHA2DS2VASc score of 2.68 ± 1.22. Subjects with night-time mean diastolic values < 65 mmHg were higher in females [54.7% vs. 45.3%, P = 0.048; odds ratio (OR) = 1.914, 95% CI: 1.047-3.500]. Logistic regression analysis showed that only CHA2DS2VASc score was independently associated with night-time mean diastolic values < 65 mmHg (OR = 1.518, 95% CI: 1.161-1.985; P = 0.002), but CCI was not.

CONCLUSIONS

ABPM and comorbidity evaluation appear associated in elderly fit subjects with masked hypotension. Comorbid women appear to have higher risk for low ambulatory BP.

Risk Stratification by Coronary Perfusion Pressure in Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction Patients Undergoing Revascularization: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis

Background

Coronary perfusion pressure (CPP) and coronary artery stenosis are responsible for myocardial perfusion. However, how CPP-related survival outcome affects revascularization is unclear.

Objective

The aim of this study is to investigate the prognostic role of CPP in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with complete revascularization (CR) or reasonable incomplete revascularization (RIR).

Methods

We retrospectively screened 6,076 consecutive patients in a registry. The residual synergy between percutaneous coronary intervention with Taxus and cardiac surgery (SYNTAX) score (rSS) was used to define CR (rSS = 0) and RIR (0<rSS≤8). Propensity score matching was performed to reduce bias between RIR and CR. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality.

Results

In total, 816 patients with LVSD who underwent CR or RIR were enrolled. After a mean follow-up of 4.6 years, 134 patients died. Both CPP and RIR independently predicted mortality in the total population. After 1:1 matching, 175 pairs of RIR and CR were found in patients with CPP > 42 mmHg. Moreover, 101 pairs of RIR and CR were present in patients with CPP ≤ 42 mmHg. In patients with CPP > 42 mmHg, RIR was not significantly different from CR in long-term mortality [hazard ratio (HR) 1.20; 95% confidence interval (CI):0.70–2.07; p = 0.513]; However, in patients with CPP≤42 mmHg, RIR had a significantly higher mortality risk than CR (HR 2.39; 95% CI: 1.27–4.50; p = 0.007).

Conclusions

The CPP had a risk stratification role in selecting different revascularization strategies in patients with LVSD. When patients with LVSD had CPP > 42 mmHg, RIR was equivalent to CR in survival. However, when patients with LVSD had CPP ≤ 42 mmHg, RIR had a significantly higher mortality risk than CR.

Metabolic syndrome at baseline was not predictive to new-onset cardiovascular diseases in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: A prospective observational registry

Objective: It has been established that metabolic syndrome is prevalent in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of metabolic syndrome at baseline on new-onset cardiovascular disease (CVD) in patients with SLE. Methods: The demographic and lupus-related clinical variables of 229 patients with SLE were collected from the Korean Lupus Network (KORNET) registry. Metabolic syndrome was defined by the modified National Cholesterol Education Program’s Adult Treatment Panel III (NCEP ATP III) criteria. Binary logistic regression analysis was applied to identify clinical variables including metabolic syndrome related to pre-existing CVD at the time of enrollment or new-onset CVD during 3 years of follow-up.

Results: Patients with pre-existing CVD at baseline had higher rates of metabolic syndrome than those without CVD in SLE ( p = .022), whereas there was no difference in the frequency of metabolic syndrome between patients with and without new-onset CVD. Logistic regression analysis revealed that metabolic syndrome and the number of its components were associated with pre-existing CVD, together with body mass index and hypertriglyceridemia. Metabolic syndrome at baseline and its components were not related with increased risk of new-onset CVD. On the contrary, anti-dsDNA antibody titer, anti-ds DNA positivity, and lower diastolic blood pressure increased the risk of new-onset CVD. Conclusion: This study demonstrated that metabolic syndrome at baseline was not predictive to new-onset CVD at 3 years of follow-up, although it was associated with pre-existing CVD in SLE.

The diastolic blood pressure J-curve revisited: An update

Hypertension remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality. Recent treatment guidelines stress more strict systolic blood pressure (SBP) targets without regard for abnormally low achieved diastolic blood pressures (DBP). However, as DBP falls below a critical level, adverse events increase, the so-called J-shaped curve. Proponents argue that the low DBP is causative due to reduced coronary perfusion during diastole with obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD), whereas others postulate the J-curve represents reverse causality from underlying comorbidity. Most data are observational, derived from population-based cohorts or post-hoc analyses of randomized controlled trials (RCT) conducted for other reasons. The purpose of this review is to analyze the observational studies performed over the last decade addressing the J-curve, with consideration of earlier data. Overall, a J-curve exists, but it remains uncertain whether low DBP is causative or instead reflects reverse causation from either diseased vasculature (widened pulse pressure) or severe underlying comorbidity. The most convincing data for causation come from studies restricted to patients with documented CAD, with evidence suggesting revascularization may mitigate risk. RCTs are needed to determine if a low DBP should preclude intensification of therapy, especially with documented CAD. Firm recommendations cannot be made with contemporary data.

Contributions of Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressures to Cardiovascular Outcomes in the ALLHAT Study

BACKGROUND

SBP and DBP have important associations with cardiovascular events, but are seldom considered simultaneously.

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to simultaneously analyze systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) measurements on the associated risk of a primary composite outcome of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), congestive heart failure (CHF), or stroke.

METHODS

This study analyzed ALLHAT (Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial) data, which randomized adults to chlorthalidone, amlodipine, or lisinopril. The authors evaluated the simultaneous association of repeated SBP and DBP measurements on the primary composite outcome, and each outcome using proportional hazards regression. The authors report hazard ratios using a "heat map" to represent high and low risk according to SBP and DBP combinations.

RESULTS

During a median follow-up of 4.4 years (interquartile range: 3.6-5.4 years), 33,357 participants experienced 2,636 MIs, 866 CHF events, 936 strokes, and 3,700 deaths; 8,138 patients (24.4%) had at least 1 event. For the composite outcome, all-cause mortality, MI, and CHF, a U-shaped association was observed with SBP and DBP, but the SBP and DBP associated with the lowest hazards differed for each outcome. For example, SBP/DBP of 140-155/70-80 mm Hg was associated with the lowest HR for all-cause mortality, compared with 110-120/85-90 mm Hg for MI and 125-135/70-75 mm Hg for CHF. In contrast, the association of SBP and stroke was linear.

CONCLUSIONS

The risk pattern of SBP and DBP differs by clinical outcomes, and the SBP and DBP associated with the lowest risk. Our results suggest individualization of blood pressure targets may depend in part on the cardiovascular event for which the patient is most at risk.

A Randomized, Double-blind, Active-controlled, Two Parallel-Group, Optional Titration, Multicenter, Phase IIIb Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Fimasartan Versus Perindopril Monotherapy With and Without a Diuretic Combination in Elderly Patients With Essential Hypertension

PURPOSE

The efficacy and tolerability of fimasartan in elderly patients have not been fully evaluated. This study was therefore conducted to determine the efficacy and tolerability of fimasartan compared with perindopril in elderly Korean patients aged >70 years with essential hypertension (defined by a mean sitting systolic blood pressure [SBP] ≥140 mm Hg).

METHODS

This randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, 2 parallel-group, optional titration, multicenter, Phase IIIb trial (FITNESS [Fimasartan in the Senior Subjects]) enrolled 241 patients from 23 cardiac centers in the Republic of Korea between August 2017 and December 2019. After the placebo run-in period, treatment started with fimasartan 30 mg or perindopril arginine 2.5 mg once daily at a 1:1 ratio; if BP was not controlled at week 4, the dose was doubled. If BP was not controlled at week 8, a diuretic combination (fimasartan 60 mg/hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg or perindopril arginine 5 mg/indapamide 1.25 mg) was administered. After 16 weeks of the double-blind treatment, the patients with controlled BP participated in an 8-week open-label extension study, with the 2 groups unified by fimasartan 60 mg with or without hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg for 8 weeks. The primary outcome was a change in SBP for 8 weeks. The secondary outcomes included a change in sitting diastolic BP (DBP) for 8 weeks and changes in SBP and DBP for 4, 16, and 24 weeks.

FINDINGS

At week 8, mean SBP significantly decreased from baseline in both groups: -14.2 (14.4) mm Hg in the fimasartan group and -9.0 (16.1) mm Hg in the perindopril group. The difference between the 2 groups was 5.4 (2.1) mm Hg, indicating the noninferiority of fimasartan to perindopril. Moreover, fimasartan exhibited a higher BP-lowering effect than perindopril (P = 0.0108). In addition, reductions in SBP and DBP from baseline to weeks 4, 8, and 16 were significantly greater in the fimasartan group than in the perindopril group, although the SBP reduction was comparable at week 16. Both groups reported an excellent mean compliance rate of 97.4% (4.7%) through week 16. During the study period, 82 adverse events were reported in 52 patients, 40 in the fimasartan group and 42 in the perindopril group (P = 0.4647). Dizziness was the most commonly reported adverse event (7 cases). Remarkably, only 1 case of orthostatic hypotension was reported during the study period.

IMPLICATIONS

In elderly patients with essential hypertension, fimasartan 30 to 60 mg with a possible hydrochlorothiazide 12.5-mg combination was noninferior to perindopril 2.5 to 5 mg with a possible indapamide 1.25-mg combination. Furthermore, fimasartan exhibited higher BP-lowering efficacy than perindopril. There was no difference in tolerability between the 2 groups. Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT03246555.

The value of ambulatory blood pressure measurement to detect masked diastolic hypotension in older patients treated for hypertension

OBJECTIVE

assess how many patients with low ambulatory diastolic blood pressure (DBP) are not identified when relying on office DBP alone, and thus have 'masked diastolic hypotension'.

DESIGN

cross-sectional, retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

academic hospital.

SUBJECTS

848 patients treated for hypertension who received ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM).

METHODS

cut-off value between on- and off-target systolic blood pressure (SBP): 140 mmHg. Cut-off for low office and/or ambulatory DBP: DBP ≤ 70 mmHg. 'Masked diastolic hypotension' was defined as office DBP > 70 mmHg and mean ambulatory DBP ≤ 70 mmHg.

RESULTS

mean age of the sample was 60 ± 13 years, 50% was female, 37% had diabetes, 42% preexisting cardiovascular disease (CVD), mean office blood pressure (BP) was 134/79 mmHg. In all patients (n = 848), low office DBP was present in n = 84(10%), while n = 183(22%) had low ambulatory DBP. In all patients with normal-to-high office DBP (n = 764), n = 122(16%) had 'masked diastolic hypotension'. In this group, ambulatory DBP was 14-19 mmHg lower than office DBP. Patients with low ambulatory DBP were older, had more (cardiovascular) comorbidities, and used more (antihypertensive) drugs. Antihypertensive drugs were lowered or discontinued in 30% of all patients with 'masked diastolic hypotension' due to side effects.

CONCLUSIONS

'masked diastolic hypotension' is common among patients treated for hypertension, particularly in older patients with CVD (e.g. coronary artery disease, diabetes), patient groups in which the European Society of Cardiology/Hypertension guideline advises to prevent low DBP. Although it remains to be examined at which BP levels the harms of low DBP outweigh the benefits of lowering SBP, our observations are aimed to increase awareness among physicians.

Associations Between Achieved Ambulatory Blood Pressures and Its Changes With Adverse Outcomes in Resistant Hypertension: Was There a J-Curve for Ambulatory Blood Pressures?

[Figure: see text].

Evaluation of Optimal Diastolic Blood Pressure Range Among Adults With Treated Systolic Blood Pressure Less Than 130 mm Hg

Importance

Extremely low diastolic blood pressure has been reported to be associated with increased adverse cardiovascular events (ie, the diastolic J-shape phenomenon); however, current US guidelines recommend an intensive blood pressure target of less than 130/80 mm Hg without mentioning the lower limits of diastolic blood pressure.

Objectives

To evaluate whether there is a diastolic J-shape phenomenon for patients with an treated systolic blood pressure of less than 130 mm Hg and to explore the safe and optimal diastolic blood pressure ranges for this patient population.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This cohort study analyzed outcome data of patients at high cardiovascular risk who were randomized to intensive or standard blood pressure control and achieved treated systolic blood pressure of less than 130 mm Hg in the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT) and Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes-Blood Pressure (ACCORD-BP) trial. Data were collected from October 2010 to August 2015 (SPRINT) and from September 1999 to June 2009 (ACCORD-BP). Data were analyzed from January to May 2020.

Exposure

Treated diastolic blood pressure, divided in intervals of less than 60, 60 to less than 70, 70 to less than 80, and 80 mm Hg and greater.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and nonfatal stroke. A composite cardiovascular outcome, including cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and nonfatal stroke, was among the key secondary outcomes.

Results

A total of 7515 patients (mean [SD] age, 65.6 [8.7] years; 4553 [60.6%] men) were included in this analysis. The nominally lowest risk was observed at a diastolic blood pressure between 70 and 80 mm Hg for the primary outcome, the composite cardiovascular outcome, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and cardiovascular death. A mean diastolic blood pressure of less than 60 mm Hg was associated with significantly increased risk of the primary outcome (hazard ratio [HR], 1.46; 95% CI, 1.13-1.90; P = .004), the composite cardiovascular outcome (HR, 1.74; 95% CI, 1.26-2.41; P = .001), nonfatal myocardial infarction (HR, 1.73; 95% CI, 1.15-2.59; P = .008), and nonfatal stroke (HR, 2.67; 95% CI, 1.26-5.63; P = .01).

Conclusions and Relevance

This cohort study found that lowering diastolic blood pressure to less than 60 mm Hg was associated with increased risk of cardiovascular events in patients with high cardiovascular risk and an treated systolic blood pressure less than 130 mm Hg. The finding that a diastolic blood pressure value between 70 and 80 mm Hg was an optimum target for this patient population merits further study.

Updates in Hypertension Studies According to the Main Clinical Trials: A Review of the Past 45 Years about Pharmaceutical Intervention Effects

BACKGROUND

High blood pressure remains one of the most important risk factors for cardiovascular disease. Although there is no consensus, all the clinical practice guidelines agree on the need to reduce blood pressure levels to minimize the risks. There are many clinical trials conducted to try to find the best pharmacotherapy to achieve this goal. The aim was to compare the main international randomized clinical trials on hypertension in people older than 50 years.

METHODS

Literature qualitative review of randomized clinical trials selected from PubMed and UpToDate in people older than 50 years, from 1985 until 2020. The clinical trials conducted during this period show variability in the drugs used, the inclusion criteria for blood pressure figures, and the consideration or not of other vascular risk factors (smoking, obesity, lipid disorders, diabetes, and physical inactivity).

RESULTS

Of the 8334 articles found, 19 of them fulfilled the inclusion and exclusion criteria that involved 202,638 people. The main findings of each investigation were grouped as follows: incidence of non-cardiovascular death, death of cardiovascular origin, coronary heart disease, cerebrovascular disease, renal failure, and hypertensive retinopathy. In all patients, blood pressure figures were reduced, although this did not always lead to statistically significant differences in morbidity and/or mortality risk reduction. Twelve of them found risk reduction as an effect of reduced blood pressure.

CONCLUSIONS

Randomized clinical trials conducted on hypertension in people older than 50 years of age show variability in the inclusion criteria. Variability in the antihypertensive drugs used was observed in this population. Blood pressure figures were reduced in all cases, although without statistically significant differences in morbidity and/or mortality risk reduction.

The clinical significance of isolated diastolic hypertension

The prevalence of isolated diastolic hypertension (IDH) has been increased in hypertensive subjects with the new 2017 ACC/AHA blood pressure treatment guidelines to 6.5% from 1.3% by the JNC-7 guidelines. However, its clinical significance as a cause of adverse cardiovascular (CV) events especially in older subjects has been debated by several investigators, who have demonstrated no adverse CV effects of untreated IDH, but not by others. It is also more common in the young subjects who are at low CV risk and quite rare in the older subjects, who are at increased CV risk. Treatment of IDH in the older subjects could increase the CV complications due to a J-curve effect and, in addition, could increase the incidence of stroke from further lowering the normal systolic blood pressure (SBP). Very low SBP and DBP cannot be sustained by the cerebral blood flow autoregulation and could lead to cerebral ischemia. In order to get a better perspective of the current status of the treatment of IDH, a review of the English language literature of the available studies was conducted and 12 papers with pertinent information were retrieved. The analysis of results from these studies suggests that IDH is associated with adverse CV events in younger persons and it should be treated. In contrast, the prevalence of IDH is low in older subjects and is not associated with adverse CV events in the majority of cases. Thus, its further lowering should be avoided to prevent further decrease in normal SBP and prevent the onset of adverse CV events. However, the decision to treat IDH in older subjects should be individualized.

Hypertension in the elderly: recent developments and insights

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This article will summarize the effects of more intensive blood pressure (BP) control on cardiovascular, cognitive, and renal outcomes among elderly (age ≥75 years) individuals at high risk for cardiovascular events. Subsets of patients who may not benefit and obstacles to implementation will be addressed. The authors' insights will conclude the review.

RECENT FINDINGS

A burst of new research regarding the effects of lower BP targets on cardiovascular, cognitive, and renal endpoints among the elderly has been published. Achieved values of 123 mmHg systolic in those without diabetes or prior stroke revealed striking declines in all-cause mortality, heart failure, and stroke. Although there was no benefit on the incidence of dementia, mild cognitive impairment was reduced. A trend towards modest declines in renal function and higher adverse event rates with normalization of BP were noted. Whether those with poor functional status or diastolic hypotension realize comparable gains remains unknown.

SUMMARY

Intensive BP control (systolic goal 120-130 mmHg systolic) results in lower rates of all-cause mortality and major adverse cardiac events. Elderly individuals with a good functional status and no history of diabetes or stroke are suitable candidates.

Blood Pressure at 6 Months After Acute Myocardial Infarction and Outcomes at 2 Years: The Perils Associated With Excessively Low Blood Pressures

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to determine the association between achieved blood pressure at 6-month follow-up and cardiovascular outcomes at 2 years in patients treated with β-blockers and renin-angiotensin-aldosterone blockers after acute myocardial infarction (AMI).

METHODS

We analyzed data from 5503 patients enrolled in the national AMI registry. Patients with myocardial reinfarction (MrI), rehospitalization for heart failure (rHHF), or stroke before 6-month follow-up were excluded. Achieved blood pressures were categorized into 10-mm Hg increments. The primary outcome was all-cause death. The secondary outcome was a composite of all-cause death, MrI, and rHHF. Hazard ratios (HRs) were estimated with multivariable-adjusted Cox hazards models using 125- to 134-mm Hg systolic blood pressure (SBP) and 75- to 84-mm Hg diastolic blood pressure (DBP) subgroups as reference.

RESULTS

After a median follow-up of 2.1 years, SBP < 115 mm Hg was associated with increased risks for all-cause death (adjusted HR: 2.202 [1.158-4.188]) and for a composite outcome (HR: 1.682 [1.075-2.630]). Likewise, DBP < 75 mm Hg tended to be associated with an increase in all-cause death (HR: 2.078 [0.998-4.327] for DBP of 65 to 74 mm Hg; HR: 2.610 [1.256-5.423] for DBP < 65 mm Hg). Even in patients <75 years, the risk of a composite outcome was increased for DBP < 65 mm Hg (HR: 2.492 [1.401-4.434]).

CONCLUSIONS

Low blood pressure achieved with β-blocker and renin-angiotensin-aldosterone blocker at 6 months was associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality independently of confounding factors in patients with AMI. This finding suggests that caution should be taken for patients with AMI who use blood-pressure-lowering treatments.

Low blood pressure and cardiovascular events in diabetic patients with coronary artery disease after revascularization: the CREDO-Kyoto registry cohort-1

The current American, European, and Japanese guidelines for hypertension treatment have lowered blood pressure (BP) targets to <130/80 mmHg in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) and patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). However, there is concern that low BP may increase cardiovascular events in diabetic CAD patients. Currently, coronary revascularization has become widespread in diabetic CAD patients. Thus, whether low BP is an independent risk factor for cardiovascular events in diabetic CAD patients after revascularization was investigated. We examined 2718 stable CAD patients with DM in the CREDO-Kyoto cohort-1 registry enrolling 9877 patients who underwent their first percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary bypass grafting. There were no cutoff points for systolic BP (SBP) below which the age- and sex-adjusted hazard ratios for cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI), and nonfatal stroke increased. The cutoff diastolic BP (DBP) for increasing cardiovascular death was 70 mmHg (P = 0.014), whereas there was no cutoff DBP for increasing nonfatal MI and nonfatal stroke. However, on stepwise Cox hazard proportional regression analysis, the independent factors increasing cardiovascular death were hypertension, low creatinine clearance, wide pulse pressure, prior MI, and nonuse of statins, but DBP < 70 mmHg was not a significant factor. In conclusion, in diabetic CAD patients after coronary revascularization, low SBP and DBP were not significant factors that increased cardiovascular events. Careful attention should be paid to vascular lesions and organ damage that have already progressed.

Hypertension: evolving from standardized to individualized care

: The hypertension paradigm has contributed to a dramatic reduction in CVD mortality. This has been achieved by applying average results of population studies to identify a target population and design a common intervention to achieve a BP goal. Progressive lowering of the BP threshold has expanded the fraction of persons at risk who have access to treatment. Meanwhile, falling risk reduces potential benefit, while treatment-induced adverse events increase - making further expansion of the treatment pool no longer tenable. Still, CVD remains the leading cause of death. Fortunately, new science reveals opportunities to enhance CVD prevention when BP management is based upon individual characteristics. Treatment can be directed at those most likely to benefit, while sparing others the hazards of unnecessary therapy. Treatment can be designed to achieve a variety of physiological objectives that influence cardiovascular outcomes. This new strategy should improve both the efficacy and efficiency of BP-related CVD prevention.

Unsolved Problem: (Isolated) Systolic Hypertension with Diastolic Blood Pressure below the Safety Margin

The problem of high systolic blood pressure (sBP) combined with low diastolic blood pressure (dBP) requires attention because sBP is directly and continuously related to the most important criterion, i.e., all-cause mortality, whereas dBP becomes inversely related to it after the age of 50-60 years. The European Society of Cardiology and European Society of -Hypertension (ESC/ESH) 2018 guidelines for hypertension (HTN) are helpful because they recommend a lower safety cut-off for in-treatment dBP. To prevent tissue hypoperfusion, these guidelines recommend that dBP should be ≥70 mm Hg during treatment. A patient with very elevated sBP (e.g., 220 mm Hg) and low dBP (e.g., 65 mm Hg) is difficult to treat if one strictly follows the guidelines. In this situation, the sBP is a clear indication for antihypertensive treatment, but the dBP is a relative contraindication (as it is <70 mm Hg, a safety margin recognized by the 2018 ESC/ESH guidelines). The dilemma about whether or not to treat isolated systolic hypertension (SH) patients with low dBP (<70 mm Hg) is evident from the fact that almost half (45%) remain untreated. This is a common occurrence and identifying this problem is the first step to solving it. We suggest that an adequate search and analysis should be performed, starting from the exploration of the prognosis of the isolated (I)SH subset of patients with a very low dBP (<70 mm Hg) at the beginning of already performed randomized clinical trials.

Association of blood pressure documentation with adverse outcomes in an emergency department in Brazil

OBJECTIVE

To associate blood pressure (BP) documentation with adverse outcomes in an emergency department (ED).

METHODS

This is a retrospective observational study, and 642 records of patients admitted to the ED of a tertiary hospital in Brazil were used. We included medical records of patients of both sexes aged over 18 years, who were allocated in general wards in the period December 2015-June 2016. Association between BP measurements with length of stay (LOS), worsening of clinical presentation, unplanned patient transfer, readmission, stroke or transient ischemic attack, cardiorespiratory arrest, and death were investigated.

RESULTS

Association was observed between worsening of clinical presentation and systolic (p = 0.003) or diastolic (p = 0.001) BP values. The association between LOS and worsening of clinical presentation with the number of BP measurements or mean time between BP measurements was statistically significant (p < 0.001). Unplanned patient transfer was associated with an increase in the number of BP measurements (p < 0.001). The mean time between BP measurements was higher among patients who returned to the ED within 48-72 h (p = 0.030).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study showed association between BP documentation with adverse outcomes in the ED, reinforcing the need to develop educational strategies regarding nursing records and monitoring of vital signs.

Determination of optimal on-treatment diastolic blood pressure range using automated measurements in subjects with cardiovascular disease-Analysis of a SPRINT trial subpopulation

Automated office blood pressure measurement (AOBPM) is recommended for diagnosing hypertension; however, optimal treatment targets using this method are not established. Discrepancies between automated and office measurements of blood pressure have been described, producing uncertainty regarding the use of AOBPM in clinical practice. The Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT) results improved our understanding of target AOBPM systolic blood pressure (SBP) levels; however, diastolic blood pressure (DBP) targets remain unknown. Therefore, we sought to determine the optimal on-treatment DBP range. The analysis was performed on the participants of the SPRINT trial who had hypertension and prior cardiovascular disease. We analyzed the data of 1470 participants (mean age 70.3 ± 9.3 years, 24.1% female) selected from the SPRINT trial database of National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute. The mean achieved SBP and DBP were 127.9 ± 10.7 and 68.3 ± 9.4 mm Hg, respectively. Most of the participants (57.4%) had a DBP lower than 70 mm Hg, while only 11.7% had DPB ≥80 mm Hg. Clinical composite endpoint was defined as myocardial infarction, acute coronary syndrome not resulting in myocardial infarction, stroke, acute decompensated heart failure or death from cardiovascular causes. There were 159 (10.8%) clinical endpoint events. The participants with on-treatment AOBPM DBP range of 68.6-78.6 mm Hg showed the lowest hazard risk of a clinical composite endpoint. These results correspond to the office DBP range of 70-80 mm Hg recommended in ESC guidelines. This is the first attempt to determine the range of optimal DBP values using population-based AOBPM in patients with prior cardiovascular disease.

Achievement of target SBP without attention to decrease in DBP can increase cardiovascular morbidity in treated arterial hypertension: the Campania Salute Network

OBJECTIVES

Results of the SPRINT study have influenced recent guidelines on arterial hypertension, in the identification of target SBP, but scarce attention has been paid to the consequences on DBP. However, there is evidence that reducing DBP too much can be harmful.

METHODS

We analyzed outcome in 4005 treated hypertensive patients (22% obesity, 8% diabetes and 21% current smoking habit) with target attended office SBP less than 140 mmHg, in relation to quintiles of DBP, cardiovascular risk profile and target organ damage (LV hypertrophy, carotid plaque and left atrial dilatation). Composite fatal and nonfatal cardiovascular event was the outcome variable in this analysis (stroke and myocardial infarction, sudden cardiac death, heart failure requiring hospitalization, transient ischemic attack, myocardial revascularization, de novo angina, carotid stenting and atrial fibrillation).

RESULTS

Lower DBP was associated with greater proportion of women and diabetes, older age, decline in kidney function and greater values of LV mass index and left atrial volume and greater prevalence of carotid plaque (all 0.04 < P < 0.0001). The lowest quintile of DBP (74.1 ± 3.7 mmHg) was associated with 1.49 higher hazard of composite cardiovascular events, independently of significant effect of older age, female sex, LV hypertrophy and borderline effect of left atrial dilatation (0.04 < P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Increased risk associated with aggressive reduction of DBP should be balanced with the advantage of reducing aggressively SBP to predict the net benefit of antihypertensive treatment, especially in the oldest old individuals.

Effects of lowering diastolic blood pressure to <80 mmHg on cardiovascular mortality and events in patients with coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

The target of diastolic blood pressure (DBP) remains controversial in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). We systematically searched PubMed/Medline and the Cochrane Central database for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the efficacy and safety of reducing DBP in CAD patients from January 1965 to July 2017. Seven placebo-controlled RCTs enrolling 34,814 CAD patients who achieved DBP <80 mmHg were included in the drug-intervention group. The average achieved blood pressures (BPs) were 126.3/75.1 and 131.5/77.8 mmHg in the drug-intervention and placebo-control groups, respectively. Drug intervention was associated with an 11% reduction in coronary revascularization and a 31% reduction in heart failure. In the drug-intervention group, all-cause death, myocardial infarction, angina pectoris, and stroke were reduced with marginal significance, whereas hypotension was increased by 123%. A meta-analysis of four RCTs, in which the achieved DBP was <75 mmHg, showed that the drug intervention was associated with a 22% reduction in heart failure. These results suggest that reducing DBP to 80 mmHg or less would significantly reduce coronary revascularization and heart failure but at the expense of causing hypotension in CAD patients. Further trials are warranted to prove this issue.

Lower Systolic Blood Pressure and Cardiovascular Event Risk Stratified by Renal Resistive Index in Hospitalized Cardiovascular Patients: J-VAS Study

BACKGROUND

The threshold of blood pressure (BP) reduction in cardiovascular patients is debatable due to the J-shaped curve phenomenon, which is particularly observed in patients with increased arterial stiffness. The renal resistive index (RRI) correlates well with systemic arterial stiffness; therefore, we aimed to demonstrate the role of RRI in guiding the choice of optimal BP.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data of the hospitalized cardiovascular patients at Jichi Medical University Hospital. All patients had the RRI measurement performed and were assigned to a higher (RRI ≥ 0.8) or lower RRI group. Each group was subdivided by quartiles of the BP at discharge. The primary endpoints were fatal and nonfatal cardiovascular events, including heart failure, acute coronary syndrome, acute aortic disease, acute arterial occlusion, and stroke.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up period was 1.9 years (3,365 person-years), n = 1,777 (mean age 64.7 years). There were 252 cardiovascular events occurred, 24.0% and 12.2% in the higher and lower RRI populations, P < 0.001. In the higher RRI group, the lowest systolic BP (SBP) quartile (<105 mm Hg) was a risk factor for cardiovascular events when compared with the highest SBP quartile (≥130 mm Hg; adjusted hazard ratio, 2.42; 95% confidence interval, 1.17-5.03; P = 0.017). A 1 SD decrease of SBP (17.5 mm Hg) was associated with a 25% increase in the risk of cardiovascular events. In the lower RRI group, these associations were not observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Lower SBP at discharge was associated with a risk of cardiovascular events in the hospitalized cardiovascular patients with RRI ≥ 0.8.

Diastolic blood pressure predicts coronary plaque volume in patients with coronary artery disease

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Hypertension is associated with increased clinical and subclinical coronary artery disease (CAD); however, the relationship between blood pressure and coronary plaque volume is unclear. We examined the effect of systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) on coronary artery plaque volume.

METHODS

285 subjects with stable CAD on statin therapy underwent coronary computed tomographic angiography to measure volume of fatty, fibrous, noncalcified, calcified and total coronary plaque.

RESULTS

Mean (SD) age was 63.1 (7.7); mean (SD) LDL-C, 78.7 mg/dL (28.5). Compared to the highest DBP tertile (>76 mmHg), those in the lowest DBP tertile (≤68 mmHg) had lower volumes of fatty: 10.0 vs. 7.7 mm³/mm, (p trend = 0.042), fibrous: 19.6 vs. 13.8 mm³/mm (p trend = 0.011), non-calcified: 29.7 vs. 22.5 mm³/mm (p trend = 0.017) and total plaque: 37.8 vs. 25.1 mm³/mm (p trend = 0.010) whereas there was no relationship with SBP tertiles. Similarly, when examined as a continuous variable, higher DBP was a significant independent predictor of higher plaque volume after multivariate adjustment: for every 1 mmHg increase in DBP, fibrous plaque increased 0.128 mm³/mm (p = 0.022), noncalcified plaque increased 0.176 mm³/mm (p = 0.045), calcified plaque increased 0.096 mm³/mm (p = 0.001) and total plaque increased 0.249 mm³/mm (p = 0.019) whereas SBP ranging from 95 to 154 mmHg did not predict plaque volume.

CONCLUSIONS

Level of DBP predicts coronary plaque with a DBP tertile ≤68 mmHg associated with the least amount of coronary plaque in subjects with LDL-C < 80 mg/dL.