Aetiological profile and treatment outcomes of epistaxis at a major teaching hospital: a review of 721 cases.
Ir J Med Sci 2017;
187:761-766. [PMID:
29197966 DOI:
10.1007/s11845-017-1721-x]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2017] [Accepted: 11/19/2017] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Epistaxis is the most prevalent ENT emergency and a significant burden on ENT services. Our objective was to study the incidence and outcomes of patients presenting with epistaxis at a major teaching hospital.
METHODS
A retrospective descriptive study of 721 patients, who presented with epistaxis over a 1-year period, was carried out. Data collected was analysed using SPSS software version 20.
RESULTS
Of the 721 patients, initial treatment consisted of nasal cautery (298), nasal packing (200), or no treatment (223). Fifty-nine patients were admitted. The mean age of admitted patients was 66.8 years and the male to female ratio was 2:1. 69.5% had hypertension and 78% used an antiplatelet/anticoagulation medication. The majority of admitted and return patients were out of hours referrals from ED and the mean admission duration was five nights. Surgical treatment for intractable epistaxis included arterial ligation or endovascular embolisation. Successful treatment was defined as no recurrent epistaxis following pack removal or no readmission with epistaxis within 24 h of hospital discharge. Six hundred forty-four patients had successful treatment.
CONCLUSION
More return and admitted patients presented at out-of-hours times with less clinical staff on site. Most non-admitted patients received no treatment. These factors possibly lead to increased stress on the ENT casualty service. Cautery and nasal packing are the most common treatment modalities in first-time and admitted patients yet result in considerable rates of representation.
Collapse