1
|
Le DE, Alkayed NJ, Cao Z, Chattergoon NN, Garcia-Jaramillo M, Thornburg K, Kaul S. Metabolomics of repetitive myocardial stunning in chronic multivessel coronary artery stenosis: Effect of non-selective and selective β1-receptor blockers. J Physiol 2024. [PMID: 38885335 DOI: 10.1113/jp285720] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2023] [Accepted: 05/29/2024] [Indexed: 06/20/2024] Open
Abstract
Chronic coronary artery stenosis can lead to regional myocardial dysfunction in the absence of myocardial infarction by repetitive stunning, hibernation or both. The molecular mechanisms underlying repetitive stunning-associated myocardial dysfunction are not clear. We used non-targeted metabolomics to elucidate responses to chronically stunned myocardium in a canine model with and without β-adrenergic blockade treatment. After development of left ventricular systolic dysfunction induced by ameroid constrictors on the coronary arteries, animals were randomized to 3 months of placebo, metoprolol or carvedilol. We compared these two β-blockers with their different β-adrenergic selectivities on myocardial function, perfusion and metabolic pathways involved in tissue undergoing chronic stunning. Control animals underwent sham surgery. Dysfunction in stunned myocardium was associated with reduced fatty acid oxidation and enhanced ketogenic amino acid metabolism, together with alterations in mitochondrial membrane phospholipid composition. These changes were consistent with impaired mitochondrial function and were linked to reduced nitric oxide and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor signalling, resulting in a decline in adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase. Mitochondrial changes were ameliorated by carvedilol more than metoprolol, and improvement was linked to nitric oxide and possibly hydrogen sulphide signalling. In summary, repetitive myocardial stunning commonly seen in chronic multivessel coronary artery disease is associated with adverse metabolic remodelling linked to mitochondrial dysfunction and specific signalling pathways. These changes are reversed by β-blockers, with the non-selective inhibitor having a more favourable impact. This is the first investigation to demonstrate that β-blockade-associated improvement of ventricular function in chronic myocardial stunning is associated with restoration of mitochondrial function. KEY POINTS: The mechanisms responsible for the metabolic changes associated with repetitive myocardial stunning seen in chronic multivessel coronary artery disease have not been fully investigated. In a canine model of repetitive myocardial stunning, we showed that carvedilol, a non-selective β-receptor blocker, ameliorated adverse metabolic remodelling compared to metoprolol, a selective β1-receptor blocker, by improving nitric oxide synthase and adenosine monophosphate protein kinase function, enhancing calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase, probably increasing hydrogen sulphide, and suppressing cyclic-adenosine monophosphate signalling. Mitochondrial fatty acid oxidation alterations were ameliorated by carvedilol to a larger extent than metoprolol; this improvement was linked to nitric oxide and possibly hydrogen sulphide signalling. Both β-blockers improved the cardiac energy imbalance by reducing metabolites in ketogenic amino acid and nucleotide metabolism. These results elucidated why metabolic remodelling with carvedilol is preferable to metoprolol when treating chronic ischaemic left ventricular systolic dysfunction caused by repetitive myocardial stunning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Elizabeth Le
- Knight Cardiovascular Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA
- Veterans Affairs Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Nabil J Alkayed
- Knight Cardiovascular Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Zhiping Cao
- Knight Cardiovascular Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Natasha N Chattergoon
- Knight Cardiovascular Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Manuel Garcia-Jaramillo
- Department of Environmental and Molecular Toxicology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA
| | - Kent Thornburg
- Knight Cardiovascular Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Sanjiv Kaul
- Knight Cardiovascular Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zaatari G, Bello D, Blandon C, Abbott JD, Subačius H, Goldberger JJ. Impact of Diabetes Mellitus on Benefit of β-Blocker Therapy After Myocardial Infarction. Am J Cardiol 2023:S0002-9149(23)00232-1. [PMID: 37183092 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2023.04.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2022] [Revised: 04/09/2023] [Accepted: 04/13/2023] [Indexed: 05/16/2023]
Abstract
Beta blockers are uniformly recommended for all patients after myocardial infarction (MI), including those with diabetes mellitus (DM). This study assesses the impact of β-blocker type and dosing on survival in patients with DM after MI. A cohort of 6,682 patients in the Outcomes of Beta-blocker Therapy After Myocardial INfarction registry were discharged after MI. In this cohort, 2,137 patients had DM (32%). Beta-blocker dose was indexed to the target daily dose used in randomized clinical trials and reported as percentage. Dosage groups were: no β blocker, >0% to 12.5%, >12.5% to 25%, >25% to 50%, and >50% of the target dose. The overall mean discharge β-blocker dose in patients with DM was 42.7 ± 34.1% versus 35.9 ± 27.4% in patients without DM (p <0.0001). Patients with DM were prescribed carvedilol at a higher rate than those without DM (27.8% vs 19.6%). The 3-year mortality estimates were 24.4% and 12.8% for patients with DM versus without DM (p <0.0001), respectively, with an unadjusted hazard ratio = 1.820 (confidence interval 1.587 to 2.086, p <0.0001). Patients with DM in the >12.5% to 25% dose category had the highest survival rates, whereas patients in the >50% dose had the lowest survival rate among patients discharged on β blockers (p <0.0001). In the multivariable analysis among patients with DM after MI, all β-blocker dose categories demonstrated lower mortality than no therapy; however, only the >12.5% to 25% dose had a statistically significant hazard ratio 0.450 (95% confidence interval 0.224 to 0.907, p = 0.025). In patients with DM, there was no statistically significant difference in 3-year mortality among those treated with metoprolol versus carvedilol. In conclusion, our analysis in patients with DM after MI suggested a survival benefit from β-blocker therapy, with no apparent advantage to high- versus low-dose β-blocker therapy; although, physicians tended to prescribe higher doses in patients with DM. There was no survival benefit for carvedilol over metoprolol in patients with DM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ghaith Zaatari
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida
| | - David Bello
- Division of Cardiology, Orlando Health Heart Institute, Orlando, Florida
| | - Catherine Blandon
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida
| | - J Dawn Abbott
- Division of Cardiology, Lifespan Cardiovascular Institute, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhodes Island
| | - Haris Subačius
- Research Center, Society of Thoracic Surgeons, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Jeffrey J Goldberger
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida.
| |
Collapse
|