Response to Letter Regarding Article, "Outcome Following Decompressive Hemicraniectomy for Malignant Cerebral Infarction: Ethical Considerations"

Attitudes of Nurses Toward Disability and Treatment in Space-Occupying Middle Cerebral Artery Stroke

BACKGROUND

Attitudes toward the degree of acceptable disability and the importance of aphasia are critical in deciding on decompressive hemicraniectomy (DHC) in space-occupying middle cerebral artery stroke (SOS). The attitudes of nurses deserve strong attention, because of their close interaction with patients during acute stroke treatment.

METHODS

This is a multicenter survey among 627 nurses from 132 hospitals in Germany. Questions address the acceptance of disability, importance of aphasia, and the preferred treatment in the hypothetical case of SOS.

RESULTS

Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores of 1 and 2 were considered acceptable by the majority of all respondents (89.7%). A mRS of 3, 4, and 5 was considered acceptable by 60.0, 15.5, and 1.6%, respectively. DHC was indicated as the treatment of choice in 31.4%. Every third participant considered the presence of aphasia important for treatment decision (33.3%). Older respondents more often refrained from DHC, irrespective of the presence of aphasia (dominant hemisphere p = 0.001, non-dominant hemisphere p = 0.004). Differences regarding acceptable disability and treatment decision were dependent on age, sex, and having relatives with stroke.

CONCLUSION

Most German nurses indicate moderately severe disability after SOS not to be acceptable, without emphasizing the presence of aphasia. The results call for greater scientific efforts in order to find reliable predictors for outcome after SOS.

Hemicraniectomy for Malignant Middle Cerebral Artery Syndrome: A Review of Functional Outcomes in Two High-Volume Stroke Centers

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Despite recent landmark randomized controlled trials showing significant benefits for hemicraniectomy (HCT) compared with medical therapy (MT) in patients with malignant middle cerebral artery infarction (MMCAI), HCT rates have not substantially increased in the United States. We sought to evaluate early outcomes in patients with MMCAI who were treated with HCT (cases) in comparison to patients treated with MT due to the perception of procedural futility by families (controls).

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated consecutive patients with acute MMCAI treated in 2 tertiary care centers during a 7-year period. Pretreatment National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) and modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 3 months were documented. Functional independence (FI) and survival without severe disability (SWSD) were defined as mRS of 0-2 and 0-4, respectively.

RESULTS

A total of 66 patients (37 cases and 29 controls) fulfilled the study inclusion criteria (mean age 59 ± 15 years, 52% men, median admission NIHSS score: 19 points [interquartile range {IQR}: 16-22]). Cases were younger (51 ± 11 versus 68 ± 13 years; P < .001) and tended to have lower median admission NIHSS than controls (18 [IQR:16-20] versus 20 [IQR:18-23]; P = .072). The rates of FI and SWSD at 3 months were higher in cases than controls (16% versus 0% [P = .031] and 62% versus 0% [P < .001]), while 3-month mortality was lower (24% versus 77%; P < .001). Multivariable Cox regression analyses adjusting for potential confounders identified HCT as the most important predictor of lower risk of 3-month mortality (hazard ratio: .02, 95% confidence interval: .01-0.10; P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

HCT is a critical and effective therapy for patients with MMCAI but cannot provide a guarantee of functional recovery.

Attitudes of Patients and Relatives Toward Disability and Treatment in Malignant MCA Infarction

BACKGROUND

Attitudes among patients and relatives toward the degree of acceptable disability and the importance of aphasia are critical in deciding on decompressive hemicraniectomy (DHC) in malignant middle cerebral artery infarction (MMI). However, most MMI patients are not able to communicate their will. Furthermore, attitudes of healthy individuals and relatives may not correspond to those of stroke patients.

METHODS

This is a multicenter survey among 355 patients and 199 relatives during treatment for acute minor or moderate severe ischemic stroke in Germany. Questions address the acceptance of disability, importance of aphasia, and the preferred treatment in the hypothetical case of future MMI.

RESULTS

mRS scores of 2 or better were considered acceptable by the majority of all respondents (72.9-88.1%). A mRS of 3, 4, and 5 was considered acceptable by 56.0, 24.5, and 6.8%, respectively. Except for a mRS of 1, relatives indicated each grade of disability significantly more often acceptable than patients. Differences regarding acceptable disability and treatment decision were depending on family status, housing situation, need of care, and disability. The presence of aphasia was considered important for treatment decision by both patients (46.5%) and relatives (39.2%). Older respondents more often refrained from DHC (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

In Germany, there is substantial heterogeneity in patients and relatives regarding acceptable disability, aphasia, and treatment decision in the hypothetical case of MMI. Relatives significantly overestimate the degree of disability that is acceptable to stroke patients. Further studies are warranted to determine whether differences in attitudes impact on the decision to undergo DHC.