Moving toward Equitable Care for Sleep Apnea in the United States: Positive Airway Pressure Adherence Thresholds: An Official American Thoracic Society Policy Statement

A multidisciplinary approach to the home management of continuous positive airway pressure therapy for obstructive sleep apnea: beyond usual care pathways (a narrative review)

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a common chronic condition that is growing in prevalence, associated with important comorbidities, and has several different phenotypes. Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is the gold standard OSA treatment, but its effectiveness relies on consistent adherence, which can often be difficult to maintain. This narrative review discusses current challenges in the care pathways for CPAP therapy management in OSA, including fragmented care/lack of continuity, inadequate management of comorbidities, suboptimal implementation of digital medicine solutions, and existing reimbursement paradigms. Key tasks to be shared between the appropriate healthcare professionals and providers include technical CPAP follow-up (adherence, effectiveness, alert management), management of comorbidities, and multimodal non-invasive monitoring. What this looks like and who provides the different aspects of care should vary by OSA phenotype, ranging from simple follow-up in primary care (uncomplicated OSA with good CPAP adherence) to multidisciplinary specialist management (high-risk OSA with comorbidities), with regular reassessment to ensure continued alignment with the chosen care plan. In addition to better defining these pathways, how they are reimbursed also needs to be addressed. We suggest that there should be a multidisciplinary approach to symptom reduction and adherence, longitudinal assessment of patient-reported outcomes, and a focus on long-term cardiometabolic health as part of managing CPAP-treated patients with OSA. Facilitated by the appropriate use of digital technologies, these approaches should lead to more personalized care and greater patient engagement, resulting in better long-term adherence and treatment effectiveness. The ultimate goal should be to do better for less.

Access and models of obstructive sleep apnea care: a cross-national comparison of Canadian and Australian patient survey data

STUDY OBJECTIVES

We aimed to describe similarities and differences in obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) care pathways and their impact on patients in Australia and Canada, including among urban vs rural participants.

METHODS

In this secondary data analysis of patient surveys exploring OSA care in Australia and Canada, we recruited adults with a prior diagnosis of OSA from market research companies, social media, and patient-facing medical associations. Residential postal codes were used to classify participants as urban or rural. Survey domains included wait times and travel distances for care, providers, and treatments.

RESULTS

Data from 589 Canadians (21% rural; 42% female; mean [standard deviation] age = 57 [13] years) and 412 Australians (38% rural; 45% female; mean [standard deviation] age = 58 [14] years) with OSA were included. Participants in both countries most commonly sought initial care for suspected OSA from a primary care practitioner. Canadian participants waited longer to seek care than Australian participants (37% vs 51% within 12 months of symptom onset). Wait times for diagnostic testing were longer in Canada (59% vs 76% within 3 months of initial assessment), especially in urban settings (58% vs 78%). In both countries, > 80% of participants were offered positive airway pressure therapy. Overall, a greater variety of treatments were offered and used by Australian participants.

CONCLUSIONS

Greater access to diagnostic testing and a greater variety of treatments were found in Australia compared to Canada. Further research is needed to determine whether reduced diagnostic wait times and presentation of increased therapy options found in Australia translate to better patient outcomes.

CITATION

Fatima D, Sweetman A, Lovato N, et al. Access and models of obstructive sleep apnea care: a cross-national comparison of Canadian and Australian patient survey data. J Clin Sleep Med. 2025;21(3):467-477.

Peer-Driven Intervention for Care Coordination and Adherence Promotion for Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Randomized, Parallel-Group Clinical Trial

Rationale: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a common condition that is usually treated by continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy, but poor adherence is common and is associated with worse patient outcomes and experiences. Patient satisfaction is increasingly adopted as a quality indicator by healthcare systems. Objectives: We tested the hypothesis that peer-driven intervention effected through an interactive voice response (IVR) system leads to better patient satisfaction (primary outcome), care coordination, and CPAP adherence than active control. Methods: We performed a 6-month randomized, parallel-group, controlled trial with CPAP-naive patients recruited from four centers and CPAP-adherent patients who were trained to be mentors delivering support through an IVR system. Measurements and Main Results: In 263 patients, intention-to-treat analysis of global satisfaction for sleep-specific services was better in the intervention group (4.57 ± 0.71 Likert scale score; mean ± SD) than in the active-control group (4.10 ± 1.13; P < 0.001). CPAP adherence was greater in the intervention group (4.5 ± 0.2 h/night; 62.0% ± 3.0% of nights >4 h use) versus the active-control group (3.7 ± 0.2 h/night; 51.4% ± 3.0% of nights >4 h use; P = 0.014 and P = 0.023). When compared with the active-control group, the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care rating was moderately increased by an adjusted difference of 0.33 ± 0.12 (P = 0.009), Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Provider and Systems rating was not different (adjusted difference, 0.46 ± 0.26; P = 0.076), and Client Perception of Coordination Questionnaire was mildly better in the intervention group (adjusted difference, 0.15 ± 0.07; P = 0.035). Conclusions: Patient satisfaction with care delivery, CPAP adherence, and care coordination were improved by peer-driven intervention through an IVR system. New payor policies compensating peer support may enable implementation of this approach. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02056002).

Evaluating the Benefit of Home Support Provider Services for Positive Airway Pressure Therapy in Patients With Obstructive Sleep Apnea: Protocol for an Ambispective International Real-World Study

BACKGROUND

Adherence and persistence to positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy are key factors for positive health outcomes. Home support providers participate in the home implementation and follow-up of PAP therapy for patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). In Europe, home support provider service levels are country (or area) specific, resulting in differences in content and frequency of patient interactions. However, no robust evaluation of the impact of these differences on clinical and patient outcomes has been performed.

OBJECTIVE

The AWAIR study aims to evaluate and compare the impact of different home support provider service levels on PAP adherence and persistence in 4 European countries.

METHODS

This real-world, ambispective, cohort study-conducted in France, Belgium, Spain, and Portugal-will recruit adults with OSA who started PAP therapy between 2019 and 2023 and were followed by an Air Liquide Healthcare home support provider. Given the large number of eligible participants (around 150,000), the study will use a decentralized and digital approach. A patient video will present the study objectives and the participation process. A secure electronic solution will be used to manage patient information and consent, as well as to administer a web-based questionnaire. Retrospective data, collected during routine patient follow-up by home support providers, include the level of service and device data, notably PAP use. Prospective data collected using an electronic patient-reported outcome tool include health status, OSA-related factors, patient-reported outcomes including quality of life and symptoms, OSA and PAP literacy, patient-reported experience, and satisfaction with PAP therapy and service. Hierarchical models, adjusted for preidentified confounding factors, will be used to assess the net effect of home support provider services on PAP adherence and persistence while minimizing real-world study biases and considering the influence of country-level contextual factors. We hypothesize that higher levels of home support provider services will be positively associated with adherence and persistence to PAP therapy.

RESULTS

As of December 2024, the study has received approval in France, Portugal, and 2 regions of Spain. The study began enrollment in France in October 2024. Results are expected in the second quarter of 2025.

CONCLUSIONS

The AWAIR study has a unique design, leveraging an unprecedented number of eligible participants, decentralized technologies, and a real-world comparative methodology across multiple countries. This approach will highlight intercountry differences in terms of patient characteristics, PAP adherence, and persistence, as well as patient-reported outcomes, patient-reported experiences, and satisfaction with the home service provider. By assessing the added value of home support provider services, the results will support best practices for patient management and for decision-making by payers and authorities.

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID)

PRR1-10.2196/65840.

Sleep Health Disparities

Sleep is an important and potentially modifiable determinant of many severe health outcomes. Sleep health disparities exist and are exemplified by reported differential rates of prevalence, severity, and outcomes among minority groups and low-socioeconomic-status backgrounds. In this review we highlight the concept of sleep health, review the evidence for disparities in sleep health, examine risk factors and consequences of poor sleep health, and discuss policy implications.

Racial Disparity in Obstructive Sleep Apnea Care and its Impact on Cardiovascular Health

Purpose of Review

Racial disparities in sleep health as well as the diagnosis and treatment of sleep disorders have emerged as a key driver of cardiovascular outcomes. Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), is characterized by repeated airway obstructions during sleep and is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease. While racial and ethnic minorities have disproportionately high OSA prevalence rates, diagnosis rates remain low. One explanation behind this phenomenon are structural environmental and lifestyle barriers that prevent access to OSA care. Additionally, there remains significantly limited understanding of OSA and its causes and symptoms within communities.

Recent Findings

In general, minorities have poorer sleep health due to systemic and environmental racism, which also causes an increased in conditions such as obesity that increases OSA risk. Disparities also persist within various types of OSA treatment. The most common form of treatment, continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) has lower adherence among African Americans, as well as those living in areas with low socioeconomic status (SES), primarily minorities. There have been a small number of studies that have shown some initial success of educational campaigns about OSA within minority communities in increasing screenings and diagnoses. Peer based education has been an effective technique, and there is a need for such programs to be expanded.

Summary

Disparities persist, with minority groups having worse sleep health and lower rates of adherence to OSA treatment. Some grassroots, peer-led educational campaigns show promise in increasing adherence. In light of these disparities, there remains a need for the field of sleep medicine to continue addressing the systemic barriers that hinder the timely evaluation and treatment in racial minorities.

Racial and ethnic differences in the receipt of continuous positive airway pressure treatment for obstructive sleep apnea

OBJECTIVE

To examine the pattern of health services access and utilization that may contribute to racial/ethnic disparities in receiving continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) treatment for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA).

METHODS

This cross-sectional study used a national sample from the All of Us Research Program, which included over 80 % of participants from underrepresented populations in biomedical research. Study participants included adults aged 18 years and older diagnosed with OSA (N = 8518). Diagnosis of OSA and CPAP treatment were ascertained by diagnostic and procedural codes from the electronic health records. Sociodemographic characteristics and health service utilization factors were identified using self-reported survey data.

RESULTS

With this national survey, the overall diagnosed prevalence of OSA was 8.8 %, with rates of 8.12 % in non-Hispanic (NH) Black adults, 5.99 % in Hispanic adults, and 10.35 % in NH White adults. When comparing to NH White adults, Hispanic adults were less likely to receive CPAP treatment for OSA after adjusting for socioeconomic and demographic characteristics, access to and utilization of health services, and comorbidities such as obesity and having multiple chronic conditions (OR = 0.73, 95 % CI = 0.59,0.90), p < 0.01.

CONCLUSIONS

The rates of CPAP treatment among OSA patients are not consistent across racial and ethnic groups. Unequal access to health services based on residence may contribute to these differences. Interventions that target disparities in OSA diagnosis, access to treatment, and barriers in insurance coverage could potentially help reduce racial and ethnic differences in OSA diagnosis and management.

The Great Controversy of Obstructive Sleep Apnea Treatment for Cardiovascular Risk Benefit: Advancing the Science Through Expert Consensus. An Official American Thoracic Society Workshop Report

The prevalence of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is on the rise, driven by various factors including more sensitive diagnostic criteria, increased awareness, enhanced technology through at-home testing enabling easy and cost-effective diagnosis, and a growing incidence of comorbid conditions such as obesity. Treating symptomatic patients with OSA syndrome to enhance quality of life remains a cornerstone approach. However, there is a lack of consensus regarding treatment to improve cardiovascular disease (CVD) outcomes, particularly in light of overall negative results from several randomized controlled trials (RCT) indicating no benefit of positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy on primary and secondary CVD events. These RCTs were limited by suboptimal PAP adherence, use of composite CVD outcomes, and limited diversity and generalizability to Sleep Clinic patients. As such, this workshop assembled clinical experts, as well as researchers in basic and translational science, epidemiology, clinical trials, and population health to discuss the current state, and future research directions to guide personalized therapeutic strategies and future research directions in OSA. There was overall consensus among workshop participants that OSA represents a heterogeneous disease with variable endotypes and phenotypes, and heterogeneous responses to treatment. Future research should prioritize employing multi-modal therapeutic approaches within innovative and adaptive trial designs, focusing on specific subgroups of OSA patients hypothesized to benefit from a CVD perspective. Future work should also be inclusive of diverse populations and consider the life-course of OSA to better comprehend treatment strategies that can address the disproportionate impact of OSA on racially minoritized groups. Further, a more holistic approach to sleep must be adopted to include broader assessments of symptoms, sleep duration, and comorbid sleep and circadian disorders. Finally, it is imperative to establish a sleep research consortium dedicated to collecting raw data and biospecimens categorized by OSA subtypes. This will facilitate mechanistic determinations, foster collaborative research, and help bolster the pipeline of early-career researchers.

Evaluation of continuous positive airway pressure adherence and its contributing factors

BACKGROUND

Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) adherence may vary based on the study design and country.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate long-term CPAP adherence and elucidate associated factors.

METHODS

A multicenter retrospective observational cohort study was conducted over two years. The study included patients diagnosed with obstructive sleep apnea who were prescribed CPAP (n = 1261). Adherence was assessed for 90 days and 365 days. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) criteria (≥4 h/night on ≥70 % of nights) and research adherence criteria (≥4 h/night during the observational period) were used. Factors influencing CPAP adherence (CMS criteria) during 90 and 365 days were also evaluated. Continuous variables were categorized into low, middle, and high classes, and logistic regression analysis with interaction was performed.

RESULTS

CPAP adherence to CMS criteria for 90 and 365 days was 45.6 % and 44.7 %, respectively, whereas adherence to research criteria was 57.0 % and 54.1 %, respectively. Middle age, high age, and high apnea ratio independently increased CPAP adherence. Conversely, a high rapid eye movement apnea-hypopnea index ratio decreased CPAP adherence. Although high body mass index (BMI) had no independent effect on adherence, its interaction with high 3 % oxygen desaturation index increased 90-day CPAP adherence. However, high BMI decreased 90-day CPAP adherence in males. The interaction between middle age and high BMI was associated with decreased CPAP adherence over 365 days.

CONCLUSIONS

Adherence to CPAP in real-world settings is modest. Various factors influence CPAP adherence. BMI may exert varied effects on CPAP adherence depending on the accompanying factors.

Positive Airway Pressure, Mortality, and Cardiovascular Risk in Older Adults With Sleep Apnea

Importance

Positive airway pressure (PAP) is the first-line treatment for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), but evidence on its beneficial effect on major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and mortality prevention is limited.

Objective

To determine whether PAP initiation and utilization are associated with lower mortality and incidence of MACE among older adults with OSA living in the central US.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This retrospective clinical cohort study included Medicare beneficiaries with 2 or more distinct OSA claims identified from multistate, statewide, multiyear (2011-2020) Medicare fee-for-service claims data. Individuals were followed up until death or censoring on December 31, 2020. Analyses were performed between December 2021 and December 2023.

Exposures

Evidence of PAP initiation and utilization based on PAP claims after OSA diagnosis.

Main Outcomes and Measures

All-cause mortality and MACE, defined as a composite of myocardial infarction, heart failure, stroke, or coronary revascularization. Doubly robust Cox proportional hazards models with inverse probability of treatment weights were used to estimate treatment effect sizes controlling for sociodemographic and clinical factors.

Results

Among 888 835 beneficiaries with OSA included in the analyses (median [IQR] age, 73 [69-78] years; 390 598 women [43.9%]; 8115 Asian [0.9%], 47 122 Black [5.3%], and 760 324 White [85.5%] participants; median [IQR] follow-up, 3.1 [1.5-5.1] years), those with evidence of PAP initiation (290 015 [32.6%]) had significantly lower all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 0.53; 95% CI, 0.52-0.54) and MACE incidence risk (HR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.89-0.91). Higher quartiles (Q) of annual PAP claims were progressively associated with lower mortality (Q2 HR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.81-0.87; Q3 HR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.74-0.79; Q4 HR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.72-0.77) and MACE incidence risk (Q2 HR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.89-0.95; Q3 HR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.86-0.91; Q4 HR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.85-0.90).

Conclusions and Relevance

In this cohort study of Medicare beneficiaries with OSA, PAP utilization was associated with lower all-cause mortality and MACE incidence. Results might inform trials assessing the importance of OSA therapy toward minimizing cardiovascular risk and mortality in older adults.

Differences in Positive Airway Pressure Requirements in Obstructive Sleep Apnea Between Black and White Patients

OBJECTIVE

There are disparities between Black and White patients in the utilization of positive airway pressure (PAP) alternatives for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Given low utilization rates among Black patients, there is limited knowledge of PAP alternative outcomes in this group. Therapeutic PAP levels are clinically accessible measures that have been shown to predict PAP alternative outcomes. Herein, we examined differences in PAP requirements between Black and White patients in a large clinical sample.

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional.

SETTING

Academic sleep center.

METHODS

We included OSA patients prescribed autoadjusting PAP between January 2018 and 2020 with baseline apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) ≥ 10. Mean and 90th percentile PAP levels were compared between White and Black patients who used PAP for ≥1 hour daily using linear regression controlling for age, sex, body mass index (BMI), AHI, oxygen saturation nadir, and mask type.

RESULTS

There were 157 Black and 234 White patients who were generally obese (BMI, 37.3 ± 8.7) with severe OSA (AHI, 36.9 ± 25.6). Black patients had a 0.68 cm higher (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.36, 1.35) mean PAP level and 0.85 cm H2O higher (95% CI: 0.36, 1.35) 90th percentile PAP level than white patients. Although statistically significant, differences were small and not clinically meaningful.

CONCLUSION

Black and White OSA patients had clinically insignificant differences in PAP requirements, suggesting comparable upper airway collapsibility. Considering the predictive value of therapeutic PAP levels, our findings suggest Black and White patients may have comparable PAP alternative responses from a collapsibility standpoint. Future studies should explore reasons for low utilization of PAP alternatives among Black patients.

National Implementation of CPAP Telemonitoring and a Pay-for-performance Scheme for Homecare Providers in France Leads to Prioritisation of Resources to Individuals with Low Therapy Adherence: The IMPACT-PAP Cohort Study

INTRODUCTION

Long-term adherence to continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy for obstructive sleep apnoea remains suboptimal and low adherence increases healthcare costs. This study investigated relationships between CPAP adherence and the intensity of support provided by homecare providers after implementation of telemonitoring and pay-for-performance reimbursement for CPAP in France.

METHODS

Adults who started CPAP in 2018/2019, used telemonitoring, and had ≥1 year of homecare provider data were eligible. The main objective was to determine associations between CPAP adherence at 1 month (low [<2h/night], intermediate [2 to <4h/night], high [≥4h/night]) and the number/type of homecare provider interactions (home visits, phone calls, mask change) during the first year.

RESULTS

Eleven thousand, one hundred sixty-six individuals were included (mean age 59.8±12.7 years, 67% male). The number of homecare provider interactions per person increased significantly as 1-month CPAP usage decreased (7.65±4.3, 6.5±4.0, 5.4±3.4 in low, intermediate and high adherence groups; p<0.01). There was marked improvement in device usage over the first 5-6 months of therapy in the low and intermediate adherence subgroups (p<0.05 after adjustment for age, sex, initial CPAP adherence, and number of interactions). After adjustment for age, sex and 1-month adherence, having 3-4 interactions was significantly associated with better 1-year adherence (odds ratio 1.24, 95% confidence interval 1.05-1.46), while having >7 interactions was significantly associated with worse 1-year adherence.

CONCLUSIONS

The telemonitoring/reimbursement scheme in France had a positive impact on CPAP adherence and facilitated a more personalised approach to therapy management, focusing resources on patients with low and intermediate adherence.

Performance of Claims-Based Algorithms for Adherence to Positive Airway Pressure Therapy in Commercially Insured Patients With OSA

BACKGROUND

Positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy is first-line therapy for OSA, but consistent use is required for it to be effective. Previous studies have used Medicare fee-for-service claims data (eg, device, equipment charges) as a proxy for PAP adherence to assess its effects. However, this approach has not been validated in a US commercially insured population, where coverage rules are not standardized.

RESEARCH QUESTION

In a commercially insured population in the United States, how well do claims-based algorithms for defining PAP adherence correspond with objective PAP device usage?

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Deidentified administrative claims data of commercially insured patients (aged 18-64 years) with OSA were linked to objective PAP therapy usage data from cloud-connected devices. Adherence was defined based on device use (using an extension of Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services 90-day compliance criteria) and from claims-based algorithms to compare usage metrics and identify potential misclassifications.

RESULTS

The final sample included 213,341 patients. Based on device usage, 48% were adherent in the first year. Based on claims, between 10% and 84% of patients were identified as adherent (accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity ranges: 53%-68%, 12%-95%, and 26%-92%, respectively). Relative to patients who were claims-adherent, patients who were device-adherent had consistently higher usage across all metrics (mean, 339.9 vs 260.0-290.0 days of use; 6.6 vs 5.1-5.6 d/wk; 6.4 vs 4.6-5.2 h/d). Consistent PAP users were frequently identified by claims-based algorithms as nonadherent, whereas many inconsistent users were classified by claims-based algorithms as adherent.

INTERPRETATION

In aggregate US commercial data with nonstandardized PAP coverage rules, concordance between existing claims-based definitions and objective PAP use was low. Caution is warranted when applying existing claims-based algorithms to commercial populations.

Patient motivation ranked by caregivers at continuous positive airway pressure initiation is predictive of adherence and 1-year therapy termination rate

PURPOSE

In patients diagnosed with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), continuous positive airway pressure therapy (CPAP) is effective in reducing symptoms and improving quality of life. However, poor mid- to long-term adherence and high termination rates are a problem. We asked whether or not patient motivation at CPAP initiation was associated with 15-day and 1-year CPAP adherence and termination rates.

METHODS

In this nationwide multicenter observational study, individual patient motivation for achieving CPAP adherence was subjectively evaluated at the time of CPAP set-up by the home-care provider's technician on a simple scale (low, average, good, very good). Then, adherence and CPAP termination rates were objectively monitored via the home-care provider's CPAP remote monitoring platform at 15 days and 1 year.

RESULTS

A total of 10,450 adults with OSA initiating CPAP were included by 36 centers. CPAP adherence at day 15 was significantly different between the low and the very good motivation groups: 5.4 [3.2; 6.9] hours and 6.0 [4.2; 7.3] hours per night respectively. In the 72.0% of patients using CPAP at 1 year, CPAP adherence was 5.2 [3.1; 6.7] and 5.5 [4.0; 7.0] hours per night in the groups with low and very good motivation respectively. Therapy termination rates at 1 year were 14.6% in the low motivation group and 8.0% in the very good motivation group.

CONCLUSION

Our study suggests that motivation of patients with OSA estimated by caregivers at CPAP initiation using a simple four-item ranking is associated with CPAP adherence and primary therapy termination rates during the first year of treatment.

Personality traits and pre-treatment beliefs and cognitions predicting patient adherence to continuous positive airway pressure: A systematic review

Adherence to Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) for obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) can be improved by behavioural interventions which modify patients' beliefs and cognitions about OSA, CPAP, and themselves. We have conducted the first systematic review of the literature on beliefs and cognitions held before starting treatment, and personality (which influences the former) that predict the decision to purchase or start CPAP, or CPAP adherence one month or more after CPAP initiation. A systematic search and screen of articles identified 21 eligible publications from an initial 1317. Quality assessment performed using an adapted Newcastle-Ottawa Scale demonstrated that 13 (62%) studies were poor quality and only seven (33%) were high quality. Eighteen factors, such as self-efficacy (confidence) in using CPAP and value placed on health predicted CPAP adherence; however, for only six (33%), utility as an intervention target is known, from calculation of individual predictive power. Studies did not use new behavioural frameworks effective at explaining adherence behaviours, nor did they interview patients to collect in-depth data on barriers and facilitators of CPAP use. Future studies cannot have these limitations if high quality evidence is to be generated for intervention development, which is currently sparse as highlighted by this review.

The lived experience of positive airway pressure therapy in patients with obstructive sleep apnea across the lifespan: a qualitative study

STUDY OBJECTIVES

Although treatment of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) with positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy is effective, adherence is often poor. Understanding the patient perspective is needed to inform adherence-promoting interventions. This qualitative study assessed the experiences, preferences, facilitators, and barriers surrounding PAP therapy for the management of OSA in patients from adolescence to older adulthood.

METHODS

Eligible participants ages 19 and older were identified from administrative health care claims; adolescent participants ages 12-18 and their parents/caregivers were identified via electronic health records of a tertiary sleep specialty clinic at a large children's hospital. Forty English-speaking patients and 10 parents of adolescents diagnosed with OSA and prescribed PAP therapy completed semistructured 60-minute telephone interviews conducted by a trained facilitator. Common themes and illustrative quotes were identified.

RESULTS

Themes around OSA diagnosis, initiating OSA treatment, learning about OSA/PAP, decision to start PAP, PAP benefits and challenges, and reasons for nonadherence were identified. Participants suggested design and delivery changes to improve PAP devices. Issues unique to adolescents and their parents were discussed.

CONCLUSIONS

The unique perspectives of patients regarding PAP therapy should be taken into consideration when developing interventions to increase PAP adherence and improve clinical care. Based on identified themes, opportunities for intervention may exist at all stages of care, from diagnosis to treatment initiation. Involving partners, parents, and other caregivers in PAP therapy may be beneficial for optimizing adherence.

CITATION

Simon SL, Stephenson JJ, Haynes K, et al. The lived experience of positive airway pressure therapy in patients with obstructive sleep apnea across the lifespan: a qualitative study. J Clin Sleep Med. 2024;20(3):407-416.

Positive Airway Pressure Therapy Predicts Lower Mortality and Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events Incidence in Medicare Beneficiaries with Obstructive Sleep Apnea

Background

Obesity is associated with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and cardiovascular risk. Positive airway pressure (PAP) is the first line treatment for OSA, but evidence on its beneficial effect on major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) prevention is limited. Using claims data, the effects of PAP on mortality and incidence of MACE among Medicare beneficiaries with OSA were examined.

Methods

A cohort of Medicare beneficiaries with ≥2 distinct OSA claims was defined from multi-state, state-wide, multi-year (2011-2020) Medicare fee-for-service claims data. Evidence of PAP initiation and utilization was based on PAP claims after OSA diagnosis. MACE was defined as a composite of myocardial infarction, heart failure, stroke, or coronary revascularization. Doubly robust Cox proportional hazards models with inverse probability of treatment weights estimated treatment effects controlling for sociodemographic and clinical factors.

Results

Among 888,835 beneficiaries with OSA (median age 73 years; 43.9% women; median follow-up 1,141 days), those with evidence of PAP initiation (32.6%) had significantly lower all-cause mortality (HR [95%CI]: 0.53 [0.52-0.54]) and MACE incidence risk (0.90 [0.89-0.91]). Higher quartiles of annual PAP claims were progressively associated with lower mortality (Q2: 0.84 [0.81-0.87], Q3: 0.76 [0.74-0.79], Q4: 0.74 [0.72-0.77]) and MACE incidence risk (Q2: 0.92 [0.89-0.95], Q3: 0.89 [0.86-0.91], Q4: 0.87 [0.85-0.90]).

Conclusion

PAP utilization was associated with lower all-cause mortality and MACE incidence among Medicare beneficiaries with OSA. Results might inform trials assessing the importance of OSA therapy towards minimizing cardiovascular risk and mortality in older adults.

Perspective: Systematic review and meta-analysis in obstructive sleep apnea - What is lacking?

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) affects nearly one billion of the global adult population. It is associated with substantial burden in terms of quality of life, cognitive function, and cardiovascular health. Positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy, commonly considered the first-line treatment, is limited by low compliance and lacking efficacy on long-term cardiovascular outcomes. A substantial body of research has been produced investigating (novel) non-PAP treatments. With increased understanding of OSA pathogenesis, promising therapeutic approaches are emerging. There is an imperative need of high-quality synthesis of evidence; however, current systematic reviews and meta-analyses (SR/MA) on the topic demonstrate important methodological limitations and are seldom based on research questions that fully reflect the complex intricacies of OSA management. Here, we discuss the current challenges in management of OSA, the need of treatable traits based OSA treatment, the methodological limitations of existing SR/MA in the field, potential remedies, as well as future perspectives.

Investigating associations between social determinants, self-efficacy measurement of sleep apnea and CPAP adherence: the SEMSA study

Study objectives

The prospective Self-Efficacy Measure for Sleep Apnea study (SEMSAS) is investigating thresholds for health literacy, self-efficacy and precariousness at obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) diagnosis to predict CPAP adherence. This paper describes the study protocol and presents baseline data from the ongoing study.

Methods

Eligible individuals had confirmed OSA and were referred to a homecare provider for continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy initiation. Data on patient characteristics and comorbidities were collected, along with baseline evaluations of self-efficacy [15-item Self-Efficacy Measure for Sleep Apnea tool (SEMSA-15)], precariousness [Deprivation in Primary Care Questionnaire (DipCareQ)], and health literacy (Health Literacy Questionnaire). CPAP adherence over 12 months of follow-up will be determined using remote monitoring of CPAP device data. The primary objective is to define an optimal SEMSA-15 score threshold to predict CPAP adherence at 3- and 12-month follow-up.

Results

Enrollment of 302 participants (71% male, median age 55 years, median body mass index 31.6 kg/m²) is complete. Low self-efficacy (SEMSA-15 score ≤ 2.78) was found in 93/302 participants (31%), and 38 (12.6%) reported precariousness (DipCareQ score > 1); precariousness did not differ significantly between individuals with a SEMSA-15 score ≤ 2.78 versus >2.78. Health literacy was generally good, but was significantly lower in individuals with versus without precariousness, and with low versus high self-efficacy.

Conclusion

SEMSAS is the first study using multidimensional baseline assessment of self-efficacy, health literacy and precariousness, plus other characteristics, to determine future adherence to CPAP, including CPAP adherence trajectories. Collection of follow-up data is underway.

The individual and societal price of non-adherence to continuous positive airway pressure, contributors and strategies for improvement

INTRODUCTION

Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is the first line therapy for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). CPAP is highly effective for improving symptoms and quality of life but the major issue is adherence, with up to 50% of OSA discontinuing CPAP in the first 3 years after CPAP initiation.

AREAS COVERED

We present the individual and societal cost of non-adherence to CPAP, factors associated with non-adherence to CPAP, as well as current strategies for improving adherence including telehealth, couples-based interventions and behavioral interventions. We also report on challenges and pitfalls for the visualization and analysis of CPAP remote monitoring platforms.

EXPERT OPINION

CPAP termination rates and adherence to therapy remain major issues despite technical improvements in CPAP devices. The individual and societal price of non-adherence to CPAP for OSA patients goes beyond excessive sleepiness and includes cardiovascular events, all-cause mortality, and increased health costs. Strategies for improving CPAP adherence should be individually tailored and aim to also improve lifestyle habits including physical activity and nutrition. Access to these strategies should be supported by refining visualization dashboards of CPAP remote monitoring platforms, and by disseminating telehealth and innovative analytics, including artificial intelligence.