Outpatient management of knee osteoarthritis

Geniculate Artery Embolization for the Treatment of Mild to Moderate Knee Osteoarthritis Improves Pain and Function at Short-Term Follow-Up With Significant Procedural Heterogeneity Described Across the Literature: A Systematic Review

PURPOSE

To evaluate procedural heterogeneity, patient-reported outcomes (PROs), and complications following geniculate artery embolization (GAE) for knee osteoarthritis (OA).

METHODS

A literature search was performed using PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases from inception to August 2023 according to the 2020 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Human clinical studies reporting PROs following GAE for treatment of knee OA were included, and a qualitative comparison across PROs, procedural descriptions, and complications was performed. Study quality was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration's risk of bias tool and the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies criteria. The primary outcome measures included changes in PROs at 12 months and variances in procedural methodology.

RESULTS

A total of 17 studies, consisting of 533 patients and 620 knees, were identified. The reported mean improvement at 12 months for visual analog scale for pain and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index scores ranged from 10 to 59 and 35.3 to 47, respectively. At 12 months, median improvements were observed in Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score subscales such as Pain (range, 8.3-19.5), Quality of Life (15.49-25.0), Sport (7.5-26.3), and Symptoms (1.8-25.0). Decreasing minimal clinically important difference (MCID) achievement was observed between the 3-month and 6-month follow-up points. Patients with advanced OA and degenerative findings on magnetic resonance imaging exhibited lower rates of MCID achievement. Transient adverse events occurred in up to 80% of patients. Limited evidence from serial magnetic resonance imaging assessments suggests that GAE improves levels of synovitis. Significant heterogeneity exists among the GAE methodology as 4 different definitions of technical success, 4 distinct embolization targets, and use of 5 embolization agents were noted.

CONCLUSIONS

GAE results in short-term improvements in pain and function with decreasing MCID achievement observed after 3 to 6 months. Patients with severe OA also demonstrate lower rates of MCID achievement. A high rate of transient complications is reported, including skin discoloration and access site hematomas. Significant protocol heterogeneity exists, which contributes to variable outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, systematic review of Level I to IV studies.

A Randomized Study of Myostaal® Liniment as an Add-On Therapy for Muscle Strengthening in Cases of Knee Osteoarthritis

INTRODUCTION

Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a prevalent degenerative musculoskeletal condition, affecting approximately 277 million people worldwide, with significant impacts on mobility, especially in women and obese patients, and an increasing incidence among Indians aged 30 to 50 years. The primary objective was to evaluate the knee muscle-strengthening effect of Myostaal® liniment (Solumiks Herbaceuticals Limited, Mumbai, India) as an add-on to physiotherapy for 90 days compared to physiotherapy alone in participants with knee OA. Secondary objectives included assessing changes in the total Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score, WOMAC Subscale scores, Six-Minute Walk Test (6MWT) distance, Single Leg Stance Test (SLST) duration, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score, and the number of adverse events from baseline to Day 90 between the two groups.

METHODS

Seventy participants were randomly allocated to Group A (Myostaal® liniment plus physiotherapy) or Group B (physiotherapy alone) for 90 days, with Myostaal® liniment applied twice daily in Group A. Data were recorded in Case Report Forms (CRFs) and analyzed using parametric tests for within-group comparisons (one-way ANOVA or Friedman test) and non-parametric tests (Mann-Whitney test) for between-group comparisons, with significance set at p<0.05.

RESULTS

The knee muscle strength (index knee) in Group A (test medication group) was significantly greater compared to Group B (standard treatment group) at Visit 3 (p<0.05; Day 60±3) and Visit 4 (p<0.001; Day 90±3). For the non-index (other) knee, a statistically significant increase in knee muscle strength was observed (p<0.001 at Day 90±3) solely in Group A. A notable reduction in total WOMAC score was seen in Group A from Visit 2 (p<0.01; Day 30±3) onward, compared to Visit 1 (Day 0). The scores at Visit 3 (p<0.001; Day 60±3) and Visit 4 (p<0.001; Day 90±3) were significantly lower than those at Visit 2 (Day 30±3).

CONCLUSION

The local application of Myostaal® liniment through massage as an adjunct to a physiotherapy regimen, improved knee muscle strength in participants with knee OA, leading to an enhancement in joint functionality. Additionally, Myostaal® liniment provided superior pain relief as an add-on therapy.

An Oral Form of Cetylated Fatty Acids versus Meloxicam for Knee Osteoarthritis: A Randomised Clinical Trial

Objective/Aim

This study aimed to assess how effective an oral form of Cetylated fatty acids compounds (CFA) is in improving the physical function, pain, and stiffness of individuals suffering from knee osteoarthritis (OA) and how its effectiveness compares to that of Meloxicam, a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID).

Methods

For this parallel-arm randomised clinical trial, 48 adult patients with knee OA were divided into two groups. The intervention group was prescribed 350mg CFA capsule three times per day for 30 days. The control group was given 15mg of Meloxicam, one tablet daily for ten days. Patients were instructed to fill out the Oxford Knee Score (OKS), Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), and Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Data were obtained before the administration of the first dose (considered baseline or t0), and two (t1), four (t2), and eight (t3) weeks after the final dose of each intervention.

Results

No significant differences were observed in total WOMAC and OKS scores between the two groups at t1, t2, or t3. However, both groups had significant improvements in their OKS, VAS, and total WOMAC scores compared to their baselines (t0). No adverse events were noted in the CFA group.

Conclusion

Improvements in pain intensity and overall physical function were reported in the CFA group. Oral CFAs could safely benefit patients with knee OA.

Management and Treatment of Coxarthrosis in the Orthopedic Outpatient Clinic

Coxarthrosis, or hip osteoarthritis (OA), is one of the main causes of hip pain, which can affect patients of all ages, being one of the most common reasons for patients presenting to the specialized outpatient clinic. The objective of our research was to determine the number of patients with coxarthrosis who presented to the Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology within the Emergency County Hospital of Drobeta Turnu Severin, between 2017-2019, the sex, age, social environment of the patients. All patients underwent a thorough clinical examination to determine the risk factors, the favouring factors and their correlation with the paraclinical data obtained through imaging investigation (pelvis X-ray, computer tomography and nuclear magnetic resonance). The study included 462 patients, aged between 23 and 89 years old, who were diagnosed with varying degrees of coxarthrosis within the specialized outpatient clinic. The main risk factors were obesity, osteoporosis, chronic smoking, rural environment, female sex, the existence of a hip injury and intense physical exertion. The main purpose of the research was to analyse a series of data, which would bring information on the incidence, distribution by age groups, sex, living environment and professional activity of the population with coxarthrosis, in order to develop a therapeutic management as effective as possible.

How effective is a blended web-based rehabilitation for improving pain, physical activity, and knee function of patients with knee osteoarthritis? Study protocol for a randomized control trial

Due to the chronic nature of knee osteoarthritis (KOA) self-management is considered an essential part of therapy to improve physical function, activity, pain and quality of life (QoL). Web-based rehabilitation may be a potential innovative mode of patient’ training to guide management compared to usual care, especially with the current restrictions pandemic imposed. Moreover, in order to alter KOA patients’ behavior towards physical activity (PA), it may be more attractive and motivating to combine within their rehabilitation program, outdoor real life local activity that could feasible to be sustained in the future. Aim of the current study is to evaluate the effects of a blended web-based rehabilitation compared with structured PA alone in patients with KOA. This is a randomized multi-center study with two prospective arms. Fifty-six eligible participants with KOA will be recruited from the West Attica region (considered as structurally weak areas). After a comprehensive face-to face training session, participants will follow a 6-week web-based rehabilitation program, consisting of exercise, advice material enhanced outdoor structured PA. The control group will be encouraged to follow the outdoor structured PA alone. Baseline, 6-week and 12-week follow up assessments will be performed. The primary outcome is self-reported physical function as measured by the Knee Injury Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS). Secondary measures include pain, function (Timed Up and Go Test, Sit to Stand test), PA levels (Lower Extremity Activity Scale, Baecke Scale and pedometer), psychological perspective (Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia) and health-related QoL (Short-Form 12). Baseline-adjusted Analysis of Variance will be used to test for group differences in the primary and secondary outcomes. The study will evaluate the blended web-based exercise and advice material, enhanced with outdoor PA in many respects compared to the outdoor PA alone so as to promote self-management care programs for KOA patients.

Trial registration: Prospectively registered ISRCTN12950684 (27-09-2020).

Healthcare Utilization and Knee Osteoarthritis Symptoms among Urban Older Malaysian

Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a prevalent chronic disorder in the older population. While timely management is important to minimize the consequences of knee OA, information on the utilization of healthcare services among this population remains limited. Therefore, the objectives of this study were to determine the healthcare utilization and its associated factors in older persons with knee OA. Cross-sectional data from 1073 participants aged 60 years and above from the Malaysian Elders Longitudinal Research (MELoR) study were included. The utilization rate of healthcare services was quantified. Factors related to the utilization of healthcare services were determined using logistic regression analysis. Healthcare utilization among participants with knee OA was significantly higher than those without knee OA (p < 0.01). Outpatient usage was higher (p < 0.01) in comparison to inpatient and pharmacotherapy. Being married and having an income were significantly associated with seeking outpatient care (OR: 11.136, 95% CI: 1.73–52.82, p < 0.01) and pharmacotherapy (OR: 10.439, 95% CI: 1.187–91.812, p < 0.05), while females were less likely to utilize inpatient care services (OR: 0.126, 95% CI: 0.021–0.746, p < 0.05). The higher rate of healthcare utilization among older persons with knee OA indicates the increased healthcare needs of this population, who are commonly assumed to suffer from a benign disease.

Expectations of Singaporean patients concerning activities after total knee arthroplasty

Background:

There are many factors that affect the experience and satisfaction of a patient undergoing knee replacement surgery.

Objective:

This study aims to explore the effects of demographic factors, disease severity and several novel parameters on patients’ expectations in a Singaporean population.

Methods:

Phone interviews were conducted with 69 patients to measure their expectations before total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Information such as demographics, surgical histories, baseline Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36 (SF-36) score, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Lower Extremity Activity Scale (LEAS), kneeling ability, quality of reviews from relatives or friends and histories of any traditional therapies utilised were obtained. Radiological severity of osteoarthritis was graded using the Kellgren–Lawrence scale; discordance with severity of knee pain was recorded.

Results:

Patients expected TKA to result in pain relief, improved mobility, increased ability to participate in physical activities, and paid employment. On multivariate regression analysis, LEAS, SF-36 physical, KOOS-pain and KOOS-activity of daily living scores remained significant predictors of expectations.

Conclusion:

The results indicated multiple factors influence patient’s expectations pre-operatively and their satisfaction post-operatively. Better patient outcomes may be achieved by making improvements in understanding and moderating patient expectations.

Level of evidence:

Diagnostic III

Effect of glucosamine sulfate on intraocular pressure in patients with knee osteoarthritis: A prospective randomized controlled trial

PURPOSE

Glucosamine sulfate is one of the treatment options for patients with osteoarthritis of the knee. It has been postulated that glucosamine sulfate affects intraocular pressure (IOP). This study aimed to evaluate the effect of crystalline glucosamine sulfate on IOP in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee.

METHODS

Forty-two patients with osteoarthritis of the knee were randomized into two groups. The first group of patients received 1500mg of crystalline glucosamine sulfate once daily for 6 months and the conventional treatment protocol. The second group of patients received only the conventional treatment protocol. IOP was recorded at the start of the study and at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 9 months.

RESULTS

The patient demographic data were not different between the two groups. There were no differences in the IOPs between the groups (P>0.05) nor differences in baseline IOPs within each group compared with each follow-up visit (P>0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Glucosamine sulfate is still an option without significant concern over elevated IOP in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee and normal ocular pressure.

Is the Wedged Insole an Effective Treatment Option When Compared with a Flat (Placebo) Insole: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Using the lateral wedge insole is a conservative management strategy for knee osteoarthritis. The theoretical basis for this intervention is to correct femorotibial angle, thereby reducing pain and optimising function.

OBJECTIVE

This systematic review evaluates the evidence on the effectiveness of wedge insole compared with flat insole for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed, searching published (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CNKI, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science) and unpublished literature from their inception to April 2018. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared the use of wedge insole with a flat insole were included. Risk of bias and clinical relevance were assessed, and outcomes were analysed through meta-analysis.

RESULT

From a total of 413 citations, 8 studies adhered to the a priori eligibility criteria. The WOMAC pain was shown to be statistically nonsignificant change with the use of wedge insole (SMD=0.07), and low heterogeneity (I2=22%) and a 95% CI that crossed zero (95% CI: -0.09 to 0.24). The 5 independent trials were not significant in improving pain score (SMD = -0.02, 95% CI: -0.19 to 0.16). This review also revealed no significance in improving Lequesne index (SMD = -0.27, 95% CI: -0.72 to 0.19). The meta-analysis from the 2 independent trials was significant in improving femorotibial angle (SMD = -0.41, 95% CI: -0.73 to -0.09). In conclusion, this meta-analysis suggested that lateral wedge insoles can improve femorotibial angle but are of no benefit with pain and functions in knee osteoarthritis.