1
|
Hill H, Mitsi E, Nikolaou E, Blizard A, Pojar S, Howard A, Hyder-Wright A, Devin J, Reiné J, Robinson R, Solórzano C, Jochems SP, Kenny-Nyazika T, Ramos-Sevillano E, Weight CM, Myerscough C, McLenaghan D, Morton B, Gibbons E, Farrar M, Randles V, Burhan H, Chen T, Shandling AD, Campo JJ, Heyderman RS, Gordon SB, Brown JS, Collins AM, Ferreira DM. A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial of Nasal Immunization with Live Virulence Attenuated Streptococcus pneumoniae Strains Using Human Infection Challenge. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2023; 208:868-878. [PMID: 37556679 DOI: 10.1164/rccm.202302-0222oc] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2023] [Accepted: 08/09/2023] [Indexed: 08/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Rationale: Pneumococcal pneumonia remains a global health problem. Pneumococcal colonization increases local and systemic protective immunity, suggesting that nasal administration of live attenuated Streptococcus pneumoniae (Spn) strains could help prevent infections. Objectives: We used a controlled human infection model to investigate whether nasopharyngeal colonization with attenuated S. pneumoniae strains protected against recolonization with wild-type (WT) Spn (SpnWT). Methods: Healthy adults aged 18-50 years were randomized (1:1:1:1) for nasal administration twice (at a 2-wk interval) with saline solution, WT Spn6B (BHN418), or one of two genetically modified Spn6B strains, SpnA1 (Δfhs/piaA) or SpnA3 (ΔproABC/piaA) (Stage I). After 6 months, participants were challenged with SpnWT to assess protection against the homologous serotype (Stage II). Measurements and Main Results: 125 participants completed both study stages per intention to treat. No serious adverse events were reported. In Stage I, colonization rates were similar among groups: SpnWT, 58.1% (18 of 31); SpnA1, 60% (18 of 30); and SpnA3, 59.4% (19 of 32). Anti-Spn nasal IgG levels after colonization were similar in all groups, whereas serum IgG responses were higher in the SpnWT and SpnA1 groups than in the SpnA3 group. In colonized individuals, increases in IgG responses were identified against 197 Spn protein antigens and serotype 6 capsular polysaccharide using a pangenome array. Participants given SpnWT or SpnA1 in Stage I were partially protected against homologous challenge with SpnWT (29% and 30% recolonization rates, respectively) at stage II, whereas those exposed to SpnA3 achieved a recolonization rate similar to that in the control group (50% vs. 47%, respectively). Conclusions: Nasal colonization with genetically modified live attenuated Spn was safe and induced protection against recolonization, suggesting that nasal administration of live attenuated Spn could be an effective strategy for preventing pneumococcal infections. Clinical trial registered with the ISRCTN registry (ISRCTN22467293).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helen Hill
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Elena Mitsi
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom
- Oxford Vaccine Group, Department of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Elissavet Nikolaou
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Annie Blizard
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Sherin Pojar
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Ashleigh Howard
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Angela Hyder-Wright
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom
- Liverpool University Hospitals National Health Service Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Jack Devin
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Jesus Reiné
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom
- Oxford Vaccine Group, Department of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Ryan Robinson
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom
- Liverpool University Hospitals National Health Service Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Carla Solórzano
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom
- Oxford Vaccine Group, Department of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Simon P Jochems
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Tinashe Kenny-Nyazika
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Elisa Ramos-Sevillano
- UCL Respiratory, Division of Medicine, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Caroline M Weight
- Division of Infection and Immunity, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Chris Myerscough
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Daniella McLenaghan
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Ben Morton
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Emily Gibbons
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Madlen Farrar
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Victoria Randles
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom
- Liverpool University Hospitals National Health Service Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Hassan Burhan
- Liverpool University Hospitals National Health Service Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Tao Chen
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | | | - Joe J Campo
- Antigen Discovery Inc, Irvine, California; and
| | - Robert S Heyderman
- Division of Infection and Immunity, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Stephen B Gordon
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom
- Malawi Liverpool Wellcome-Trust Programme, Blantyre, Malawi
| | - Jeremy S Brown
- UCL Respiratory, Division of Medicine, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Andrea M Collins
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom
- Liverpool University Hospitals National Health Service Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Daniela M Ferreira
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom
- Oxford Vaccine Group, Department of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ramos-Sevillano E, Ercoli G, Guerra-Assunção JA, Felgner P, Ramiro de Assis R, Nakajima R, Goldblatt D, Tetteh KKA, Heyderman RS, Gordon SB, Ferreria DM, Brown JS. Protective Effect of Nasal Colonisation with ∆cps/piaA and ∆cps/proABCStreptococcus pneumoniae Strains against Recolonisation and Invasive Infection. Vaccines (Basel) 2021; 9:vaccines9030261. [PMID: 33804077 PMCID: PMC8000150 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines9030261] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2021] [Revised: 03/10/2021] [Accepted: 03/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
RATIONALE Nasopharyngeal administration of live virulence-attenuated Streptococcus pneumoniae strains is a potential novel preventative strategy. One target for creating reduced virulence S. pneumoniae strains is the capsule, but loss of the capsule reduces the duration of S. pneumoniae colonisation in mice which could impair protective efficacy against subsequent infection. OBJECTIVES To assess protective efficacy of nasopharyngeal administration of unencapsulated S. pneumoniae strains in murine infection models. METHODS Strains containing cps locus deletions combined with the S. pneumoniae virulence factors psaA (reduces colonisation) or proABC (no effect on colonisation) were constructed and their virulence phenotypes and ability to prevent recolonisation or invasive infection assessed using mouse infection models. Serological responses to colonisation were compared between strains using ELISAs, immunoblots and 254 S. pneumoniae protein antigen array. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS The ∆cps/piaA and ∆cps/proABC strains were strongly attenuated in virulence in both invasive infection models and had a reduced ability to colonise the nasopharynx. ELISAs, immunoblots and protein arrays showed colonisation with either strain stimulated weaker serological responses than the wild type strain. Mice previously colonised with these strains were protected against septicaemic pneumonia but, unlike mice colonised with the wild type strain, not against S. pneumoniae recolonisation. CONCLUSIONS Colonisation with the ∆cps/piaA and ∆cps/proABC strains prevented subsequent septicaemia, but in contrast, to published data for encapsulated double mutant strains they did not prevent recolonisation with S. pneumoniae. These data suggest targeting the cps locus is a less effective option for creating live attenuated strains that prevent S. pneumoniae infections.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elisa Ramos-Sevillano
- Centre for Inflammation and Tissue Repair, UCL Respiratory, Division of Medicine, University College London, Rayne Institute, London WC1E 6JF, UK;
- Correspondence: (E.R.-S.); (J.S.B.); Tel.: +44-20-7679-6008 (J.S.B.); Fax: +44-20-7679-6973 (J.S.B.)
| | - Giuseppe Ercoli
- Centre for Inflammation and Tissue Repair, UCL Respiratory, Division of Medicine, University College London, Rayne Institute, London WC1E 6JF, UK;
| | | | - Philip Felgner
- Vaccine Research and Development Center, Department of Physiology and Biophysics, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA 92697-4560, USA; (P.F.); (R.R.d.A.); (R.N.)
| | - Rafael Ramiro de Assis
- Vaccine Research and Development Center, Department of Physiology and Biophysics, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA 92697-4560, USA; (P.F.); (R.R.d.A.); (R.N.)
| | - Rie Nakajima
- Vaccine Research and Development Center, Department of Physiology and Biophysics, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA 92697-4560, USA; (P.F.); (R.R.d.A.); (R.N.)
| | - David Goldblatt
- Immunobiology Section, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, London WC1N 1EH, UK;
| | - Kevin Kweku Adjei Tetteh
- Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, London WC1E 7HT, UK;
| | - Robert Simon Heyderman
- Research Department of Infection, Division of Infection and Immunity, University College London, Rayne Institute, London WC1E 6JF, UK;
| | - Stephen Brian Gordon
- Malawi-Liverpool-Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Programme, Blantyre 30096, Malawi;
| | - Daniela Mulari Ferreria
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool L3 5QA, UK;
| | - Jeremy Stuart Brown
- Centre for Inflammation and Tissue Repair, UCL Respiratory, Division of Medicine, University College London, Rayne Institute, London WC1E 6JF, UK;
- Correspondence: (E.R.-S.); (J.S.B.); Tel.: +44-20-7679-6008 (J.S.B.); Fax: +44-20-7679-6973 (J.S.B.)
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
The Dynamics of Respiratory Microbiota during Mechanical Ventilation in Patients with Pneumonia. J Clin Med 2020; 9:jcm9030638. [PMID: 32120914 PMCID: PMC7141134 DOI: 10.3390/jcm9030638] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2020] [Revised: 02/21/2020] [Accepted: 02/21/2020] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Bacterial pneumonia is a major cause of mechanical ventilation in intensive care units. We hypothesized that the presence of particular microbiota in endotracheal tube aspirates during the course of intubation was associated with clinical outcomes such as extubation failure or 28-day mortality. Sixty mechanically ventilated ICU (intensive care unit) patients (41 patients with pneumonia and 19 patients without pneumonia) were included, and tracheal aspirates were obtained on days 1, 3, and 7. Gene sequencing of 16S rRNA was used to measure the composition of the respiratory microbiome. A total of 216 endotracheal aspirates were obtained from 60 patients. A total of 22 patients were successfully extubatedwithin3 weeks, and 12 patients died within 28days. Microbiota profiles differed significantly between the pneumonia group and the non-pneumonia group (Adonis, p < 0.01). While α diversity (Shannon index) significantly decreased between day 1 and day 7 in the successful extubation group, it did not decrease in the failed extubation group among intubated patients with pneumonia. There was a significant difference in the change of βdiversity between the successful extubation group and the failed extubation group for Bray-Curtis distances (p < 0.001). At the genus level, Rothia, Streptococcus, and Prevotella correlated with the change of β diversity. A low relative abundance of Streptococci at the time of intubation was strongly associated with 28-day mortality. The dynamics of respiratory microbiome were associated with clinical outcomes such as extubation failure and mortality. Further large prospective studies are needed to test the predictive value of endotracheal aspirates in intubated patients.
Collapse
|