Republished: Society for Neuroscience in Anesthesiology and Critical Care expert consensus statement: Anesthetic management of endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke

Exploring the optimal lower blood pressure boundary during endovascular thrombectomy in patients with large vessel occlusion

BACKGROUND

Current guidelines advocate for maintaining BP level below 180/105 mmHg during EVT, determining the safe lower boundary remains primarily consensus-driven by experts. This study aims to delve into the correlation between various targets of lower boundary for systolic and diastolic BP (SBP and DBP) during EVT and 3-month functional outcomes.

METHODS

A cohort study was conducted across two EVT-capable centers, enrolling patients with large artery occlusion undergoing EVT within 8 h of stroke onset. Mean BP values during EVT were meticulously recorded, and logistic regression models were utilized to evaluate the correlation between outcomes and diverse lower boundary targets for SBP and DBP. Additionally, logistic regression models investigated the relationship between periprocedural BP variability and subsequent outcomes.

RESULTS

Among the 201 patients included, having a SBP higher than 130 or 140 mmHg showed an independent association with increased good functional outcomes at 3 months (adjusted odds ratio, aOR 2.80, 95% Cis, 1.26-6.39 for 140 mmHg; aOR 2.34, 95% Cis, 1.03-5.56 for 130 mmHg). Additionally, an SBP exceeding 130 mmHg was correlated with decreased 3-month mortality (aOR, 0.24, 95% CI 0.07-0.74). No significant relationship was observed between DBP and functional outcomes. Patients with higher periprocedural SBP coefficient variance exhibited a decreased rate of good functional outcomes at 3 months (aOR, 0.42, 95% CI, 0.18-0.96).

CONCLUSION

A SBP range above 130-140 mmHg could potentially serve as a safe lower boundary during EVT, while minimizing BP fluctuations may correlate with improved post-EVT functional outcomes.

Neurocritical Care Rapid Response Team Providing Critical Care Support During Mechanical Thrombectomy of Emergent Large Vessel Occlusion Stroke

BACKGROUND

 Acute ischemic stroke with medium and large vessel occlusion is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality, in which timely intervention with mechanical thrombectomy (MT) is crucial for restoring cerebral blood flow and improving patient outcomes. Effective analgosedation and hemodynamic management during MT are critical to patient outcomes and typically managed by anesthesia. Because of inconsistent anesthesia support at our institution, we implemented a dedicated neurocritical care rapid response team (NCC-RRT) to manage these aspects of care. The primary outcome of our study was door-to-groin puncture time, before and after the implementation of the NCC-RRT. Secondary outcomes included door-to-recanalization time, patient disposition status, and the need for emergent anesthesia support.

METHODS

 We conducted a prospective analysis of patients with acute ischemic stroke undergoing MT at a comprehensive stroke center between January 2021 and December 2023. The study compared two periods: era 1 (pre-NCC-RRT, January to October 2021) and era 2 (post-NCC-RRT, December 2021 to December 2023). We excluded inpatient stroke alerts and patients intubated at outside hospitals. The NCC-RRT was responsible for the expedited transfer, airway management, procedural analgosedation, and hemodynamic support.

RESULTS

 A total of 373 patients were included in the study, with 86 patients in era 1 and 287 in era 2. The implementation of the NCC-RRT was associated with a statistically significant reduction in median DGP and door-to-recanalization times by 11.7% and 12.6%, respectively. NCC-RRT was also associated with a 21.4% increase in general anesthesia utilization, and no patients required emergent anesthesia support.

CONCLUSIONS

 The introduction of a dedicated NCC-RRT led to substantial improvements in MT process efficiency, highlighting the critical role of neurocritical care in optimizing stroke treatment and enhancing patient outcomes. This model offers an effective alternative for centers where dedicated neuroanesthesia teams are unavailable.

Outcomes After Endovascular Therapy With Procedural Sedation vs General Anesthesia in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke: The AMETIS Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

General anesthesia and procedural sedation are common practice for mechanical thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke. However, risks and benefits of each strategy are unclear.

Objective

To determine whether general anesthesia or procedural sedation for anterior circulation large-vessel occlusion acute ischemic stroke thrombectomy are associated with a difference in periprocedural complications and 3-month functional outcome.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This open-label, blinded end point randomized clinical trial was conducted between August 2017 and February 2020, with final follow-up in May 2020, at 10 centers in France. Adults with occlusion of the intracranial internal carotid artery and/or the proximal middle cerebral artery treated with thrombectomy were enrolled.

Interventions

Patients were assigned to receive general anesthesia with tracheal intubation (n = 135) or procedural sedation (n = 138).

Main Outcomes and Measures

The prespecified primary composite outcome was functional independence (a score of 0 to 2 on the modified Rankin Scale, which ranges from 0 [no neurologic disability] to 6 [death]) at 90 days and absence of major periprocedural complications (procedure-related serious adverse events, pneumonia, myocardial infarction, cardiogenic acute pulmonary edema, or malignant stroke) at 7 days.

Results

Among 273 patients evaluable for the primary outcome in the modified intention-to-treat population, 142 (52.0%) were women, and the mean (SD) age was 71.6 (13.8) years. The primary outcome occurred in 38 of 135 patients (28.2%) assigned to general anesthesia and in 50 of 138 patients (36.2%) assigned to procedural sedation (absolute difference, 8.1 percentage points; 95% CI, -2.3 to 19.1; P = .15). At 90 days, the rate of patients achieving functional independence was 33.3% (45 of 135) with general anesthesia and 39.1% (54 of 138) with procedural sedation (relative risk, 1.18; 95% CI, 0.86-1.61; P = .32). The rate of patients without major periprocedural complications at 7 days was 65.9% (89 of 135) with general anesthesia and 67.4% (93 of 138) with procedural sedation (relative risk, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.86-1.21; P = .80).

Conclusions and Relevance

In patients treated with mechanical thrombectomy for anterior circulation acute ischemic stroke, general anesthesia and procedural sedation were associated with similar rates of functional independence and major periprocedural complications.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03229148.

Inhalational versus Intravenous General Anesthesia for mechanical thrombectomy for stroke: A single centre retrospective study

BACKGROUND

When general anesthesia is used for endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) for acute ischemic stroke (AIS), the choice of anesthetic agents for maintenance remains inconclusive. The different effects of intravenous anesthetic and volatiles agents on cerebral hemodynamics are known and may explain differences in outcomes of patients with cerebral pathologies exposed to the different anesthetic modalities. In this single institutional retrospective study, we assessed the impact of total intravenous (TIVA) and inhalational anesthesia on outcomes after EVT.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of all patients ≥ 18 years who underwent EVT for AIS of the anterior or posterior circulation under general anesthesia. Baseline patient characteristics, anesthetic agents, intra operative hemodynamics, stroke characteristics, time intervals and clinical outcome data were collected and analyzed.

RESULTS

The study cohort consisted of 191 patients. After excluding 76 patients who were lost to follow up at 90 days, 51 patients received inhalational anesthesia and 64 patients who received TIVA were analyzed. The clinical characteristics between the groups were comparable. Multivariate logistic regression analysis of outcome measures for TIVA versus inhalational anesthesia showed significantly increased odds of good functional outcome (mRS 0-2) at 90 days (adjusted odds ratio, 3.24; 95% CI, 1.25-8.36; p = 0.015) and a non-significant trend towards decreased mortality (adjusted odds ratio, 0.73; CI, 0.15-3.6; p = 0.70).

CONCLUSION

Patients who had TIVA for mechanical thrombectomy had significantly increased odds of good functional outcome at 90 days and a non-significant trend towards decrease in mortality. These findings warrant further investigation with large randomized, prospective trials.

A retrospect and outlook on the neuroprotective effects of anesthetics in the era of endovascular therapy

Studies on the neuroprotective effects of anesthetics were carried out more than half a century ago. Subsequently, many cell and animal experiments attempted to verify the findings. However, in clinical trials, the neuroprotective effects of anesthetics were not observed. These contradictory results suggest a mismatch between basic research and clinical trials. The Stroke Therapy Academic Industry Roundtable X (STAIR) proposed that the emergence of endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) would provide a proper platform to verify the neuroprotective effects of anesthetics because the haemodynamics of patients undergoing EVT is very close to the ischaemia–reperfusion model in basic research. With the widespread use of EVT, it is necessary for us to re-examine the neuroprotective effects of anesthetics to guide the use of anesthetics during EVT because the choice of anesthesia is still based on team experience without definite guidelines. In this paper, we describe the research status of anesthesia in EVT and summarize the neuroprotective mechanisms of some anesthetics. Then, we focus on the contradictory results between clinical trials and basic research and discuss the causes. Finally, we provide an outlook on the neuroprotective effects of anesthetics in the era of endovascular therapy.

The 2020 Taiwan Stroke Society guidelines for blood pressure control at the acute stage of ischemic stroke

The 2020 Taiwan Stroke Society (TSS) guidelines for blood pressure (BP) control related to ischemic stroke update the 2015 TSS BP guidelines. The early management of acute ischemic stroke has evolved rapidly in the previous two decades. Since the publication of the previous version of the TSS BP guidelines, many studies have addressed BP management in ischemic stroke. Particularly, several successful endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) trials published in 2015 led to a new era of acute treatment for ischemic stroke. With the ever-increasing use of EVT, evidence-based guidelines for ideal BP management during and after EVT are urgently needed. Consequently, the 2020 guidelines are updating and providing recommendations on BP control for the treatment and prevention of ischemic stroke based on new evidence. The present study encompasses the most important chapter of the 2020 Taiwan BP guidelines: BP control at the acute stage of ischemic stroke. We incorporated the most updated evidence regarding BP control at the acute stage of ischemic stroke in patients receiving or not receiving acute reperfusion therapy and provided specific recommendations for different treatment subgroups accordingly.

Type of anaesthesia for acute ischaemic stroke endovascular treatment

BACKGROUND

The use of mechanical thrombectomy to restore intracranial blood flow after proximal large artery occlusion by a thrombus has increased over time and led to better outcomes than intravenous thrombolytic therapy alone. Currently, the type of anaesthetic technique during mechanical thrombectomy is under debate as having a relevant impact on neurological outcomes.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of different types of anaesthesia for endovascular interventions in people with acute ischaemic stroke.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Stroke Group Specialised Register of Trials on 5 July 2022, and CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and seven other databases on 21 March 2022. We performed searches of reference lists of included trials, grey literature sources, and other systematic reviews.  SELECTION CRITERIA: We included all randomised controlled trials with a parallel design that compared general anaesthesia versus local anaesthesia, conscious sedation anaesthesia, or monitored care anaesthesia for mechanical thrombectomy in acute ischaemic stroke. We also included studies reported as full-text, those published as abstract only, and unpublished data. We excluded quasi-randomised trials, studies without a comparator group, and studies with a retrospective design.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently applied the inclusion criteria, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias and the certainty of the evidence using the GRADE approach. The outcomes were assessed at different time periods, ranging from the onset of the stroke symptoms to 90 days after the start of the intervention. The main outcomes were functional outcome, neurological impairment, stroke-related mortality, all intracranial haemorrhage, target artery revascularisation status, time to revascularisation, adverse events, and quality of life. All included studies reported data for early (up to 30 days) and long-term (above 30 days) time points.

MAIN RESULTS

We included seven trials with 982 participants, which investigated the type of anaesthesia for endovascular treatment in large vessel occlusion in the intracranial circulation. The outcomes were assessed at different time periods, ranging from the onset of stroke symptoms to 90 days after the procedure. Therefore, all included studies reported data for early (up to 30 days) and long-term (above 30 up to 90 days) time points. General anaesthesia versus non-general anaesthesia(early) We are uncertain about the effect of general anaesthesia on functional outcomes compared to non-general anaesthesia (mean difference (MD) 0, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.31 to 0.31; P = 1.0; 1 study, 90 participants; very low-certainty evidence) and in time to revascularisation from groin puncture until the arterial reperfusion (MD 2.91 minutes, 95% CI -5.11 to 10.92; P = 0.48; I² = 48%; 5 studies, 498 participants; very low-certainty evidence). General anaesthesia may lead to no difference in neurological impairment up to 48 hours after the procedure (MD -0.29, 95% CI -1.18 to 0.59; P = 0.52; I² = 0%; 7 studies, 982 participants; low-certainty evidence), and in stroke-related mortality (risk ratio (RR) 0.98, 95% CI 0.52 to 1.84; P = 0.94; I² = 0%; 3 studies, 330 participants; low-certainty evidence), all intracranial haemorrhages (RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.65 to 1.29; P = 0.63; I² = 0%; 5 studies, 693 participants; low-certainty evidence) compared to non-general anaesthesia. General anaesthesia may improve adverse events (haemodynamic instability) compared to non-general anaesthesia (RR 0.21, 95% CI 0.05 to 0.79; P = 0.02; I² = 71%; 2 studies, 229 participants; low-certainty evidence). General anaesthesia improves target artery revascularisation compared to non-general anaesthesia (RR 1.10, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.18; P = 0.02; I² = 29%; 7 studies, 982 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). There were no available data for quality of life. General anaesthesia versus non-general anaesthesia (long-term) There is no difference in general anaesthesia compared to non-general anaesthesia for dichotomous and continuous functional outcomes (dichotomous: RR 1.21, 95% CI 0.93 to 1.58; P = 0.16; I² = 29%; 4 studies, 625 participants; low-certainty evidence; continuous: MD -0.14, 95% CI -0.34 to 0.06; P = 0.17; I² = 0%; 7 studies, 978 participants; low-certainty evidence). General anaesthesia showed no changes in stroke-related mortality compared to non-general anaesthesia (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.64 to 1.22; P = 0.44; I² = 12%; 6 studies, 843 participants; low-certainty evidence). There were no available data for neurological impairment, all intracranial haemorrhages, target artery revascularisation status, time to revascularisation from groin puncture until the arterial reperfusion, adverse events (haemodynamic instability), or quality of life. Ongoing studies We identified eight ongoing studies. Five studies compared general anaesthesia versus conscious sedation anaesthesia, one study compared general anaesthesia versus conscious sedation anaesthesia plus local anaesthesia, and two studies compared general anaesthesia versus local anaesthesia. Of these studies, seven plan to report data on functional outcomes using the modified Rankin Scale, five studies on neurological impairment, six studies on stroke-related mortality, two studies on all intracranial haemorrhage, five studies on target artery revascularisation status, four studies on time to revascularisation, and four studies on adverse events. One ongoing study plans to report data on quality of life. One study did not plan to report any outcome of interest for this review.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

In early outcomes, general anaesthesia improves target artery revascularisation compared to non-general anaesthesia with moderate-certainty evidence. General anaesthesia may improve adverse events (haemodynamic instability) compared to non-general anaesthesia with low-certainty evidence. We found no evidence of a difference in neurological impairment, stroke-related mortality, all intracranial haemorrhage and haemodynamic instability adverse events between groups with low-certainty evidence. We are uncertain whether general anaesthesia improves functional outcomes and time to revascularisation because the certainty of the evidence is very low. However, regarding long-term outcomes, general anaesthesia makes no difference to functional outcomes compared to non-general anaesthesia with low-certainty evidence. General anaesthesia did not change stroke-related mortality when compared to non-general anaesthesia with low-certainty evidence. There were no reported data for other outcomes. In view of the limited evidence of effect, more randomised controlled trials with a large number of participants and good protocol design with a low risk of bias should be performed to reduce our uncertainty and to aid decision-making in the choice of anaesthesia.

Challenges in the hemodynamic management of acute nontraumatic neurological injuries

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To appraise the evidence from the literature and suggest an integrated hemodynamic approach of early and delayed phases of acute ischemic stroke (AIS), subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) and intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH).

RECENT FINDINGS

In AIS, the research aims to evaluate the optimal pressure control before, during and after the revascularization, to optimize the perfusion in the ischemic areas, minimizing the risk of hemorrhage or secondary damage to already infarcted areas. In the early phase of SAH, systemic pressure should be controlled to balance the risk of stroke, hypertension-related rebleeding, and maintenance of cerebral perfusion pressure. The late phase aims to minimize the risk of cerebral vasospasm by adapting systemic pressure and volemia to cerebral and systemic physiological hemodynamic targets. In the mild-to-moderate ICH, achieving SAP of less than 140 mmHg and greater than 110 mmHg may be considered as a beneficial target. Caution should be considered in lowering intensively SAP in severe ICH.

SUMMARY

In nontraumatic brain injuries, the hemodynamic management is strictly related to fluctuating physiology of these diseases, needing a strict control of pressure and flow variable to ensure both cerebral and systemic homeostasis.

Periprocedural Management During Stroke Thrombectomy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Endovascular therapy (EVT) for acute ischemic stroke caused by large vessel occlusion is a powerful and evidence-based tool to achieve reperfusion and results in improved neurologic outcome. Focus has now shifted toward optimizing the procedure. We reviewed the relevant current literature on periprocedural stroke care such as pretreatment with IV tissue plasminogen activator (tPA), choice of anesthesia, ventilation strategy, and blood pressure management.

RECENT FINDINGS

IV tPA should not be withheld in a patients with stroke eligible for EVT. A meta-analysis of randomized trials on general anesthesia (GA) vs procedural sedation has shown better neurologic outcomes with protocol-based GA in centers with dedicated neuroanesthesia teams. There are no data from randomized trials on blood pressure control, but according to available evidence, systolic blood pressure should probably be held at >140 mm Hg during the procedure and <160 mm Hg after reperfusion. In ventilated patients, extreme deviations from normoxemia and normocapnia should be avoided.

SUMMARY

Periprocedural care influences the outcome after EVT for large vessel ischemic stroke. More evidence from prospective ongoing and future studies is urgently needed to identify its optimization.

Association between hyperpyrexia and poststroke outcomes in patients with recanalization after mechanical thrombectomy: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Limited data are available for evaluating the relationship between the prognosis and body temperature (BT) in patients treated with mechanical thrombectomy (MT), especially in those with successful recanalization. We aimed to explore the prognostic value of BT in predicting outcomes of stroke recovery at 3 months poststroke.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the relationship among BT levels as a continuous variable, with fever (BT ≥ 37.5℃) as a binary variable, and obtained several outcomes of interest. Subjects were stratified according to successful recanalization (thrombolysis in cerebral infarction scores of 2b-3) following MT. Functional independence was defined as a modified Rankin scale (mRS) score of 0-2.

RESULTS

In total, 258 patients were included. The proportion of patients with functional independence was significantly lower among patients with BT ≥ 37.5℃ than among those with BT < 37.5 °C (45.3 % versus 23.0 %; P < 0.001). In the multivariate analysis, hyperpyrexia (especially BT ≥ 38 °C) was significantly associated with poor 3-month outcomes in patients treated with MT. Subgroup analysis was conducted by comparing the successful recanalization group with the non-recanalization group, showing that BT ≥ 37.5 °C was associated with a significantly lower proportion of functional independence in the recanalized patients. Besides, the Kaplan-Meier model showed that the fever group had significantly lower survival rates than the non-fever group during the 3-month follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients treated with MT, hyperpyrexia is an independent predictor of poststroke outcomes at 3 months, particularly in those with successful recanalization.

Anesthesia modality does not affect clinical outcomes of intra-arterial vasodilator treatment in patients with symptomatic cerebral vasospasms

Background: Delayed cerebral ischemia and cerebral vasospasm remain the leading causes of poor outcome in survivors of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Refractory cerebral vasospasms can be treated with endovascular vasodilator therapy, which can either be performed in conscious sedation or general anesthesia. The aim of this study is to compare the effect of the anesthesia modality on long-term clinical outcomes in patients undergoing endovascular vasodilator therapy due to cerebral vasospasm and hypoperfusion.

Methods: Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores were retrospectively analyzed at time of discharge from the hospital and six months after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Additionally, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) was assessed 24 hours before, immediately before, immediately after, and 24 hours after endovascular vasodilator therapy, and at discharge and six months. Interventional parameters such as duration of intervention, choice and dosage of vasodilator and number of arteries treated were also recorded.

Results: A total of 98 patients were included in this analysis and separated into patients who had interventions in conscious sedation, general anesthesia and a mix of both. Neither mRS at discharge nor at six months showed a significant difference for functionally independent outcomes (mRS 0-2) between groups. NIHSS before endovascular vasodilator therapy was significantly higher in patients receiving interventions in general anesthesia but did not differ anymore between groups six months after the initial bleed.

Conclusion: This study did not observe a difference in outcome whether patients underwent endovascular vasodilator therapy in general anesthesia or conscious sedation for refractory cerebral vasospasms. Hence, the choice should be made for each patient individually.

Blood Pressure Thresholds and Neurologic Outcomes After Endovascular Therapy for Acute Ischemic Stroke: An Analysis of Individual Patient Data From 3 Randomized Clinical Trials

Importance

The optimal blood pressure targets during endovascular therapy (EVT) for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) are unknown.

Objective

To study whether procedural blood pressure parameters, including specific blood pressure thresholds, are associated with neurologic outcomes after EVT.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This retrospective cohort study included adults with anterior-circulation AIS who were enrolled in randomized clinical trials assessing anesthetic strategy for EVT between February 2014 and February 2017. The trials had comparable blood pressure protocols, and patients were followed up for 90 days. A total of 3630 patients were initially approached, and 3265 patients were excluded.

Exposure

Endovascular therapy.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary efficacy variable was functional outcome as defined by the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score at 90 days. Associations of blood pressure parameters and time less than and greater than mean arterial blood pressure (MABP) thresholds with outcome were analyzed.

Results

Of the 365 patients included in the analysis, the mean (SD) age was 71.4 (13.0) years, 163 were women (44.6%), and the median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score was 17 (interquartile range [IQR], 14-21). For the entire cohort, 182 (49.9%) received general anesthesia and 183 (50.1%) received procedural sedation. A cumulated period of minimum 10 minutes with less than 70 mm Hg MABP (adjusted OR, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.02-2.22) and a continuous episode of minimum 20 minutes with less than 70 mm Hg MABP (adjusted OR, 2.30; 95% CI, 1.11-4.75) were associated with a shift toward higher 90-day mRS scores, corresponding to a number needed to harm of 10 and 4, respectively. A cumulated period of minimum 45 minutes with greater than 90 mm Hg MABP (adjusted OR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.11-2.02) and a continuous episode of minimum 115 minutes with greater than 90 mm Hg MABP (adjusted OR, 1.89; 95% CI, 1.01-3.54) were associated with a shift toward higher 90-day mRS scores, corresponding to a number needed to harm of 10 and 6, respectively.

Conclusions and Relevance

Critical MABP thresholds and durations for poor outcome were found to be MABP less than 70 mm Hg for more than 10 minutes and MABP greater than 90 mm Hg for more than 45 minutes, both durations with a number needed to harm of 10 patients. Mean arterial blood pressure may be a modifiable therapeutic target to prevent or reduce poor functional outcome after EVT.

Acute ischemic stroke & emergency mechanical thrombectomy: The effect of type of anesthesia on early outcome

BACKGROUND

Endovascular mechanical thrombectomy (EMT) is the standard of care for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) caused by proximal large vessel occlusions. There is conflicting evidence on outcome of patients undergoing EMT under procedural sedation (PS) or general anesthesia (GA). In this retrospective study we analyze the effect of GA and PS on the functional outcome of patients undergoing EMT.

METHODS

Patients who have been admitted at our institute AIS and were treated with EMT under GA or PS between January 2015 and September 2018 were included in the study. Primary end point was the proportion of patients with good functional outcome as defined by a modified Rankin score (mRS) 0-2 at discharge.

RESULTS

A total of 155 patients were analyzed in this study including 45 (29.03 %) patients who received 97 GA, 110 (70.9 %) PS and 31 of these received Dexmedetomidine/Remifentanil. The median (IQR) 98 mRS at discharge was 4.0 (1.0-4.0) in the GA group Vs 3.00, (1.00-4.00) in the PS group. Among the secondary outcomes the lowest MAP recorded was significantly less in GA group (64.56 100 ± 18.70) compared to PS group (70.86 ± 16.30); p = 0.03. The PS group had a lower odd of mRS 3-5 (after adjustment), however, this finding was statistically not significant (OR 0.52 [0.07-3.5] 102 p = 0.5).

CONCLUSIONS

Our retrospective analysis did not find any influence of GA compared to PS whenever this was delivered by target controlled infusion (TCI) of propofol or by remifentanil/dexmedetomidine (REX) on early functional outcome.

Hypertensive Crisis in Acute Cerebrovascular Diseases Presenting at the Emergency Department: A Narrative Review

Hypertensive crisis, defined as an increase in systolic blood pressure >179 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure >109 mmHg, typically causes end-organ damage; the brain is an elective and early target, among others. The strong relationship between arterial hypertension and cerebrovascular diseases is supported by extensive evidence, with hypertension being the main modifiable risk factor for both ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke, especially when it is uncontrolled or rapidly increasing. However, despite the large amount of data on the preventive strategies and therapeutic measures that can be adopted, the management of high BP in patients with acute cerebrovascular diseases presenting at the emergency department is still an area of debate. Overall, the outcome of stroke patients with high blood pressure values basically depends on the occurrence of hypertensive emergency or hypertensive urgency, the treatment regimen adopted, the drug dosages and their timing, and certain stroke features. In this narrative review, we provide a timely update on the current treatment, debated issues, and future directions related to hypertensive crisis in patients referred to the emergency department because of an acute cerebrovascular event. This will also focus greater attention on the management of certain stroke-related, time-dependent interventions, such as intravenous thrombolysis and mechanic thrombectomy.

Hypertensive Crisis in Acute Cerebrovascular Diseases Presenting at the Emergency Department: A Narrative Review

Hypertensive crisis, defined as an increase in systolic blood pressure >179 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure >109 mmHg, typically causes end-organ damage; the brain is an elective and early target, among others. The strong relationship between arterial hypertension and cerebrovascular diseases is supported by extensive evidence, with hypertension being the main modifiable risk factor for both ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke, especially when it is uncontrolled or rapidly increasing. However, despite the large amount of data on the preventive strategies and therapeutic measures that can be adopted, the management of high BP in patients with acute cerebrovascular diseases presenting at the emergency department is still an area of debate. Overall, the outcome of stroke patients with high blood pressure values basically depends on the occurrence of hypertensive emergency or hypertensive urgency, the treatment regimen adopted, the drug dosages and their timing, and certain stroke features. In this narrative review, we provide a timely update on the current treatment, debated issues, and future directions related to hypertensive crisis in patients referred to the emergency department because of an acute cerebrovascular event. This will also focus greater attention on the management of certain stroke-related, time-dependent interventions, such as intravenous thrombolysis and mechanic thrombectomy.

Initial management of acute ischaemic stroke

The management of acute ischaemic stroke has been revolutionised by effective reperfusion therapies including thrombolysis and mechanical thrombectomy. In particular, mechanical thrombectomy has heralded a new era in stroke medicine. There have also been developments to improve clinical outcomes for patients who have had an acute ischaemic stroke but are not eligible for this procedure. This article presents an update on the initial management of acute ischaemic stroke, including reperfusion therapies, periprocedural considerations and ongoing research for potential improvements in the care of these patients.

Acute ischemic stroke management: concepts and controversies.A narrative review

INTRODUCTION

Amongst the 25.7 million survivors and 6.5 million deaths from stroke between 1990 and 2013, ischemic strokes accounted for approximately 70% and 50% of the cases, respectively. With patients still suffering from complications and stroke recurrence, more questions have been raised as to how we can better improve patient management.

AREAS COVERED

The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) were adopted to ensure a comprehensive inclusion of quality literature from various sources. PubMed and Embase were searched for evidence on thrombolysis, mechanical thrombectomy, artificial intelligence (AI), antiplatelet therapy, anticoagulation and hypertension management.

EXPERT OPINION

The directions of future research in these areas are dependent on the current level of validation. Endovascular therapy and applications of AI are relatively new compared to the other areas discussed in this review. As such, future studies need to focus on validating their efficacy. As for thrombolysis, antiplatelet and anticoagulation therapy, their efficacy has been well-established and future research efforts should be directed toward adjusting its use according to patient-specific factors, starting with factors with the most clinical relevance and prevalence.

Intraoperative management of thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke: Do we need general anesthesia?

Since 2015, endovascular thrombectomy has been established as the standard of care for re-establishing cerebral blood flow in patients with acute ischemic stroke. Several retrospective observational studies and prospective clinical trials have investigated two anesthetic techniques for endovascular stroke therapy: general anesthesia (GA) and conscious sedation (CS). The recent randomized studies suggest that GA is associated with higher rates of successful recanalization and better functional independence at 3 months compared with the CS technique. However, CS techniques are highly variable, and there is currently a lack of consensus on which anesthetic approach is best in all patients. Numerous patient and procedural factors should ultimately guide the decision of whether GA or CS should be used for a particular patient.

Anaesthesia and haemodynamic management of acute ischaemic stroke patients before, during and after endovascular therapy

Endovascular therapy (EVT) is now standard of care for eligible patients with acute ischaemic stroke caused by large vessel occlusion in the anterior circulation. EVT can be performed with general anaesthesia (GA) or with monitored anaesthesia care, involving local anaesthesia with or without conscious sedation (LA/CS). Controversies remain regarding the optimal choice of anaesthetic strategy and observational studies suggested poorer functional outcome and higher mortality in patients treated under GA, essentially because of its haemodynamic consequences and the delay to put patients under GA. However, these studies are limited by selection bias, the most severe patients being more likely to receive GA and recent randomised trials and meta-analysis showed that protocol-based GA compared with LA/CS is significantly associated with less disability at 3 months. Unlike for intravenous thrombolysis, few data exist to guide management of blood pressure (BP) before and during EVT, but arterial hypotension should be avoided as long as the occlusion persists. BP targets following EVT should probably be adapted to the degree of recanalisation and the extent of ischaemia. Lower BP levels may be warranted to prevent reperfusion injuries even if prospective haemodynamic management evaluations after EVT are lacking.

Management of Acute Ischemic Stroke-Specific Focus on Anesthetic Management for Mechanical Thrombectomy

Acute ischemic stroke is a neurological emergency with a high likelihood of morbidity, mortality, and long-term disability. Modern stroke care involves multidisciplinary management by neurologists, radiologists, neurosurgeons, and anesthesiologists. Current American Heart Association/American Stroke Association (AHA/ASA) guidelines recommend thrombolytic therapy with intravenous (IV) alteplase within the first 3-4.5 hours of initial stroke symptoms and endovascular mechanical thrombectomy within the first 16-24 hours depending on specific inclusion criteria. The anesthesia and critical care provider may become involved for airway management due to worsening neurologic status or to enable computerized tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanning, to facilitate mechanical thrombectomy, or to manage critical care of stroke patients. Existing data are unclear whether the mechanical thrombectomy procedure is best performed under general anesthesia or sedation. Retrospective cohort trials favor sedation over general anesthesia, but recent randomized controlled trials (RCT) neither suggest superiority nor inferiority of sedation over general anesthesia. Regardless of anesthesia type, a critical element of intraprocedural stroke care is tight blood pressure management. At different phases of stroke care, different blood pressure targets are recommended. This narrative review will focus on the anesthesia and critical care providers' roles in the management of both perioperative stroke and acute ischemic stroke with a focus on anesthetic management for mechanical thrombectomy.

Blood Pressure Management Following Large Vessel Occlusion Strokes: A Narrative Review

Stroke is one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Intravenous tissue plasminogen activator and mechanical thrombectomy comprise the two major treatments for acute ischemic stroke. Tissue plasminogen activator has been used for more than two decades and guidelines for hemodynamic management following tissue plasminogen activator administration are well established. However, mechanical thrombectomy is a relatively newer therapy and there is a paucity of evidence regarding hemodynamic management following large vessel occlusion strokes. The important tenets guiding the pathophysiology of large vessel occlusion strokes include understanding of cerebral autoregulation, collateral circulation, and blood pressure variability. In this narrative review, we discuss the current American Heart Association-American Stroke Association guidelines for the early management of acute ischemic stroke during different phases of the illness, encountered at different sections of a hospital including the emergency room, the neuro-interventional suite, and the intensive care unit. There is emerging evidence with regard to post-recanalization blood pressure management following large vessel occlusion strokes. Future research directions will include rea-ltime blood pressure variability assessments, identifying the extent of impaired autoregulation, and providing guidelines related to range and personalized blood pressure trajectories for patients following large vessel occlusion strokes.

Choice of ANaesthesia for EndoVAScular treatment of acute ischaemic stroke at posterior circulation (CANVAS II): protocol for an exploratory randomised controlled study

INTRODUCTION

Observational and interventional studies indicate that the type of anaesthesia may be associated with the postprocedural neurological function in patients with anterior circulation acute ischaemic stroke undergoing endovascular treatment. Patients with acute posterior circulation ischaemic stroke may experience different physiological changes and result in severe neurological outcome. However, the effect of the type of anaesthesia on postprocedure neurological function remained unclear in this population.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This is an exploratory randomised controlled trial that will be carried out at Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University. Patients with acute posterior circulation ischaemic stroke and deemed suitable for emergency endovascular recanalisation will be recruited in this trial. Eighty-four patients will be randomised to receive either general anaesthesia or conscious sedation with 1:1 allocation ratio. The primary endpoint is the 90-day modified Rankin Scale.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The study has been reviewed by and approved by Ethics Committee of Beijing Tiantan Hospital of Capital Medical University (KY2017-074-02). If the results are positive, the study will indicate whether the type of anaesthesia affects neurological outcome after endovascular treatment of posterior stroke. The findings of the study will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at national or international conferences.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT03317535.

Physiologic predictors of collateral circulation and infarct growth during anesthesia - Detailed analyses of the GOLIATH trial

Collateral circulation plays a pivotal role in acute ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion (LVO) and may be affected by multiple variables during sedation for endovascular therapy (EVT). We conducted detailed analyses of the GOLIATH trial to identify predictors of collateral circulation grade and infarct growth. We also modified the ASITN collateral grading scale and sought to determine its impact on clinical outcome and infarct growth. Multivariable analysis was used to identify predictors of collaterals and infarct growth. Ordinal analysis demonstrated nominal, but non-significant association between modified ASITN scale and infarct growth. Among all analyzed baseline clinical and procedural variables, the most significant predictors of infarct growth at 24 h were phenylephrine dose (estimate 6.78; p = 0.014) and baseline infarct volume (estimate 0.93; p = 0.03). The most significant predictors of worse collateral grade were mean arterial pressure (MAP) <70 mmHg (OR 0.35; p = 0.048) and baseline infarct volume (OR 0.96; p = 0.003). Hypotension during sedation for EVT for LVO negatively impacts collateral circulation, while higher pressor dose is a strong predictor of infarct growth. Avoidance of anesthesia-induced hypotension and consequent need for pressor therapy may prevent collateral failure and minimize infarct growth.

Single mean arterial blood pressure drops during stroke thrombectomy under general anaesthesia are associated with poor outcome

Background

We examined the influence of periprocedural blood pressure (BP), especially critical BP drops, on 3-month functional outcome in stroke patients undergoing mechanical thrombectomy (MT) under general anaesthesia (GA).

Methods

We screened all patients with anterior circulation large vessel occlusion receiving MT under GA at our centre from January 2011 to June 2016 and selected those who had continuous invasive periinterventional BP monitoring. Clinical and radiological data were prospectively collected as part of an ongoing cohort study, monitoring data were extracted from electronic anaesthesia records. We used uni- and multivariable regression to investigate the association of BP values with unfavourable outcome, defined as modified Rankin Scale scores 3–6 3 months post-stroke.

Results

115 patients were included in this study (mean age 65.3 ± 13.0 years, 55.7% male). Periinterventional systolic, diastolic, and mean arterial BP (MAP) values averaged across MT had no effect on outcome. However, single BP drops were related to unfavourable outcome, with absolute MAP drops showing the highest association compared to both systolic and relative BP drops (with reference to pre-interventional values). The BP value with the strongest association with unfavourable outcome was identified as an MAP ever < 60 mmHg (p = 0.01) with a pronounced effect in patients with poor collaterals. An MAP < 60 mmHg remained independently associated with poor functional outcome in multivariable analysis (p < 0.01).

Conclusions

For patients undergoing MT under GA, single MAP drops < 60 mmHg are independently related to unfavourable 3-month outcome. Therefore, every effort should be made to prevent periinterventional hypotensive episodes, especially below this threshold.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s00415-020-09701-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Anesthesia practice for endovascular therapy of acute ischemic stroke in Europe

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Anesthetic assistance is often required during endovascular therapy (EVT) of large vessel occlusion in patients with acute ischemic stroke. It is currently debated whether EVT should be performed under general anesthesia or conscious sedation. This review will summarize the recent literature with emphasis on the influence of anesthesia method on neurological outcome.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent randomized trials have reported no difference in outcome after EVT performed under either conscious sedation or general anesthesia. This is in contrast to a substantial number of retrospective studies, which found that EVT performed under general anesthesia was associated with a worse neurologic outcome compared with conscious sedation. Anesthetic drugs affect vessel tone and the level of blood pressure may influence outcome. The most favorable choice of anesthetic agents and ventilatory strategy is still debated.

SUMMARY

The optimal anesthetic practice for EVT remains to be identified. Currently, conscious sedation is often an easy first-line strategy, but general anesthesia can be considered an equal and safe alternative to conscious sedation when there is a carefully administered anesthetic that maintains strict hemodynamic control. Attention to ventilation is advocated. The presence of a specialized neuroanesthesiologist or otherwise dedicated anesthesia personnel is highly recommended.

Blood pressure characteristics in patients with acute basilar artery occlusion undergoing endovascular thrombectomy

Acute basilar artery occlusion (BAO) is a rare but potentially life-threatening neurological condition. While endovascular therapy (EVT) has been shown to improve outcome, there is limited knowledge about prognostic factors beyond early recanalization. We studied whether blood pressure (BP) exceeds or falls below suggested thresholds during intervention and whether these changes are associated with complications and outcome. BP measurements mostly with one-minute intervals were available in 39 patients. An individual systolic blood pressure (SBP) reference value was defined as the median of the first five intra-procedural measurements. Half of the patients (51.3%) received drugs for BP augmentation and two a BP lowering drug (5.1%). Thrombolysis in cerebral infarction grade 2b and 3 (TICI) was achieved in 29 (74.4%) and 23 patients (58.9%) had good outcome at three months. We observed a continuous intra-procedural increase of median SBP (+11%) and mean arterial pressure (MAP, +10%, both p < 0.001), and a unique temporal pattern of intermittent peaks and troughs. Successful recanalization was more common in patients whose intra-procedural duration with SBP under 140 mmHg was shorter (p = 0.009). Patients with isolated tip of basilar artery (TBA) occlusion had significantly more BP excursion of 20% below the reference SBP and required more frequent use of sympathomimetic drugs compared to vertebrobasilar occlusion (p = 0.008 and p = 0.041, respectively). Brain hemorrhage was more prevalent in patients who experienced SBP excursions at least 20% above the individual reference value (p = 0.038) and a longer duration of time spent with SBP above 180 mmHg (p = 0.029). Patients with higher pre-procedural mean SBP had a greater chance of a good outcome (p = 0.03). This study using high resolution BP monitoring suggests a relationship between intra-procedural BP characteristics and recanalization, hemorrhagic complications and outcome in patients receiving EVT for acute posterior circulation cerebrovascular syndromes. Differences with regard to BP regulation during recanalization therapy for vertebrobasilar and TBA occlusion deserves further attention.

[Periinterventional management of acute endovascular stroke treatment]

Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) is more effective than standard medical treatment with or without intravenous thrombolysis alone for treating acute ischemic stroke (AIS) caused by large vessel occlusion (LVO) in the anterior circulation. MT is therefore recommended in current international guidelines, and many acute-care hospitals and stroke centers will have to prepare for providing this treatment in an optimal way. Beside successful recanalization, management before, during, and after the intervention represents significant challenges. One unresolved matter is whether the choice of anesthetic strategy, including airway management, affects functional outcome. Based on current data, treatment under general anesthesia (GA)-respecting predefined safety criteria and contraindications-seem seems to be equivalent to treating the patient in conscious sedation (CS) and not necessarily disadvantageous. Aspects of periinterventional management of MT, including pragmatic recommendations concerning logistics, monitoring, postprocedural steps, and follow-up imaging, will be summarized in this overview.

Contrast Extravasation After Endovascular Treatment in Posterior Circulation Stroke

OBJECTIVE

Endovascular treatment (EVT) is a promising clinical technology. However, some patients with posterior circulation stroke might not experience neurological function recovery after EVT. We reviewed the recent experience with EVT to clarify the clinical and radiographic factors that contribute to optimal neurological outcomes.

METHODS

We analyzed the data from 108 consecutive patients with acute posterior circulation stroke who had undergone EVT from January 2016 to December 2018. A favorable outcome was defined as a modified Rankin scale score of 0-3 at 3 months. We evaluated the association and predictive value of the clinical and radiographic factors that contribute to good neurological outcomes.

RESULTS

Of the 108 included patients, 43 had a favorable clinical outcome at day 90. Univariate analysis revealed a significant association between the 90-day favorable outcome and the baseline values of systolic blood pressure, time of stroke onset, contrast extravasation, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, general anesthesia, Alberta stroke program early computed tomography score for the posterior circulation, and the National Institutes of Health stroke scale (NIHSS) score. Contrast extravasation (odds ratio [OR], 5.094; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.22-21.261), symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (OR, 11.24; 95% CI, 1.309-96.517), general anesthesia (OR, 5.094; 95% CI, 1.22-21.26), and baseline NIHSS score (OR, 1.087; 95% CI, 1.023-1.309) were found to be independent predictors of a favorable outcome at day 90. Contrast extravasation alone predicted for unfavorable clinical outcomes and mortality with high specificity.

CONCLUSION

In the present retrospective case series, contrast extravasation, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, the use of general anesthesia, and baseline NIHSS score were related to a favorable prognosis for patients with posterior circulation stroke after EVT. Contrast extravasation was an independent and strong predictor of unfavorable clinical outcomes.

Management of Blood Pressure During and After Recanalization Therapy for Acute Ischemic Stroke

Ischemic stroke is a common neurologic condition and can lead to significant long term disability and death. Observational studies have demonstrated worse outcomes in patients presenting with the extremes of blood pressure as well as with hemodynamic variability. Despite these associations, optimal hemodynamic management in the immediate period of ischemic stroke remains an unresolved issue, particularly in the modern era of revascularization therapies. While guidelines exist for BP thresholds during and after thrombolytic therapy, there is substantially less data to guide management during mechanical thrombectomy. Ideal blood pressure targets after attempted recanalization depend both on the degree of reperfusion achieved as well as the extent of infarction present. Following complete reperfusion, lower blood pressure targets may be warranted to prevent reperfusion injury and promote penumbra recovery however prospective clinical trials addressing this issue are warranted.

Anesthesia for stroke rescue

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To highlight the potential implications of recent advances in the management of large vessel occlusions for intraprocedural anesthetic management.

RECENT FINDINGS

Stroke remains the leading cause of disability in the United States and the second leading cause of death in the world. Several randomized control trials published within the past decade have helped to make endovascular thrombectomy the standard of care for all eligible patients. However, whether intraprocedural anesthesia care practices may significantly improve in-hospital and out-of-hospital morbidity and mortality outcomes are not clear.

SUMMARY

Management strategies that shorten the time to intervention and maintain blood pressure to preserve penumbral tissue may be beneficial. Future well powered studies are necessary to enable inferences on what type of anesthetic management is harmless, neurotoxic, or neural plasticity promoting.

Anesthetic management of endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke: Influences on outcome and complications

Background and objectives

The emerging use of endovascular therapies for acute ischemic stroke, like intra-arterial thrombectomy, compels a better understanding of the anesthetic management required and its impact in global outcomes. This article reviews the available data on the anesthetic management of endovascular treatment, comparing general anesthesia with conscious sedation, the most used modalities, in terms of anesthetic induction and procedure duration, patient mobility, occlusion location, hemodynamic parameters, outcome and safety; it also focuses on the state-of-the-art on physiologic and pharmacologic neuroprotection.

Contents

Most of the evidence on this topic is retrospective and contradictory, with only three small randomized studies to date. Conscious sedation was frequently associated with better outcomes, but the prospective evidence declared that it has no advantage over general anesthesia concerning that issue. Conscious sedation is at least as safe as general anesthesia for the endovascular treatment of acute ischemic stroke, with equivalent mortality and fewer complications like pneumonia, hypotension or extubation difficulties. It has, however, a higher frequency of patient agitation and movement, which is the main cause for conversion to general anesthesia.

Conclusions

General anesthesia and conscious sedation are both safe alternatives for anesthetic management of patients submitted to endovascular thrombectomy. No anesthetic management is universally recommended and hopefully the ongoing randomized clinical trials will shed some light on the best approach; meanwhile, the choice of anesthesia should be based on the patient's individual characteristics. Regarding neuroprotection, hemodynamic stability is currently the most important strategy, as no pharmacological method has been proven effective in humans.

[Anesthetic management of endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke: Influences on outcome and complications]

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The emerging use of endovascular therapies for acute ischemic stroke, like intra-arterial thrombectomy, compels a better understanding of the anesthetic management required and its impact in global outcomes. This article reviews the available data on the anesthetic management of endovascular treatment, comparing general anesthesia with conscious sedation, the most used modalities, in terms of anesthetic induction and procedure duration, patient mobility, occlusion location, hemodynamic parameters, outcome and safety; it also focuses on the state-of-the-art on physiologic and pharmacologic neuroprotection.

CONTENTS

Most of the evidence on this topic is retrospective and contradictory, with only three small randomized studies to date. Conscious sedation was frequently associated with better outcomes, but the prospective evidence declared that it has no advantage over general anesthesia concerning that issue. Conscious sedation is at least as safe as general anesthesia for the endovascular treatment of acute ischemic stroke, with equivalent mortality and fewer complications like pneumonia, hypotension or extubation difficulties. It has, however, a higher frequency of patient agitation and movement, which is the main cause for conversion to general anesthesia.

CONCLUSIONS

General anesthesia and conscious sedation are both safe alternatives for anesthetic management of patients submitted to endovascular thrombectomy. No anesthetic management is universally recommended and hopefully the ongoing randomized clinical trials will shed some light on the best approach; meanwhile, the choice of anesthesia should be based on the patient's individual characteristics. Regarding neuroprotection, hemodynamic stability is currently the most important strategy, as no pharmacological method has been proven effective in humans.

Impact of Anesthetic Management on Safety and Outcomes Following Mechanical Thrombectomy for Ischemic Stroke in SWIFT PRIME Cohort

Background and purpose: The optimal anesthetic management of acute ischemic stroke patients during mechanical thrombectomy (MT) remains controversial. In this post-hoc analysis, we investigated the impact of anesthesia type on clinical outcomes in patients included in SWIFT PRIME trial.

Methods: Ninety-seven patients treated with MT were included. Patients treated in centers with general anesthesia (GA) policy (n = 32) were compared with those treated in centers with conscious sedation (CS) policy (n = 65). Primary outcomes studied included times to treatment initiation (TTI), rates of successful recanalization (TICI 2b/3), and functional independence (mRS 0–2 at 90 days). Secondary outcomes were adverse events, lowest systolic and diastolic blood pressures (LSBP and LDBP) during MT. Univariate analysis and multivariate regression logistic modeling were conducted.

Results: The GA-policy and CS-policy groups presented comparable TTI (94 ± 36 min vs. 102 ± 48 min; p = 0.44), rates of TICI 2b/3 recanalization (22/32 [68.8%] vs. 51/65 [78.5%]; p = 0.32). CS-policy was associated to higher rate of functional independence than GA-policy, but the difference was not significant (43/65 [66.2%] vs. 16/32 [50.0%]; p = 0.18). GA-policy patients had a higher rate of postoperative pneumonia (11/32 [34.4%] vs. 8/65 [12.3%]; p = 0.02) and lower LSBP (110 [30,160] mmHg vs. 119 [77,170] mmHg; p = 0.03) and LDBP (55 (15,75) mmHg vs. 67 [40,121]; p < 0.001). When corrected for differences in baseline characteristics, GA-policy was associated with lower rate of functional independence (OR 0.32; p = 0.05). A 10-point increase in perprocedural LDBP was associated with an increased likelihood of favorable outcome (OR 1.51; p = 0.01).

Conclusions: GA-policy for MT presented comparable TTI and rates of successful revascularization to CS-policy. However, GA-policy was associated with lower rates of functional independence and with higher incidence of perprocedural hypotension and postoperative pneumonia.

Clinical Trial Registration: URL—http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01657461

Update in the Early Management and Reperfusion Strategies of Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke

Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) remains a leading cause of death and long-term disability. The paradigms on prehospital care, reperfusion therapies, and postreperfusion management of patients with AIS continue to evolve. After the publication of pivotal clinical trials, endovascular thrombectomy has become part of the standard of care in selected cases of AIS since 2015. New stroke guidelines have been recently published, and the time window for mechanical thrombectomy has now been extended up to 24 hours. This review aims to provide a focused up-to-date review for the early management of adult patients with AIS and introduce the new upcoming areas of ongoing research.

Techniques for endovascular treatment of acute ischemic stroke

Early recanalization of occluded vessels in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) by either intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) or endovascular revascularization has been shown to be associated with improved clinical outcomes and reduced mortality. Since the initial report regarding endovascular treatment (EVT) of AIS in 1983, endovascular techniques have been tremendously improved, advancing from intra-arterial administration of thrombolytic drugs to stent retrievers. IVT has been evaluated in several large randomized trials and has been shown to improve clinical outcomes at 90 days if treatment was initiated within 3h of stroke onset, while its benefit at 3-4.5h was subsequently demonstrated in the European Cooperative Acute Stroke Study (ECASS) III. Thus, EVT had to be evaluated against IVT. The first randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were published in 2013, and demonstrated no major differences between IVT and EVT for AIS, although these trials had important limitations. The positive results of the Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke (MR CLEAN) in the Netherlands, followed by five other positive RCTs, finally established the efficacy of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) with stent retrievers (also called 'stentrievers') in AIS due to large vessel occlusion within 6h of stroke onset. Currently, the European and US guidelines recommend MT with stent retrievers as a first-line treatment in the management of AIS. The recent publication of the DWI or CTP Assessment with Clinical Mismatch in the Triage of Wake-Up and Late-Presenting Strokes Undergoing Neurointervention (DAWN) trial is expected to lead to extension of the time window for patients carefully selected by imaging. Thus, optimizing the selection of patients as well as the EVT procedures and techniques used is still an important goal to be evaluated in further trials.

Mechanical thrombectomy in acute stroke - Five years of experience in Poland

OBJECTIVES

Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) is not reimbursed by the Polish public health system. We present a description of 5 years of experience with MT in acute stroke in Comprehensive Stroke Centers (CSCs) in Poland.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We retrospectively analyzed the results of a structured questionnaire from 23 out of 25 identified CSCs and 22 data sets that include 61 clinical, radiological and outcome measures.

RESULTS

Most of the CSCs (74%) were founded at University Hospitals and most (65.2%) work round the clock. In 78.3% of them, the working teams are composed of neurologists and neuro-radiologists. All CSCs perform CT and angio-CT before MT. In total 586 patients were subjected to MT and data from 531 of them were analyzed. Mean time laps from stroke onset to groin puncture was 250±99min. 90.3% of the studied patients had MT within 6h from stroke onset; 59.3% of them were treated with IV rt-PA prior to MT; 15.1% had IA rt-PA during MT and 4.7% - emergent stenting of a large vessel. M1 of MCA was occluded in 47.8% of cases. The Solitaire device was used in 53% of cases. Successful recanalization (TICI2b-TICI3) was achieved in 64.6% of cases and 53.4% of patients did not experience hemorrhagic transformation. Clinical improvement on discharge was noticed in 53.7% of cases, futile recanalization - in 30.7%, mRS of 0-2 - in 31.4% and mRS of 6 in 22% of cases.

CONCLUSION

Our results can help harmonize standards for MT in Poland according to international guidelines.

Anaesthesia practices for endovascular therapy of acute ischaemic stroke: a Nordic survey

BACKGROUND

The optimal method of anaesthesia for endovascular therapy (EVT) in acute ischaemic stroke (AIS) has not been identified. Nordic departments of anaesthesiology may handle EVT cases for AIS differently. The aim of this survey was to describe the current practice patterns of Nordic anaesthesia departments in anaesthetic management of EVT in AIS.

METHODS

A survey consisting of 13 questions was sent to one qualified individual at all Nordic departments of anaesthesiology who manage anaesthesia for EVT interventions. The individual completed the questionnaire on behalf of their department.

RESULTS

Response rate was 100%. The majority of departments (84%) managed all EVT cases at their respective centres. Most departments have institutional guidelines on anaesthetic management (84%) including blood pressure management (63%) and were able to provide a 24-h immediate response to an EVT request (63%). Conscious sedation was favoured by 68% of the departments using a variety of sedation protocols. Propofol and remifentanil was preferred for GA (58%). Emergent conversion to GA due to uncontrolled patient movements or loss of airway was experienced by 82% and 35% of the departments, respectively. Majority of the departments (89%) responded that non-specialist anaesthetists occasionally handle EVT cases.

CONCLUSIONS

This survey indicates that the majority of Nordic anaesthesia departments who manage anaesthesia for EVT are able to provide immediate 24-h response to an EVT request. Most of these departments have institutional guidelines for EVT anaesthesia and haemodynamic management. Conscious sedation appears to be the preferred method of anaesthetic care.

Impact of Anesthesia on the Outcome of Acute Ischemic Stroke after Endovascular Treatment with the Solitaire Stent Retriever

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

General anesthesia during endovascular treatment of acute ischemic stroke may have an adverse effect on outcome compared with conscious sedation. The aim of this study was to examine the impact of the type of anesthesia on the outcome of patients with acute ischemic stroke treated with the Solitaire stent retriever, accounting for confounding factors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Four-hundred one patients with consecutive acute anterior circulation stroke treated with a Solitaire stent retriever were included in this prospective analysis. Outcome was assessed after 3 months by the modified Rankin Scale.

RESULTS

One-hundred thirty-five patients (31%) underwent endovascular treatment with conscious sedation, and 266 patients (69%), with general anesthesia. Patients under general anesthesia had higher NIHSS scores on admission (17 versus 13, P < .001) and more internal carotid artery occlusions (44.6% versus 14.8%, P < .001) than patients under conscious sedation. Other baseline characteristics such as time from symptom onset to the start of endovascular treatment did not differ. Favorable outcome (mRS 0-2) was more frequent with conscious sedation (47.4% versus 32%; OR, 0.773; 95% CI, 0.646-0.925; P = .002) in univariable but not multivariable logistic regression analysis (P = .629). Mortality did not differ (P = .077). Independent predictors of outcome were age (OR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.933-0.969; P < .001), NIHSS score (OR, 0.894; 95% CI, 0.855-0.933; P < .001), time from symptom onset to the start of endovascular treatment (OR, 0.998; 95% CI, 0.996-0.999; P = .011), diabetes mellitus (OR, 0.544; 95% CI, 0.305-0.927; P = .04), and symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (OR, 0.109; 95% CI, 0.028-0.428; P = .002).

CONCLUSIONS

In this single-center study, the anesthetic management during stent retriever thrombectomy with general anesthesia or conscious sedation had no impact on the outcome of patients with large-vessel occlusion in the anterior circulation.

Choice of ANesthesia for EndoVAScular Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke: Protocol for a randomized controlled (CANVAS) trial

Background

Observational studies indicate that the type of anesthesia, local or general, may be associated with the post-procedural neurological function in patients with acute ischemic stroke undergoing endovascular treatment. However, these results need further confirmation, and the causal relationship has not yet been established.

Methods

This is a randomized controlled equivalence trial. Permuted block randomization stratified by culprit vessels will be used. Six hundred and forty patients with acute ischemic stroke undergoing endovascular recanalization will be randomized one to one to receive either general anesthesia or local anesthesia. The primary endpoint is the modified Rankin scale at 90 days after endovascular treatment. The secondary endpoints are the peri-procedural mortality and morbidity.

Discussion

The study aims to determine the effects of anesthetic choice on neurological outcomes in patients with acute ischemic stroke undergoing intra-arterial recanalization. If the results are positive, the study will indicate that the type of anesthesia does not affect neurological outcome after endovascular treatment. Trial registration: ClinicalTrial.gov identifier: NCT02677415

A decrease in blood pressure is associated with unfavorable outcome in patients undergoing thrombectomy under general anesthesia

BACKGROUND

Up to two-thirds of patients are either dependent or dead 3 months after thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Loss of cerebral autoregulation may render patients with AIS vulnerable to decreases in mean arterial pressure (MAP).

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether a fall in MAP during intervention under general anesthesia (GA) affects functional outcome.

METHODS

This subgroup analysis included patients from the MR CLEAN trial treated with thrombectomy under GA. The investigated variables were the difference between MAP at baseline and average MAP during GA (ΔMAP) as well as the difference between baseline MAP and the lowest MAP during GA (ΔLMAP). Their association with a shift towards better outcome on the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) after 90 days was determined using ordinal logistic regression with adjustment for prognostic baseline variables.

RESULTS

Sixty of the 85 patients treated under GA in MR CLEAN had sufficient anesthetic information available for the analysis. A greater ΔMAP was associated with worse outcome (adjusted common OR (acOR) 0.95 per point mm Hg, 95% CI 0.92 to 0.99). An average MAP during GA 10 mm Hg lower than baseline MAP constituted a 1.67 times lower odds of a shift towards good outcome on the mRS. For ΔLMAP this association was not significant (acOR 0.97 per mm Hg, 95% CI 0.94 to 1.00, p=0.09).

CONCLUSIONS

A decrease in MAP during intervention under GA compared with baseline is associated with worse outcome.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NTR1804; ISRCTN10888758; post-results.