1
|
Gurman D, Reynaud A. Measuring the Interocular Delay and its Link to Visual Acuity in Amblyopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2024; 65:2. [PMID: 38165706 PMCID: PMC10768699 DOI: 10.1167/iovs.65.1.2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2023] [Accepted: 12/07/2023] [Indexed: 01/04/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose Research on interocular synchronicity in amblyopia has demonstrated a deficit in synchronization (i.e., a neural processing delay) between the two eyes. Current methods for assessing interocular delay are either costly or ineffective for assessments in severe amblyopia. In this study, we adapted a novel protocol developed by Burge and Cormack based on continuous target tracking to measure the interocular delay on a wide range of amblyopes. Our main aims were to assess the accessibility of this protocol and to investigate the relationship between interocular delay and visual acuity. Methods This protocol, which consists of tracking a target undergoing random lateral motion with the mouse cursor, is performed both binocularly and monocularly. The processing speed of a given eye is computed by comparing the changes in velocity of the target and mouse via cross-correlation. The difference in processing speed between the eyes defines the interocular delay. Results Cross-correlations revealed that the amblyopic eye tends to be delayed in time compared with the fellow eye. Interocular delays fell in the range of 0.6 to 114.0 ms. The magnitude of the delay was positively correlated with differences in interocular visual acuity (R2 = 0.484; P = 0.0002). Conclusions These results demonstrate the accessibility of this new protocol and further support the link between interocular synchronicity and amblyopia. Furthermore, we determine that the interocular delay in amblyopia is best explained by a deficit in the temporal integration of the amblyopic eye.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Gurman
- McGill Vision Research Unit, Department of Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Alexandre Reynaud
- McGill Vision Research Unit, Department of Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Fixation instability, astigmatism, and lack of stereopsis as factors impeding recovery of binocular balance in amblyopia following binocular therapy. Sci Rep 2022; 12:10311. [PMID: 35725590 PMCID: PMC9209502 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-13947-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2022] [Accepted: 05/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Dichoptic therapy is a promising method for improving vision in pediatric and adult patients with amblyopia. However, a systematic understanding about changes in specific visual functions and substantial variation of effect among patients is lacking. Utilizing a novel stereoscopic augmented-reality based training program, 24 pediatric and 18 adult patients were trained for 20 h along a three-month time course with a one-month post-training follow-up for pediatric patients. Changes in stereopsis, distance and near visual acuity, and contrast sensitivity for amblyopic and fellow eyes were measured, and interocular differences were analyzed. To reveal what contributes to successful dichoptic therapy, ANCOVA models were used to analyze progress, considering clinical baseline parameters as covariates that are potential requirements for amblyopic recovery. Significant and lasting improvements have been achieved in stereoacuity, interocular near visual acuity, and interocular contrast sensitivity. Importantly, astigmatism, fixation instability, and lack of stereopsis were major limiting factors for visual acuity, stereoacuity, and contrast sensitivity recovery, respectively. The results demonstrate the feasibility of treatment-efficacy prediction in certain aspects of dichoptic amblyopia therapy. Furthermore, our findings may aid in developing personalized therapeutic protocols, capable of considering individual clinical status, to help clinicians in tailoring therapy to patient profiles for better outcome.
Collapse
|
3
|
Neural markers of suppression in impaired binocular vision. Neuroimage 2021; 230:117780. [PMID: 33503479 PMCID: PMC8063178 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.117780] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2020] [Revised: 12/29/2020] [Accepted: 01/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Even after conventional patching treatment, individuals with a history of amblyopia typically lack good stereo vision. This is often attributed to atypical suppression between the eyes, yet the specific mechanism is still unclear. Guided by computational models of binocular vision, we tested explicit predictions about how neural responses to contrast might differ in individuals with impaired binocular vision. Participants with a history of amblyopia (N = 25), and control participants with typical visual development (N = 19) took part in the study. Neural responses to different combinations of contrast in the left and right eyes, were measured using both electroencephalography (EEG) and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Stimuli were sinusoidal gratings with a spatial frequency of 3c/deg, flickering at 4 Hz. In the fMRI experiment, we also ran population receptive field and retinotopic mapping sequences, and a phase-encoded localiser stimulus, to identify voxels in primary visual cortex (V1) sensitive to the main stimulus. Neural responses in both modalities increased monotonically with stimulus contrast. When measured with EEG, responses were attenuated in the weaker eye, consistent with a fixed tonic suppression of that eye. When measured with fMRI, a low contrast stimulus in the weaker eye substantially reduced the response to a high contrast stimulus in the stronger eye. This effect was stronger than when the stimulus-eye pairings were reversed, consistent with unbalanced dynamic suppression between the eyes. Measuring neural responses using different methods leads to different conclusions about visual differences in individuals with impaired binocular vision. Both of the atypical suppression effects may relate to binocular perceptual deficits, e.g. in stereopsis, and we anticipate that these measures could be informative for monitoring the progress of treatments aimed at recovering binocular vision.
Collapse
|
4
|
Mortazavi M, Aigner KM, Antono JE, Gambacorta C, Nahum M, Levi DM, Föcker J. Neural correlates of visual spatial selective attention are altered at early and late processing stages in human amblyopia. Eur J Neurosci 2020; 53:1086-1106. [PMID: 33107117 DOI: 10.1111/ejn.15024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2020] [Revised: 10/19/2020] [Accepted: 10/20/2020] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Amblyopia is a neurodevelopmental visual disorder which results in reduced visual acuity in one eye and impaired binocular interactions. Previous studies suggest attentional deficits in amblyopic individuals. However, spatial cues which orient attention to a visual field improved performance. Here, we investigate the neural correlates of auditory-visual spatial selective attention in amblyopia during EEG recording. An auditory cue, that was followed by the presentation of two Gabor patches presented in the lower left and right visual fields, indicated the most likely location of an upcoming target Gabor. The target Gabor differed in orientation from the more frequently presented non-target Gabor patches. Adults with amblyopia and neurotypical observers were asked to detect the target Gabor monocularly at the cued location, while withholding their response to targets presented at the uncued location and to all non-target Gabor patches. Higher response rates were observed for cued compared to uncued targets in both groups. However, amblyopic individuals detected targets less efficiently with their amblyopic eye as compared to their fellow eye. Correspondingly, event-related potentials (ERPs) recorded to the onset of the non-target Gabor patches were delayed at early processing stages (150-300 ms: posterior N100) and reduced in amplitude at later time windows (150-350 ms: P200, 300-500 ms: sustained activity) in the amblyopic eye compared to the fellow eye. Such interocular differences were not observed in neurotypical observers. These findings suggest that neural resources allocated to the early formation of visual discrimination as well as later stimulus recognition processes are altered in the amblyopic eye.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matin Mortazavi
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital LMU, Munich, Munich, Germany.,Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital LMU, Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Kiera M Aigner
- Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Ludwig-Maximilian University, Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Jessica E Antono
- European Neuroscience Institute-Goettingen, A Joint Initiative of the University Medical Center Goettingen and the Max Planck Society, Goettingen, Germany
| | - Christina Gambacorta
- School of Optometry, Graduate Group in Vision Science and Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkley, Berkley, CA, USA
| | - Mor Nahum
- School of Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Dennis M Levi
- School of Optometry, Graduate Group in Vision Science and Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkley, Berkley, CA, USA
| | - Julia Föcker
- School of Psychology, College of Social Sciences, University of Lincoln, Lincoln, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Characterising the orientation-specific pattern-onset visual evoked potentials in children with bilateral refractive amblyopia and non-amblyopic controls. Doc Ophthalmol 2020; 142:197-211. [PMID: 32968834 DOI: 10.1007/s10633-020-09794-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2019] [Accepted: 09/09/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE An orientation-specific visual evoked potential (osVEP) protocol was developed to probe meridional anisotropies in children with refractive amblyopia. The aim was to characterise the osVEP response in children with bilateral refractive amblyopia, evaluate the intra-session repeatability of the main osVEP components (C1, C2 and C3), coefficient of repeatability (CoR) of the response to gratings in different meridians and determine if refractive amblyopes have poorer repeatability as compared with non-amblyopic controls. METHODS Children aged 4-7 years with newly diagnosed and untreated bilateral refractive amblyopia and non-amblyopic controls were recruited. Orientation-specific pattern-onset VEPs were recorded in response to an achromatic sinewave grating stimulus of 4 cycles per degree under monocular and binocular stimulation. The grating lines used for monocular stimulation were parallel with the subjects' most positive and negative astigmatic meridians when considered in sphero-minus cylinder form (Meridians 1 and 2, respectively). In subjects without astigmatism, meridians 1 and 2 were designated horizontal and vertical gratings, respectively. Binocular stimuli were presented with grating lines parallel to meridians 45, 90, 135 and 180°. The repeatability of latencies of the main osVEP components (C1, C2 and C3) were investigated using two successive osVEPs recordings for each stimulus meridian and the CoR for each component's latencies were assessed. RESULTS Seven amblyopic children (Visual acuity (VA) ranging from 0.08 to 0.40 LogMAR in the less amblyopic eye and 0.26-0.52 LogMAR in the more amblyopic eye) and 7 non-amblyopic controls (VA ranging from 0.00 to 0.02 LogMAR in either eye), with a median age of 4.6 and 7.0 years, respectively, completed the study. C1 had the highest CoR for most conditions assessed. Ratio of CoRs C1:C2 was > 2 for all binocular meridians in controls and the 90 and 180 meridians in the amblyopes; C1:C3 was > 2 for the binocularly assessed 45, 90 and 135 meridians in the controls and the 90 and 180 meridians in the amblyopes; C2:C3 were all < 2 for all meridians assessed in both groups. CONCLUSIONS The osVEP waveforms are reliable and useful for future investigations into the meridional anisotropies in children with refractive amblyopia, particularly the C3 component. Component C1 had the poorest repeatability, which consequentially affected C2 amplitude estimation. Only C3 amplitude and latency could be consistently estimated as C2 and C3 latencies were similarly repeatable. Coefficients of repeatability of osVEP latencies did not appear to systematically differ between non-amblyopic and amblyopic children.
Collapse
|
6
|
Gambacorta C, Ding J, McKee SP, Levi DM. Both saccadic and manual responses in the amblyopic eye of strabismics are irreducibly delayed. J Vis 2018; 18:20. [PMID: 29677336 PMCID: PMC6097642 DOI: 10.1167/18.3.20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2017] [Accepted: 02/01/2018] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Abnormal early visual development can result in a constellation of neural and visual deficits collectively known as amblyopia. Among the many deficits, a common finding is that both saccadic and manual reaction times to targets presented to the amblyopic eye are substantially delayed when compared to the fellow eye or to normal eyes. Given the well-known deficits in contrast sensitivity in the amblyopic eye, a natural question is whether the prolonged reaction times are simply a consequence of reduced stimulus visibility. To address this question, in Experiment 1 we measure saccadic reaction times (RT) to perifoveal stimuli as a function of effective stimulus contrast (i.e., contrast scaled by the amblyopic eye's contrast threshold). We find that when sensory differences between the eyes are minimized, the asymptotic RTs of our anisometropic amblyopes were similar in the two eyes. However, our results suggest that some strabismic amblyopes have an irreducible delay at the asymptote. That is, even when the sensory differences of the stimulus were accounted for, these observers still had large interocular differences (on average, 77 ms) in saccadic reaction time. In Experiment 2, to assess the role of fixation on saccadic reaction time we compared reaction time with and without a foveal target (the "gap effect"). Our results suggest that, while removing the fixation target does indeed speed up reaction time in the amblyopic eye, the gap effect is similar in the two eyes. Therefore, the gap effect does not eliminate the irreducible delay in the amblyopic eye. Finally, in Experiment 3 we compared the interocular differences in saccadic and manual reaction times in the same observers. This allowed us to determine the relationship between the latencies in the two modalities. We found a strong correlation between the differences in saccadic and manual reaction times; however, the manual RT difference is about half that of saccadic RT, suggesting that there may be two separable effects on saccadic reaction time: (a) a central problem with directing actions to a target, related to disengagement of attention at the fovea, which results in delays in both saccadic and manual reaction times, and (b) a further delay in saccadic reaction times because of the motor refractory period from a previous saccade or microsaccade, made in an attempt to stabilize the amblyopic eye of strabismics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jian Ding
- School of Optometry, University of California-Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA
| | - Suzanne P McKee
- Smith-Kettlewell Eye Research Institute, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Dennis M Levi
- School of Optometry, University of California-Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA
- The Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California-Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Roberts M, Cymerman R, Smith RT, Kiorpes L, Carrasco M. Covert spatial attention is functionally intact in amblyopic human adults. J Vis 2016; 16:30. [PMID: 28033433 PMCID: PMC5215291 DOI: 10.1167/16.15.30] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2016] [Accepted: 11/20/2016] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Certain abnormalities in behavioral performance and neural signaling have been attributed to a deficit of visual attention in amblyopia, a neurodevelopmental disorder characterized by a diverse array of visual deficits following abnormal binocular childhood experience. Critically, most have inferred attention's role in their task without explicitly manipulating and measuring its effects against a baseline condition. Here, we directly investigate whether human amblyopic adults benefit from covert spatial attention-the selective processing of visual information in the absence of eye movements-to the same degree as neurotypical observers. We manipulated both involuntary (Experiment 1) and voluntary (Experiment 2) attention during an orientation discrimination task for which the effects of covert spatial attention have been well established in neurotypical and special populations. In both experiments, attention significantly improved accuracy and decreased reaction times to a similar extent (a) between the eyes of the amblyopic adults and (b) between the amblyopes and their age- and gender-matched controls. Moreover, deployment of voluntary attention away from the target location significantly impaired task performance (Experiment 2). The magnitudes of the involuntary and voluntary attention benefits did not correlate with amblyopic depth or severity. Both groups of observers showed canonical performance fields (better performance along the horizontal than vertical meridian and at the lower than upper vertical meridian) and similar effects of attention across locations. Despite their characteristic low-level vision impairments, covert spatial attention remains functionally intact in human amblyopic adults.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mariel Roberts
- Department of Psychology, New York University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Rachel Cymerman
- Department of Ophthalmology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - R Theodore Smith
- Department of Ophthalmology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Lynne Kiorpes
- Department of Psychology, New York University, New York, NY, USACenter for Neural Science, New York University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Marisa Carrasco
- Department of Psychology, New York University, New York, NY, USACenter for Neural Science, New York University, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Kelly JP, Tarczy-Hornoch K, Herlihy E, Weiss AH. Occlusion therapy improves phase-alignment of the cortical response in amblyopia. Vision Res 2015; 114:142-50. [DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2014.11.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2014] [Revised: 11/10/2014] [Accepted: 11/17/2014] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
|