1
|
Oskouie F, Khanjari S, Banazadeh M. Beyond the healthcare system: The societal and contextual factors impacting parents' participation in decision-making for neonates with life-threatening conditions. PLoS One 2024; 19:e0309914. [PMID: 39240963 PMCID: PMC11379267 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0309914] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2024] [Accepted: 08/20/2024] [Indexed: 09/08/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Parents of neonates with life-threatening conditions and professionals, bear the burden of making complex decisions. Parents may not be fully involved in decision-making, and there is a paucity of evidence regarding the influence of social context on parents' participation. We aimed to explore factors that extended beyond the healthcare system and impacted parents' participation in decision-making for neonates with life-threatening conditions. MATERIALS AND METHODS This qualitative research was carried out in 2019 in four level-III Iranian NICUs, (neonatal intensive care units) where twenty-three face-to-face semi-structured interviews were conducted, transcribed, and analyzed using a conventional content analysis technique. Interviews were condensed into meaningful units during the coding phase, resulting in 206 open codes. These codes were then categorized into eleven categories based on commonalities and distinctions. This iterative process continued until 4 main subcategories were established. RESULTS The main categories and sub-categories were "unmodified regulations according to the neonatology advances" (lack of regulations to modify ineffective treatments, lack of a legally documented do not resuscitate order, lack of a defined regional neonatal viability threshold, and lack of maternal guardianship of child medical care), "deficiencies of the health insurance system" (covering the cost of ineffective treatments and lack of insurance covering for palliative care services), "treatment-oriented culture in society" (expecting a miracle for medical science, difficult acceptance of neonatal death and difficult acceptance of home death), and "physician-oriented culture in society" (excessive respect for physicians' decision-making eligibility and social position of physicians). CONCLUSION The findings revealed concepts surrounding parents' participation in decision-making for life-threatening conditions neonates are influenced by social, legal, cultural, and financial aspects. To bridge the gap between healthcare professionals' attitudes and cultural and religious beliefs, fatwas, and laws, a collaborative approach is necessary. To address the complex challenges of decision-making for these neonates, involving stakeholders like clinicians, legal experts, Islamic scholars, sociologists, jurists, judges, and medical ethicists is crucial for modifying laws to align with neonatology advancements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fatemeh Oskouie
- Nursing and Midwifery Care Research Center, Health Management Research Institute, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Sedigheh Khanjari
- Nursing and Midwifery Care Research Center, Health Management Research Institute, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Marjan Banazadeh
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
- Department of Nursing, School of Nursing, Alborz University of Medical Sciences, Karaj, Iran
- Nursing and Midwifery Care Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Supady A, Allen WL, Pope TM. Continuing ECMO with no possible transition to recovery or transplant. THE LANCET. RESPIRATORY MEDICINE 2024:S2213-2600(24)00260-1. [PMID: 39243789 DOI: 10.1016/s2213-2600(24)00260-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2024] [Revised: 07/09/2024] [Accepted: 08/07/2024] [Indexed: 09/09/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander Supady
- Interdisciplinary Medical Intensive Care, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany.
| | - William L Allen
- University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Cortegiani A, Ippolito M, Mercadante S. End-of-life Care in the Intensive Care Unit and Ethics of Withholding/Withdrawal of Life-sustaining Treatments. Anesthesiol Clin 2024; 42:407-419. [PMID: 39054016 DOI: 10.1016/j.anclin.2024.02.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/27/2024]
Abstract
The medical progress has produced improvements in critically ill patients' survival to early phases of life-threatening diseases, thus producing long intensive care stays and persisting disability, with uncertain long-term survival rates and quality of life. Thus, compassionate end-of-life care and the provision of palliative care, even overlapping with the most aggressive of curative intensive care unit (ICU) care has become crucial. Moreover, withdrawal or withholding of life-sustaining treatment may be adopted, allowing unavoidable deaths to occur, without prolonging agony or ICU stay. Our aim was to summarize the key element of end-of-life care in the ICU and the ethics of withholding/withdrawal life-sustaining treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Cortegiani
- Department of Precision Medicine in Medical, Surgical and Critical Care Area (Me.Pre.C.C.), University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy; Department of Anesthesia Analgesia Intensive Care and Emergency, University Hospital Policlinico 'Paolo Giaccone', Via del vespro 129, Palermo 90127, Italy.
| | - Mariachiara Ippolito
- Department of Precision Medicine in Medical, Surgical and Critical Care Area (Me.Pre.C.C.), University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy; Department of Anesthesia Analgesia Intensive Care and Emergency, University Hospital Policlinico 'Paolo Giaccone', Via del vespro 129, Palermo 90127, Italy
| | - Sebastiano Mercadante
- Main Regional Center of Pain Relief and Supportive/palliative Care, Nutrition (S.M.), La Maddalena Cancer Center, Via San Lorenzo, 312/D, Palermo 90146, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ketchaikosol N, Pinyopornpanish K, Angkurawaranon C, Dejkriengkraikul N, Chutarattanakul L. Physicians' experiences and perceptions about withholding and withdrawal life-sustaining treatment in Chiang Mai University Hospital: a cross-sectional study. BMC Palliat Care 2024; 23:206. [PMID: 39138443 PMCID: PMC11320918 DOI: 10.1186/s12904-024-01511-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2024] [Accepted: 07/10/2024] [Indexed: 08/15/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Withholding or withdrawing life-sustaining treatment in end-of-life patients is a challenging ethical issue faced by physicians. Understanding physicians' experiences and factors influencing their decisions can lead to improvement in end-of-life care. OBJECTIVES To investigate the experiences of Thai physicians when making decisions regarding the withholding or withdrawal of life-sustaining treatments in end-of-life situations. Additionally, the study aims to assess the consensus among physicians regarding the factors that influence these decisions and to explore the influence of families or surrogates on the decision-making process of physicians, utilizing case-based surveys. METHODS A web-based survey was conducted among physicians practicing in Chiang Mai University Hospital (June - October 2022). RESULTS Among 251 physicians (response rate 38.3%), most of the respondents (60.6%) reported that they experienced withholding or withdrawal treatment in end-of-life patients. Factors that influence their decision-making include patient's preferences (100%), prognosis (93.4%), patients' quality of life (92.8%), treatment burden (89.5%), and families' request (87.5%). For a chronic disease with comatose condition, the majority of the physicians (47%) chose to continue treatments, including cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). In contrast, only 2 physicians (0.8%) would do everything, in cases when families or surrogates insisted on stopping the treatment. This increased to 78.1% if the families insisted on continuing treatment. CONCLUSION Withholding and withdrawal of life-sustaining treatments are common in Thailand. The key factors influencing their decision-making process included patient's preferences and medical conditions and families' requests. Effective communication and early engagement in advanced care planning between physicians, patients, and families empower them to align treatment choices with personal values.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nattanit Ketchaikosol
- Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, 110 Intawaroros Rd. Si Phum, Muang, Chiang Mai, Chiang Mai, 50200, Thailand
| | - Kanokporn Pinyopornpanish
- Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, 110 Intawaroros Rd. Si Phum, Muang, Chiang Mai, Chiang Mai, 50200, Thailand
- Global Health and Chronic Conditions Research Group, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand
| | - Chaisiri Angkurawaranon
- Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, 110 Intawaroros Rd. Si Phum, Muang, Chiang Mai, Chiang Mai, 50200, Thailand
- Global Health and Chronic Conditions Research Group, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand
| | - Nisachol Dejkriengkraikul
- Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, 110 Intawaroros Rd. Si Phum, Muang, Chiang Mai, Chiang Mai, 50200, Thailand
- Global Health and Chronic Conditions Research Group, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand
| | - Lalita Chutarattanakul
- Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, 110 Intawaroros Rd. Si Phum, Muang, Chiang Mai, Chiang Mai, 50200, Thailand.
- Global Health and Chronic Conditions Research Group, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Amadori K, Steiner T. [Palliative neurology]. DER NERVENARZT 2024; 95:743-753. [PMID: 39023548 DOI: 10.1007/s00115-024-01701-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/12/2024] [Indexed: 07/20/2024]
Abstract
Palliative medicine represents the holistic multiprofessional treatment of severely and incurably ill people and their relatives, addressing their complex physical, psychological, social and spiritual needs. The central therapeutic goals are the quality of life and alleviation of suffering. In the course of many neurological diseases, high symptom burden, long and variable trajectories and unfavorable prognosis at times create a need for palliative care even at an early stage, which is currently still inadequately met. This can be countered by qualified neuropalliative care. In addition to intensifying interdisciplinary collaboration, this requires neurologists to have core competencies in palliative care. These include a team-oriented attitude, communication skills, expertise in symptom control and knowledge of biomedical ethics including palliative options at the end of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Amadori
- Klinik für Altersmedizin, varisano Klinikum Frankfurt Höchst, Gotenstraße 6-8, 65929, Frankfurt am Main, Deutschland.
- Klinik für Neurologie, varisano Klinikum Frankfurt Höchst, Frankfurt am Main, Deutschland.
| | - T Steiner
- Klinik für Neurologie, varisano Klinikum Frankfurt Höchst, Frankfurt am Main, Deutschland
- Klinik für Neurologie, Universitätsklinik Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Lizza JP, Lazaridis C, Nowak PG. Defining Death: Toward a Biological and Ethical Synthesis. THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS : AJOB 2024:1-12. [PMID: 39018166 DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2024.2371124] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/19/2024]
Abstract
Much of the debate over the definition and criteria for determining our death has focused on disagreement over the correct biological account of death, i.e., what it means for any organism to die. In this paper, we argue that this exclusive focus on the biology of death is misguided, because it ignores ethical and social factors that bear on the acceptability of criteria for determining our death. We propose that attention shift from strictly biological considerations to ethical and social considerations that bear on the determination of what we call "civil death." We argue for acceptance of a neurological criterion for determining death on grounds that it is the most reasonable way to synthesize biological, ethical, and social considerations about our death..
Collapse
|
7
|
Al-Fadhl MD, Karam MN, Chen J, Zackariya SK, Lain MC, Bales JR, Higgins AB, Laing JT, Wang HS, Andrews MG, Thomas AV, Smith L, Fox MD, Zackariya SK, Thomas SJ, Tincher AM, Al-Fadhl HD, Weston M, Marsh PL, Khan HA, Thomas EJ, Miller JB, Bailey JA, Koenig JJ, Waxman DA, Srikureja D, Fulkerson DH, Fox S, Bingaman G, Zimmer DF, Thompson MA, Bunch CM, Walsh MM. Traumatic Brain Injury as an Independent Predictor of Futility in the Early Resuscitation of Patients in Hemorrhagic Shock. J Clin Med 2024; 13:3915. [PMID: 38999481 PMCID: PMC11242176 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13133915] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2024] [Revised: 06/08/2024] [Accepted: 06/26/2024] [Indexed: 07/14/2024] Open
Abstract
This review explores the concept of futility timeouts and the use of traumatic brain injury (TBI) as an independent predictor of the futility of resuscitation efforts in severely bleeding trauma patients. The national blood supply shortage has been exacerbated by the lingering influence of the COVID-19 pandemic on the number of blood donors available, as well as by the adoption of balanced hemostatic resuscitation protocols (such as the increasing use of 1:1:1 packed red blood cells, plasma, and platelets) with and without early whole blood resuscitation. This has underscored the urgent need for reliable predictors of futile resuscitation (FR). As a result, clinical, radiologic, and laboratory bedside markers have emerged which can accurately predict FR in patients with severe trauma-induced hemorrhage, such as the Suspension of Transfusion and Other Procedures (STOP) criteria. However, the STOP criteria do not include markers for TBI severity or transfusion cut points despite these patients requiring large quantities of blood components in the STOP criteria validation cohort. Yet, guidelines for neuroprognosticating patients with TBI can require up to 72 h, which makes them less useful in the minutes and hours following initial presentation. We examine the impact of TBI on bleeding trauma patients, with a focus on those with coagulopathies associated with TBI. This review categorizes TBI into isolated TBI (iTBI), hemorrhagic isolated TBI (hiTBI), and polytraumatic TBI (ptTBI). Through an analysis of bedside parameters (such as the proposed STOP criteria), coagulation assays, markers for TBI severity, and transfusion cut points as markers of futilty, we suggest amendments to current guidelines and the development of more precise algorithms that incorporate prognostic indicators of severe TBI as an independent parameter for the early prediction of FR so as to optimize blood product allocation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mahmoud D Al-Fadhl
- Department of Medical Education, South Bend Campus, Indiana University School of Medicine, South Bend, IN 46617, USA
| | - Marie Nour Karam
- Department of Medical Education, South Bend Campus, Indiana University School of Medicine, South Bend, IN 46617, USA
| | - Jenny Chen
- Department of Medical Education, South Bend Campus, Indiana University School of Medicine, South Bend, IN 46617, USA
| | - Sufyan K Zackariya
- Department of Medical Education, South Bend Campus, Indiana University School of Medicine, South Bend, IN 46617, USA
| | - Morgan C Lain
- Department of Medical Education, South Bend Campus, Indiana University School of Medicine, South Bend, IN 46617, USA
| | - John R Bales
- Department of Medical Education, South Bend Campus, Indiana University School of Medicine, South Bend, IN 46617, USA
| | - Alexis B Higgins
- Department of Medical Education, South Bend Campus, Indiana University School of Medicine, South Bend, IN 46617, USA
| | - Jordan T Laing
- Department of Medical Education, South Bend Campus, Indiana University School of Medicine, South Bend, IN 46617, USA
| | - Hannah S Wang
- Department of Medical Education, South Bend Campus, Indiana University School of Medicine, South Bend, IN 46617, USA
| | - Madeline G Andrews
- Department of Medical Education, South Bend Campus, Indiana University School of Medicine, South Bend, IN 46617, USA
| | - Anthony V Thomas
- Department of Medical Education, South Bend Campus, Indiana University School of Medicine, South Bend, IN 46617, USA
| | - Leah Smith
- Department of Medical Education, South Bend Campus, Indiana University School of Medicine, South Bend, IN 46617, USA
| | - Mark D Fox
- Department of Medical Education, South Bend Campus, Indiana University School of Medicine, South Bend, IN 46617, USA
| | - Saniya K Zackariya
- Department of Internal Medicine, Saint Joseph Regional Medical Center, Mishawaka, IN 46545, USA
| | - Samuel J Thomas
- Department of Internal Medicine, Saint Joseph Regional Medical Center, Mishawaka, IN 46545, USA
| | - Anna M Tincher
- Department of Medical Education, South Bend Campus, Indiana University School of Medicine, South Bend, IN 46617, USA
| | - Hamid D Al-Fadhl
- Department of Medical Education, South Bend Campus, Indiana University School of Medicine, South Bend, IN 46617, USA
| | - May Weston
- Department of Internal Medicine, Saint Joseph Regional Medical Center, Mishawaka, IN 46545, USA
| | - Phillip L Marsh
- Department of Internal Medicine, Saint Joseph Regional Medical Center, Mishawaka, IN 46545, USA
| | - Hassaan A Khan
- Department of Internal Medicine, Saint Joseph Regional Medical Center, Mishawaka, IN 46545, USA
| | - Emmanuel J Thomas
- Department of Internal Medicine, Saint Joseph Regional Medical Center, Mishawaka, IN 46545, USA
| | - Joseph B Miller
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI 48202, USA
| | - Jason A Bailey
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Elkhart General Hospital, Elkhart, IN 46515, USA
| | - Justin J Koenig
- Department of Trauma & Surgical Services, Memorial Hospital, South Bend, IN 46601, USA
| | - Dan A Waxman
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46601, USA
- Versiti Blood Center of Indiana, Indianapolis, IN 46208, USA
| | - Daniel Srikureja
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Hospital, South Bend, IN 46601, USA
| | - Daniel H Fulkerson
- Department of Trauma & Surgical Services, Memorial Hospital, South Bend, IN 46601, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, Memorial Hospital, South Bend, IN 46601, USA
| | - Sarah Fox
- Department of Trauma & Surgical Services, Memorial Hospital, South Bend, IN 46601, USA
| | - Greg Bingaman
- Department of Trauma & Surgical Services, Memorial Hospital, South Bend, IN 46601, USA
| | - Donald F Zimmer
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Memorial Hospital, South Bend, IN 46601, USA
| | - Mark A Thompson
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Hospital, South Bend, IN 46601, USA
| | - Connor M Bunch
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI 48202, USA
| | - Mark M Walsh
- Department of Internal Medicine, Saint Joseph Regional Medical Center, Mishawaka, IN 46545, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Karwa ML, Naqvi AA, Betchen M, Puri AK. In-Hospital Triage. Crit Care Clin 2024; 40:533-548. [PMID: 38796226 DOI: 10.1016/j.ccc.2024.03.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/28/2024]
Abstract
The intensive care unit (ICU) is a finite and expensive resource with demand not infrequently exceeding capacity. Understanding ICU capacity strain is essential to gain situational awareness. Increased capacity strain can influence ICU triage decisions, which rely heavily on clinical judgment. Having an admission and triage protocol with which clinicians are very familiar can mitigate difficult, inappropriate admissions. This article reviews these concepts and methods of in-hospital triage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manoj L Karwa
- Division of Critical Care Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine / Montefiore Medical Center, Weiler Hospital, 4th Floor, 1825 Eastchester Road, Bronx, NY 10461, USA.
| | - Ali Abbas Naqvi
- Division of Critical Care Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine / Montefiore Medical Center, Moses Division, 111 East 210th Street, Gold Zone (Main Floor), Bronx, NY 10467, USA
| | - Melanie Betchen
- Division of Critical Care Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine / Montefiore Medical Center, Moses Division, 111 East 210th Street, Gold Zone (Main Floor), Bronx, NY 10467, USA
| | - Ajay Kumar Puri
- Division of Critical Care Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine / Montefiore Medical Center, Moses Division, 111 East 210th Street, Gold Zone (Main Floor), Bronx, NY 10467, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Nelson RH. Navigating Tensions Between Law and Ethics in Surrogate Decision Making. THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS : AJOB 2024; 24:127-128. [PMID: 38913458 DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2024.2353815] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/26/2024]
|
10
|
Huber MT. Dealer's Choice?: Choosing Among Surrogate Decision Makers with Different Decisions and Knowledge of the Patient. THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS : AJOB 2024; 24:129-131. [PMID: 38913456 DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2024.2353833] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/26/2024]
|
11
|
Turner K, Brummett A, Salter E. On What Grounds? A Pilot Study of References Used in Clinical Ethics Consultation and Education. HEC Forum 2024:10.1007/s10730-024-09532-7. [PMID: 38819603 DOI: 10.1007/s10730-024-09532-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/17/2024] [Indexed: 06/01/2024]
Abstract
In accordance with standards published by the American Society for Bioethics and Humanities (ASBH), ethics consultants are expected to provide recommendations that align with scholarly literature, professional society statements, law, and policy. However, there are no studies to date that characterize the specific references that ethics consultants and educators use to inform their work. To address this gap, a convenience sample of clinical ethics consultants and educators was surveyed online through two major listservs for clinical ethics, the ASBH Clinical Ethics Consultation Affinity Group (CECAG) and the Association of Bioethics Program Directors (ABPD). Ninety-five ethics consultants and/or educators with diverse educational background, credentials, and experience provided responses. In total, 451 references, 315 of which were unique, were reported. These references were broken into 6 categories after analysis: bioethics literature (divided into articles and books), professional society documents (divided into professional society statements and codes of ethics), federal/state/uniform/case law, hospital/health system policies, official religious teachings, and other. We found extensive variation and minimal overlap in the references respondents used for ethics consultation and education, even when referring to the same topics. Future research directions should include conducting more systematic efforts to characterize the references used by ethics consultants across the US; determining whether demographic characteristics of consultants influence the references used; and ascertaining whether the variation in references used reflects genuine disagreements in consultants' and educators' bioethical analysis or recommendations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kelly Turner
- Gnaegi Center for Health Care Ethics, Saint Louis University, Saint Louis, MO, USA.
| | - Abram Brummett
- Department of Foundational Medical Studies, Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Rochester, MI, USA
- Corewell Health, William Beaumont University Hospital, Rochester, USA
| | - Erica Salter
- Gnaegi Center for Health Care Ethics, Saint Louis University, Saint Louis, MO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Iyer S, Sonawane RN, Shah J, Salins N. Semiotics of ICU Physicians' Views on End-of-life Care and Quality of Dying in a Critical Care Setting: A Qualitative Study. Indian J Crit Care Med 2024; 28:424-435. [PMID: 38738199 PMCID: PMC11080105 DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24696] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/29/2024] [Accepted: 03/22/2024] [Indexed: 05/14/2024] Open
Abstract
Background and aim While intensive care unit (ICU) mortality rates in India are higher when compared to countries with more resources, fewer patients with clinically futile conditions are subjected to limitation of life-sustaining treatments or given access to palliative care. Although a few surveys and audits have been conducted exploring this phenomenon, the qualitative perspectives of ICU physicians regarding end-of-life care (EOLC) and the quality of dying are yet to be explored. Methods There are 22 eligible consultant-level ICU physicians working in multidisciplinary ICUs were purposively recruited and interviewed. The study data was analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis (RTA) with a critical realist perspective, and the study findings were interpreted using the lens of the semiotic theory that facilitated the development of themes. Results About four themes were generated. Intensive care unit physicians perceived the quality of dying as respecting patients' and families' choices, fulfilling their needs, providing continued care beyond death, and ensuring family satisfaction. To achieve this, the EOLC process must encompass timely decision-making, communication, treatment guidelines, visitation rights, and trust-building. The contextual challenges were legal concerns, decision-making complexities, cost-related issues, and managing expectations. To improve care, ICU physicians suggested amplifying patient and family voices, building therapeutic relationships, mitigating conflicts, enhancing palliative care services, and training ICU providers in EOLC. Conclusion Effective management of critically ill patients with life-limiting illnesses in ICUs requires a holistic approach that considers the complex interplay between the EOLC process, its desired outcome, the quality of dying, care context, and the process of meaning-making by ICU physicians. How to cite this article Iyer S, Sonawane RN, Shah J, Salins N. Semiotics of ICU Physicians' Views on End-of-life Care and Quality of Dying in a Critical Care Setting: A Qualitative Study. Indian J Crit Care Med 2024;28(5):424-435.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shivakumar Iyer
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Bharati Vidyapeeth Deemed University Medical College, Pune, Maharashtra, India
| | - Rutula N Sonawane
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Bharati Vidyapeeth Deemed University Medical College, Pune, Maharashtra, India
| | - Jignesh Shah
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Bharati Vidyapeeth Deemed University Medical College, Pune, Maharashtra, India
| | - Naveen Salins
- Department of Palliative Medicine and Supportive Care, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Piscitello GM, Lyons PG, Koch VG, Parker WF, Huber MT. Hospital Policy Variation in Addressing Decisions to Withhold and Withdraw Life-Sustaining Treatment. Chest 2024; 165:950-958. [PMID: 38184166 PMCID: PMC11026167 DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2023.12.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2023] [Revised: 11/28/2023] [Accepted: 12/23/2023] [Indexed: 01/08/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Sociodemographic disparities in physician decisions to withhold and withdraw life-sustaining treatment exist. Little is known about the content of hospital policies that guide physicians involved in these decisions. RESEARCH QUESTION What is the prevalence of US hospitals with policies that address withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining treatment; how do these policies approach ethically controversial scenarios; and how do these policies address sociodemographic disparities in decisions to withhold and withdraw life-sustaining treatment? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS This national cross-sectional survey assessed the content of hospital policies addressing decisions to withhold or withdraw life-sustaining treatment. We distributed the survey electronically to American Society for Bioethics and Humanities members between July and August 2023 and descriptively analyzed responses. RESULTS Among 93 respondents from hospitals or hospital systems representing all 50 US states, Puerto Rico, and Washington, DC, 92% had policies addressing decisions to withhold or withdraw life-sustaining treatment. Hospitals varied in their stated guidance, permitting life-sustaining treatment to be withheld or withdrawn in cases of patient or surrogate request (82%), physiologic futility (81%), and potentially inappropriate treatment (64%). Of the 8% of hospitals with policies that addressed patient sociodemographic disparities in decisions to withhold or withdraw life-sustaining treatment, these policies provided opposing recommendations to either exclude sociodemographic factors in decision-making or actively acknowledge and incorporate these factors in decision-making. Only 3% of hospitals had policies that recommended collecting and maintaining information about patients for whom life-sustaining treatment was withheld or withdrawn that could be used to identify disparities in decision-making. INTERPRETATION Although most surveyed US hospital policies addressed withholding or withdrawing life-sustaining treatment, these policies varied widely in criteria and processes. Surveyed policies also rarely addressed sociodemographic disparities in these decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gina M Piscitello
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Section of Palliative Care and Medical Ethics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA; Palliative Research Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
| | - Patrick G Lyons
- Department of Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR; Department of Medical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR
| | - Valerie Gutmann Koch
- Health Law & Policy Institute, The University of Houston Law Center, Houston, TX; MacLean Center for Clinical Medical Ethics, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - William F Parker
- MacLean Center for Clinical Medical Ethics, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Public Health Sciences, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Michael T Huber
- Division of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL; Institute of Bioethics and Health Policy, University of Miami, Miami, FL
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Mani RK, Bhatnagar S, Butola S, Gursahani R, Mehta D, Simha S, Divatia JV, Kumar A, Iyer SK, Deodhar J, Bhat RS, Salins N, Thota RS, Mathur R, Iyer RK, Gupta S, Kulkarni P, Murugan S, Nasa P, Myatra SN. Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine and Indian Association of Palliative Care Expert Consensus and Position Statements for End-of-life and Palliative Care in the Intensive Care Unit. Indian J Crit Care Med 2024; 28:200-250. [PMID: 38477011 PMCID: PMC10926026 DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24661] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2024] [Accepted: 02/28/2024] [Indexed: 03/14/2024] Open
Abstract
End-of-life care (EOLC) exemplifies the joint mission of intensive and palliative care (PC) in their human-centeredness. The explosion of technological advances in medicine must be balanced with the culture of holistic care. Inevitably, it brings together the science and the art of medicine in their full expression. High-quality EOLC in the ICU is grounded in evidence, ethical principles, and professionalism within the framework of the Law. Expert professional statements over the last two decades in India were developed while the law was evolving. Recent landmark Supreme Court judgments have necessitated a review of the clinical pathway for EOLC outlined in the previous statements. Much empirical and interventional evidence has accumulated since the position statement in 2014. This iteration of the joint Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine-Indian Association of Palliative Care (ISCCM-IAPC) Position Statement for EOLC combines contemporary evidence, ethics, and law for decision support by the bedside in Indian ICUs. How to cite this article Mani RK, Bhatnagar S, Butola S, Gursahani R, Mehta D, Simha S, et al. Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine and Indian Association of Palliative Care Expert Consensus and Position Statements for End-of-life and Palliative Care in the Intensive Care Unit. Indian J Crit Care Med 2024;28(3):200-250.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raj K Mani
- Department of Critical Care and Pulmonology, Yashoda Super Specialty Hospital, Ghaziabad, Kaushambi, Uttar Pradesh, India
| | - Sushma Bhatnagar
- Department of Onco-Anaesthesia and Palliative Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Savita Butola
- Department of Palliative Care, Border Security Force Sector Hospital, Panisagar, Tripura, India
| | - Roop Gursahani
- Department of Neurology, P. D. Hinduja National Hospital & Medical Research Centre, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Dhvani Mehta
- Division of Health, Vidhi Centre for Legal Policy, New Delhi, India
| | - Srinagesh Simha
- Department of Palliative Care, Karunashraya, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
| | - Jigeeshu V Divatia
- Department of Anaesthesia, Critical Care, and Pain, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Arun Kumar
- Department of Intensive Care, Medical Intensive Care Unit, Fortis Healthcare Ltd, Mohali, Punjab, India
| | - Shiva K Iyer
- Department of Critical Care, Bharati Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University) Medical College, Pune, Maharashtra, India
| | - Jayita Deodhar
- Department Palliative Care, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Rajani S Bhat
- Department of Interventional Pulmonology and Palliative Medicine, SPARSH Hospitals, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
| | - Naveen Salins
- Department of Palliative Medicine and Supportive Care, Kasturba Medical College Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India
| | - Raghu S Thota
- Department Palliative Care, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Roli Mathur
- Department of Bioethics, Indian Council of Medical Research, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
| | - Rajam K Iyer
- Department of Palliative Care, Bhatia Hospital; P. D. Hinduja National Hospital & Medical Research Centre, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Sudeep Gupta
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | | | - Sangeetha Murugan
- Department of Education and Research, Karunashraya, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
| | - Prashant Nasa
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, NMC Specialty Hospital, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
| | - Sheila N Myatra
- Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Choi HR, Ho MH, Lin CC. Futile life-sustaining treatment in the intensive care unit - nurse and physician experiences: meta-synthesis. BMJ Support Palliat Care 2024; 14:36-46. [PMID: 38050047 DOI: 10.1136/spcare-2023-004640] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2023] [Accepted: 11/19/2023] [Indexed: 12/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Continuing futile life-sustaining treatment prolongs patients' suffering and family members' and medical staff's psychological distress. Additionally, continuing futile treatment is inefficient in healthcare resource distribution. Although the withdrawal of futile life-sustaining treatment is ideal, the prevalence is variable. OBJECTIVE To synthesise nurses' and physicians' experiences with continuing futile life-sustaining treatment in the intensive care unit. DESIGN This meta-synthesis was conducted following the thematic synthesis. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses and Enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research statement were used in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research statements. METHODS AND DATA SOURCES A systematic search was conducted following the inclusion and exclusion criteria in APA PsycINFO, CINAHL Plus, EMBASE, MEDLINE, PubMed and Web of Science in May 2023. Two reviewers independently screened and extracted the data. The extracted data were analysed using thematic analysis of qualitative research. FINDINGS A total of 16 studies were finally included, and 141 quotes were extracted and analysed. The main findings were categorised into four themes: (1) contextual and cultural diversity, (2) perceptions of futile treatment, (3) professional roles and responsibilities, and (4) emotional distress. CONCLUSION The study highlights the influence of culture, religion and family members, as well as perceptions of futile treatment among clinicians, on continuing futile life-sustaining treatment. Also, nurses' awareness of their roles and responsibilities in ensuring patients' comfort at end of life was revealed. This study informs future research to explore the experiences of futile life-sustaining treatment across various contexts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hye Ri Choi
- School of Nursing, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Mu-Hsing Ho
- School of Nursing, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Chia-Chin Lin
- School of Nursing, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Sawyer KE, Opel DJ. Shared Decision-Making in Pediatrics. Pediatr Clin North Am 2024; 71:39-48. [PMID: 37973305 DOI: 10.1016/j.pcl.2023.08.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2023]
Abstract
This article briefly reviews a 4-step process for implementing shared decision-making (SDM) in pediatrics. The authors address difficulties with determining whether SDM should occur and comment on how the SDM process relates to, and may be conflated with, other decision-making models that leverage similar patient-centered and family-centered communication strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kimberly E Sawyer
- Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Texas Children's Hospital Palliative Care Team, 6621 Fannin Street, Suite W.1990, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
| | - Douglas J Opel
- Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA; Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics, Seattle Children's Research Institute, 1900 9th Avenue, JMB 6, Seattle, WA 98101, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Guidet B, Vallet H, Flaatten H, Joynt G, Bagshaw SM, Leaver SK, Beil M, Du B, Forte DN, Angus DC, Sviri S, de Lange D, Herridge MS, Jung C. The trajectory of very old critically ill patients. Intensive Care Med 2024; 50:181-194. [PMID: 38236292 DOI: 10.1007/s00134-023-07298-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2023] [Accepted: 11/27/2023] [Indexed: 01/19/2024]
Abstract
The demographic shift, together with financial constraint, justify a re-evaluation of the trajectory of care of very old critically ill patients (VIP), defined as older than 80 years. We must avoid over- as well as under-utilisation of critical care interventions in this patient group and ensure the inclusion of health care professionals, the patient and their caregivers in the decision process. This new integrative approach mobilises expertise at each step of the process beginning prior to intensive care unit (ICU) admission and extending to long-term follow-up. In this review, several international experts have contributed to provide recommendations that can be universally applied. Our aim is to define a minimum core dataset of information to be shared and discussed prior to ICU admission and to facilitate the shared-decision-making process with the patient and their caregivers, throughout the patient journey. Documentation of uncertainty may contribute to a tailored level of care and ultimately to discussions around possible limitations of life sustaining treatments. The goal of ICU care is not only to avoid death, but more importantly to maintain an acceptable quality of life and functional autonomy after hospital discharge. Societal consideration is important to highlight, together with alternatives to ICU admission. We discuss challenges for the future and potential areas of research. In summary, this review provides a state-of-the-art current overview and aims to outline future directions to address the challenges in the treatment of VIP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bertrand Guidet
- Medical ICU, Assistance Publique, Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Service de Réanimation Médicale, 75012, Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, UMR_S 1136, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, 75013, Paris, France.
| | - Helene Vallet
- Department of Geriatrics, Sorbonne Université, Institut National de la Santé Et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), UMRS 1135, Centre d'immunologie et de Maladies Infectieuses (CIMI), Saint Antoine, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), 75012, Paris, France
| | - Hans Flaatten
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Haukeland University Hospital, University of Bergen, Department of Research and Development, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - Gavin Joynt
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong
| | - Sean M Bagshaw
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta and Alberta Health Services, Edmonton, Canada
| | | | - Michael Beil
- Department of Medical Intensive Care, Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University and Hadassah University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Bin Du
- Medical Intensive Care Unit, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, 100730, China
| | - Daniel N Forte
- Departament of Emergency Medicine, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Derek C Angus
- Critical Care Medicine, UPMC and University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, USA
| | - Sigal Sviri
- Department of Medical Intensive Care, Hadassah Medical Center and Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Dylan de Lange
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center, University Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Margaret S Herridge
- Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, Critical Care and Respiratory Medicine, University Health Network, Toronto General Research Institute, Institute of Medical Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Christian Jung
- Department of Cardiology, Pulmonology and Angiology, University Hospital, Düsseldorf, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Imran S, Chen LL, Rausen M, Morris LGT, Patel S, Halpern NA. A Case Series of Patients With Complex Airway Disease and Large Thyroid Tumors Anterior to the Trachea Precluding Tracheostomy. Crit Care Explor 2024; 6:e1047. [PMID: 38343442 PMCID: PMC10857691 DOI: 10.1097/cce.0000000000001047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/07/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This case series explores the management of respiratory failure in patients with large anterior tracheal thyroid tumors where tracheostomy is not an option. To our knowledge, this study is the first to address the challenges associated with caring for such patients. CASE SUMMARY We present the clinical courses of four intubated adults with advanced thyroid cancer and complex airway issues that preclude surgical tracheostomy. Interventions included custom airway stents, long-term intubation, and oncological therapies. Ethical quandaries around patient autonomy and capacity emerged, exacerbated by the absence of viable exit strategies for prolonged intubation, notably the performance of a tracheostomy, causing emotional distress in patients, families, and staff. CONCLUSIONS This study showcases the multifaceted challenges in medical, ethical, and emotional domains associated with managing intubated patients with complex disease precluding tracheotomies. We advocate for a nuanced, multidisciplinary, and personalized approach to confront unique issues in airway management, ethical considerations, and disposition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saira Imran
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Leon L Chen
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Michelle Rausen
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Luc G T Morris
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Snehal Patel
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Neil A Halpern
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Kozakowski JL. Catholic Teaching: A Middle Ground and Guide for End-of-Life Care and Decision-Making and an Antidote for Dying Badly in America. LINACRE QUARTERLY 2024; 91:52-73. [PMID: 38304889 PMCID: PMC10829578 DOI: 10.1177/00243639221141230] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2024]
Abstract
Dying in the United States is characterized as: medicalized, depersonalized, high technology, fragmented with frequent transitions among care settings, burdensome to patients and families, driven by efficiency and effectiveness, and lacking in key areas, for example, access to palliative care and adequate pain and symptom treatment. Patients and families are often left with a choice of two extremes: vitalism or utilitarian pessimism (utilitarianism). The Catholic Church, however, rejects both of these extremes, and Catholic social teaching (CST) at end of life focuses on ordinary-extraordinary treatments/means, a culture of life and human dignity, accompaniment and community, and caring for whole persons through the end of life. The Catholic tradition of ordinary-extraordinary means is helpful to guide complex end-of-life decisions, regardless of one's religious beliefs, and offers a middle ground between vitalism and utilitarianism that can inform end-of-life care and decision-making for all patients in Catholic health care. While it does not provide answers, it offers guidance and enables conversations that are crucial for the dying and their families to make autonomous, informed decisions about end-of-life care. It provides an opportunity for the dying to let the care team, loved ones, and decision-makers know what a life with meaning, purpose, and passion is for them-and how they want to live and die. This article will summarize the problem, describe end-of-life Catholic teaching, and discuss how it offers a middle-ground. Arguments for and against vitalism and utilitarianism will be explored, including a discussion of CST's response to those receiving care in Catholic health care facilities who are outside the Catholic tradition and do not believe in the teaching. The last section describes a model of collaborative partnership where local parishes and Catholic health care come together to tackle the challenges of caring for and ministering to the seriously ill and those facing death.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer L. Kozakowski
- Providence Little Company of Mary, San Pedro and Torrance, CA, USA
- Neiswanger Institute for Bioethics & Healthcare Leadership, Loyola University, Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Sarpal A, Miller MR, Martin CM, Sibbald RW, Speechley KN. Perceived potentially inappropriate treatment in the PICU: frequency, contributing factors and the distress it triggers. Front Pediatr 2024; 12:1272648. [PMID: 38304746 PMCID: PMC10830678 DOI: 10.3389/fped.2024.1272648] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2023] [Accepted: 01/03/2024] [Indexed: 02/03/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Potentially inappropriate treatment in critically ill adults is associated with healthcare provider distress and burnout. Knowledge regarding perceived potentially inappropriate treatment amongst pediatric healthcare providers is limited. Objectives Determine the frequency and factors associated with potentially inappropriate treatment in critically ill children as perceived by providers, and describe the factors that providers report contribute to the distress they experience when providing treatment perceived as potentially inappropriate. Methods Prospective observational mixed-methods study in a single tertiary level PICU conducted between March 2 and September 14, 2018. Patients 0-17 years inclusive with: (1) ≥1 organ system dysfunction (2) moderate to severe mental and physical disabilities, or (3) baseline dependence on medical technology were enrolled if they remained admitted to the PICU for ≥48 h, and were not medically fit for transfer/discharge. The frequency of perceived potentially inappropriate treatment was stratified into three groups based on degree of consensus (1, 2 or 3 providers) regarding the appropriateness of ongoing active treatment per enrolled patient. Distress was self-reported using a 100-point scale. Results Of 374 patients admitted during the study, 133 satisfied the inclusion-exclusion criteria. Eighteen patients (unanimous - 3 patients, 2 providers - 7 patients; single provider - 8 patients) were perceived as receiving potentially inappropriate treatment; unanimous consensus was associated with 100% mortality on 3-month follow up post PICU discharge. Fifty-three percent of providers experienced distress secondary to providing treatment perceived as potentially inappropriate. Qualitative thematic analysis revealed five themes regarding factors associated with provider distress: (1) suffering including a sense of causing harm, (2) conflict, (3) quality of life, (4) resource utilization, and (5) uncertainty. Conclusions While treatment perceived as potentially inappropriate was infrequent, provider distress was commonly observed. By identifying specific factor(s) contributing to perceived potentially inappropriate treatment and any associated provider distress, organizations can design, implement and assess targeted interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amrita Sarpal
- Department of Paediatrics, Children's Hospital – London Health Sciences Centre, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, ON, Canada
- Children's Health Research Institute, London, ON, Canada
| | - Michael R. Miller
- Department of Paediatrics, Children's Hospital – London Health Sciences Centre, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, ON, Canada
- Children's Health Research Institute, London, ON, Canada
| | - Claudio M. Martin
- Lawson Health Research Institute, London, ON, Canada
- Division of Critical Care, Department of Medicine, London Health Sciences Centre, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Robert W. Sibbald
- Department of Ethics, London Health Sciences Centre, London, ON, Canada
- Department of Family Medicine, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Kathy N. Speechley
- Department of Paediatrics, Children's Hospital – London Health Sciences Centre, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, ON, Canada
- Children's Health Research Institute, London, ON, Canada
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Moynihan KM, Taylor LS, Siegel B, Nassar N, Lelkes E, Morrison W. "Death as the One Great Certainty": ethical implications of children with irreversible cardiorespiratory failure and dependence on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Front Pediatr 2024; 11:1325207. [PMID: 38274466 PMCID: PMC10808631 DOI: 10.3389/fped.2023.1325207] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2023] [Accepted: 12/22/2023] [Indexed: 01/27/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction Advances in medical technology have led to both clinical and philosophical challenges in defining death. Highly publicized cases have occurred when families or communities challenge a determination of death by the irreversible cessation of neurologic function (brain death). Parallels can be drawn in cases where an irreversible cessation of cardiopulmonary function exists, in which cases patients are supported by extracorporeal cardiopulmonary support, such as extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Analysis Two cases and an ethical analysis are presented which compare and contrast contested neurologic determinations of death and refusal to accept the irreversibility of an imminent death by cardiopulmonary standards. Ambiguities in the Uniform Determination of Death Act are highlighted, as it can be clear, when supported by ECMO, that a patient could have suffered the irreversible cessation of cardiopulmonary function yet still be alive (e.g., responsive and interactive). Parallel challenges with communication with families around the limits of medical technology are discussed. Discussion Cases that lead to conflict around the removal of technology considered not clinically beneficial are likely to increase. Reframing our goals when death is inevitable is important for both families and the medical team. Building relationships and trust between all parties will help families and teams navigate these situations. All parties may require support for moral distress. Suggested approaches are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katie M. Moynihan
- Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
- Department of Cardiology, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
- Children’s Hospital at Westmead Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Lisa S. Taylor
- Office of Ethics, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Bryan Siegel
- Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
- Department of Cardiology, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Natasha Nassar
- Clinical and Population Translational Health, Children’s Hospital at Westmead Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Efrat Lelkes
- Department of Pediatrics, MaineGeneral Medical Center, Augusta, ME, United States
| | - Wynne Morrison
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States
- Divisions of Critical Care and Palliative Care, The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Ross LF. Parents Don't Know Best in the United Kingdom. THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS : AJOB 2024; 24:103-106. [PMID: 38236885 DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2024.2279439] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/23/2024]
|
23
|
Kon AA. Parents Have a Right to Refuse Brain Death Testing, Including Apnea Testing. THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS : AJOB 2024; 24:106-108. [PMID: 38236892 DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2023.2278575] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/23/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander A Kon
- Community Children's and the University of Washington School of Medicine
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Wasserman JA, Brummett AL, Navin MC, Menkes DL. Conscientious Objection to Aggressive Interventions for Patients in a Vegetative State. THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS : AJOB 2023:1-12. [PMID: 38032547 DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2023.2280099] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/01/2023]
Abstract
Some physicians refuse to perform life-sustaining interventions, such as tracheostomy, on patients who are very likely to remain permanently unconscious. To explain their refusal, these clinicians often invoke the language of "futility", but this can be inaccurate and can mask problematic forms of clinical power. This paper explores whether such refusals should instead be framed as conscientious objections. We contend that the refusal to provide interventions for patients very likely to remain permanently unconscious meets widely recognized ethical standards for the exercise of conscience. We conclude that conscientious objection to tracheostomy and other life-sustaining interventions on such patients can be ethical because it does not necessarily constitute a form of invidious discrimination. Furthermore, when a physician frames their refusal as conscientious objection, it makes transparent the value-laden nature of their objection and can better facilitate patient access to the requested treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jason Adam Wasserman
- Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine
- Corewell Health - East
- Oakland University Center for Moral Values in Health and Medicine
| | - Abram L Brummett
- Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine
- Corewell Health - East
- Oakland University Center for Moral Values in Health and Medicine
| | - Mark Christopher Navin
- Corewell Health - East
- Oakland University Center for Moral Values in Health and Medicine
- Oakland University
| | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Kingsley J, Clark J, Lewis-Newby M, Dudzinski DM, Diekema D. Navigating parental requests: considering the relational potential standard in paediatric end-of-life care in the paediatric intensive care unit. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS 2023:jme-2023-108912. [PMID: 37968108 DOI: 10.1136/jme-2023-108912] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2023] [Accepted: 11/03/2023] [Indexed: 11/17/2023]
Abstract
Families and clinicians approaching a child's death in the paediatric intensive care unit (PICU) frequently encounter questions surrounding medical decision-making at the end of life (EOL), including defining what is in the child's best interest, finding an optimal balance of benefit over harm, and sometimes addressing potential futility and moral distress. The best interest standard (BIS) is often marshalled by clinicians to help navigate these dilemmas and focuses on a clinician's primary ethical duty to the paediatric patient. This approach does not consider a clinician's potential duty to the patient's family. This paper argues that when a child is dying in the PICU, the physician has a duty to serve both the patient and the family, and that in some circumstances, the duty to serve the family becomes as important as that owed to the child. We detail the limitations of the BIS in paediatric EOL care and propose the relational potential standard as an additional ethical framework to guide our decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jenny Kingsley
- Center for Bioethics, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
- Pediatrics, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Jonna Clark
- Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, Washington, USA
- Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Mithya Lewis-Newby
- Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, Washington, USA
- Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Denise Marie Dudzinski
- Bioethics & Humanities, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
- Pediatrics, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Douglas Diekema
- Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, Washington, USA
- Pediatrics, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Enck G, Condley B. Agent-Regret in Healthcare. THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS : AJOB 2023:1-15. [PMID: 37962933 DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2023.2276166] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2023]
Abstract
For healthcare professionals and organizations, there is an emphasis on addressing moral distress and compassion fatigue among clinicians. While addressing these issues is vital, this paper suggests that the philosophical concept of agent-regret is a relevant but overlooked issue in healthcare. To experience agent-regret is to regret your harmful but not wrongful actions. This person's action results in someone being killed or significantly injured, but it was ethically faultless. Despite being faultless, agent-regret is an emotional response concerning one's agency in a situation that results in death or significant harm. In healthcare, many clinicians are likely to experience regret for faultless actions that significantly harm or cause the death of a patient. The recognition of agent-regret in healthcare is significant because it differs, conceptually and practically, from moral distress and compassion fatigue. Building on the work of Wojtowicz (2022), we should strive to understand clinicians' agent-regret by recognizing their agency in the situation, not lessening or removing it.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gavin Enck
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
| | - Beth Condley
- ; The University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Choi WJ, Young MJ. Disambiguating Consciousness in Clinical Settings. Neurology 2023; 101:896-900. [PMID: 37748883 PMCID: PMC10662996 DOI: 10.1212/wnl.0000000000207765] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2023] [Accepted: 07/26/2023] [Indexed: 09/27/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- William J Choi
- From the Warren Alpert Medical School (W.J.C.), Brown University, Providence, RI; and Department of Neurology (M.J.Y.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston.
| | - Michael J Young
- From the Warren Alpert Medical School (W.J.C.), Brown University, Providence, RI; and Department of Neurology (M.J.Y.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Rodriquez J. Becoming futile: the emotional pain of treating COVID-19 patients. FRONTIERS IN SOCIOLOGY 2023; 8:1231638. [PMID: 38024788 PMCID: PMC10663339 DOI: 10.3389/fsoc.2023.1231638] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2023] [Accepted: 10/16/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023]
Abstract
Introduction The COVID-19 pandemic has had a profoundly detrimental impact on the emotional wellbeing of health care workers. Numerous studies have shown that their rates of the various forms of work-related distress, which were already high before the pandemic, have worsened as the demands on health care workers intensified. Yet much less is known about the specific social processes that have generated these outcomes. This study adds to our collective knowledge by focusing on how one specific social process, the act of treating critically ill COVID-19 patients, contributed to emotional pain among health care workers. Methods This article draws from 40 interviews conducted with intensive care unit (ICU) staff in units that were overwhelmed with COVID-19 patients. The study participants were recruited from two suburban community hospitals in Massachusetts and the interviews were conducted between January and May 2021. Results The results show that the uncertainty over how to treat critically ill COVID-19 patients, given the absence of standard protocols combined with ineffective treatments that led to an unprecedented number of deaths caused significant emotional pain, characterized by a visceral, embodied experience that signaled moral distress, emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and burnout. Furthermore, ICU workers' occupational identities were undermined as they confronted the limits of their own abilities and the limits of medicine more generally. Discussion The inability to save incurable COVID-19 patients while giving maximal care to such individuals caused health care workers in the ICU an immense amount of emotional pain, contributing to our understanding of the social processes that generated the well-documented increase in moral distress and related measures of work-related psychological distress. While recent studies of emotional socialization among health care workers have portrayed clinical empathy as a performed interactional strategy, the results here show empathy to be more than dramaturgical and, in this context, entailed considerable risk to workers' emotional wellbeing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jason Rodriquez
- Department of Sociology, University of Massachusetts Boston, Boston, MA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Portig I, Karaaslan E, Hofacker E, Volberg C, Seifart C. Patients' Perspective on Termination of Pacemaker Therapy-A Cross-Sectional Anonymous Survey among Patients Carrying a Pacemaker in Germany. Healthcare (Basel) 2023; 11:2896. [PMID: 37958040 PMCID: PMC10649284 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare11212896] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2023] [Revised: 10/30/2023] [Accepted: 11/02/2023] [Indexed: 11/15/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine the opinions of patients regarding the withdrawal of pacemaker therapy. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS A cross-sectional anonymous questionnaire was administered to patients visiting an outpatient cardiologic clinic for routine follow-up visits of pacemaker therapy or patients carrying a pacemaker admitted to a hospital between 2021 and 2022. RESULTS Three-hundred and forty patients answered the questionnaire. A total of 56% of the participants were male. The mean age was 81 years. The majority of respondents were very comfortable with their PM and felt well informed, with one exception: more than half of respondents were missing information on withdrawal of pacemaker therapy. Almost two-thirds wanted to decide for themselves if their pacemaker therapy was withdrawn regardless of whether they were ill or healthy. Almost 60% of patients would like the pacemaker to be turned off when dying. Women expressed this wish significantly more often than men. CONCLUSION Our survey shows that patients prefer to be informed on issues regarding the withdrawal of pacemakers as early as preimplantation. Also, patients would like to be involved in decisions that have to be made at the end of life, including decisions on withdrawal. Offers of conversations about this important issue should include information on special features of the patient's pacemaker, e.g., the absence or presence of pacemaker dependency. Knowledge about the pacemaker's functionality may prevent distress among individuals nearing their end of life when, for example, under the false impression that timely deactivation may allow for a more peaceful death.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Irene Portig
- Research Group Medical Ethics, Faculty of Medicine, Philipps University of Marburg, 35043 Marburg, Germany
| | - Elif Karaaslan
- Research Group Medical Ethics, Faculty of Medicine, Philipps University of Marburg, 35043 Marburg, Germany
| | - Elena Hofacker
- Research Group Medical Ethics, Faculty of Medicine, Philipps University of Marburg, 35043 Marburg, Germany
| | - Christian Volberg
- Research Group Medical Ethics, Faculty of Medicine, Philipps University of Marburg, 35043 Marburg, Germany
| | - Carola Seifart
- Research Group Medical Ethics, Faculty of Medicine, Philipps University of Marburg, 35043 Marburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Kim DT, Shelton W, Applewhite MK. Clinician Moral Distress: Toward an Ethics of Agent-Regret. Hastings Cent Rep 2023; 53:40-53. [PMID: 38131494 DOI: 10.1002/hast.1544] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2023]
Abstract
Moral distress names a widely discussed and concerning clinician experience. Yet the precise nature of the distress and the appropriate practical response to it remain unclear. Clinicians speak of their moral distress in terms of guilt, regret, anger, or other distressing emotions, and they often invoke them interchangeably. But these emotions are distinct, and they are not all equally fitting in the same circumstances. This indicates a problematic ambiguity in the moral distress concept that obscures its distinctiveness, its relevant circumstances, and how individual clinicians and the medical community should practically respond to it. We argue that, in a range of situations that are said to be morally distressing, the characteristic emotion can be well-understood in terms of what Bernard Williams calls "agent-regret." We show what can thereby be gained in terms of a less ambiguous concept and a more adequate ethical response to this distinctive and complex clinician experience.
Collapse
|
31
|
Beil M, van Heerden PV, Joynt GM, Lapinsky S, Flaatten H, Guidet B, de Lange D, Leaver S, Jung C, Forte DN, Bin D, Elhadi M, Szczeklik W, Sviri S. Limiting life-sustaining treatment for very old ICU patients: cultural challenges and diverse practices. Ann Intensive Care 2023; 13:107. [PMID: 37884827 PMCID: PMC10603016 DOI: 10.1186/s13613-023-01189-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2023] [Accepted: 09/11/2023] [Indexed: 10/28/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Decisions about life-sustaining therapy (LST) in the intensive care unit (ICU) depend on predictions of survival as well as the expected functional capacity and self-perceived quality of life after discharge, especially in very old patients. However, prognostication for individual patients in this cohort is hampered by substantial uncertainty which can lead to a large variability of opinions and, eventually, decisions about LST. Moreover, decision-making processes are often embedded in a framework of ethical and legal recommendations which may vary between countries resulting in divergent management strategies. METHODS Based on a vignette scenario of a multi-morbid 87-year-old patient, this article illustrates the spectrum of opinions about LST among intensivsts with a special interest in very old patients, from ten countries/regions, representing diverse cultures and healthcare systems. RESULTS This survey of expert opinions and national recommendations demonstrates shared principles in the management of very old ICU patients. Some guidelines also acknowledge cultural differences between population groups. Although consensus with families should be sought, shared decision-making is not formally required or practised in all countries. CONCLUSIONS This article shows similarities and differences in the decision-making for LST in very old ICU patients and recommends strategies to deal with prognostic uncertainty. Conflicts should be anticipated in situations where stakeholders have different cultural beliefs. There is a need for more collaborative research and training in this field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Beil
- Department of Medical Intensive Care, Hadassah Medical Center and Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Peter Vernon van Heerden
- General Intensive Care, Hadassah Medical Center and Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Gavin M Joynt
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Stephen Lapinsky
- Intensive Care Unit, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Hans Flaatten
- Department of Research and Development, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - Bertrand Guidet
- INSERM, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, AP-HP, Hôpital Saint Antoine, Service MIR, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | - Dylan de Lange
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center, University Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Susannah Leaver
- General Intensive Care, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Christian Jung
- Department of Cardiology, Pulmonology and Vascular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Heinrich-Heine-University, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Daniel Neves Forte
- Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Du Bin
- Medical Intensive Care Unit, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China
| | | | - Wojciech Szczeklik
- Center for Intensive Care and Perioperative Medicine, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Ul. Wrocławska 1-3, 30 - 901, Kraków, Poland.
| | - Sigal Sviri
- Department of Medical Intensive Care, Hadassah Medical Center and Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Rubin EB, Robinson EM, Cremens MC, McCoy TH, Courtwright AM. Declining to Provide or Continue Requested Life-Sustaining Treatment: Experience With a Hospital Resolving Conflict Policy. JOURNAL OF BIOETHICAL INQUIRY 2023; 20:457-466. [PMID: 37380828 DOI: 10.1007/s11673-023-10270-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2022] [Accepted: 10/31/2022] [Indexed: 06/30/2023]
Abstract
In 2015, the major critical care societies issued guidelines outlining a procedural approach to resolving intractable conflict between healthcare professionals and surrogates over life-sustaining treatments (LST). We report our experience with a resolving conflict procedure. This was a retrospective, single-centre cohort study of ethics consultations involving intractable conflict over LST. The resolving conflict process was initiated eleven times for ten patients over 2,015 ethics consultations from 2000 to 2020. In all cases, the ethics committee recommended withdrawal of the contested LST. In seven cases, the patient died or was transferred or a legal injunction was obtained before completion of the process. In the four cases in which LST was withdrawn, the time from ethics consultation to withdrawal of LST was 24.8 ± 12.2 days. Healthcare provider and surrogate were often distressed during the process, sometimes resulting in escalation of conflict and legal action. In some cases, however, surrogates appeared relieved that they did not have to make the final decision regarding LST. Challenges regarding implementation included the time needed for process completion and limited usefulness in emergent situations. Although it is feasible to implement a due process approach to conflict over LST, there are factors that limit the procedure's usefulness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily B Rubin
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Bullfinch Building, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
| | - Ellen M Robinson
- Optimum Care Committee, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Patient Care Services, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - M Cornelia Cremens
- Optimum Care Committee, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Psychiatry Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Thomas H McCoy
- Optimum Care Committee, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Psychiatry Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Piers RD, Banner-Goodspeed V, Åkerman E, Kieslichova E, Meyfroidt G, Gerritsen RT, Uyttersprot E, Benoit DD. Outcomes in Patients Perceived as Receiving Excessive Care by ICU Physicians and Nurses: Differences Between Patients < 75 and ≥ 75 Years of Age? Chest 2023; 164:656-666. [PMID: 37062350 DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2023.04.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2022] [Revised: 03/24/2023] [Accepted: 04/04/2023] [Indexed: 04/18/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The benefit of the ICU for older patients is often debated. There is little knowledge on subjective impressions of excessive care in ICU nurses and physicians combined with objective patient data in real-life cases. RESEARCH QUESTION Is there a difference in treatment limitation decisions and 1-year outcomes in patients < 75 and ≥ 75 years of age, with and without concordant perceptions of excessive care by two or more ICU nurses and physicians? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS This was a reanalysis of the prospective observational DISPROPRICUS study, performed in 56 ICUs. Nurses and physicians completed a daily questionnaire about the appropriateness of care for each of their patients during a 28-day period in 2014. We compared the cumulative incidence of patients with concordant perceptions of excessive care, treatment limitation decisions, and the proportion of patients attaining the combined end point (death, poor quality of life, or not being at home) at 1 year across age groups via Cox regression with propensity score weighting and Fisher exact tests. RESULTS Of 1,641 patients, 405 (25%) were ≥ 75 years of age. The cumulative incidence of concordant perceptions of excessive care was higher in older patients (13.6% vs 8.5%; P < .001). In patients with concordant perceptions of excessive care, we found no difference between age groups in risk of death (1-year mortality, 83% in both groups; P > .99; hazard ratio [HR] after weighting, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.74-1.65), treatment limitation decisions (33% vs 31%; HR after weighting, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.69-2.17), and reaching the combined end point at 1 year (90% vs 93%; P = .546). In patients without concordant perceptions of excessive care, we found a difference in risk of death (1-year mortality, 41% vs 30%; P < .001; HR after weighting, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.11-1.73) and treatment limitation decisions (11% vs 5%; P < .001; HR, 2.11; 95% CI, 1.37-3.27); however, treatment limitation decisions were mostly documented prior to ICU admission. The risk of reaching the combined end point was higher in the older adults (61.6% vs 52.8%; P < .001). INTERPRETATION Although the incidence of perceptions of excessive care is slightly higher in older patients, there is no difference in treatment limitation decisions and 1-year outcomes between older and younger patients once patients are identified by concordant perceptions of excessive care. Additionally, in patients without concordant perceptions, the outcomes are worse in the older adults, pleading against ageism in ICU nurses and physicians.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruth D Piers
- Department of Geriatrics, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
| | - Valerie Banner-Goodspeed
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Eva Åkerman
- Division of Nursing, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden; General Intensive Care Unit, Department of Perioperative Medicine and Intensive Care, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Eva Kieslichova
- Department of Anesthesiology, Resuscitation and Intensive Care, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic; First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Geert Meyfroidt
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - Emma Uyttersprot
- Department of Applied Mathematics and Computer Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Dominique D Benoit
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Mathey L, Jacquier M, Meunier-Beillard N, Andreu P, Roudaut JB, Labruyère M, Rigaud JP, Quenot JP, Ecarnot F. ICU stays that are judged to be non-beneficial: A qualitative study of the perception of nursing staff. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0289954. [PMID: 37561766 PMCID: PMC10414562 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289954] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2022] [Accepted: 07/20/2023] [Indexed: 08/12/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Non-beneficial stays in the intensive care unit (ICU) may have repercussions for patients and their families, but can also cause suffering among the nursing staff. We aimed explore the perceptions of nursing staff in the ICU about patient stays that are deemed to be "non-beneficial" for the patient, to identify areas amenable to intervention, with a view to improving how the nursing staff perceive the patient pathway before, during and after intensive care. METHODS Multicentre, qualitative study using individual, semi-structured interviews. All qualified nurses and nurses' aides who were full-time employees in the ICU of three participating centres were invited to participate. Interviews were recorded, transcribed and analyzed using textual content analysis. RESULTS A total of 21 interviews were performed from February 2020 to October 2021, at which point saturation was reached in the data. Average age of participants was 38.5±7.5 years, and they had an average of 10.7±7.4 years of experience working in the ICU. Four major themes emerged from the interviews, namely: (1) the work is oriented towards life-threatening emergencies, technical procedures and burdensome care; (2) a range of specific criteria and circumstances influence the decisions to admit patients to ICU; (3) there are significant organisational, physical and psychological repercussions associated with a non-beneficial stay in the ICU; (4) respondents made some proposals for improvements to the patient care pathway. CONCLUSION Nursing staff have a similar perception to physicians regarding admission decisions and non-beneficial ICU stays. The possibility of future ICU admission needs to be anticipated, discussed systematically with patients and integrated into healthcare goals that are consistent with the patient's wishes and preferences, in multi-professional collaboration including nursing and medical staff.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucas Mathey
- Service de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, CHU Dijon-Bourgogne, Dijon, France
| | - Marine Jacquier
- Service de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, CHU Dijon-Bourgogne, Dijon, France
- Equipe Lipness, Centre de Recherche INSERM UMR1231 et LabEx LipSTIC, Université de Bourgogne-Franche Comté, Dijon, France
| | - Nicolas Meunier-Beillard
- INSERM, CIC 1432, Module Épidémiologie Clinique, Université de Bourgogne-Franche Comté, Dijon, France
- DRCI, USMR, CHU Dijon Bourgogne, Dijon, France
| | - Pascal Andreu
- Service de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, CHU Dijon-Bourgogne, Dijon, France
| | | | - Marie Labruyère
- Service de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, CHU Dijon-Bourgogne, Dijon, France
- INSERM, CIC 1432, Module Épidémiologie Clinique, Université de Bourgogne-Franche Comté, Dijon, France
| | - Jean-Philippe Rigaud
- Department of Intensive Care, Centre Hospitalier de Dieppe, Dieppe, France
- Espace de Réflexion Éthique de Normandie, University Hospital Caen, Caen, France
| | - Jean-Pierre Quenot
- Service de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, CHU Dijon-Bourgogne, Dijon, France
- Equipe Lipness, Centre de Recherche INSERM UMR1231 et LabEx LipSTIC, Université de Bourgogne-Franche Comté, Dijon, France
- INSERM, CIC 1432, Module Épidémiologie Clinique, Université de Bourgogne-Franche Comté, Dijon, France
- Espace de Réflexion Éthique Bourgogne Franche-Comté (EREBFC), Dijon, France
| | - Fiona Ecarnot
- EA3920, Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Besancon, Besancon, France
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Rubin MA, Riecke J, Heitman E. Futility and Shared Decision-Making. Neurol Clin 2023; 41:455-467. [PMID: 37407099 DOI: 10.1016/j.ncl.2023.03.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/07/2023]
Abstract
Medical futility is an ancient and yet consistent challenge in clinical medicine. The means of balancing conflicting priorities and stakeholders' preferences has changed as much as the science that powers the understanding and treatment of disease. The introduction of patient self-determination and choice in medical decision-making shifted the locus of power in the physician-patient relationship but did not obviate the physician's responsibilities to provide benefit and prevent harm. As we have refined the process in time, new paradigms, specialists, and tools have been developed to help navigate the ever-changing landscape.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael A Rubin
- Department of Neurology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Boulevard, Dallas, TX 75390-8855, USA; Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Boulevard, Dallas, TX 75390-8855, USA.
| | - Jenny Riecke
- Department of Neurology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Boulevard, Dallas, TX 75390-8855, USA; Department of Palliative Care, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Boulevard, Dallas, TX 75390-8855, USA
| | - Elizabeth Heitman
- Program in Ethics in Science and Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Boulevard, NC5.832, Dallas, TX 75390-9070, USA; Department of Applied Clinical Research, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Boulevard, NC5.832, Dallas, TX 75390-9070, USA
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Piscitello GM, Tyker A, Schenker Y, Arnold RM, Siegler M, Parker WF. Disparities in Unilateral Do Not Resuscitate Order Use During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Crit Care Med 2023; 51:1012-1022. [PMID: 36995088 PMCID: PMC10526631 DOI: 10.1097/ccm.0000000000005863] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/31/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES A unilateral do-not-resuscitate (UDNR) order is a do-not-resuscitate order placed using clinician judgment which does not require consent from a patient or surrogate. This study assessed how UDNR orders were used during the COVID-19 pandemic. DESIGN We analyzed a retrospective cross-sectional study of UDNR use at two academic medical centers between April 2020 and April 2021. SETTING Two academic medical centers in the Chicago metropolitan area. PATIENTS Patients admitted to an ICU between April 2020 and April 2021 who received vasopressor or inotropic medications to select for patients with high severity of illness. INTERVENTIONS None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS The 1,473 patients meeting inclusion criteria were 53% male, median age 64 (interquartile range, 54-73), and 38% died during admission or were discharged to hospice. Clinicians placed do not resuscitate orders for 41% of patients ( n = 604/1,473) and UDNR orders for 3% of patients ( n = 51/1,473). The absolute rate of UDNR orders was higher for patients who were primary Spanish speaking (10% Spanish vs 3% English; p ≤ 0.0001), were Hispanic or Latinx (7% Hispanic/Latinx vs 3% Black vs 2% White; p = 0.003), positive for COVID-19 (9% vs 3%; p ≤ 0.0001), or were intubated (5% vs 1%; p = 0.001). In the base multivariable logistic regression model including age, race/ethnicity, primary language spoken, and hospital location, Black race (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 2.5; 95% CI, 1.3-4.9) and primary Spanish language (aOR, 4.4; 95% CI, 2.1-9.4) had higher odds of UDNR. After adjusting the base model for severity of illness, primary Spanish language remained associated with higher odds of UDNR order (aOR, 2.8; 95% CI, 1.7-4.7). CONCLUSIONS In this multihospital study, UDNR orders were used more often for primary Spanish-speaking patients during the COVID-19 pandemic, which may be related to communication barriers Spanish-speaking patients and families experience. Further study is needed to assess UDNR use across hospitals and enact interventions to improve potential disparities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gina M Piscitello
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Section of Palliative Care and Medical Ethics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
- Palliative Research Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Albina Tyker
- Division of Respirology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Yael Schenker
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Section of Palliative Care and Medical Ethics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
- Palliative Research Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Robert M Arnold
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Section of Palliative Care and Medical Ethics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
- Palliative Research Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Mark Siegler
- Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
- MacLean Center for Clinical Medical Ethics, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - William F Parker
- MacLean Center for Clinical Medical Ethics, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
- Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Fiester A, Stites S. Using a Mediator's Toolbox: Reducing Clinical Conflict by Learning to Reconceive the "Difficult" Patient or Family. MEDEDPORTAL : THE JOURNAL OF TEACHING AND LEARNING RESOURCES 2023; 19:11324. [PMID: 37456671 PMCID: PMC10345165 DOI: 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11324] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2022] [Accepted: 04/06/2023] [Indexed: 07/18/2023]
Abstract
Introduction Given the prevalence of conflict between physicians and patients and families, it is crucial that trainees build the skills to manage clinical conflict. Mediators employ an approach that can be applied to clinical encounters to prevent conflicts from escalating. This workshop introduced trainees to techniques commonly used by mediators to manage disputes. Methods Medical students in a virtual workshop (cohort A) and clinical fellows in an in-person workshop (cohort B) were presented with a mediator's approach to interpreting patient and family behavior viewed as challenging. Trainees were introduced to two specific techniques designed to facilitate the resolution of clinical conflict. After an interactive large-group discussion of each method, small groups practiced applying the technique to a sample clinical case. Finally, participants completed an assessment of their perception of the workshop's effectiveness. Results In early 2022, 15 medical students (cohort A) participated in a virtual workshop and 10 clinical fellows (cohort B) participated in an in-person workshop on clinical conflict management. Eight medical students from cohort A completed the postworkshop assessment (response rate: 53%); six clinical fellows from cohort B completed the assessment (response rate: 60%). Cohort A gave the workshop an overall evaluation of 4.6 out of 5.0; cohort B gave the workshop an overall score of 4.7 out of 5.0. Discussion In both the virtual platform and the traditional in-person format, this workshop introduces a set of tools for navigating bedside conflicts with patients and their families that participants believed would better prepare them for such challenging interactions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Autumn Fiester
- Associate Professor, Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania; Director, Program in Clinical Conflict Management, University of Pennsylvania
| | - Shana Stites
- Assistant Professor, Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Rushton CH. Transforming Moral Suffering by Cultivating Moral Resilience and Ethical Practice. Am J Crit Care 2023; 32:238-248. [PMID: 37391375 DOI: 10.4037/ajcc2023207] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/02/2023]
Abstract
Ethical challenges are inherent in nursing practice. They affect patients, families, teams, organizations, and nurses themselves. These challenges arise when there are competing core values or commitments and diverse views on how to balance or reconcile them. When ethical conflict, confusion, or uncertainty cannot be resolved, moral suffering ensues. The consequences of moral suffering in its many forms undermine safe, high-quality patient care, erode teamwork, and undermine well-being and integrity. My experience as a nurse in the pediatric intensive care unit and later as a clinical nurse specialist in confronting these moral and ethical challenges has been the foundation of my program of research. Together we will explore the evolution of our understanding of moral suffering-its expressions, meanings, and consequences and attempts to measure it. Moral distress, the most described form of moral suffering, took hold within nursing and slowly within other disciplines. After 3 decades of research documenting the existence of moral distress, there were few solutions. It was at this juncture that my work pivoted toward exploring the concept of moral resilience as a means for transforming but not eliminating moral suffering. The evolution of the concept, its components, a scale to measure it, and research findings will be explored. Throughout this journey, the interplay of moral resilience and a culture of ethical practice were highlighted and examined. Moral resilience is continuing to evolve in its application and relevance. Many vital lessons have been learned that can inform future research and guide interventions to harness the inherent capabilities of clinicians to restore or preserve their integrity and to engage in large-scale system transformation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cynda Hylton Rushton
- Cynda Hylton Rushton is the Anne and George L. Bunting Professor of Clinical Ethics, Berman Institute of Bioethics, and a professor of nursing and pediatrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Nursing, Baltimore, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Kennedy KO, Puccetti DF, Marron JM, Brown SD. Potentially Inappropriate Treatment: Competing Ethical Considerations. AACN Adv Crit Care 2023; 34:161-167. [PMID: 37289624 DOI: 10.4037/aacnacc2023884] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Kerri O Kennedy
- Kerri O. Kennedy is Senior Clinical Ethicist, Office of Ethics, Boston Children's Hospital, 300 Longwood Ave, Boston, MA 02115 ; and Affiliated Faculty, Center for Bioethics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Deirdre F Puccetti
- Deirdre F. Puccetti is Clinical Fellow of Anesthesia (Critical Care), Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jonathan M Marron
- Jonathan M. Marron is Clinical Ethicist, Office of Ethics, Boston Children's Hospital; Director of Clinical Ethics, Center for Bioethics, Harvard Medical School; Attending Physician, Department of Pediatric Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute; and Attending Physician, Division of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Stephen D Brown
- Stephen D. Brown is Associate Clinical Ethicist, Office of Ethics, Boston Children's Hospital; Faculty, Center for Bioethics, Harvard Medical School; and Associate Professor of Radiology (part-time), Department of Radiology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Kon AA. Withdrawal of ECMO Support over the Objections of a Capacitated Patient can be Appropriate. THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS : AJOB 2023; 23:30-32. [PMID: 37220383 DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2023.2201218] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/25/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander A Kon
- Community Children's
- University of Washington School of Medicine
- University of California San Diego School of Medicine
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Childress A, Bibler T, Moore B, Nelson RH, Robertson-Preidler J, Schuman O, Malek J. From Bridge to Destination? Ethical Considerations Related to Withdrawal of ECMO Support over the Objections of Capacitated Patients. THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS : AJOB 2023; 23:5-17. [PMID: 35616323 DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2022.2075959] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 22.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/25/2023]
Abstract
Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is typically viewed as a time-limited intervention-a bridge to recovery or transplant-not a destination therapy. However, some patients with decision-making capacity request continued ECMO support despite a poor prognosis for recovery and lack of viability as a transplant candidate. In response, critical care teams have asked for guidance regarding the ethical permissibility of unilateral withdrawal over the objections of a capacitated patient. In this article, we evaluate several ethical arguments that have been made in favor of withdrawal, including distributive justice, quality of life, patients' rights, professional integrity, and the Equivalence Thesis. We find that existing justifications for unilateral withdrawal of ECMO support in capacitated patients are problematic, which leads us to conclude that either: (1) additional ethical arguments are necessary to defend this approach or (2) the claim that it is not appropriate to use ECMO as a destination therapy should be questioned.
Collapse
|
42
|
Batten JN, Dzeng E, Finder S, Blythe JA, Nurok M. When Critically Ill Patients with Decision Making Capacity and No Further Therapeutic Options Request Indefinite Life Support. THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS : AJOB 2023; 23:21-23. [PMID: 37220368 DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2023.2201208] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/25/2023]
|
43
|
Stahl D. Misuses of "Quality of Life" Judgments in End-of-Life Care. Chest 2023; 163:1228-1231. [PMID: 37164577 DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2022.11.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2022] [Revised: 11/02/2022] [Accepted: 11/23/2022] [Indexed: 05/12/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Devan Stahl
- Department of Religion, Baylor University, Waco, TX.
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Benoit DD, Vanheule S, Manesse F, Anseel F, De Soete G, Goethals K, Lievrouw A, Vansteelandt S, De Haan E, Piers R. Coaching doctors to improve ethical decision-making in adult hospitalised patients potentially receiving excessive treatment: Study protocol for a stepped wedge cluster randomised controlled trial. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0281447. [PMID: 36943825 PMCID: PMC10030010 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0281447] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2022] [Accepted: 01/18/2023] [Indexed: 03/23/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Fast medical progress poses a significant challenge to doctors, who are asked to find the right balance between life-prolonging and palliative care. Literature indicates room for enhancing openness to discuss ethical sensitive issues within and between teams, and improving decision-making for benefit of the patient at end-of-life. METHODS Stepped wedge cluster randomized trial design, run across 10 different departments of the Ghent University Hospital between January 2022 and January 2023. Dutch speaking adult patients and one of their relatives will be included for data collection. All 10 departments were randomly assigned to start a 4-month coaching period. Junior and senior doctors will be coached through observation and debrief by a first coach of the interdisciplinary meetings and individual coaching by the second coach to enhance self-reflection and empowering leadership and managing group dynamics with regard to ethical decision-making. Nurses, junior doctors and senior doctors anonymously report perceptions of excessive treatment via the electronic patient file. Once a patient is identified by two or more different clinicians, an email is sent to the second coach and the doctor in charge of the patient. All nurses, junior and senior doctors will be invited to fill out the ethical decision making climate questionnaire at the start and end of the 12-months study period. Primary endpoints are (1) incidence of written do-not-intubate and resuscitate orders in patients potentially receiving excessive treatment and (2) quality of ethical decision-making climate. Secondary endpoints are patient and family well-being and reports on quality of care and communication; and clinician well-being. Tertiairy endpoints are quantitative and qualitative data of doctor leadership quality. DISCUSSION This is the first randomized control trial exploring the effects of coaching doctors in self-reflection and empowering leadership, and in the management of team dynamics, with regard to ethical decision-making about patients potentially receiving excessive treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dominique D. Benoit
- Ghent University Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Gent, Belgium
- Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Ghent, Gent, Belgium
| | - Stijn Vanheule
- Ghent University Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Gent, Belgium
| | - Frank Manesse
- Independent, Conversio, Gent, Belgium
- Kets de Vries Institute, London, United Kingdom
| | - Frederik Anseel
- Ghent University Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Gent, Belgium
| | - Geert De Soete
- Ghent University Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Gent, Belgium
| | | | - An Lievrouw
- Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Ghent, Gent, Belgium
- Ghent University Hospital Cancer Centre, Gent, Belgium
| | - Stijn Vansteelandt
- Faculty of Applied Mathematics, Computer Sciences and Statistics, Ghent University Faculty of Sciences, Gent, Belgium
- London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| | - Erik De Haan
- Hult International Business School Ashridge Centre for Coaching, Berkhamsted, United Kingdom
- VU Amsterdam School of Business and Economics, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ruth Piers
- Ghent University Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Gent, Belgium
- Ghent University Hospital Geriatrics, Gent, Belgium
| | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Harting MT, Munson D, Linebarger J, Hirshberg E, Gow KW, Malek MM, Robbins AJ, Turnbull J. Ethical Considerations in Critically Ill Neonatal and Pediatric Patients. J Pediatr Surg 2023; 58:1059-1073. [PMID: 36948932 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2023.02.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2023] [Accepted: 02/03/2023] [Indexed: 02/19/2023]
Abstract
The care of critically ill neonates and pediatric patients can be particularly emotionally and ethically challenging. Emerging evidence suggests that we can improve the patient, family, and care team experience in the critical care setting through a better understanding and application of ethical frameworks and communication strategies. We conducted a multidisciplinary panel session at the American Academy of Pediatrics National Conference and Exhibition in the fall of 2022 wherein we explored a myriad of ethical and communication considerations in this unique patient population, with congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) as the congenital anomaly/disease framework. In this review, we will cover state of the art topics in ethics, communication, and palliative care including basic terminology, communication strategies such as trauma-informed communication, establishing/evolving goals of care, futility, medically inappropriate treatment, ethical frameworks, parental discretion, establishing milestones, internal/external intentions, and re-direction of care. These topics will be helpful to many specialties who are involved in the care of critically ill neonates and children including maternal fetal medicine, pediatrics, neonatology, pediatric critical care, palliative care, and pediatric surgery, along with the pediatric surgical subspecialties. We use a theoretical CDH case as an example and include the live audience responses from the interactive session. This primer provides overarching educational principles, as well as practical communication concepts, that can cultivate compassionate multidisciplinary teams, equipped to optimize family-centered, evidence-based compassionate communication and care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew T Harting
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, McGovern Medical School at the University of Texas Health Science Center and Children's Memorial Hermann Hospital, Houston, TX, USA.
| | - David Munson
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatology, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania and the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Jennifer Linebarger
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Missouri - Kansas City and Children's Mercy Hospital, Kansas City, MO, USA
| | - Ellie Hirshberg
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah School of Medicine and Intermountain Healthcare, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Kenneth W Gow
- Department of Surgery, Division of Pediatric Surgery, University of Washington and Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Marcus M Malek
- Department of Surgery, Division of Pediatric Surgery, University of Pittsburgh and UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Alexandria J Robbins
- Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA; Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, Division of Palliative Care, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Jessica Turnbull
- Department of Pediatrics and the Center for Biomedical Ethics and Society, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Siddiqui S, Lutz G, Tabatabai A, Nathan R, Anders M, Gibbons M, Russo M, Whitehead S, Rock P, Scalea T, Kheirbek RE. Early Guided Palliative Care Communication for Patients With COVID-19 Receiving ECMO. Am J Crit Care 2023; 32:166-174. [PMID: 36775881 DOI: 10.4037/ajcc2023184] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) combined with COVID-19 presents challenges (eg, isolation, anticipatory grief) for patients and families. OBJECTIVE To (1) describe characteristics and outcomes of patients with COVID-19 receiving ECMO, (2) develop a practice improvement strategy to implement early, semistructured palliative care communication in ECMO acknowledgment meetings with patients' families, and (3) examine family members' experiences as recorded in clinicians' notes during these meetings. METHODS Descriptive observation of guided, in-depth meetings with families of patients with COVID-19 receiving ECMO, as gathered from the electronic medical record of a large urban academic medical center. Most meetings were held within 3 days of initiation of ECMO. RESULTS Forty-three patients received ECMO between March and October 2020. The mean patient age was 44 years; 63% of patients were Hispanic/Latino, 19% were Black, and 7% were White. Documentation of the ECMO acknowledgment meeting was completed for 60% of patients. Fifty-six percent of patients survived to hospital discharge. Family discussions revealed 7 common themes: hope, reliance on faith, multiple family members with COVID-19, helping children adjust to a new normal, visitation restrictions, gratitude for clinicians and care, and end-of-life discussions. CONCLUSION Early and ongoing provision of palliative care is feasible and useful for highlighting a range of experiences related to COVID-19. Palliative care is also useful for educating patients and families on the benefits and limitations of ECMO therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Safanah Siddiqui
- Safanah Siddiqui is a fellow, Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston
| | - Gabriel Lutz
- Gabriel Lutz is an assistant professor, Department of Medicine, Division of Palliative Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore
| | - Ali Tabatabai
- Ali Tabatabai is an adjunct associate professor, Department of Medicine, Division of Education, University of Maryland School of Medicine
| | - Rachel Nathan
- Rachel Nathan is an assistant professor, Department of Medicine, Division of Palliative Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine
| | - Megan Anders
- Megan Anders is an associate professor, Department of Anesthesiology, University of Maryland School of Medicine
| | - Miranda Gibbons
- Miranda Gibbons is a clinical systems analyst, Department of Anesthesiology, University of Maryland School of Medicine
| | - Marguerite Russo
- Marguerite Russo is a nurse practitioner, University of Maryland Medical Center, and an adjunct associate professor, University of Maryland School of Nursing, Baltimore
| | - Sarah Whitehead
- Sarah Whitehead is a nurse practitioner, University of Maryland Medical Center
| | - Peter Rock
- Peter Rock is a professor, Department of Anesthesiology, University of Maryland School of Medicine
| | - Thomas Scalea
- Thomas Scalea is a professor, Department of Surgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, and director of the R. Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, Baltimore
| | - Raya E Kheirbek
- Raya E. Kheirbek is a professor, Department of Medicine, Division of Palliative Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Hammond J, Schneiderhan J, Taylor L, Marks A. Off the Beaten Path: Caring for People Engaging in Potentially Unsafe Low Evidence Therapies. Am J Hosp Palliat Care 2023; 40:129-135. [PMID: 35531986 DOI: 10.1177/10499091221101181] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Palliative care clinicians regularly care for patients with serious illnesses, many of whom are engaging in the use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) either alone or along with conventional medical therapies. A subset of these patients may be engaging in therapies that have little or no evidence for efficacy and carry significant potential risks to their health. These therapies, however, may carry a great deal of significance for the patient and family for whom conventional medicine has failed or is otherwise deemed untenable. Dismissing such therapies as "quackery" risks alienating patients and damaging or even severing a therapeutic relationship. When faced with patients who are engaging in potentially unsafe low-evidence therapies (PULETs), clinicians themselves may experience a great deal of moral distress when deciding how to balance supporting the hope PULETs may represent with the principles of nonmaleficence and autonomy. In this article, we will review the definition of PULETs and distinguish them from most CAM therapies. Drawing upon existing writings in the CAM literature, we will then review a framework to evaluate the relative risk/benefit ratio of such therapies followed by a review of the ethical and legal aspects of care. Finally, utilizing existing principles and tools in emotion-based communication, we present a communication approach to foster continued collaboration and care for patients who engage in PULETs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John Hammond
- 12266University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Jill Schneiderhan
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Laura Taylor
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Adam Marks
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Fiester A, Yuan C. Ethical Issues in Using Behavior Contracts to Manage the "Difficult" Patient and Family. THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS : AJOB 2023; 23:50-60. [PMID: 34590938 DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2021.1974974] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
Long used as a tool for medical compliance and adhering to treatment plans, behavior contracts have made their way into the in-patient healthcare setting as a way to manage the "difficult" patient and family. The use of this tool is even being adopted by healthcare ethics consultants (HECs) in US hospitals as part of their work in navigating conflict at the bedside. Anecdotal evidence of their increasing popularity among clinical ethicists, for example, can be found at professional bioethics meetings and conversations and idea-sharing among practitioners on HEC social media. While there are a handful of papers gesturing toward a bioethical critique of behavior contracts of various types, the use of behavior contracts in the context of interpersonal conflict has not been vetted by bioethicists to determine their ethical legitimacy or efficacy. In this paper, we highlight a set of ethical concerns that we believe must be addressed before continuing or widespread implementation of behavior contracts to manage the "difficult" patient or family.
Collapse
|
49
|
Giabicani M, Arditty L, Mamzer MF, Fournel I, Ecarnot F, Meunier-Beillard N, Bruneel F, Weiss E, Spranzi M, Rigaud JP, Quenot JP. Team-family conflicts over end-of-life decisions in ICU: A survey of French physicians' beliefs. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0284756. [PMID: 37098023 PMCID: PMC10128920 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284756] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2023] [Accepted: 04/08/2023] [Indexed: 04/26/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Conflicts between relatives and physicians may arise when decisions are being made about limiting life-sustaining therapies (LST). The aim of this study was to describe the motives for, and management of team-family conflicts surrounding LST limitation decisions in French adult ICUs. METHODS Between June and October 2021, French ICU physicians were invited to answer a questionnaire. The development of the questionnaire followed a validated methodology with the collaboration of consultants in clinical ethics, a sociologist, a statistician and ICU clinicians. RESULTS Among 186 physicians contacted, 160 (86%) answered all the questions. Conflicts over LST limitation decisions were mainly related to requests by relatives to continue treatments considered to be unreasonably obstinate by ICU physicians. The absence of advance directives, a lack of communication, a multitude of relatives, and religious or cultural issues were frequently mentioned as factors contributing to conflicts. Iterative interviews with relatives and proposal of psychological support were the most widely used tools in attempting to resolve conflict, while the intervention of a palliative care team, a local ethics resource or the hospital mediator were rarely solicited. In most cases, the decision was suspended at least temporarily. Possible consequences include stress and psychological exhaustion among caregivers. Improving communication and anticipation by knowing the patient's wishes would help avoid these conflicts. CONCLUSION Team-family conflicts during LST limitation decisions are mainly related to requests from relatives to continue treatments deemed unreasonable by physicians. Reflection on the role of relatives in the decision-making process seems essential for the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mikhael Giabicani
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Beaujon Hospital, DMU Parabol, AP-HP Nord, and Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
- Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers, Sorbonne Université, Université Paris Cité, Inserm, Laboratoire ETREs, Paris, France
| | - Laure Arditty
- Service de Réanimation, Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal des Alpes du Sud, Gap, France
| | - Marie-France Mamzer
- Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers, Sorbonne Université, Université Paris Cité, Inserm, Laboratoire ETREs, Paris, France
- Unité Fonctionnelle d'Ethique Médicale, Hôpital Necker-Enfants Malades, AP-HP, Paris, France
| | - Isabelle Fournel
- CHU Dijon Bourgogne, INSERM, Université de Bourgogne, CIC 1432, Module Épidémiologie Clinique, Dijon, France
| | - Fiona Ecarnot
- Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Besançon, Besançon, France
- EA3920, Université de Bourgogne-Franche Comté, Besançon, France
| | - Nicolas Meunier-Beillard
- CHU Dijon Bourgogne, INSERM, Université de Bourgogne, CIC 1432, Module Épidémiologie Clinique, Dijon, France
- DRCI, USMR, CHU Dijon Bourgogne, Dijon, France
| | - Fabrice Bruneel
- Intensive Care Unit, Versailles Hospital Center, Le Chesnay, France
| | - Emmanuel Weiss
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Beaujon Hospital, DMU Parabol, AP-HP Nord, and Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Marta Spranzi
- Center for Clinical Ethics, AP-HP, Paris and Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin en Yvelines, Versailles, France
| | - Jean-Philippe Rigaud
- Service de Médecine Intensive Réanimation, CH de Dieppe, Dieppe, France
- Espace de Réflexion Éthique de Normandie, CHU de Caen, Caen, France
| | - Jean-Pierre Quenot
- CHU Dijon Bourgogne, INSERM, Université de Bourgogne, CIC 1432, Module Épidémiologie Clinique, Dijon, France
- Service de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, CHU Dijon-Bourgogne, Dijon, France
- Equipe Lipness, Centre de Recherche INSERM UMR1231 et LabEx LipSTIC, Université de Bourgogne-Franche Comté, Dijon, France
- Espace de Réflexion Éthique Bourgogne Franche-Comté (EREBFC), Dijon, France
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Jones S, Mulaikal TA. End of Life: What Is the Anesthesiologist's Role? Adv Anesth 2022; 40:1-14. [PMID: 36333041 DOI: 10.1016/j.aan.2022.07.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
Anesthesiologists receive extensive training in the area of perioperative care and the specialized skills required to maintain life during surgery and complex procedures. Integrated into almost every facet of contemporary medicine, they interact with patients at multiple stages of their health care journeys. While traditionally thought of as the doctors best equipped to save lives, they may also be some of the best doctors to help navigate the chapters at the end of life. Successfully navigating end-of-life care, particularly in the COVID-19 era, is a complicated task. Competing ethical principles of autonomy and nonmaleficence may often be encountered as sophisticated medical technologies offer the promise of extending life longer than ever before seen. From encouraging patients to actively engage in advance care planning, normalizing the conversations around the end of life, employing our skills to relieve pain and suffering associated with dying, and using our empathy and communication skills to also care for the families of dying patients, there are many ways for the anesthesiologist to elevate the care provided at the end of life. The aim of this article is to review the existing literature on the role of the anesthesiologist in end-of-life care, as well as to encourage future development of our specialty in this area.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie Jones
- Columbia University Irving Medical Center, Division of Critical Care Medicine, 622 W. 168th St, New York, NY 10032, USA
| | - Teresa A Mulaikal
- Division of Cardiothoracic and Critical Care, Columbia University Medical Center, 622 W. 168th St., PH 5 Stem 133, New York, NY 10032, USA.
| |
Collapse
|