Phase 2b Study of Inhaled RVT-1601 for Chronic Cough in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: SCENIC Trial: Multi-Center, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study

Cough in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: what is new

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a chronic, progressive and fatal interstitial fibrosing disease and, despite some well-known risk factors, its cause is still unknown. Cough is experienced by most patients and is commonly chronic and refractory, having a significant impact on quality of life. Its aetiology is complex, combining factors related to interstitial lung disease (ILD) such as an increased sensitivity of cough-sensitive nerves, structural lung changes and inflammation, genetic factors, several comorbidities and medication-adverse effects. Despite the therapeutic advancements in IPF over the past decade with the introduction of antifibrotic drugs that slow disease progression, effective treatment options for cough in IPF remain unavailable. Cough management often relies on empirical approaches based on studies involving chronic cough patients of unspecified causes and ILD physicians' personal experiences. Different classes of medications have been tried over time and, more recently, the focus has turned to neuromodulators and opioids, but several studies have shown suboptimal efficacy in cough. On the other hand, these drugs are associated with significant physical, psychological and economic burdens. However, the future brings us hope to the extent that most current ongoing clinical trials are using new molecules and some have demonstrated promising antitussive effects. This review aims to provide a practical guide to understanding and managing cough in IPF patients, presenting pharmacological and non-pharmacological approaches over time, as well as those treatments that are currently being investigated in clinical settings.

Examining Cough's Role and Relief Strategies in Interstitial Lung Disease

Chronic cough is a distressing and prevalent symptom in interstitial lung disease (ILD), significantly impairing quality of life (QoL) and contributing to disease progression, particularly in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). It is associated with physical discomfort, psychological distress, and social isolation and is often refractory to conventional therapies. The pathophysiology of cough in ILD is complex and multifactorial, involving neural hypersensitivity, structural lung changes, inflammatory processes, and comorbid conditions such as gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Evaluating cough in ILD relies on subjective and objective tools to measure its severity, frequency, and impact on daily life, although standardization of these measures remains challenging. Management strategies span pharmacological interventions, including neuromodulators such as opiates, antifibrotic agents, pharmacologic and surgical GERD treatments, and non-pharmacological approaches like behavioral therapies, cough suppression techniques, and pulmonary rehabilitation and physiotherapy. Emerging treatments, such as P2X3 receptor antagonists and airway hydration therapies, offer promising avenues but require further investigation through robust clinical trials. This review aims to demonstrate the importance of addressing cough in ILD as a significant symptom and present objective and subjective methods of quantifying coughs, while providing insights into effective and emerging therapeutic options. By highlighting these potential therapies, we hope to guide healthcare practitioners in considering them through a thorough evaluation of benefits and risks on a case-by-case basis, with relevance both in the U.S. and internationally.

Objective measurement of cough in pulmonary fibrosis: a cohort study - ImpaCT

Using both objective cough monitoring and patient-reported outcomes measures, this study describes the burden of cough for patients with non-IPF pulmonary fibrosis https://bit.ly/3wFm0th.

What causes cough in pulmonary fibrosis, and how should we treat it?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To review the current understanding of the impact, mechanisms and treatments for cough in patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD). Evidence suggests that cough is a prevalent symptom in patients with ILD and has a significant impact on patients.

RECENT FINDINGS

There is increasing interest in the role of cough hypersensitivity as seen in chronic refractory cough in patients with ILD, and encouraging recent results suggest that ILD-associated cough responds to opiate therapy.

SUMMARY

Understanding the aetiology of cough in patients with ILD is crucial to continue to develop therapies which might be effective in reducing cough and increasing quality of life.

The burden of cough in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and other interstitial lung diseases: a systematic evidence synthesis

BACKGROUND

Cough remains a persistent symptom in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and other interstitial lung diseases (ILDs). To inform future research, treatment and care models, we conducted the first systematic synthesis of evidence on its associated burden.

METHODS

A literature search was performed for articles published between January 2010 and October 2023 using databases including Embase, MEDLINE and the Cochrane Library. Studies in patients with IPF and other ILDs reporting cough-related measures were eligible for inclusion. Included studies were categorised based on the types of ILD they examined and their design. Study details, patient characteristics and outcomes were extracted, and the risk of bias was assessed. A narrative synthesis approach was employed to interpret the findings.

RESULTS

Sixty-one studies were included: 33 in IPF, 18 in mixed-ILDs, six in connective tissue disease-associated-ILDs and four in sarcoidosis. Across the studies, a range of tools to assess cough and its impact were used. The most frequently used measures of cough were cough severity visual analogue scale (VAS) and objective cough counts, whereas the most frequently used health-related quality of life (HRQoL)/impact measures were the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) and Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ). In IPF, studies consistently reported correlations between various cough and HRQoL measures, including between cough VAS scores and objective cough counts, LCQ scores and SGRQ scores. Similar correlations were observed in studies in other ILDs, but data were more limited. Qualitative studies in both IPF and other ILDs consistently highlighted the significant cough-related burden experienced by patients, including disruption of daily activities, fatigue and social embarrassment. Although there were no studies specifically investigating the economic burden of cough, one study in patients with fibrotic ILD found cough severity was associated with workplace productivity loss.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study underscores the heterogeneity in assessing cough and its impact in IPF and other ILDs. The findings confirm the negative impact of cough on HRQoL in IPF and suggest a comparable impact in other ILDs. Our synthesis highlights the need for standardised assessment tools, along with dedicated studies, particularly in non-IPF ILDs and on the economic burden of cough.

Comparison of Pirfenidone and Nintedanib: Post Hoc Analysis of the CleanUP-IPF Study

BACKGROUND

Antifibrotics are effective in slowing FVC decline in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). However, whether antifibrotic type is differentially associated with FVC decline remains inconclusive.

RESEARCH QUESTION

Are there significant differences in 12-month FVC decline between pirfenidone and nintedanib?

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

A post hoc analysis was performed using the Clinical Efficacy of Antimicrobial Therapy Strategy Using Pragmatic Design in IPF (CleanUP-IPF) trial (No. NCT02759120). Participants who reported using pirfenidone or nintedanib on enrollment into the trial were in the primary analysis. Spirometry was scheduled at baseline and the 12- and 24-month study visits. Linear mixed-effects models with random intercept and slope were used to examine changes in FVC over time. Models were adjusted for age, sex, smoking history, coronary artery disease history, baseline FVC, and 12-month spline term. Survival and nonelective respiratory hospitalization by antifibrotic type were determined using Cox regression models with adjustment for age, sex, smoking history, coronary artery disease history, and baseline FVC and diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide.

RESULTS

Out of the 513 participants with IPF randomized in the CleanUP-IPF trial, 407 reported using pirfenidone (n = 264, 65%) or nintedanib (n = 143, 35%). The pirfenidone group had more participants with a history of coronary artery disease than the nintedanib group (34.1% vs 20.3%, respectively). Patients treated with nintedanib had a higher 12-month visit FVC than patients treated with pirfenidone (mean difference, 106 mL; 95% CI, 34-178). This difference was attenuated at the 24-month study visit. There were no significant differences in overall survival and nonelective respiratory hospitalization between the pirfenidone- and nintedanib-treated groups.

INTERPRETATION

Patients with IPF who used nintedanib had a slower 12-month FVC decline than pirfenidone in a post hoc analysis of a clinical trial.

Novel inhalation therapy in pulmonary fibrosis: principles, applications and prospects

Pulmonary fibrosis (PF) threatens millions of people worldwide with its irreversible progression. Although the underlying pathogenesis of PF is not fully understood, there is evidence to suggest that the disease can be blocked at various stages. Inhalation therapy has been applied for lung diseases such as asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and its application for treating PF is currently under consideration. New techniques in inhalation therapy, such as the application of microparticles and nanoparticles, traditional Chinese medicine monomers, gene therapy, inhibitors, or agonists of signaling pathways, extracellular vesicle interventions, and other specific drugs, are effective in treating PF. However, the safety and effectiveness of these therapeutic techniques are influenced by the properties of inhaled particles, biological and pathological barriers, and the type of inhalation device used. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the pharmacological, pharmaceutical, technical, preclinical, and clinical experimental aspects of novel inhalation therapy for treating PF and focus on therapeutic methods that significantly improve existing technologies or expand the range of drugs that can be administered via inhalation. Although inhalation therapy for PF has some limitations, the advantages are significant, and further research and innovation about new inhalation techniques and drugs are encouraged.

The Therapeutic Landscape in Chronic Cough

In recent years, there has been a substantial increase in the development of antitussive therapies and the first new therapy, gefapixant has been licenced in Europe. This review describes current unlicenced treatments for chronic cough and details treatments currently in development for refractory chronic cough and cough in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, as well as compounds previously explored.

Assessment and Management of Cough in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: A Narrative Review

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a chronic, progressive, and fatal disease with an unknown cause. It is characterized by symptoms such as cough and breathlessness, which significantly impact patients' quality of life. Cough, in particular, has emerged as a burdensome symptom for individuals with IPF. The etiology of cough in IPF patients is believed to be complex, involving factors related to the disease itself, such as increased sensitivity of cough nerves, lung structural changes, inflammation, and genetic factors, as well as comorbidities and medication effects. Unfortunately, effective treatment options for cough in IPF remain limited, often relying on empirical approaches based on studies involving chronic cough patients in general and the personal experience of physicians. Medications such as opioids and neuromodulators are commonly prescribed but have shown suboptimal efficacy, imposing significant physical, psychological, and economic burdens on patients. However, there is hope on the horizon, as specific purinergic P2 receptor ligand-gated ion channel (P2X3) inhibitors have demonstrated promising antitussive effects in ongoing clinical trials. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the evaluation and management of cough in IPF patients, as well as highlight emerging pharmacological and non-pharmacological approaches that target the cough reflex and are currently being investigated in clinical settings.

Mechanisms and management of cough in interstitial lung disease

INTRODUCTION

Many patients with interstitial lung diseases (ILDs), especially fibrotic ILDs, experience chronic cough. It negatively impacts both physical and psychological well-being. Effective treatment options are limited.

AREAS COVERED

The pathophysiology of chronic cough in IPF is complex and involves multiple mechanisms, including mechanical distortion of airways, parenchyma, and nerve fibers. The pathophysiology of cough in other fibrosing ILDs is poorly understood and involves various pathways. The purpose of this review is to highlight mechanisms of chronic cough and to present therapeutic evidence for its management in the most commonly occurring diffuse fibrosing lung diseases including idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), connective tissue disease-related interstitial lung disease (CTD-ILD), sarcoidosis-related ILD (Sc-ILD), chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis-related ILD (CHP-ILD), and post-COVID-19-related interstitial lung disease (PC-ILD).

EXPERT OPINION

This review guides the management of chronic cough in fibrosing ILDs. In this era of precision medicine, chronic cough management should be individualized in each interstitial lung disease.

Current and Future Treatment Landscape for Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) remains a disease with poor survival. The pathogenesis is complex and encompasses multiple molecular pathways. The first-generation antifibrotics pirfenidone and nintedanib, approved more than 10 years ago, have been shown to reduce the rate of progression, increase the length of life for patients with IPF, and work for other fibrotic lung diseases. In the last two decades, most clinical trials on IPF have failed to meet the primary endpoint and an urgent unmet need remains to identify agents or treatment strategies that can stop disease progression. The pharmacotherapeutic landscape for IPF is moving forward with a number of new drugs currently in clinical development, mostly in phase I and II trials, while only a few phase III trials are running. Since our understanding of IPF pathogenesis is still limited, we should keep focusing our efforts to deeper understand the mechanisms underlying this complex disease and their reflection on clinical phenotypes. This review discusses the key pathogenetic concepts for the development of new antifibrotic agents, presents the newest data on approved therapies, and summarizes new compounds currently in clinical development. Finally, future directions in antifibrotics development are discussed.

Contemporary Concise Review 2022: Interstitial lung disease

Novel genetic associations for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) risk have been identified. Common genetic variants associated with IPF are also associated with chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis. The characterization of underlying mechanisms, such as pathways involved in myofibroblast differentiation, may reveal targets for future treatments. Newly identified circulating biomarkers are associated with disease progression and mortality. Deep learning and machine learning may increase accuracy in the interpretation of CT scans. Novel treatments have shown benefit in phase 2 clinical trials. Hospitalization with COVID-19 is associated with residual lung abnormalities in a substantial number of patients. Inequalities exist in delivering and accessing interstitial lung disease specialist care.

An update on current and emerging drug treatments for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis

INTRODUCTION

Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF) is a progressive and devastating lung disease, characterized by progressive lung scarring.

AREAS COVERED

Prior to antifibrotic therapy (pirfenidone and nintedanib), there was no validated pharmaceutical therapy for IPF. Both antifibrotics can slow disease progression, however, IPF remains a detrimental disease with poor prognosis and treated survival rates of less than 7 years from diagnosis. Despite their effect the disease remains non-reversible and progressing whilst their side effect profile is often challenging. Treatment of comorbidities is also crucial. In this review, we discuss the current pharmacological management as well as management of comorbidities and symptoms. We also reviewed clinicaltrials.gov and summarised all the mid to late stage clinical trials (phase II and III) registered in IPF over the last 7 years and discuss the most promising drugs in clinical development.

EXPERT OPINION

Future for IPF management will need to focus on current unresolved issues. First a primary pathogenetic pathway has not been clearly identified. Future management may involve a combination of brushstroke approach with antifibrotics with targeted treatments for specific pathways in patient subsets following an 'oncological' approach. Another unmet need is management of exacerbations, which are deathly in most cases as well as either treating or preventing lung cancer.

Trials and Treatments: An Update on Pharmacotherapy for Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a chronic and progressive fibrosing interstitial lung disease that occurs predominantly in the older population. There is increasing incidence and prevalence in IPF globally. The emergence of anti-fibrotic therapies in the last decade have improved patient survival though a cure is yet to be developed. In this review article, we aim to summarize the existing and novel pharmacotherapies for the treatment of IPF (excluding treatments for acute exacerbations), focusing on the current knowledge on the pathophysiology of the disease, mechanism of action of the drugs, and clinical trials.