Aspects of human detection and discrimination correlate with macaque V1 physiology

Background changes delay the perceptual availability of form information

In natural visual situations, unlike most psychophysical experiments, when a new stimulus appears in a portion of the visual field, the surrounding background changes simultaneously. In recordings from macaque V1, we found that a visual stimulus presented simultaneously with a background change evokes a response that is qualitatively different from the response to the same stimulus flashed on a static background. With the changing background, information about stimulus orientation and contrast is significantly delayed compared with the static-background situation. Our physiological results make several predictions that we test in the present paper with human psychophysical experiments. In a backward masking paradigm, a bar stimulus was either flashed onto a static background or presented simultaneously with a change in background luminance or pattern. Subjects discriminated bar orientation or detected that the scene changed before the mask. To achieve an equivalent contrast threshold for orientation discrimination, a longer stimulus-mask onset asynchrony (SOA) was needed in the changing than in the static-background condition; to match the orientation discrimination performance in the static and changing-background conditions at a fixed SOA, a higher bar contrast was needed when the background changed. Moreover, in the changing-background condition, a longer SOA was needed to discriminate bar orientation than to detect the scene change. These results suggest that orientation information is available more slowly when the background changes; orientation information is available earlier as stimulus contrast increases. The psychophysical findings are consistent with our physiological predictions. Compared with the common technique of flashing stimuli onto a static background, the changing-background paradigm may be more similar to natural vision in which saccades bring new stimuli and backgrounds into the visual field.

The importance of modulatory input for V1 activity and perception

To conduct well-controlled studies of visual processing in the laboratory, deviations from natural visual situations must generally be employed. In some regards, the reduced visual paradigms typically used are adequate for providing an accurate description of visual representations. However, the use of fixation paradigms and stimuli isolated within a receptive field may underestimate the richness of visual processing in area V1. Experiments ranging from lightness encoding and perception to paradigms involving natural scenes and saccades used to examine the relationship between V1 activity and perception are reviewed in this chapter. Using more complex and natural visual stimulation, V1 responses have been detected that are significantly different from responses obtained in more reduced paradigms. A feature common to the findings of different experiments is that the scale of the activated neural population and circuitry appears to play a key role in the correlation between V1 activity and perception. More complex and natural visual stimulation brings into play extra-receptive field modulatory input not involved with stimulation localized to the receptive field. The results suggest that rather than subtly sculpting the response, modulatory input coming from intra- and/or intercortical sources is fundamental in establishing perceptual response patterns in natural visual situations.