Clinical Implications of the Global Lung Function Initiative Race-Neutral Spirometry Reference Equations in Terms of Breathlessness and Mortality

Pulmonary function tests: an integrated approach to interpreting results in the search for treatable traits

INTRODUCTION

Technological advances have led to the proliferation of lung function assessment techniques beyond spirometry in most countries. At the same time, new knowledge of respiratory physiology has allowed an expansion of lung function parameters, requiring an integrated approach to interpreting results.

AREAS COVERED

This review addresses the major pulmonary function tests (PFTs) used in clinical practice, new concepts regarding reference values, and reformulations of terminology for defining standards of lung function impairment. It highlights the complexities and nuances inherent in the interpretation of PFT parameters, particularly in light of recent updates from the European Respiratory Society/American Thoracic Society.

EXPERT OPINION

In a new paradigm, PFTs should be used to classify the pathophysiology of treatable traits rather than to diagnose respiratory disease, given the considerable variation in the clinical patterns of PFTs. It is necessary to look not only at lung mechanics but also at lung volume, gas transfer, and small airway involvement to capture as much information as possible. In this context, it is also important to understand that racial/ethnic differences in lung function are not due to biological differences but may reflect socioeconomic status and represent health disparities.

Implications of Global Lung Function Initiative Spirometry Reference Equations in Northeast Asian Patients With COPD

BACKGROUND

Accurate spirometry interpretation is critical in the diagnosis and management of COPD. With increasing efforts for a unified approach by the Global Lung Function Initiative (GLI), this study evaluated the application of race-specific 2012 GLI and race-neutral 2022 GLI reference equations compared with Choi's reference equations, which are derived and widely used in South Korea, for spirometry interpretation in Northeast Asian patients with COPD.

RESEARCH QUESTION

What are the effects of applying race-specific 2012 GLI, race-neutral 2022 GLI, and Choi's reference equations on the diagnosis, severity grade, and clinical outcome associations of COPD?

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Serial spirometry data from the Korea COPD Subgroup Study (KOCOSS) consisting of 3,477 patients were used for reanalysis using 2012 GLI, 2022 GLI, and Choi's reference equations. The COPD diagnosis and severity categorization, associations with disease manifestations and health outcomes, and longitudinal trajectories of lung function were determined.

RESULTS

Although there was strong concordance in COPD diagnosis comparing 2012 GLI, and 2022 GLI reference equations with Choi's reference equations, a notable portion of patients were reclassified to milder disease severity (17.0% and 23.4% for 2012 GLI and 2022 GLI reference equations, respectively). Relationships between FEV1 % predicted values calculated using 2012 GLI, 2022 GLI, and Choi's equations with clinical outcomes including dyspnea severity, exercise capacity, health-related quality of life, and frequency of exacerbations remain consistently significant. Similar annual decline rates of FEV1 and FVC % predicted were observed among the reference equations used, except for slower annual decline rate of FEV1 in Choi's equation compared with 2022 GLI race-neutral equation.

INTERPRETATION

Application of GLI reference equations for spirometry interpretation in Northeast Asian patients with COPD has potential implications on disease severity grade for clinical management and trial participation, and maintains consistent significant relationships with key disease outcomes.

Severity of Airflow Obstruction Based on FEV1/FVC Versus FEV1 Percent Predicted in the General U.S. Population

Rationale: According to the Global Initiative for Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD), the FEV1/FVC ratio is used to confirm the presence of airflow obstruction in the diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), whereas FEV1 percent predicted normal value (FEV1%pred) is used for grading its severity. The STaging of Airflow obstruction by the FEV1/FVC Ratio (STAR), and its prediction of adverse outcomes, has not been evaluated in general populations. Objectives: To compare the STAR (FEV1/FVC) and the GOLD (FEV1%pred) classifications for the severity of airflow limitation in terms of exertional breathlessness and mortality in the general U.S. population. Methods: Severity stages according to the STAR and GOLD were applied to the multiethnic National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey of 2007-2012, including people ages 18-80 years, using a postbronchodilatory FEV1/FVC ratio of <0.70 to define airflow obstruction in both staging systems. Prevalence of the severity stages STAR 1-4 and GOLD 1-4 was calculated, and associations with breathlessness and mortality were analyzed by multinomial logistic regression and Cox regression, respectively. Measurements and Main Results: STAR versus GOLD severity staging of airflow obstruction showed similar associations with breathlessness and all-cause mortality, regardless of ethnicity and/or race. In those with airflow obstruction, the correlation between the two classification systems was 0.461 (P < 0.001). STAR reclassified 59% of GOLD 2 subjects as having mild airflow obstruction (STAR 1). Compared with GOLD 1, STAR 1 was more clearly differentiated from nonobstruction in terms of both breathlessness and mortality. Conclusions: FEV1/FVC and FEV1%pred as measures of airflow limitation severity show similar predictions of breathlessness and mortality in the adult U.S. population across ethnicity groups. However, Stage 1 differed more clearly from nonobstruction on the basis of FEV1/FVC ratio than FEV1%pred.

Outcome-based Definition of the Lower Limit of Normal in Spirometry: A Study of 26,000 Young Adult Men

Rationale: The definition of the lower limit of normal (LLN) of spirometric variables is not well established. Objectives: To investigate the relationship between spirometric abnormalities defined with different thresholds of the LLN and clinical outcomes and to explore the possibility of using different LLN thresholds according to the pretest probability of disease. Methods: We studied the associations between prebronchodilator spirometric abnormalities (forced expiratory volume in the first second [FEV1] < LLN, forced vital capacity [FVC] < LLN, airflow obstruction, spirometric restriction) defined with different thresholds of the LLN (10th, 5th, 2.5th, 1st percentile) and multiple outcomes (prevalence of spirometric abnormalities, respiratory symptoms, all-cause and respiratory mortality) in 26,091 30- to 46-year-old men who participated in a general population survey in Norway in 1988-1990 and were followed for 26 years. Analyses were performed with both local and Global Lung Function Initiative (GLI)-2012 reference equations, stratified by pretest risk (presence or absence of respiratory symptoms), and adjusted for age, body mass index, smoking, and education. Results: In the total population, the prevalence of airflow obstruction was 11.6% with GLI-LLN10, 11.0% with Local-LLN5, 6.1% with GLI-LLN5, 7.6% with Local-LLN2.5, and 3.5% with GLI-LLN2.5. The prevalence of spirometric restriction was 5.9% with GLI-LLN10, 5.2% with Local-LLN5, and 2.8% with GLI-LLN5. Increasingly lower thresholds of the LLN were associated with increasingly higher odds of respiratory symptoms and hazard of mortality for all spirometric abnormalities with both reference equations. Spirometric abnormalities defined with Local-LLN2.5 in asymptomatic subjects were associated with lower hazard of all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 1.50; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.15-1.95 for FEV1 < LLN) than those defined with Local-LLN5 in the general population (HR, 1.67; 95% CI, 1.50-1.87 for FEV1 < LLN) and symptomatic subjects (HR, 1.67; 95% CI, 1.46-1.91 for FEV1 < LLN). Overall, the prevalence of spirometric abnormalities and associations with outcomes obtained with Local-LLN5 were comparable to those obtained with GLI-LLN10 and those obtained with Local-LLN2.5 to GLI-LLN5. Conclusions: There is a relationship between statistically based thresholds of the LLN of spirometric variables and clinical outcomes. Different thresholds of the LLN may be used in different risk subgroups of subjects, but the choice of the threshold needs to be evaluated together with the choice of reference equations.

Changes in Spirometry Interpretative Strategies: Implications for Classifying COPD and Predicting Exacerbations

BACKGROUND

Recent guidelines for spirometry interpretation recommend both race-neutral reference equations and use of z score thresholds to define severity of airflow obstruction.

RESEARCH QUESTION

How does the transition from race-specific to race-neutral equations impact severity classifications for patients with COPD when using % predicted vs z score thresholds, and do changes in severity correspond to clinical risk?

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included Black and White patients with COPD and available spirometry from the Johns Hopkins Health System. Global Lung Function Initiative (GLI) 2012 (race-specific) equations and GLI Global (race-neutral) equations were used to determine FEV1 % predicted and z score values. Patients were classified as having mild, moderate, or severe disease according to % predicted or z score thresholds. Associations between a change in severity classification from race-specific to race-neutral with COPD exacerbations and all-cause hospitalizations were evaluated using logistic regression.

RESULTS

This cohort included 13,324 patients, of whom 9,232 patients (69.3%) were White (mean age, 65.7 years) and 4,092 patients (30.7%) were Black (mean age, 61.1 years). More Black than White patients showed a change in severity classification between approaches when using % predicted thresholds (20.2% vs 6.1%; P < .001), but not with z score thresholds (12.6% vs 12.3%; P = .68). An increased severity classification with a race-neutral approach was associated with increased risk of exacerbation when using z score thresholds (OR, 2.34; 95% CI, 1.51-3.63), but not when using % predicted thresholds (OR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.61-1.93). A decreased severity classification with a race-neutral approach was associated with lower risk of exacerbation with both % predicted (OR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.28-0.87) and z score (OR 0.67; 95% CI, 0.50-0.90) thresholds.

INTERPRETATION

The proportions of Black and White individuals reclassified were similar with z score thresholds, and changes in severity corresponded to clinical risk with z scores. These results support recent recommendations for use of race-neutral equations and z score thresholds for spirometry interpretation.

Implications of Race Adjustment in Lung-Function Equations

BACKGROUND

Adjustment for race is discouraged in lung-function testing, but the implications of adopting race-neutral equations have not been comprehensively quantified.

METHODS

We obtained longitudinal data from 369,077 participants in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, U.K. Biobank, the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis, and the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network. Using these data, we compared the race-based 2012 Global Lung Function Initiative (GLI-2012) equations with race-neutral equations introduced in 2022 (GLI-Global). Evaluated outcomes included national projections of clinical, occupational, and financial reclassifications; individual lung-allocation scores for transplantation priority; and concordance statistics (C statistics) for clinical prediction tasks.

RESULTS

Among the 249 million persons in the United States between 6 and 79 years of age who are able to produce high-quality spirometric results, the use of GLI-Global equations may reclassify ventilatory impairment for 12.5 million persons, medical impairment ratings for 8.16 million, occupational eligibility for 2.28 million, grading of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease for 2.05 million, and military disability compensation for 413,000. These potential changes differed according to race; for example, classifications of nonobstructive ventilatory impairment may change dramatically, increasing 141% (95% confidence interval [CI], 113 to 169) among Black persons and decreasing 69% (95% CI, 63 to 74) among White persons. Annual disability payments may increase by more than $1 billion among Black veterans and decrease by $0.5 billion among White veterans. GLI-2012 and GLI-Global equations had similar discriminative accuracy with regard to respiratory symptoms, health care utilization, new-onset disease, death from any cause, death related to respiratory disease, and death among persons on a transplant waiting list, with differences in C statistics ranging from -0.008 to 0.011.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of race-based and race-neutral equations generated similarly accurate predictions of respiratory outcomes but assigned different disease classifications, occupational eligibility, and disability compensation for millions of persons, with effects diverging according to race. (Funded by the National Heart Lung and Blood Institute and the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences.).