Association Between Adherence to Quality Indicators and 7-Day In-Hospital Mortality After Acute Ischemic Stroke

Correlation of Quality Metrics of Acute Stroke Care with Clinical Outcomes in an Indian Tertiary-care University Hospital: A Prospective Evidence-based Study

Aim

To characterize the impact of adherence to quality metrics of stroke care on the clinical outcomes of ischemic stroke (IS) and intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) admissions.

Methods

Consecutive patients with acute stroke were prospectively followed up for their demographic and clinical characteristics, acute stroke management, and associated clinical outcomes at discharge. Stroke quality metrics [adopted from the American Heart Association (AHA)/American Stroke Association's Get with The Guidelines (GWTG)] with a specific interest in an association between acute reperfusion therapies and functional recovery in stroke patients are analyzed and presented. A composite measure of care was considered "0 (non-adherence) to 1 (adherence)." An all-or-none measure of care was calculated to check whether eligible patients received all the quality-of-care interventions. Multivariate Cox regression models were used to study an association between optimal adherence and clinical outcomes.

Results

During the study period, of the total 256 stroke admissions, 200 (78.1%) patients had IS, and the remaining 56 (21.9%) patients had ICH. The median [interquartile range (IQR)] age of total stroke admissions was 57 (36-78) years. Male preponderance was observed (IS: 80% and ICH: 67.9%). The conformity of performance metrics in IS patients was from 69.1% [95% confidence interval (CI), 68.5-69.6] for the use of deep vein thrombosis prophylaxis (DVTp) to 97.8% (95% CI, 96.2-98.6) for the use of statins. In ICH patients, it ranged from 61.7% (95% CI, 60.4-62.5) for the use of DVTp to 89.9% (95% CI, 88.6-89.7) for stroke rehabilitation. The unadjusted odds ratio (OR) of mortality (in-hospital plus the 28th-day postdischarge) was higher in ICH patients vs IS patients (4.42, p = 0.005). Optimal adherence with intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (IV-rtPA) therapy [hazards ratio (HR) = 0.23], in-hospital acute measures [IS (HR = 0.41) and ICH (HR = 0.63)], and discharge measures [IS (HR = 0.35) and ICH (HR = 0.45)] were associated with reduced hazards of the 28th-day mortality in both cohorts. Compared to ICH, IS patients had significantly improved neurofunctional recovery [modified Rankin score (mRS) ≤ 2, p < 0.01].

Conclusion

Adherence to quality metrics and performance measures was associated with low mortality and favorable clinical outcomes. Also, DVTp as an in-hospital (acute) measure of stroke care needs attention in both cerebrovascular events.

How to cite this article

Panda BK, Suryawanshi VR, Attarde G, Borkar N, Iyer S, Shah J. Correlation of Quality Metrics of Acute Stroke Care with Clinical Outcomes in an Indian Tertiary-care University Hospital: A Prospective Evidence-based Study. Indian J Crit Care Med 2023;27(11):806-815.

Identifying Quality Indicators for the Care of Hospitalized Injured Older Adults: A Scoping Review of the Literature

OBJECTIVES

Older adults represent more than 50% of trauma admissions in many high-income countries. Furthermore, they are at increased risk for complications, resulting in worse health outcomes than younger adults and a significant health care utilization burden. Quality indicators (QIs) are used to assess the quality of care in trauma systems, but few QIs reflect responses to older patients' specific needs. We aimed to (1) identify QIs used to assess acute hospital care for injured older patients, (2) assess support for identified QIs and, (3) identify gaps in existing QIs.

DESIGN

Scoping review of the scientific and gray literature.

METHODS

Selection and data extraction were performed by 2 independent reviewers. The level of support was assessed by the number of sources reporting QIs and whether they were developed according to scientific evidence, expert consensus, and patients' perspectives.

RESULTS

Of 10,855 identified studies, 167 were eligible. Among 257 different QIs identified, 52% were hip fracture specific. Gaps were identified for head injuries, rib, and pelvic ring fractures. Although 61% of QIs assessed care processes, 21% and 18% focused on structures and outcomes, respectively. Although most QIs were based on literature reviews and/or expert consensus, patients' perspective was rarely accounted for. The 15 QIs with the highest level of support included minimum time between emergency department arrival and ward admission, minimum time to surgery for fractures, assessment by a geriatrician, orthogeriatric review for hip fracture patients, delirium screening, prompt and appropriate analgesia, early mobilizations, and physiotherapy.

CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS

Multiple QIs were identified, but their level of support was limited, and important gaps were identified. Future work should focus on achieving consensus for a set of QIs to assess the quality of trauma care to older adults. Such QIs could be used for quality improvement and ultimately improve outcomes for injured older adults.

Variation in stroke care at the hospital level: A cross-sectional multicenter study

Introduction

Stroke is one of the leading causes of mortality and disability. Improving patient outcomes can be achieved by improving stroke care and adherence to guidelines. Since wide variation in adherence rates for stroke guidelines still exists, we aimed to describe and compare stroke care variability within Belgian hospitals.

Materials and methods

An observational, multicenter study was performed in 29 Belgian hospitals. We retrospectively collected patient characteristics, quality indicators, and time metrics from the last 30 consecutive patients per hospital, diagnosed with ischemic stroke in 2019 with structured questionnaires. Mean adherence ratios (%) ± SD (minimum – maximum) were calculated.

Results

We analyzed 870 patient records from 29 hospitals. Results showed large inter- and intrahospitals variations in adherence for various indicators. Almost all the patients received brain imaging (99.7%) followed by admission at a stroke unit in 82.9% of patients. Of patients not receiving thrombolysis, 92.5% of patients were started on antithrombotic drugs. Indicators with moderate median adherence but large interhospital variability were glycemia monitoring [82.3 ± 16.7% (26.7–100.0%)], performing clinical neurological examination and documentation of stroke severity [63.1 ± 36.8% (0–100%)], and screening for activities of daily living [51.1 ± 40.3% (0.0–100.0%)]. Other indicators lacked adequate adherence: swallowing function screening [37.0 ± 30.4% (0.0–93.3%)], depression screening [20.2 ± 35.8% (0.0–100%)], and timely body temperature measurement [15.1 ± 17.0% (0.0–60%)].

Conclusion

We identified high adherence to guidelines for some indicators, but lower rates with large interhospital variability for other recommendations also based on robust evidence. Improvement strategies should be implemented to improve the latter.

[Effects of statutory quality assurance in acute inpatient care]

BACKGROUND

Statutory quality assurance (QA) serves to ensure and further develop the quality of service provision. Particularly prominent in Germany's acute inpatient care are mandatory quality reports (QRs) and participation in external quality assessments (eQAs). Their effects have not yet been comprehensively evaluated.

OBJECTIVES

What are the effects of eQAs and QRs on the quality of care?

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Based on a selective literature review, international evidence on the effects of QA was compiled. This was supplemented by analyses of the quality reports of the Federal Office for Quality Assurance (BQS), the Institute for Applied Quality Improvement and Research in Health Care (AQUA), and the Institute for Quality Assurance and Transparency in Healthcare (IQTIG), which have been responsible for eQAs since 2001.

RESULTS

According to international literature, at most weak effects of these measures can be expected, especially on process quality. Studies from Germany mostly observe only uncontrolled temporal trends and partly show improved quality indicators. Only one controlled study each was able to show weak positive effects on outcome and process quality for eQAs and QRs, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

There are no convincing evaluation results for either the QRs or the eQAs. Deficiencies in the addressee-oriented design of the QRs and the reported indicator results in terms of their validity, risk adjustment, and temporal availability can be cited as potential causes. Statutory QA should be revised by paying more attention to the prerequisites for successful performance feedback and by again creating room for an intrinsically motivated assessment of one's own quality of care.

Quality Assurance Measures and Mortality After Stroke

BACKGROUND

Quality assurance for acute in-hospital care in Germany is based on compulsory comparisons between institutions, so-called external quality assurance (EQA). The effectiveness of EQA has not yet been adequately studied. The purpose of the QUASCH project, which is supported by the Innovation Fund of the Federal Joint Committee, is to investigate the association between EQA and health care outcomes, specifically with respect to stroke.

METHODS

The analyses were based on data from 379 825 patients insured by the AOK health insurance fund who were acutely admitted to a hospital because of stroke over the period 2007-2017. Data on 47 659 patients were derived from EQA documentation in the state of Hesse, in which stroke EQA had already been introduced in 2003; data on the remaining 332 166 patients were from other federal states, where 117 734 of these patients had been treated under EQA conditions. The association of EQA with mortality over the period of observation was analyzed by multivariate Cox regression, with the following covariates: age, sex, comorbidities, time period of occurrence, nursing care level, type of stroke, socio-economic deprivation in the region of origin, and treatment in a stroke unit.

RESULTS

Compared to treatment without EQA, mortality risk under EQA in the state of Hesse was significantly lower (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.93; 95% confidence interval: [0.92; 0.95]). The reduction in mortality risk with EQA was somewhat lower in the other federal states (HR: 0.96 [0.95; 0.97]). Treatment in a stroke unit was associated with a mortality risk that was lower still (HR: 0.86 [0.85; 0.87]). Mortality risk rose with age, comorbidities, and need for nursing care; it was lower in women and in persons whose stroke occurred in a later period.

CONCLUSION

Quality assurance measures are associated with lower mortality risk after stroke. The concentration of care in specially qualified institutions is associated with stronger effects than EQA alone.