Incentive Design and Quality Improvements: Evidence from State Medicaid Nursing Home Pay-for-Performance Programs

Sustainability of the Preferences for Everyday Living Inventory Use in Ohio Nursing Homes Over Time

OBJECTIVES

In 2015, the Ohio Department of Medicaid incentivized use of the Preferences for Everyday Living Inventory (PELI) as a quality initiative. The pay-for-performance (P4P) program, however, was then deimplemented in 2019. This study investigated the sustainability of use of the PELI in Ohio nursing homes (NHs) from 2017 to 2021 and examined barriers to PELI implementation.

DESIGN

This study analyzed 2 waves of Ohio Biennial Survey of Long-Term Care Facilities data.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

Data were drawn from 433 NHs in Ohio that reported on PELI implementation efforts between 2017 and 2021.

METHODS

This study examined the change in proportion of NHs implementing the PELI (ie, conducted for all residents, used in care planning) and change in proportion of NHs using different PELI assessment formats (ie, the full 72-item PELI, MDS 3.0 Section F items only). Frequencies of reported barriers to PELI implementation by NH administrators were tabulated.

RESULTS

Results indicate that although use of the full 72-item PELI decreased over time, only a small percentage discontinued its use despite possible impacts of P4P changes in 2019 and challenges posed by the COVID-19 pandemic. NHs adapted their PELI assessment formats likely in response to perceived barriers of PELI use (ie, length of the full PELI, time constraints, and residents' level of cognitive impairment).

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

Findings suggest that Ohio NHs sustained PELI implementation over time in the context of large systemic changes in P4P financial incentives and COVID-19 safeguards. Barriers were reported at the organizational level, yet NHs continued to prioritize PCC with the PELI. Policy/P4P mandates may serve as effective implementation incentives that encourage sustainability of quality care practices. Future research should explore long-term sustainability and stakeholder perspectives on PELI utilization.

Perceptions of nurses and physicians on pay-for-performance in hospital: a systematic review of qualitative studies

AIMS

To systematically examine perceptions of nurses and physicians on pay-for-performance in hospital.

BACKGROUND

Pay-for-performance projects have proliferated over the past two decades, most systematic reviews of which solely focused on its effectiveness in primary healthcare and the physicians' or nurses' attitudes. However, systematic reviews of qualitative approaches for better examining perceptions of both nurses and physicians in hospital are lacking.

EVALUATION

Electronic databases were systematic searched with date from its inception to December 31, 2020. Meta-aggregation synthesis methodology and the conceptual framework of the Theory of Planned Behavior were used to summarize findings.

KEY ISSUES

A total of nine studies were included. Three major synthesized themes were identified: (1) perceptions of the motivation effects and positive outcomes (2) perceptions about the design defects and negative effects (3) perceptions of the obstacles in the implementation process.

CONCLUSION

To maximize the intended positive effects, nurses' and physicians' perceptions should be considered and incorporated into the project design and implementation stage.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING MANAGEMENT AND RESEARCH

The paper gives enlightenment to nurse managers on improving and advancing the cause of nurses when planning for or evaluating their institutions' policies on pay-for-performance in the future research.