Plaque Components in Symptomatic Moderately Stenosed Carotid Arteries Related to Cerebral Infarcts

The Clinical Contribution of Neurovascular Ultrasonography in Acute Ischemic Stroke

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Patients with acute ischemic stroke receive computed tomography angiogram (CTA) and digital subtraction angiogram (DSA) for clinical evaluation. Current guidelines lack in defining indications for transcranial Doppler (TCD) and/or carotid duplex ultrasonography (CUS) in acute stroke evaluation or follow-up cerebrovascular imaging after reperfusion. We investigated the clinical utility of performing additional TCD/CUS after reperfusion in guiding postacute care stroke management.

METHODS

Retrospective review of acute ischemic stroke patients admitted to a comprehensive stroke center with CTA head and neck and/or DSA followed by TCD/CUS. Cases were reviewed by two authors to determine if TCD/CUS provided additional diagnostic information to aid management. A nominal group process, using a third author, achieved consensus in cases of disagreements.

RESULTS

Only 25 of 198 patients had CTA or DSA followed by TCD/CUS. Ten (40%) cases showed new clinical information from CUS aiding management. Of those with TCD, 5 patients (22.7%) had findings that impacted management. These clinical scenarios included detection of mobile thrombus requiring anticoagulation; distinguishing carotid near-occlusion from occlusion; confirming hemodynamic significance of intra/extracranial stenosis helping emergent stenting/endarterectomy; detecting hyperperfusion on TCDs causing symptoms; and establishing chronicity of carotid stenosis based on collateral flow patterns, which deferred further intervention.

DISCUSSION

Our experience shows that TCD/CUS may offer additional diagnostic information assisting postacute care management in small subset of patients with acute ischemic stroke. Larger studies are needed to research the clinical impact and cost-effectiveness of additional imaging and inform clinical guidelines for selecting patients who will benefit from these additional studies.

Dynamic change of carotid intraplaque hemorrhage volume in subjects with mild carotid stenosis

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Early detection of intraplaque hemorrhage (IPH) in the carotid artery is important as it is correlated with an increased risk of cerebral ischemic events. We examined changes in IPH with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) over an extended follow-up period in patients with mild carotid stenosis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From November 2013 to November 2015, we retrospectively reviewed cerebral MRI of 2036 patients, including magnetization-prepared rapid acquisition with gradient-echo (MPRAGE) sequences obtained with a 3.0 T (T) MRI unit. An experienced neuroradiologist reviewed all studies and found 38 patients with carotid IPH and carotid stenosis that were categorized as mild (<30%), according to the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) criteria. Twenty-five patients agreed to join this study and signed informed consent for (MPRAGE) sequence imaging. We used semi-automated software to measure IPH volume on both the initial and follow up scans.

RESULTS

The median follow-up time of patients with mild carotid stenosis and IPH was 33.3 months. IPH volume increased in 10 of 27 carotid arteries (37.0%), with a mean volume increase of 42.6 ± 44.0 mm³. IPH volume decreased in 17 of 27 carotid arteries (63%), with a mean volume decrease of 17.2 ± 22.8 mm³. Two patients without IPH at baseline showed IPH development on follow-up imaging. There were no significant differences in patient demographics between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Carotid IPH volume in subjects with mild carotid stenosis can change over time and may not be correlated with any typical patient demographics.

Carotid stenting with proximal cerebral protection in symptomatic low-grade vulnerable recurrent carotid stenosis

Background

Although the management of carotid disease is well established for symptomatic lesions ⩾70%, carotid revascularization for symptomatic low-grade (⩽50%) stenosis is not actually supported by data from randomized clinical trials. Such patients may occasionally have recurrent neurological symptoms despite optimal medical treatment owing to vulnerable plaques. In such cases, carotid artery stenting (CAS) may represent an option for treatment but this has not been tested in clinical trials. This study analyzed early and long-term outcomes of CAS performed in patients with low-grade symptomatic recurrent carotid stenosis.

Methods

From a prospective registry of 322 carotid revascularization in symptomatic patients, 21 consecutive patients with low-grade symptomatic recurrent carotid stenosis who underwent CAS with proximal cerebral protection device Mo.Ma, after ruling out any other source of cerebral embolization, were involved in the study.All patients had suggestive evidence of unstable plaque or plaque ulceration.

Results

Procedural technical success rate was 100%. No 30-day stroke or death occurred, and no patients had recurrent neurological events related to the revascularized hemisphere during follow up. No 30-day local complications were reported. No late carotid occlusions were detected. There was one late death, and no stroke-related deaths. Survival rates were 100% at 1 year and 96% at 3 years.

Conclusions

This study shows that CAS is a well-tolerated, effective and durable treatment for patients with recurrent symptomatic low-grade carotid stenosis associated with a vulnerable plaque. Patients had excellent protection against further ischemic events and survived long enough.

Pathological Quantification of Carotid Artery Plaque Instability in Patients Undergoing Carotid Endarterectomy

BACKGROUND

Unstable atherosclerotic carotid plaques cause cerebral thromboemboli and ischemic events. However, this instability has not been pathologically quantified, so we sought to quantify it in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy (CEA).Methods and Results:Carotid plaques were collected during CEA from 67 symptomatic and 15 asymptomatic patients between May 2015 and August 2016. The specimens were stained with hematoxylin-eosin and elastica-Masson. Immunohistochemistry was performed using an endothelial-specific antibody to CD31, CD34 and PDGFRβ. The histopathological characteristics of the plaques were studied. By multiple-variable logistic regression analysis, plaque instability correlated with the presence of plaque rupture [odds ratio (OR), 9.75; P=0.013], minimum fibrous cap thickness (OR per 10 μm 0.70; P=0.025), presence of microcalcifications in the fibrous cap (OR 7.82; P=0.022) and intraplaque microvessels (OR 1.91; P=0.043). Receiver-operating characteristics analyses showed that these factors combined into a single score diagnosed symptomatic carotid plaques in patients with carotid artery stenosis with a high level of accuracy (area under the curve 0.92; 95% confidence interval 0.85-0.99 vs. asymptomatic).

CONCLUSIONS

This analysis of carotid plaque instability strongly suggested that the diagnostic scoring of carotid plaque instability improves the understanding and treatment of carotid artery disease in patients undergoing CEA.

Etiologic classification of ischemic stroke: Where do we stand?

Despite major technological advances in ischemic stroke diagnostic techniques, our current understanding of stroke mechanisms and etiology continues to remain unclear in a significant percent of patients. As a result, several etiological ischemic stroke classifications have emerged during the last two decades but their reliability and validity is far from perfect and further world-wide research is needed in order to achieve the so much needed "standard reference language". An ideal ischemic stroke classification should both comprise all underlying pathologies that could potentially concur to an index event and emphasize the most likely etiological and pathophysiological mechanism. Currently available approaches to ischemic stroke classification are either phenotypic or causative in nature, a multitude of criteria being published by different authors. Phenotypic classifications are targeted towards describing the concurring underlying pathologies, without highlighting the most probable ischemic stroke etiology, while causative classifications focus on establishing the most likely cause, neglecting other associated diseases. A judicious use of this two different concepts might improve clinical research as well as daily clinical practice.