Interleukin-1 Trap Rilonacept Improved Health-Related Quality of Life and Sleep in Patients With Recurrent Pericarditis: Results From the Phase 3 Clinical Trial RHAPSODY

Recurrent pericarditis with normal C-reactive protein: Clinical and laboratory features, biomarkers and outcome in a non-inflammatory phenotype

BACKGROUND

Differences in recurrent pericarditis with normal vs. elevated C-reactive protein (CRP) are unknown.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We studied 448 patients with recurrent or incessant pericarditis. CRP levels <10 mg/L were considered normal. Forty-one patients with normal CRP were tested for interleukin 6 (IL-6), serum amyloid A (SAA) and soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR).

RESULTS

Among the cohort (median age 43 years, 48.4% females), 336 patients (75%) had elevated CRP, while 112 (25%) had normal levels. CRP-negative patients were younger (38.6 vs. 43.5 years, p=0.007) and predominantly female (67.9% vs. 42.0%, p<0.001). They presented less often with fever (23.2% vs. 74.1%, p<0.001), pleural involvement (7.1% vs. 61.6% p<0.001), and neutrophilic leucocytosis (WBC 6760 vs. 12315/µL, p<0.001). Pericardiocentesis was performed rarely in CRP-negative patients (2.7% vs. 13.4%, p=0.001). Recurrence rates were similar (5.4 vs. 5.5/100 months-patient, p=0.918). Among CRP-negative patients, 53 (47.3%) had an incessant course characterized by persistent symptoms (pain and tachycardia); abnormal instrumental findings included ECG changes (28.6%), mild pericardial effusion (86.6%), and cardiac magnetic resonance evidence of effusion/oedema/late gadolinium enhancement (43.7%). Anakinra was administered to 48 CRP-positive (14.3%) and 10 CRP-negative patients (8.9%), leading to good responses with discontinuation of NSAIDs and corticosteroids in 39/48 (81.2%) and 5/10 (50.0%), respectively. Among the 41 CRP-negative patients tested, IL-6 and suPAR levels were always normal, while SAA was elevated in 17.1%.

CONCLUSIONS

Pericarditis with normal CRP exhibits distinct clinical and laboratory features, often presenting with an incessant course. Although rarely elevated, SAA may help to identify inflammation beyond CRP.

Current Drug Treatment for Acute and Recurrent Pericarditis

Pericarditis is the most frequent pericardial disease and presents with a relatively benign course when treated according to guideline-directed therapies at first presentation. Recurrence is the most frequent complication and may occur more frequently after a first episode, in patients with autoimmune etiology, in patients who received glucocorticoids, or after rapid (i.e., within 1 month) tapering of anti-inflammatory drugs. The therapeutic armamentarium for pericarditis includes high-dose nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) that are tapered rapidly once symptoms are controlled. Colchicine is necessary to both relieve symptoms and reduce the rate of recurrences and is continued for at least 3-6 months. Low- to moderate-dose glucocorticoids are reserved for patients with a first recurrence for which NSAIDs and colchicine failed and/or who have an autoimmune disorder, with a slow tapering. Interleukin-1 blockers-anakinra, rilonacept, and goflikicept-are used as a third-line option in patients who cannot come off glucocorticoids or as second-line therapy after NSAIDs and colchicine in patients with contraindications to glucocorticoids or in those with high-risk features (i.e., multiple episodes, markedly elevated inflammatory markers, or extensive abnormalities at pericardial imaging) in whom treatment with glucocorticoids is unlikely to succeed.

Duration of Disease and Long-Term Outcomes in Patients With Difficult-To-Treat Recurrent Pericarditis: A Chronic Condition Treated With Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs, Colchicine, Corticosteroids, and Anti-Interleukin-1 Agents

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to investigate the remission rate and disease duration in idiopathic or post-cardiac injury pericarditis and risk factors for disease duration and anti-interleukin-1 (IL-1) agent discontinuation.

METHODS

This was a multicenter, longitudinal, observational study including 370 patients (51.4% female). The remission rate was the proportion of patients who stopped all pericarditis-related therapies for at least 6 months without recurrences.

RESULTS

The median follow-up was 4.9 (interquartile range [IQR] 2.8-8.4) years, and the median age at the end of follow-up was 49 (IQR 37-60) years. A median of 1.1 (IQR 0.6-1.9) recurrences/year and 0.4 (IQR 0.1-0.9) hospitalizations/year were recorded. The remission rate at follow-up was 34.0%, 7% per year. Disease duration was shorter for patients in remission (3.1 years, IQR 1.6-6.2 years) than for those still receiving treatment (4 years, IQR 2.2-7.8; P = 0.02). Use of "guidelines-based therapy" (hazard ratio [HR] 1.85, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.25-2.73; P = 0.02) and colchicine use at first attack (HR 1.51, 95% CI 1.02-2.23; P = 0.038) were protective factors, whereas steroid use was associated with longer disease duration (HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.35-0.81; P = 0.003). Corticosteroids were used in 77.3% of patients, with a median duration of therapy of 1.1 (IQR 0.4-2.6) years. Anakinra was used in 25.9% with a median duration of therapy of 2.4 (IQR 0.9-5.0) years; only 19.8% were able to stop anakinra at the end of observation period.

CONCLUSION

This study reports the largest and longest follow-up in patients with recurrent pericarditis. Guideline adherence from the first attack is associated with a shorter course. The disease was long and impacting in terms of recurrences and hospitalizations, often requiring a long-term treatment, in particular with anti-IL-1 agents.

Advances in the Multimodality Imaging and Management of Recurrent Pericarditis: A Contemporary Review

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To outline recent advances in imaging and treatment for recurrent pericarditis (RP).

RECENT FINDINGS

Greater understanding of NLRP3 inflammasome activation in the pathogenesis of RP has led to the development of several anti-interleukin (IL-1) agents, and technological advancements have increased the utility of multimodality imaging in RP. Multimodality imaging plays a crucial role in the assessment of RP, with echocardiography serving as the initial imaging modality; cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) as a pivotal test for diagnosis, grading severity, and surveillance; and cardiac computed tomography (CT) providing complimentary information and assisting operative assessment. Anti-IL-1 agents are now well-established as second line therapy for RP, with recent clinical trials demonstrating their efficacy.

IL-1 blockade in cardiovascular disease: an appraisal of the evidence across different inflammatory paradigms

Pre-clinical and clinical studies suggest a role for inflammation in the pathophysiology of cardiovascular (CV) diseases. The NLRP3 (NACHT, leucine-rich repeat, and pyrin domain-containing protein 3) inflammasome is activated during tissue injury and releases interleukin-1β (IL-1β). We describe three paradigms in which the NLRP3 inflammasome and IL-1β contribute to CV diseases. During acute myocardial infarction (AMI), necrotic cell debris, including IL-1α, induce NLRP3 inflammasome activation and further damage the myocardium contributing to heart failure (HF) (acute injury paradigm). In chronic HF, IL-1β is induced by persistent myocardial overload and injury, neurohumoral activation and systemic comorbidities favoring infiltration and activation of immune cells into the myocardium, microvascular inflammation, and a pro-fibrotic response (chronic inflammation paradigm). In recurrent pericarditis, an autoinflammatory response triggered by cell injury and maintained by the NLRP3 inflammasome/IL-1β axis is present (autoinflammatory disease paradigm). Anakinra, recombinant IL-1 receptor antagonist, inhibits the acute inflammatory response in patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and acute HF. Canakinumab, IL-1β antibody, blunts systemic inflammation and prevents complications of atherosclerosis in stable patients with prior AMI. In chronic HF, anakinra reduces systemic inflammation and improves cardiorespiratory fitness. In recurrent pericarditis, anakinra and rilonacept, a soluble IL-1 receptor chimeric fusion protein blocking IL-1α and IL-1β, treat and prevent acute flares. In conclusion, the NLRP3 inflammasome and IL-1 contribute to the pathophysiology of CV diseases, and IL-1 blockade is beneficial with different roles in the acute injury, chronic inflammation and autoinflammatory disease paradigms. Further research is needed to guide the optimal use of IL-1 blockers in clinical practice.

Clinical Utility of Rilonacept for the Treatment of Recurrent Pericarditis: Design, Development, and Place in Therapy

Recurrent pericarditis (RP) has been traditionally regarded as a "nightmare" for both clinicians and patients. Until approximately a decade ago, available treatments were thin on the ground with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medications, glucocorticoids, colchicine, and classical immunosuppressants being the only options. The first important step in the tale of RP was the advent of colchicine in clinical practice, which has been shown to halve the rate of first and subsequent pericarditis recurrences. The second major breakthrough advance in this setting was the introduction of interleukin-1 inhibitors based on the recently unveiled autoinflammatory nature of pericarditis. At present, anti-interleukin-1 inhibitors available for clinical use in patients with refractory RP include anakinra and rilonacept, with the latter having obtained FDA approval for this indication. Apart from the remarkable efficacy and good safety profile which is a common feature of all anti-interleukin-1 compounds, rilonacept has the advantage of weekly administration (instead of daily compared to anakinra) which is important in terms of adherence to treatment and improved quality of life albeit at the expense of a higher cost. This review aims to summarize the available evidence on the role of rilonacept in the treatment of RP and the reduction of the recurrences risk.

Novel Treatments in Refractory Recurrent Pericarditis

Refractory recurrent pericarditis is a troublesome condition that severely impairs the quality of life of affected patients and significantly increases healthcare spending. Until recently, therapeutic options included only a few medications and most of the patients resorted to chronic glucocorticoid treatment with steroid dependence. In the most recent decade, the introduction of interleukin-1 blockers in clinical practice has revolutionized the treatment of glucocorticoid-dependent and colchicine-resistant recurrent pericarditis due to their excellent efficacy and good safety profile. The rationale for the introduction of this class of medications in clinical practice is the autoinflammatory nature of recurrent pericarditis in a substantial rate of cases, with interleukin-1 being the main pro-inflammatory cytokine involved in this context. This review aims to discuss the contemporary available evidence from original research and real-world data on interleukin-1 blocker use in refractory recurrent pericarditis, in terms of indications, mechanism of action, efficacy, side effects, and recommended treatment protocols. Moreover, novel treatment proposals, such as hydroxychloroquine, beta blockers, and cannabidiol, which showed encouraging preliminary results, are addressed. Finally, gaps in knowledge, unmet needs, and future perspectives related to recurrent pericarditis are thoroughly discussed.

Novel Therapeutic Insights Into the Treatment of Pericarditis: Targeting the Innate Immune System

ABSTRACT

Acute pericarditis is characterized by pericardial inflammation that can be treated with anti-inflammatory drugs. A considerable percentage of patients develops recurrent pericarditis with several relapses. In developed countries, the idiopathic form is the most frequent and has a high risk of recurrences. Two pathophysiological mechanisms have been described for idiopathic recurrent pericarditis: autoimmune and autoinflammatory. The autoimmune mechanism is more frequently encountered in patients with rheumatologic disorders, especially systemic lupus erythematosus. The innate immune system plays a central role in the pathophysiology of pericarditis, especially in the autoinflammatory phenotype. Current evidence highlights the central role played by interleukin 1 and NLRP3 (NACHT, leucine-rich repeat, and pyrin domain-containing protein 3) in idiopathic recurrent pericarditis. Accordingly, interleukin 1 blockers have been approved for the treatment of this condition. Neutrophils are likely to be important in such setting; however, their role has only been partially investigated. In the present review, we have collected the current knowledge on the role of innate immune system in pericarditis pathophysiology and how this can be used to provide targeted treatments for patients with recurrent pericarditis.

Sustained Pericarditis Recurrence Risk Reduction With Long-Term Rilonacept

BACKGROUND

Rilonacept, a once-weekly interleukin-1 alpha and beta cytokine trap, reduced pericarditis recurrence in the phase 3 study, RHAPSODY (Rilonacept Inhibition of Interleukin-1 Alpha and Beta for Recurrent Pericarditis: A Pivotal Symptomatology and Outcomes Study). The RHAPSODY long-term extension further explored recurrent pericarditis natural history and treatment duration decision-making during 24 additional months of open-label rilonacept treatment.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Seventy-four patients commenced the long-term extension, with a median (maximum) total rilonacept duration of 22 (35) months. Individually, 18 months after the most proximal pericarditis recurrence, investigators decided to continue rilonacept on study, suspend rilonacept for off-treatment observation (rescue allowed), or discontinue the study. The annualized incidence of pericarditis recurrence on rilonacept up to the 18-month decision milestone was 0.04 events/patient-year versus 4.4 events/patient-year prestudy while on oral therapies. At the 18-month decision milestone, 64% (33/52) continued rilonacept, 15% (8/52) suspended rilonacept for observation, and 21% (11/52) discontinued the study. Among the 33 patients (1/33; 3.0%) continuing rilonacept (median time to recurrence could not be estimated due to too few events), a single recurrence occurred 4 weeks after a treatment interruption. Among patients suspending rilonacept, 75% (6/8) experienced recurrence (median time to recurrence, 11.8 weeks [95% CI, 3.7 weeks to not estimable]). There was a 98% reduction in risk of pericarditis recurrence among patients continuing rilonacept treatment after the 18-month decision milestone versus those suspending treatment for observation (hazard ratio, 0.02; P<0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

In the RHAPSODY long-term extension, continued rilonacept treatment resulted in continued response; treatment suspension at the 18-month decision milestone was associated with pericarditis recurrence.

REGISTRATION

URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03737110.

Interleukin-1 Blockers: A Paradigm Shift in the Treatment of Recurrent Pericarditis

Recurrent pericarditis is a problematic clinical condition that impairs the quality of life of the affected patients due to the need for repeated hospital admissions, emergency department visits, and complications from medications, especially glucocorticoids. Unfortunately, available treatments for recurrent pericarditis are very limited, including only a handful of medications such as aspirin/NSAIDs, glucocorticoids, colchicine, and immunosuppressants (such as interleukin-1 (IL-1) blockers, azathioprine, and intravenous human immunoglobulins). Until recently, the clinical experience with the latter class of medications was very limited. Nevertheless, in the last decade, experience with IL-1 blockers has consistently grown, and valid clinical data have emerged from randomized clinical trials. Accordingly, IL-1 blockers are a typical paradigm shift in the treatment of refractory recurrent pericarditis with a clearly positive cost/benefit ratio for those unfortunate patients with multiple recurrences. A drawback related to the above-mentioned medications is the absence of universally accepted and established treatment protocols regarding the full dose administration period and the need for a tapering protocol for individual medications. Another concern is the need for long-standing treatments, which should be discussed with the patients. The above-mentioned unmet needs are expected to be addressed in the near future, such as further insights into pathophysiology and an individualized approach to affected patients.

Surgical Approaches for Pericardial Diseases: What Is New?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this review is to discuss the evolving techniques and approaches for pericardiectomy, with a focus on the use of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and the extent of radical pericardial resection. The review aims to highlight the benefits and considerations associated with these modifications in radical pericardiectomy.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent studies have demonstrated that the use of CPB during pericardiectomy does not increase procedural risk or negatively impact survival. In fact, it has been shown to contribute to a more radical resection and improve postoperative outcomes, which is associated with less recurrence and better survival. The review emphasizes the importance of radical pericardiectomy and the use of CPB in achieving successful outcomes. Radical resection of the pericardium, facilitated by CPB, helps minimize the risk of recurrent constrictions and the need for reinterventions. The findings highlight the correlation between postoperative outcomes and survival, further supporting the use of CPB.

Novel Pathophysiological, Diagnostic and Therapeutic Concepts in Acute and Recurrent Pericarditis

Acute pericarditis is the most frequent pericardial disease characterized by inflammation of the pericardial layers resulting in pain, dyspnea and fatigue. Often limited to an isolated event, up to 30% of patients experience one or more recurrences. There is limited knowledge about the pathophysiology of this disease, possibly due to the limited availability of animal models. More recently, following seminal clinical trials with colchicine and interleukin-1 (IL-1) blockers and a novel murine model of acute pericarditis using zymosan A, it has become clear that the NLRP3 (NACHT, leucine-rich repeat, and pyrin domain-containing protein 3) inflammasome/IL-1 β axis plays a central role in driving acute pericardial inflammation and in sustaining this process during recurrences. Diagnostic management of pericarditis has been implemented with multimodality imaging including echocardiography, cardiac computed tomography, and cardiac magnetic resonance. These imaging modalities provide essential diagnostic and pathogenetic information, and are able to characterize pericardial inflammation, allowing to refine risk stratification and personalize treatment. Recent acquisitions yield relevant implications with regard to the therapeutic management of acute and recurrent pericarditis. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and colchicine are cornerstone therapies either for acute and recurrent pericarditis. However, the benefits of targeted agents, such as anakinra - a recombinant human IL-1 receptor antagonist - and rilonacept - an IL-1 α /IL-1 β trap, are being increasingly recognized. To this end, phenotyping patients with pericarditis and addressing such therapies to those presenting with auto-inflammatory features (elevated C-reactive protein, sustained pericardial and systemic inflammation, multiple recurrences) is of utmost importance to identify patients who might be more likely to benefit from NLRP3 inflammasome/IL-1 β pathway blockade.