A comparison of acute hemorrhagic stroke outcomes in 2 populations: the Crete-Boston study

Atorvastatin combined with low-dose dexamethasone improves the neuroinflammation and survival in mice with intracerebral hemorrhage

Intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is a fatal disease with high mortality and poor prognosis that triggers multiple severe brain injuries associated with an inflammatory cascade response that cannot be treated with any effective medication. Atorvastatin (ATO) suppresses inflammation, alleviates brain trauma, and eliminates subdural hematoma. Dexamethasone (DXM) also has the capacity to inhibit inflammation. Thus, we combined ATO with low-dose DXM to treat ICH mice in vivo to examine whether the combined treatment can inhibit secondary inflammation around the cerebral hemorrhage and decrease overall mortality. Compared to the monotherapy by either ATO or DXM, the combined treatment significantly improves the survivorship of the ICH mice, accelerates their recovery of impaired neurological function, and modulates the circulating cytokines, oxidative products, and apoptosis. Moreover, the benefit of ATO-DXM combination therapy was most pronounced on day 3 after dosing compared to ATO or DXM alone. Thus, early administration of ATO combined with low-dose-DXM promotes better survival of ICH and improves neurological function by reducing neuroinflammation and brain edema in their early phase.

Atrial Fibrillation in Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage, Dijon Stroke Registry (2006-2017)

Background

Atrial fibrillation (AF) represents a major indication for oral anticoagulants (OAC) that contribute to spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). This study evaluated AF prevalence among patients with ICH, temporal trends, and early functional outcomes and death of patients.

Methods and Results

Patients with first‐ever ICH were prospectively recorded in the population‐based stroke registry of Dijon, France, (2006–2017). Association between AF and early outcome of patients with ICH (ordinal modified Rankin Scale score and death at discharge) were analyzed using ordinal and logistic regressions. Among 444 patients with ICH, 97 (21.9%) had AF, including 65 (14.6%) with previously known AF treated with OAC, and 13 (2.9%) with newly diagnosed AF. AF prevalence rose from 17.2% (2006–2011) to 25.8% (2012–2017) (P‐trend=0.05). An increase in the proportion of AF treated with OAC (11.3% to 17.5%, P‐trend=0.09) and newly diagnosed AF (1.5% to 4.2%, P‐trend=0.11) was observed. In multivariable analyses, after adjustment for premorbid OAC, AF was not significantly associated with ordinal modified Rankin Scale score (odds ratio [OR], 1.29; 95% CI, 0.69–2.42) or death (OR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.40–1.96) in patients with ICH. Nevertheless, adjusted premorbid OAC use remained highly associated with a higher probability of death (OR, 2.53; 95% CI, 1.11–5.78).

Conclusions

AF prevalence and use of OAC among patients with ICH increased over time. Premorbid use of OAC was associated with poor outcome after ICH, thus suggesting a need to better identify ICH risk before initiating or pursuing OAC therapy in patients with AF, and to develop acute treatment and secondary prevention strategies after ICH in patients with AF.

Guidelines for the Acute Treatment of Cerebral Edema in Neurocritical Care Patients

BACKGROUND

Acute treatment of cerebral edema and elevated intracranial pressure is a common issue in patients with neurological injury. Practical recommendations regarding selection and monitoring of therapies for initial management of cerebral edema for optimal efficacy and safety are generally lacking. This guideline evaluates the role of hyperosmolar agents (mannitol, HTS), corticosteroids, and selected non-pharmacologic therapies in the acute treatment of cerebral edema. Clinicians must be able to select appropriate therapies for initial cerebral edema management based on available evidence while balancing efficacy and safety.

METHODS

The Neurocritical Care Society recruited experts in neurocritical care, nursing, and pharmacy to create a panel in 2017. The group generated 16 clinical questions related to initial management of cerebral edema in various neurological insults using the PICO format. A research librarian executed a comprehensive literature search through July 2018. The panel screened the identified articles for inclusion related to each specific PICO question and abstracted necessary information for pertinent publications. The panel used GRADE methodology to categorize the quality of evidence as high, moderate, low, or very low based on their confidence that the findings of each publication approximate the true effect of the therapy.

RESULTS

The panel generated recommendations regarding initial management of cerebral edema in neurocritical care patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage, traumatic brain injury, acute ischemic stroke, intracerebral hemorrhage, bacterial meningitis, and hepatic encephalopathy.

CONCLUSION

The available evidence suggests hyperosmolar therapy may be helpful in reducing ICP elevations or cerebral edema in patients with SAH, TBI, AIS, ICH, and HE, although neurological outcomes do not appear to be affected. Corticosteroids appear to be helpful in reducing cerebral edema in patients with bacterial meningitis, but not ICH. Differences in therapeutic response and safety may exist between HTS and mannitol. The use of these agents in these critical clinical situations merits close monitoring for adverse effects. There is a dire need for high-quality research to better inform clinicians of the best options for individualized care of patients with cerebral edema.