Progression of Carcinoid Heart Disease in the Modern Management Era

Management of carcinoid heart disease

Carcinoid Heart Disease (CaHD) is defined as the constellation of all cardiac manifestations that occur in patients with carcinoid tumors. Cardiac manifestations are generally due to the paraneoplastic effects of vasoactive substances secreted by carcinoid tumors. These primarily cause cardiac valve dysfunction and resultant heart failure. Successful management of patients with CaHD requires a multidisciplinary team to address both the classical manifestations of carcinoid syndrome, as well as the additional manifestations of cardiac dysfunction. While the cornerstone of medical management for carcinoid syndrome are somatostatin analogs (SSAs), there is no evidence to suggest that the usage of SSAs influences the development or progression of CaHD. Additionally, while liver-directed therapies provide a survival benefit to symptomatic carcinoid syndrome patients with resectable disease, there are conflicting data on the survival benefit of hepatic resection among patients with CaHD. Cardiac surgery in patients with CaHD is a complex undertaking, and is the only definitive treatment for symptom management in CaHD with significant survival benefit for patients in advanced disease states. Two crucial surgical decisions to be made are determining which valve(s) should be replaced, and what prosthetic should be utilized. While challenging in this often medically frail population, cardiac surgery confers a survival benefit and should be pursued in cases of symptomatic CaHD or progressive right ventricular dysfunction.

Carcinoid Heart Disease Management: A Multi-Disciplinary Collaboration

Carcinoid heart disease (CaHD) is an important complication among patients with metastatic neuroendocrine tumors and carcinoid syndrome (CS). CS patients (25%-65%) eventually develop CaHD; these patients face a significantly increased risk of morbidity and mortality. Guidance papers (eg, clinical practice guidelines, consensus guidelines, and expert statements) have been established by major organizations across the disciplines of cardiology and oncology; however, these recommendations are not routinely implemented. The aim of this article is to encourage the integration of current recommendations from national societies into clinical practice. Early screening upon recognition of CS and prior to the development of CaHD symptoms is paramount, as no existing therapies are approved to reverse the fibrotic damage to the heart once it occurs. Valvular replacement is the only definitive treatment for CaHD once it has developed. When patients are noted to have urinary 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid (5-HIAA) levels ≥300 µmol/24 h and/or serum N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels >260 pg/mL, echocardiography is recommended. Systemic approaches to control tumor growth and hormonal secretion include somatostatin analogs (SSAs), followed by options including peptide receptor radiotherapy (PRRT), everolimus and liver embolization. Telotristat is the primary choice for control of diarrhea refractory to SSA. Diuretics are the mainstay of heart failure symptom management for patients who develop CaHD. Considerations for future research are discussed, including the ongoing TELEHEART (TELotristat Ethyl in a HEART biomarker study) trial involving telotristat and not yet activated CHARRT (Carcinoid Heart disease And peptide Receptor Radiotargetted Therapy) study involving PRRT with lutetium 177 (177Lu) dotatate.

Arterial function, biomarkers, carcinoid syndrome and carcinoid heart disease in patients with small intestinal neuroendocrine tumours

PURPOSE

Carcinoid heart disease (CHD) is a life-threatening complication of carcinoid syndrome (CS) characterised by tricuspid regurgitation (TR). However, there is an unmet need for earlier diagnosis of CHD. We cross-sectionally assessed the prevalence and potential predictive or diagnostic markers for CS and CHD in a contemporary cohort of patients with small intestinal neuroendocrine tumours (SI-NETs).

METHODS

Biochemical characteristics, hepatic tumour load, measures of arterial and endothelial function, atherosclerosis, and transthoracic echocardiography were analysed in a prospective cross-sectional setting.

RESULTS

Among the 65 patients studied, 29 (45%) had CS (CS+ ), and 3 (5%) CHD. CS+ was characterised by significantly higher hepatic tumour load, S-5-HIAA and fP-CgA, higher frequency of diarrhoea and flushing, and more frequent PRRT compared to CS- (for all, P < 0.05). Central systolic, central mean, and central end-systolic blood pressures were significantly higher in CS+ than in CS- (for all, P < 0.05). Subjects with grades 2-4 TR had higher hepatic tumour burden, fP-CgA, and S-5-HIAA compared to those with grades 0-1 TR, but measures of vascular function did not differ. fP-CgA (P = 0.017) and S-5-HIAA (P = 0.019) but not proBNP increased significantly according to the severity of TR.

CONCLUSION

Although CS is common, the prevalence of CHD was found to be lower in a contemporary cohort of SI-NET patients than previously anticipated. Measures of arterial or endothelial function or carotid atherosclerosis do not identify subjects with mild TR. Echocardiography remains the most sensitive means to diagnose CHD in CS patients with high tumour burden and elevated CgA and 5-HIAA.