How Much Directly Observed Therapy Is Enough?

Direct observation and completion of treatment of tuberculosis in rural areas of China

AIMS

To analyse the current status of directly observed therapy (DOT) and completion of treatment of tuberculosis (TB) in two rural areas of China.

METHODS

Two rural counties with low DOT rates were deliberately selected as study sites. Face-to-face interviews were conducted by trained investigators with a structured questionnaire to investigate the characteristics of patients and the TB service that they had received. The associations between treatment completion and potential factors were estimated by computing odds ratios (ORs), as well as their 95% confidence intervals (CIs), from an unconditional logistic regression model.

RESULTS

Among 601 patients, 2.2% were treated with direct observation by health workers, 6.2% were supervised by family members, and 91.7% were treated with self-administered therapy. The treatment completion rate was found to be significantly associated with sputum smear test and adverse reaction to anti-tuberculosis drugs, but not with direct observation by health workers (OR 1.81, 95% CI 0.23-14.38) or by family members (OR 1.14, 95% CI 0.38-3.41). Frequent home visiting by health workers (!1 visit/month) could help to increase the completion rate (OR 3.15, 95% CI 1.30-7.63).

CONCLUSIONS

No significant difference was found in the rate of completion of TB treatment between direct observation and self-supervision groups in two rural areas with lower DOT coverage. How to build a feasible DOT strategy that is accepted by both patients and healthcare providers needs to be considered by policy-makers. Other elements apart from DOT are necessary to ensure a successful TB programme.

The impact of physician training and experience on the survival of patients with active tuberculosis

BACKGROUND

Physician training and experience may be important factors influencing treatment outcomes of patients with tuberculosis. We conducted an analysis to evaluate physician and patient characteristics and their association with the rate of death among tuberculosis patients.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed all reported cases of active tuberculosis in Toronto between July 1, 1999, and June 30, 2002. We obtained extensive clinical data on cases as well as information on the training and clinical experience of treating physicians. We subsequently identified factors associated with patient mortality in a survival analysis.

RESULTS

In a multivariable Cox regression analysis involving 1154 patients, factors associated with all-cause mortality included patient age (in years) (hazard ratio [HR] 1.05, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04-1.07, p < 0.001), use of directly observed therapy (HR 0.22, CI 0.13-0.39, p < 0.001), receipt of care from a physician experienced with tuberculosis (per case managed per year) (HR 0.98, CI 0.97-0.99; p = 0.01) and admission to hospital during the course of treatment (HR 15.44, CI 7.06-33.76, p < 0.001). Factors that were not associated with patient survival included whether the physician graduated from a foreign medical school, the physician's medical specialty and the number of years in clinical practice.

INTERPRETATION

Physician experience with tuberculosis and use of directly observed therapy positively influenced the survival of patients with active tuberculosis in our setting.