Comparison of Two Automated Computed Tomography Perfusion Applications to Predict the Final Infarct Volume After Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction 3 Recanalization

Thrombectomy in ischemic stroke patients with large core but minor ischemic changes on non-enhanced computed tomography

PURPOSE

The Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) is regularly used to guide patient selection for mechanical thrombectomy (MT). Similarly, penumbral imaging based on computed tomography perfusion (CTP) may serve as neuroimaging tool to guide treatment. Yet, patients with a large ischemic core on CTP may show only minor ischemic changes resulting in a high ASPECTS.

AIM

We hypothesized twofold: (1) the treatment effect of vessel recanalization in patients with core volume > 50 mL but ASPECTS ⩾ 6 is not different compared to high ASPECTS patients with core volume < 50 mL, and (2) recanalization is associated with core overestimation.

METHODS

We conducted an observational study analyzing ischemic stroke patients consecutively treated with MT after triage by multimodal CT. Functional endpoint was the rate of functional independence at Day 90 defined as modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 0-2. Imaging endpoint was core overestimation, which was considered when CTP-derived core was larger than the final infarct volume assessed on follow-up imaging. Recanalization was evaluated with the extended Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (eTICI) scale. Multivariable logistic regression analysis and propensity score matching (PSM) were used to assess the association of recanalization (eTICI ⩾ 2b) with functional outcome and core overestimation.

RESULTS

Of 630 patients with ASPECTS ⩾ 6, 91 patients (14.4%) had a large ischemic core. Following 1:1 PSM, the treatment effect of recanalization was not different in patients with large core and ASPECTS ⩾ 6 (+ 25.8%, 95% CI: 16.3-35.4, p < 0.001) compared to patients with ASPECTS ⩾ 6 and core volume < 50 mL (+ 14.9%, 95% CI: 5.7-24.1, p = 0.002). Recanalization (aOR: 3.46, 95% CI: 1.85-6.47, p < 0.001) and higher core volume (aOR: 1.03, 95% CI: 1.02-1.04, p < 0.001) were significantly associated with core overestimation.

CONCLUSION

In patients with ASPECTS ⩾ 6, core volumes did not significantly modify outcomes following recanalization. Reperfusion and higher core volume were significantly associated with core overestimation which may explain the treatment effect of MT for patients with a large ischemic core but minor ischemic changes on non-enhanced CT.

DATA ACCESS STATEMENT

The data analyzed in this study will be available and shared on reasonable request from any qualified researcher for the purpose of replicating the results after clearance by the local ethics committee.

Thrombectomy in Patients With Ischemic Stroke Without Salvageable Tissue on CT Perfusion

BACKGROUND

Computed tomography perfusion (CTP) imaging is regularly used to guide patient selection for mechanical thrombectomy (MT). However, the effect of MT in patients without salvageable tissue on CTP has not been investigated. The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of MT in patients with stroke without perfusion mismatch profiles.

METHODS

This observational study analyzed patients with ischemic stroke consecutively treated between March 1, 2015, and January 31, 2022, triaged by multimodal-computed tomography undergoing MT. CTP lesion-core mismatch profiles were defined using a mismatch volume/ratio of ≥10 mL/1.2, respectively. The primary end point was the rate of functional independence at 90 days, defined as the modified Rankin Scale score of 0 to 2. Recanalization was evaluated with the modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction scale. The effect of baseline variables on functional outcome was assessed using multivariable logistic regression analysis. Outcomes of patients with and without CTP-mismatch profiles were compared using 1:1 propensity score matching.

RESULTS

Of 724 patients who met the inclusion criteria of this retrospective observational study, 110 (15%) patients had no CTP mismatch and were analyzed. The median age was 74 (interquartile range, 62-80) years and 53% were women. Successful recanalization (modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction score, ≥2b) was achieved in 66% (73) and associated with functional independence at 90 days (adjusted odds ratio, 7.33 [95% CI, 1.22-43.70]; P=0.03). A significant interaction was observed between recanalization and age, as well as the extent of infarction, indicating MT to be most effective in patients <70 years and with a baseline Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score range between 3 and 7. These findings remained stable after propensity score matching, analyzing 152 matched pairs with similar rates of functional independence between patients with and without CTP-mismatch profiles (17% versus 23%; P=0.42).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients without CTP-mismatch profiles defined according to the EXTEND (Extending the Time for Thrombolysis in Emergency Neurological Deficits) criteria, recanalization was associated with improved functional outcomes. This effect was associated with baseline Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score and age, but not with the time from onset to imaging.

Impact of temporal resolution on perfusion metrics, therapy decision, and radiation dose reduction in brain CT perfusion in patients with suspected stroke

PURPOSE

CT perfusion of the brain is a powerful tool in stroke imaging, though the radiation dose is rather high. Several strategies for dose reduction have been proposed, including increasing the intervals between the dynamic scans. We determined the impact of temporal resolution on perfusion metrics, therapy decision, and radiation dose reduction in brain CT perfusion from a large dataset of patients with suspected stroke.

METHODS

We retrospectively included 3555 perfusion scans from our clinical routine dataset. All cases were processed using the perfusion software VEOcore with a standard sampling of 1.5 s, as well as simulated reduced temporal resolution of 3.0, 4.5, and 6.0 s by leaving out respective time points. The resulting perfusion maps and calculated volumes of infarct core and mismatch were compared quantitatively. Finally, hypothetical decisions for mechanical thrombectomy following the DEFUSE-3 criteria were compared.

RESULTS

The agreement between calculated volumes for core (ICC = 0.99, 0.99, and 0.98) and hypoperfusion (ICC = 0.99, 0.99, and 0.97) was excellent for all temporal sampling schemes. Of the 1226 cases with vascular occlusion, 14 (1%) for 3.0 s sampling, 23 (2%) for 4.5 s sampling, and 63 (5%) for 6.0 s sampling would have been treated differently if the DEFUSE-3 criteria had been applied. Reduction of temporal resolution to 3.0 s, 4.5 s, and 6.0 s reduced the radiation dose by a factor of 2, 3, or 4.

CONCLUSION

Reducing the temporal sampling of brain perfusion CT has only a minor impact on image quality and treatment decision, but significantly reduces the radiation dose to that of standard non-contrast CT.

Does imaging of the ischemic penumbra have value in acute ischemic stroke with large vessel occlusion?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

In this review, we summarize current evidence regarding potential benefits and limitations of using perfusion imaging to estimate presence and extent of irreversibly injured ischemic brain tissue ('core') and severely ischemic yet salvageable tissue ('penumbra') in acute stroke patients with large vessel occlusion (LVO).

RECENT FINDINGS

Core and penumbra volumes are strong prognostic biomarkers in LVO patients. Greater benefits of both intravenous thrombolysis and endovascular therapy (EVT) are observed in patients with small core and large penumbra volumes. However, some current definitions of clinically relevant penumbra may be too restrictive and exclude patients who may benefit from reperfusion therapies. Alongside other clinical and radiological factors, penumbral imaging may enhance the discussion regarding the benefit/risk ratio of EVT in common clinical situations, such as patients with large core - for whom EVT's benefit is established but associated with a high rate of severe disability -, or patients with mild symptoms or medium vessel occlusions - for whom EVT's benefit is currently unknown. Beyond penumbral evaluation, perfusion imaging is clinically relevant for optimizing patient's selection for neuroprotection trials.

SUMMARY

In an emerging era of precision medicine, perfusion imaging is a valuable tool in LVO-related acute stroke.

Penumbra salvage in extensive stroke: exploring limits for reperfusion therapy

BACKGROUND

The effect of thrombectomy in patients presenting with extensive ischemic stroke at baseline is currently being investigated; it remains uncertain to what extent brain tissue may be saved by reperfusion in such patients. Penumbra salvage volume (PSV) has been described as a tool to measure the volume of rescued penumbra.

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether the effect of recanalization on PSV is dependent on the extent of early ischemic changes.

METHODS

Observational study of patients with anterior circulation ischemic stroke triaged by multimodal-CT undergoing thrombectomy. PSV was defined as the difference between baseline penumbra volume and net infarct growth to follow-up. The effect of vessel recanalization on PSV depending on the extent of early ischemic changes (defined using Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) and core volumes based on relative cerebral blood flow) was determined using multivariable linear regression analysis, and the association with functional outcome at day 90 was tested using multivariable logistic regression.

RESULTS

384 patients were included, of whom 292 (76%) achieved successful recanalization (modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction ≥2b). Successful recanalization was independently associated with 59 mL PSV (95% CI 29.8 to 88.8 mL) and was linked to increased penumbra salvage up to an ASPECTS of 3 and core volume up to 110 mL. Recanalization was associated with a higher probability of a modified Rankin Scale score of ≤2 up to a core volume of 100 mL.

CONCLUSIONS

Recanalization was associated with significant penumbra salvage up to a lower ASPECTS margin of 3 and upper core volume margin of 110 mL. The clinical benefit of recanalization for patients with very large ischemic regions of >100 mL or ASPECTS <3 remains uncertain and requires prospective investigation.

CT perfusion stroke lesion threshold calibration between deconvolution algorithms

CTP is an important diagnostic tool in managing patients with acute ischemic stroke, but challenges persist in the agreement of stroke lesion volumes and ischemic core-penumbra mismatch profiles determined with different CTP post-processing software. We investigated a systematic method of calibrating CTP stroke lesion thresholds between deconvolution algorithms using a digital perfusion phantom to improve inter-software agreement of mismatch profiles. Deconvolution-estimated cerebral blood flow (CBF) and Tmax was compared to the phantom ground truth via linear regression for one model-independent and two model-based deconvolution algorithms. Using the clinical standard of model-independent CBF < 30% and Tmax > 6 s as reference thresholds for ischemic core and penumbra, respectively, we determined that model-based CBF < 15% and Tmax > 6 s were the corresponding calibrated thresholds after accounting for quantitative differences revealed at linear regression. Calibrated thresholds were then validated in 63 patients with large vessel stroke by evaluating agreement (concordance and Cohen's kappa, κ) between the two model-based and model-independent deconvolution methods in determining mismatch profiles used for clinical decision-making. Both model-based deconvolution methods achieved 95% concordance with model-independent assessment and Cohen's kappa was excellent (κ = 0.87; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.72-1.00 and κ = 0.86; 95% CI 0.70-1.00). Our systematic method of calibrating CTP stroke lesion thresholds may help harmonize mismatch profiles determined by different software.

Automated advanced imaging in acute ischemic stroke. Certainties and uncertainties

The purpose of this is study was to review pearls and pitfalls of advanced imaging, such as computed tomography perfusion and diffusion-weighed imaging and perfusion-weighted imaging in the selection of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients suitable for endovascular treatment (EVT) in the late time window (6-24 h from symptom onset). Advanced imaging can quantify infarct core and ischemic penumbra using specific threshold values and provides optimal selection parameters, collectively called target mismatch. More precisely, target mismatch criteria consist of core volume and/or penumbra volume and mismatch ratio (the ratio between total hypoperfusion and core volumes) with precise cut-off values. The parameters of target mismatch are automatically calculated with dedicated software packages that allow a quick and standardized interpretation of advanced imaging. However, this approach has several limitations leading to a misclassification of core and penumbra volumes. In fact, automatic software platforms are affected by technical artifacts and are not interchangeable due to a remarkable vendor-dependent variability, resulting in different estimate of target mismatch parameters. In addition, advanced imaging is not completely accurate in detecting infarct core, that can be under- or overestimated. Finally, the selection of candidates for EVT remains currently suboptimal due to the high rates of futile reperfusion and overselection caused by the use of very stringent inclusion criteria. For these reasons, some investigators recently proposed to replace advanced with conventional imaging in the selection for EVT, after the demonstration that non-contrast CT ASPECTS and computed tomography angiography collateral evaluation are not inferior to advanced images in predicting outcome in AIS patients treated with EVT. However, other authors confirmed that CTP and PWI/DWI postprocessed images are superior to conventional imaging in establishing the eligibility of patients for EVT. Therefore, the routine application of automatic assessment of advanced imaging remains a matter of debate. Recent findings suggest that the combination of conventional and advanced imaging might improving our selection criteria.

Assessing the diagnostic accuracy of CT perfusion: a systematic review

Background and purpose

Computed tomography perfusion (CTP) has successfully extended the time window for reperfusion therapies in ischemic stroke. However, the published perfusion parameters and thresholds vary between studies. Using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies (PRISMA-DTA) guidelines, we conducted a systematic review to investigate the accuracy of parameters and thresholds for identifying core and penumbra in adult stroke patients.

Methods

We searched Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and reference lists of manuscripts up to April 2022 using the following terms "computed tomography perfusion," "stroke," "infarct," and "penumbra." Studies were included if they reported perfusion thresholds and undertook co-registration of CTP to reference standards. The quality of studies was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) tool and Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy (STARD) guidelines.

Results

A total of 24 studies were included. A meta-analysis could not be performed due to insufficient data and significant heterogeneity in the study design. When reported, the mean age was 70.2 years (SD+/-3.69), and the median NIHSS on admission was 15 (IQR 13-17). The perfusion parameter identified for the core was relative cerebral blood flow (rCBF), with a median threshold of <30% (IQR 30, 40%). However, later studies reported lower thresholds in the early time window with rapid reperfusion (median 25%, IQR 20, 30%). A total of 15 studies defined a single threshold for all brain regions irrespective of collaterals and the gray and white matter.

Conclusion

A single threshold and parameter may not always accurately differentiate penumbra from core and oligemia. Further refinement of parameters is needed in the current era of reperfusion therapy.

FDA-approved machine learning algorithms in neuroradiology: A systematic review of the current evidence for approval

Over the past decade, machine learning (ML) and artificial intelligence (AI) have become increasingly prevalent in the medical field. In the United States, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is responsible for regulating AI algorithms as "medical devices" to ensure patient safety. However, recent work has shown that the FDA approval process may be deficient. In this study, we evaluate the evidence supporting FDA-approved neuroalgorithms, the subset of machine learning algorithms with applications in the central nervous system (CNS), through a systematic review of the primary literature. Articles covering the 53 FDA-approved algorithms with applications in the CNS published in PubMed, EMBASE, Google Scholar and Scopus between database inception and January 25, 2022 were queried. Initial searches identified 1505 studies, of which 92 articles met the criteria for extraction and inclusion. Studies were identified for 26 of the 53 neuroalgorithms, of which 10 algorithms had only a single peer-reviewed publication. Performance metrics were available for 15 algorithms, external validation studies were available for 24 algorithms, and studies exploring the use of algorithms in clinical practice were available for 7 algorithms. Papers studying the clinical utility of these algorithms focused on three domains: workflow efficiency, cost savings, and clinical outcomes. Our analysis suggests that there is a meaningful gap between the FDA approval of machine learning algorithms and their clinical utilization. There appears to be room for process improvement by implementation of the following recommendations: the provision of compelling evidence that algorithms perform as intended, mandating minimum sample sizes, reporting of a predefined set of performance metrics for all algorithms and clinical application of algorithms prior to widespread use. This work will serve as a baseline for future research into the ideal regulatory framework for AI applications worldwide.

Comparative analysis of core and perfusion lesion volumes between commercially available computed tomography perfusion software

Introduction:

Computed tomography perfusion (CTP) imaging has become an important tool in evaluating acute recanalization treatment candidates. Large clinical trials have successfully used RAPID automated imaging analysis software for quantifying ischemic core and penumbra, yet other commercially available software vendors are also on the market. We evaluated the possible difference in ischemic core and perfusion lesion volumes and the agreement rate of target mismatch between OLEA, MIStar, and Syngo.Via versus RAPID software in acute recanalization treatment candidates.

Patients and methods:

All consecutive stroke-code patients with baseline CTP RAPID imaging at Helsinki University Hospital during 8/2018–9/2021 were included. Ischemic core was defined as cerebral blood flow <30% than the contralateral hemisphere and within the area of delay time (DT) >3s with MIStar. Perfusion lesion volume was defined as DT > 3 s (MIStar) and Tmax > 6 s with all other software. A perfusion mismatch ratio of ⩾1.8, a perfusion lesion volume of ⩾15 mL, and ischemic core <70 mL was defined as target mismatch. The mean pairwise differences of the core and perfusion lesion volumes between software were calculated using the Bland-Altman method and the agreement of target mismatch between software using the Pearson correlation.

Results:

A total of 1606 patients had RAPID perfusion maps, 1222 of which had MIStar, 596 patients had OLEA, and 349 patients had Syngo.Via perfusion maps available. Each software was compared with simultaneously analyzed RAPID software. MIStar showed the smallest core difference compared with RAPID (−2 mL, confidence interval (CI) from −26 to 22), followed by OLEA (2 mL, CI from −33 to 38). Perfusion lesion volume differed least with MIStar (4 mL, CI from −62 to 71) in comparison with RAPID, followed by Syngo.Via (6 mL, CI from −94 to 106). MIStar had the best agreement rate with target mismatch of RAPID followed by OLEA and Syngo.Via.

Discussion and conclusion:

Comparison of RAPID with three other automated imaging analysis software showed variance in ischemic core and perfusion lesion volumes and in target mismatch.

Agreement of three CT perfusion software packages in patients with acute ischemic stroke: A comparison with RAPID

PURPOSE

To compare ischemic core volume (ICV) and penumbra volume (PV) measured by MIStar, F-STROKE, and Syngo.via with that measured by RAPID in acute ischemic stroke (AIS), and their concordance in selecting patients for endovascular thrombectomy (EVT).

METHODS

Computed tomography perfusion (CTP) data were processed with four software packages. Bland-Altman analysis and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were performed to evaluate their agreement in quantifying ICV and PV. Kappa test was conducted to assess consistency in the selection of EVT candidates. The correlation between predicted ICV and segmented final infarct volume (FIV) on follow-up images was investigated.

RESULTS

A total of 91 patients were retrospectively included. F-STROKE had the best consistency with RAPID (ICV: ICC = 0.97; PV: ICC = 0.84) and Syngo.via had the worst consistency (ICV: ICC = 0.77; PV: ICC = 0.66). F-STROKE had the narrowest limits of agreements both in ICV (-27.02, 24.40 mL) and PV (-85.59, 101.80 mL). When selecting EVT candidates, MIStar (kappa = 0.71-0.88) and F-STROKE (kappa = 0.84-0.90) had good to excellent consistency with RAPID, while Syngo.via had poor consistency (kappa = 0.20-0.41). ICV predicted by MIStar was correlated strongest with FIV (r = 0.77).

CONCLUSIONS

F-STROKE is most consistent with RAPID in quantitative ICV and PV. F-STROKE and MIStar exhibit similar EVT candidate selection to RAPID. Syngo.via, for its part, seems to have overestimated ICV and underestimated PV, leading to an overly restrictive selection of EVT candidates.

CT perfusion-based delta-radiomics models to identify collateral vessel formation after revascularization in patients with moyamoya disease

Purpose

To build CT perfusion (CTP)-based delta-radiomics models to identify collateral vessel formation after revascularization in patients with moyamoya disease (MMD).

Methods

Fifty-three MMD patients who underwent CTP and digital subtraction angiography (DSA) examination were retrospectively enrolled. Patients were divided into good and poor groups based on postoperative DSA. CTP parameters, such as mean transit time (MTT), time to drain (TTD), time to maximal plasma concentration (Tmax), and flow extraction product (FE), were obtained. CTP efficacy in evaluating surgical treatment were compared between the good and poor groups. The changes in the relative CTP parameters (ΔrMTT, ΔrTTD, ΔrTmax, and ΔrFE) were calculated to evaluate the differences between pre- and postoperative CTP values. CTP parameters were selected to build delta-radiomics models for identifying collateral vessel formation. The identification performance of machine learning classifiers was assessed using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).

Results

Of the 53 patients, 36 (67.9%) and 17 (32.1%) were divided into the good and poor groups, respectively. The postoperative changes of ΔrMTT, ΔrTTD, ΔrTmax, and ΔrFE in the good group were significantly better than the poor group (p < 0.05). Among all CTP parameters in the perfusion improvement evaluation, the ΔrTTD had the largest AUC (0.873). Eleven features were selected from the TTD parameter to build the delta-radiomics model. The classifiers of the support vector machine and k-nearest neighbors showed good diagnostic performance with AUC values of 0.933 and 0.867, respectively.

Conclusion

The TTD-based delta-radiomics model has the potential to identify collateral vessel formation after the operation.

RAPID CT Perfusion-Based Relative CBF Identifies Good Collateral Status Better Than Hypoperfusion Intensity Ratio, CBV-Index, and Time-to-Maximum in Anterior Circulation Stroke

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Information of collateral flow may help to determine eligibility for thrombectomy. Our aim was to identify CT perfusion-based surrogate parameters of good collateral status in acute anterior circulation ischemic stroke.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this retrospective study, we assessed the collateral status of 214 patients who presented with acute ischemic stroke due to occlusion of the MCA M1 segment or the carotid terminus. Collaterals were assessed on dynamic CTA images analogous to the multiphase CTA score by Menon et al. CT perfusion parameters (time-to-maximum, relative CBF, hypoperfusion intensity ratio, and CBV-index) were assessed with RAPID software. The Spearman rank correlation and receiver operating characteristic analyses were performed to identify the parameters that correlate with collateral scores and good collateral supply (defined as a collateral score of ≥4).

RESULTS

The Spearman rank correlation was highest for a relative CBF < 38% volume (ρ = -0.66, P < .001), followed by the hypoperfusion intensity ratio (ρ = -0.49, P < .001), CBV-index (ρ = 0.51, P < .001), and time-to-maximum > 8 seconds (ρ = -0.54, P < .001). Good collateral status was better identified by a relative CBF < 38% at a lesion size <27 mL (sensitivity of 75%, specificity of 80%) compared with a hypoperfusion intensity ratio of <0.4 (sensitivity of 75%, specificity of 62%), CBV-index of >0.8 (sensitivity of 60%, specificity of 78%), and time-to-maximum > 8 seconds (sensitivity of 68%, specificity of 76%).

CONCLUSIONS

Automated CT perfusion analysis allows accurate identification of collateral status in acute ischemic stroke. A relative CBF < 38% may be a better perfusion-based indicator of good collateral supply compared with time-to-maximum, the hypoperfusion intensity ratio, and the CBV-index.

Prognostic Accuracy of CTP Summary Maps in Patients with Large Vessel Occlusive Stroke and Poor Revascularization after Mechanical Thrombectomy-Comparison of Three Automated Perfusion Software Applications

Background: Innovative automated perfusion software solutions offer support in the management of acute stroke by providing information about the infarct core and penumbra. While the performance of different software solutions has mainly been investigated in patients with successful recanalization, the prognostic accuracy of the hypoperfusion maps in cases of futile recanalization has hardly been validated. Methods: In 39 patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) due to large vessel occlusion (LVO) in the anterior circulation and poor revascularization (thrombolysis in cerebral infarction (TICI) 0-2a) after mechanical thrombectomy (MT), hypoperfusion analysis was performed using three different automated perfusion software solutions (A: RAPID, B: Brainomix e-CTP, C: Syngo.via). The hypoperfusion volumes (HV) as Tmax > 6 s were compared with the final infarct volumes (FIV) on follow-up CT 36−48 h after futile recanalization. Bland−Altman analysis was applied to display the levels of agreement and to evaluate systematic differences. Based on the median hypoperfusion intensity ratio (HIR, volumetric ratio of tissue with a Tmax > 10 s and Tmax > 6 s) patients were dichotomized into high- and low-HIR groups. Subgroup analysis with favorable (<0.6) and unfavorable (≥0.6) HIR was performed with respect to the FIV. HIR was correlated to clinical baseline and outcome parameters using Pearson’s correlation. Results: Overall, there was good correlation without significant differences between the HVs and the FIVs with package A (r = 0.78, p < 0.001) being slightly superior to B and C. However, levels of agreement were very wide for all software applications in Bland-Altman analysis. In cases of large infarcts exceeding 150 mL the performance of the automated software solutions generally decreased. Subgroup analysis revealed the FIV to be generally underestimated in patients with HIR ≥ 0.6 (p < 0.05). In the subgroup with favorable HIR, however, there was a trend towards an overestimation of the FIV. Nevertheless, packages A and B showed good correlation between the HVs and FIVs without significant differences (p > 0.2), while only package C significantly overestimated the FIV (−54.6 ± 56.0 mL, p = 0.001). The rate of modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 0−3 after 3 months was significantly higher in favorable vs. unfavorable HIR (42.1% vs. 13.3%, p = 0.02). Lower HIR was associated with higher Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) at presentation and on follow-up imaging, lower risk of malignant edema, and better outcome (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Overall, the performance of the automated perfusion software solutions to predict the FIV after futile recanalization is good, with decreasing accuracy in large infarcts exceeding 150 mL. However, depending on the HIR, FIV can be significantly over- and underestimated, with Syngo showing the widest range. Our results indicate that the HIR can serve as valuable parameter for outcome predictions and facilitate the decision whether or not to perform MT in delicate cases.