Male-Female Differences in Acute Type B Aortic Dissection

Sex Differences in Peripheral Vascular Disease: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association

Sex differences in the risk factors, diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes of patients with cardiovascular disease have been well described; however, the bulk of the literature has focused on heart disease in women. Data on sex differences in peripheral vascular disease are ill defined, and there is a need to report and understand those sex-related differences to mitigate adverse outcomes related to those disparities. Although peripheral vascular disease is a highly diverse group of disorders affecting the arteries, veins, and lymphatics, this scientific statement focuses on disorders affecting the peripheral arteries to include the aorta and its branch vessels. The purpose of this scientific statement is to report the current status of sex-based differences and disparities in peripheral vascular disease and to provide research priorities to achieve health equity for women with peripheral vascular disease.

The association between sex and outcomes after thoracic endovascular repair for acute type B aortic dissection

OBJECTIVE

Prior literature has found worse outcomes for female patients after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm and mixed findings after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for thoracic aortic aneurysm. However, the influence of sex on outcomes after TEVAR for acute type B aortic dissection (aTBAD) is not fully elucidated.

METHODS

We identified patients who underwent TEVAR for aTBAD (<30 days) in the Vascular Quality Initiative from 2014 to 2022. We excluded patients with an entry tear or stent seal within the ascending aorta or aortic arch and patients with an unknown proximal tear location. Included patients were stratified by biological sex, and we analyzed perioperative outcomes and 5-year mortality with multivariable logistic regression and Cox regression analysis, respectively. Furthermore, we analyzed adjusted variables for interaction with female sex.

RESULTS

We included 1626 patients, 33% of whom were female. At presentation, female patients were significantly older (65 [interquartile range: 54, 75] years vs 56 [interquartile range: 49, 68] years; P = .01). Regarding indications for repair, female patients had higher rates of pain (85% vs 80%; P = .02) and lower rates of malperfusion (23% vs 35%; P < .001), specifically mesenteric, renal, and lower limb malperfusion. Female patients had a lower proportion of proximal repairs in zone 2 (39% vs 48%; P < .01). After TEVAR for aTBAD, female sex was associated with comparable odds of perioperative mortality to males (8.1 vs 9.2%; adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 0.79 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.51-1.20]). Regarding perioperative complications, female sex was associated with lower odds for cardiac complications (2.3% vs 4.7%; aOR: 0.52 [95% CI: 0.26-0.97]), but all other complications were comparable between sexes. Compared with male sex, female sex was associated with similar risk for 5-year mortality (26% vs 23%; adjusted hazard ratio: 1.01 [95% CI: 0.77-1.32]). On testing variables for interaction with sex, female sex was associated with lower perioperative and 5-year mortality at older ages relative to males (aOR: 0.96 [0.93-0.99] | adjusted hazard ratio: 0.97 [0.95-0.99]) and higher odds of perioperative mortality when mesenteric malperfusion was present (OR: 2.71 [1.04-6.96]).

CONCLUSIONS

Female patients were older, less likely to have complicated dissection, and had more distal proximal landing zones. After TEVAR for aTBAD, female sex was associated with similar perioperative and 5-year mortality to male sex, but lower odds of in-hospital cardiac complications. Interaction analysis showed that females were at additional risk for perioperative mortality when mesenteric ischemia was present. These data suggest that TEVAR for aTBAD overall has a similar safety profile in females as it does for males.

The distribution of the depth of aortic dissection and the correlation of the dissection depth index with other parameters

BACKGROUND

In patients with aortic dissection, the aortic wall is separated into two layers along a dissection plane. In this study, a survey was performed to investigate the distribution of the depth of dissection plane and its correlation with other clinical and pathological parameters to help understand and expand the current knowledge of aortic dissection.

METHODS

Pathology information system were searched for patients with aortic dissection who had undergone aortic replacement between 2019 and 2022 in Wuhan Asia General Hospital. The depth of dissection plane and dissection depth index were measured in the area around the edge of dissection plane. Correlation between parameters was calculated using Spearman's rank correlation coefficient.

RESULTS

124 patients were included in this study. The depth of dissection plane ranged from 533 to 2335 microns, and the 5th percentile was 778 microns. The dissection depth index ranged from 0.320 to 0.972, and the 5th percentile was 0.503. The correlation coefficients were -0.305 (P=.0007), -0.259 (P=0.0111), 0.188 (P=0.0367), 0.189 (P=0.0359) respectively for male gender, the length of aortic dissection, atherosclerosis, and translamellar mucoid extracellular matrix accumulation.

CONCLUSIONS

In 95% of patients with aortic dissection, the depth of dissection plane is larger than 778 microns, and the dissection depth index is greater than 0.503. In other words, aortic dissection rarely occurs in the inner 50.3% of the aortic media. The dissection depth index is negatively correlated with male gender and the length of aortic dissection, and positively correlated with atherosclerosis and translamellar mucoid extracellular matrix accumulation.