Simultaneous Measurement of Lung Diffusing Capacity and Pulmonary Hemodynamics Reveals Exertional Alveolar-Capillary Dysfunction in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction

Respiratory symptom perception during exercise in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

We investigated whether central or peripheral limitations to oxygen uptake elicit different respiratory sensations and whether dyspnea on exertion (DOE) provokes unpleasantness and negative emotions in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). 48 patients were categorized based on their cardiac output (Q̇c)/oxygen uptake (V̇O2) slope and stroke volume (SV) reserve during an incremental cycling test. 15 were classified as centrally limited and 33 were classified as peripherally limited. Ratings of perceived breathlessness (RPB) and unpleasantness (RPU) were assessed (Borg 0-10 scale) during a 20 W cycling test. 15 respiratory sensations statements (1-10 scale) and 5 negative emotions statements (1-10) were subsequently rated. RPB (Central: 3.5±2.0 vs. Peripheral: 3.4±2.0, p=0.86), respiratory sensations, or negative emotions were not different between groups (p>0.05). RPB correlated (p<0.05) with RPU (r=0.925), "anxious" (r=0.610), and "afraid" (r=0.383). While DOE provokes elevated levels of negative emotions, DOE and respiratory sensations seem more related to a common mechanism rather than central and/or peripheral limitations in HFpEF.

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in Heart Failure: Challenges in Diagnosis and Treatment for HFpEF and HFrEF

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is common in heart failure (HF), and it has a significant impact on the prognosis and quality of life of patients. Additionally, COPD is independently associated with lower adherence to first-line HF therapies. In this review, we outline the challenges of identifying and managing HF with preserved (HFpEF) and reduced (HFrEF) ejection fraction with coexisting COPD.

RECENT FINDINGS

Spirometry is necessary for COPD diagnosis and prognosis but is underused in HF. Therefore, misdiagnosis is a concern. Also, disease-modifying drugs for HF and COPD are usually safe but underprescribed when HF and COPD coexist. Patients with HF-COPD are poorly enrolled in clinical trials. Guidelines recommend that HF treatment should be offered regardless of COPD presence, but modern registries show that undertreatment persists. Treatment gaps could be attenuated by ensuring an accurate and earlier COPD diagnosis in patients with HF, clarifying the concerns related to pharmacotherapy safety, and increasing the use of non-pharmacologic treatments. Acknowledging the uncertainties, this review aims to provide key clinical resources to support better physician-patient co-decision-making and improve collaboration between health professionals.

Effect of Left Ventricular Diastolic Dysfunction on the Cardiopulmonary Exercise Test in Patients With Cardiovascular Disease

Left ventricular diastolic dysfunction exists in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and causes activity restriction and a poor prognosis, but there have been few reports about exercise tolerance in patients with diastolic dysfunction, regardless of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). In this study, 294 cardiovascular disease patients who performed a cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPX) with an adequate examination by echocardiography at Fukuoka University Hospital from 2011 to 2020 were investigated. Patients were divided into groups with grade I and grade II or III diastolic dysfunction according to diagnostic criteria, regardless of LVEF, by echocardiography. After adjusting for age, gender, body mass index, smoking, and LVEF by propensity score matching, we compared the results of CPX between the grade I and grade II/III groups. There were no significant differences in hemodynamic parameters, or in the respiratory exchange ratio, oxygen uptake per body weight, oxygen uptake per heart rate, or parameters of ventilatory volume. Ventilatory equivalents per oxygen uptake and per carbon dioxide output were significantly worse in the grade II/III group from the rest to peak periods during CPX. In conclusion, left ventricular diastolic dysfunction worsens ventilatory efficacy during CPX. This effect potentially contributes to a poor prognosis in left ventricular diastolic dysfunction.

Exercise intolerance in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: Causes, consequences and the journey towards a cure

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) accounts for over 50% of all heart failure cases nationwide and continues to rise in its prevalence. The complex, multi-organ involvement of the HFpEF clinical syndrome requires clinicians and investigators to adopt an integrative approach that considers the contribution of both cardiac and non-cardiac function to HFpEF pathophysiology. Thus, this symposium review outlines the key points from presentations covering the contributions of disease-related changes in cardiac function, arterial stiffness, peripheral vascular function, and oxygen delivery and utilization to exercise tolerance in patients with HFpEF. While many aspects of HFpEF pathophysiology remain poorly understood, there is accumulating evidence for a decline in vascular health in this patient group that may be remediable through pharmacological and lifestyle interventions and could improve outcomes and clinical status in this ever-growing patient population.

Hypoxaemia in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction

AIMS

It is widely held that heart failure (HF) does not cause exertional hypoxaemia, based upon studies in HF with reduced ejection fraction, but this may not apply to patients with HF and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Here, we characterize the prevalence, pathophysiology, and clinical implications of exertional arterial hypoxaemia in HFpEF.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Patients with HFpEF (n = 539) and no coexisting lung disease underwent invasive cardiopulmonary exercise testing with simultaneous blood and expired gas analysis. Exertional hypoxaemia (oxyhaemoglobin saturation <94%) was observed in 136 patients (25%). As compared to those without hypoxaemia (n = 403), patients with hypoxaemia were older and more obese. Patients with HFpEF and hypoxaemia had higher cardiac filling pressures, higher pulmonary vascular pressures, greater alveolar-arterial oxygen difference, increased dead space fraction, and greater physiologic shunt compared to those without hypoxaemia. These differences were replicated in a sensitivity analysis where patients with spirometric abnormalities were excluded. Regression analyses revealed that increases in pulmonary arterial and pulmonary capillary pressures were related to lower arterial oxygen tension (PaO2 ), especially during exercise. Body mass index (BMI) was not correlated with the arterial PaO2 , and hypoxaemia was associated with increased risk for death over 2.8 (interquartile range 0.7-5.5) years of follow-up, even after adjusting for age, sex, and BMI (hazard ratio 2.00, 95% confidence interval 1.01-3.96; p = 0.046).

CONCLUSION

Between 10% and 25% of patients with HFpEF display arterial desaturation during exercise that is not ascribable to lung disease. Exertional hypoxaemia is associated with more severe haemodynamic abnormalities and increased mortality. Further study is required to better understand the mechanisms and treatment of gas exchange abnormalities in HFpEF.

The controversial role of beta-blockers in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

Beta-blocker (BB) therapy is a main pillar in treating patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction and has shown a prognostic benefit. However, evidence for application of BB in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), especially in the absence of coronary artery disease, atrial fibrillation or arterial hypertension, is scarce. HFpEF is characterized by elevations in left atrial pressure and reduced compliance of the left ventricle leading to a hampered increase of cardiac output (CO) during exercise, which results in exertional dyspnea. This may be due to either a limited increase in stroke volume or reduced chronotropy during physical activity. We critically discuss the pathophysiological background of HFpEF, current data on BB in heart failure therapy, as well as the potential benefits and harms of BB therapy in HFpEF. Furthermore, we argue that non-cardio selective BB with peripheral activity to reduce afterload may be more suitable in this population than cardio-selective BB. Although preliminary data on BB in HFpEF are available, multicenter prospective trials to assess a reduction of cardiovascular morbidity are warranted. Future trials need to focus on phenotyping HFpEF patients and assess who may benefit most from tailored BB therapy.

Excess ventilation and exertional dyspnoea in heart failure and pulmonary hypertension

Increased ventilation relative to metabolic demands, indicating alveolar hyperventilation and/or increased physiological dead space (excess ventilation), is a key cause of exertional dyspnoea. Excess ventilation has assumed a prominent role in the functional assessment of patients with heart failure (HF) with reduced (HFrEF) or preserved (HFpEF) ejection fraction, pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH). We herein provide the key pieces of information to the caring physician to 1) gain unique insights into the seeds of patients' shortness of breath and 2) develop a rationale for therapeutically lessening excess ventilation to mitigate this distressing symptom. Reduced bulk oxygen transfer induced by cardiac output limitation and/or right ventricle-pulmonary arterial uncoupling increase neurochemical afferent stimulation and (largely chemo-) receptor sensitivity, leading to alveolar hyperventilation in HFrEF, PAH and small-vessel, distal CTEPH. As such, interventions geared to improve central haemodynamics and/or reduce chemosensitivity have been particularly effective in lessening their excess ventilation. In contrast, 1) high filling pressures in HFpEF and 2) impaired lung perfusion leading to ventilation/perfusion mismatch in proximal CTEPH conspire to increase physiological dead space. Accordingly, 1) decreasing pulmonary capillary pressures and 2) mechanically unclogging larger pulmonary vessels (pulmonary endarterectomy and balloon pulmonary angioplasty) have been associated with larger decrements in excess ventilation. Exercise training has a strong beneficial effect across diseases. Addressing some major unanswered questions on the link of excess ventilation with exertional dyspnoea under the modulating influence of pharmacological and nonpharmacological interventions might prove instrumental to alleviate the devastating consequences of these prevalent diseases.

Exercise Testing in HFpEF: an Appraisal Through Diagnosis, Pathophysiology and Therapy A Clinical Consensus Statement of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) and European Association of Preventive Cardiology (EAPC) of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC)

Patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) universally complain of exercise intolerance and dyspnoea as key clinical correlates. Cardiac as well as extracardiac components play a role for the limited exercise capacity, including an impaired cardiac and peripheral vascular reserve, a limitation in mechanical ventilation and/or gas exchange with reduced pulmonary vascular reserve, skeletal muscle dysfunction and iron deficiency/anaemia. Although most of these components can be differentiated and quantified through gas exchange analysis by cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET), the information provided by objective measures of exercise performance have not been systematically considered in the recent algorithms/scores for HFpEF diagnosis, neither by European nor US groups. The current Clinical Consensus Statement by the HFA and EAPC Association of the ESC aims at outlining the role of exercise testing and its pathophysiological, clinical and prognostic insights, addressing the implication of a thorough functional evaluation from the diagnostic algorithm to the pathophysiology and treatment perspectives of HFpEF. Along with these goals, we provide a specific analysis on the evidence that CPET is the standard for assessing, quantifying, and differentiating the origin of dyspnoea and exercise impairment and even more so when combined with echo and/or invasive hemodynamic evaluation is here provided. This will lead to improved quality of diagnosis when applying the proposed scores and may also help useful to implement the progressive characterization of the specific HFpEF phenotypes, a critical step toward the delivery of phenotype-specific treatments.

Physiological dead space during exercise in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is associated with cardiopulmonary abnormalities that may increase physiological dead space to tidal volume (VD/VT) during exercise. However, studies have not corrected VD/VT for apparatus mechanical dead space (VDM), which may confound the accurate calculation of VD/VT. We evaluated whether calculating physiological dead space with (VD/VT_VDM) and without (VD/VT) correcting for VDM impacts the interpretation of gas exchange efficiency during exercise in HFpEF. Fifteen HFpEF (age: 69 ± 6 yr; V̇o_2peak: 1.34 ± 0.45 L/min) and 12 controls (70 ± 3 yr; V̇o_2peak: 1.70 ± 0.51 L/min) were studied. Pulmonary gas exchange and arterial blood gases were analyzed at rest, submaximal (20 W for HFpEF and 40 W for controls), and peak exercise. VD/VT was calculated as [Formula: see text] - [Formula: see text]/[Formula: see text]. VD/VT_VDM was calculated as [Formula: see text] - [Formula: see text]/[Formula: see text] - VDM/VT. VD/VT decreased from rest (HFpEF: 0.54 ± 0.07; controls: 0.32 ± 0.07) to submaximal exercise (HFpEF: 0.46 ± 0.07; controls: 0.25 ± 0.06) in both groups (P < 0.05), but remained stable (P > 0.05) thereafter to peak exercise (HFpEF: 0.46 ± 0.09; controls: 0.22 ± 0.05). In HFpEF, VD/VT_VDM did not change (P = 0.58) from rest (0.29 ± 0.07) to submaximal exercise (0.29 ± 0.06), but increased (P = 0.02) thereafter to peak exercise (0.33 ± 0.06). In controls, VD/VT_VDM remained stable such that no change was observed (P > 0.05) from rest (0.17 ± 0.06) to submaximal exercise (0.14 ± 0.06), or thereafter to peak exercise (0.14 ± 0.05). Calculating physiological dead space with and without a VDM correction yields quantitively and qualitatively different results, which could have impact on the interpretation of gas exchange efficiency in HFpEF. Further investigation is required to uncover the clinical consequences and the mechanism(s) explaining the increase in VD/VT_VDM during exercise in HFpEF.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Calculating VD/VT with and without correcting for VDM yields quantitively and qualitatively different results, which could have an important impact on the interpretation of V/Q mismatch in HFpEF. The finding that V/Q mismatch and gas exchange efficiency worsened, as reflected by an increase in VD/VT_VDM during exercise, has not been previously demonstrated in HFpEF. Thus, further studies are needed to investigate the mechanisms explaining the increase in VD/VT_VDM during exercise in patients with HFpEF.

Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction: Mechanisms and Treatment Strategies

Approximately half of all patients with heart failure (HF) have a preserved ejection fraction, and the prevalence is growing rapidly given the aging population in many countries and the rising prevalence of obesity, diabetes, and hypertension. Functional capacity and quality of life are severely impaired in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), and morbidity and mortality are high. In striking contrast to HF with reduced ejection fraction, there are few effective treatments currently identified for HFpEF, and these are limited to decongestion by diuretics, promotion of a healthy active lifestyle, and management of comorbidities. Improved phenotyping of subgroups within the overall HFpEF population might enhance individualization of treatment. This review focuses on the current understanding of the pathophysiologic mechanisms underlying HFpEF and treatment strategies for this complex syndrome.