Location of Achromatizing Pupil Position and First Purkinje Reflection in a Normal Population

Digital Pupillometry and Centroid Shift Changes in Dominant and Nondominant Eyes

PURPOSE

To investigate the differences between dominant and nondominant eyes in a predominantly young patient population by analyzing the angle kappa, pupil size, and center position in dominant and nondominant eyes.

METHODS

A total of 126 young college students (252 eyes) with myopia who underwent femtosecond laser-combined LASIK were randomly selected. Ocular dominance was determined using the hole-in-card test. The WaveLight Allegro Topolyzer (WaveLight Laser Technologies AG, Erlangen, Germany) was used to measure the pupil size and center position. The offset between the pupil center and the coaxially sighted corneal light reflex (P-Dist) of the patients was recorded by the x- and y-axis eyeball tracking adjustment program of the WaveLight Eagle Vision EX500 excimer laser system (Wavelight GmbH). The patient's vision (uncorrected distance visual acuity [UDVA], best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and refractive power (spherical equivalent, SE) were observed preoperatively, 1 week, 4 weeks, and 12 weeks postoperatively, and a quality of vision (QoV) questionnaire was completed.

RESULTS

Ocular dominance occurred predominantly in the right eye [right vs. left: (178) 70.63% vs. (74) 29.37%; p < 0.001]. The P-Dist was 0.202 ± 0.095 mm in the dominant eye and 0.215 ± 0.103 mm in the nondominant eye (p = 0.021). The horizontal pupil shift was - 0.07 ± 0.14 mm in dominant eyes and 0.01 ± 0.13 mm in nondominant eyes (p = 0.001) (the temporal displacement of the dominant eye under mesopic conditions). The SE was negatively correlated with the P-Dist (r = - 0.223, p = 0.012 for the dominant eye and r = - 0.199, p = 0.025 for the nondominant eye). At 12 weeks postoperatively, the safety index (postoperative BDVA/preoperative BDVA) of the dominant and nondominant eyes was 1.20 (1.00, 1.22) and 1.20 (1.00, 1.20), respectively, and the efficacy index (postoperative UDVA/preoperative BDVA) was 1.00 (1.00, 1.20) and 1.00 (1.00, 1.20), respectively; the proportion of residual SE within ± 0.50 D was 98 and 100%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

This study found that ocular dominance occurred predominantly in the right eye. The pupil size change was larger in the dominant eye. The angle kappa of the dominant eye was smaller than that of the nondominant eye and the pupil center of the dominant eye was slightly shifted to the temporal side under mesopic conditions. The correction of myopia in the dominant and nondominant eyes exhibits good safety, efficacy, and predictability in the short term after surgery, and has good subjective visual quality performance after correction. We suggest adjusting the angle kappa percentage in the dominant eye to be lower than that of the nondominant eye in individualized corneal refractive surgery in order to find the ablation center closest to the visual axis.

Comparative study of refractive and visual quality after wavefront-optimized FS-LASIK for angle kappa adjustment in dominant and nondominant eyes

PURPOSE

To investigate the differences between dominant and nondominant eyes in femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) with 50% angle kappa compensation on diopter and visual quality.

SETTING

University hospital.

DESIGN

Retrospective clinical study.

METHODS

109 patients (218 eyes, 100%) with myopia who underwent FS-LASIK were randomly selected. The preoperative pupil size, center position, and offset between the coaxially sighted corneal light reflex ( P-Dist ) of the patients was recorded. In preoperative and postoperative 6 months, an iTrace wavefront aberrometer was used to measure the corneal, internal optics, and total aberrations.

RESULTS

The 6 months postoperatively for corneal coma of the dominant eyes were 0.141 ± 0.055 μm and the nondominant eyes were 0.157 ± 0.033 μm, which was significantly greater than the dominant eyes ( P = .028). The postoperative corneal coma aberration changes were positively correlated with preoperative P-Dist , the dominant eyes ( r = 0.221, P = .023), and the nondominant eyes ( r = 0.251, P = .009).

CONCLUSIONS

Adjusting the angle kappa percentage in the nondominant eyes to be higher than that of the dominant eyes in individualized corneal refractive surgery may help find the ablation center closest to the visual axis.

Visual Axis and Stiles-Crawford Effect Peak Show a Positional Correlation in Normal Eyes: A Cohort Study

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to locate the visual axis and evaluate its correlation with the Stiles-Crawford effect (SCE) peak.

Methods

Ten young, healthy individuals (20 eyes) were enrolled. An optical system was developed to locate the visual axis and measure SCE. To locate the visual axis, 2 small laser spots at 450 nm and 680 nm were co-aligned and delivered to the retina. The participants were asked to move a translatable pinhole until these spots were perceived to overlap each other. The same system assessed SCE at 680 nm using a bipartite, 2-channel (reference and test) Maxwellian-view optical system. The peak positions were estimated using a two-dimensional Gaussian fitting function and correlated with the visual axis positions.

Results

Both the visual axis (x = 0.24 ± 0.35 mm, y = -0.16 ± 0.34 mm) and the SCE peak (x = 0.27 ± 0.35 mm, y = -0.15 ± 0.31 mm) showed intersubject variability among the cohort. The SCE peak positions were highly correlated in both the horizontal and vertical meridians to the visual axes (R2 = 0.98 and 0.96 for the x and y coordinates, respectively). Nine of the 10 participants demonstrated mirror symmetry for the coordinates of the visual axis and the SCE peak between the eyes (R2 = 0.71 for the visual axis and 0.76 for the SCE peak).

Conclusions

The visual axis and SCE peak locations varied among the participants; however, they were highly correlated with each other for each individual. These findings suggest a potential mechanism underlying the foveal cone photoreceptor alignment.

Distribution of Pupil Offset and Angle Kappa in a Refractive Surgery Preoperative Population of 750 Myopic, Emmetropic, and Hyperopic Eyes

PURPOSE

To report the distribution of pupil offset and angle kappa in 750 myopic, emmetropic, and hyperopic eyes presenting for refractive surgery.

METHODS

A retrospective study included 750 consecutive eyes screened for corneal refractive surgery between January 2006 and February 2013. The eyes were divided into three equal groups based on manifest refraction spherical equivalent (SEQ): emmetropic group between -0.25 and +0.50 diopters (D) and cylinder up to 1.00 D, myopic group greater than -0.50 D, and hyperopic group greater than +0.50 D. Angle kappa was measured with the Orbscan II software (Bausch & Lomb, Inc) and pupil offset defined as the distance at the corneal plane between the corneal vertex and the pupil center. Correlations with SEQ, cylinder, scotopic pupil diameter, average keratometry, and age were performed.

RESULTS

All results are reported for myopic, emmetropic, and hyperopic groups, respectively. Mean SEQ was -4.84 ± 2.89 D (range: -0.88 to -14.00 D), +0.21 ± 0.23 D (range: -0.25 to +0.50 D), and +2.44 ± 1.58 D (range: +0.63 to +7.75 D). Mean pupil offset magnitude was 0.27 ± 0.14 mm (range: 0.00 to 0.68 mm), 0.34 ± 0.14 mm (range: 0.02 to 0.78 mm), and 0.39 ± 0.13 mm (range: 0.07 to 0.75 mm). Mean pupil offset X-component was -0.18 ± 0.18, -0.28 ± 0.16, and -0.34 ± 0.15 mm (temporally displaced from the corneal vertex). Mean pupil offset Y-component was 0.06 ± 0.15, 0.03 ± 0.16, and 0.01 ± 0.16 mm (superiorly displaced from the corneal vertex). Multivariate linear regression for pupil offset magnitude found statistically significant variables were SEQ, cylinder, scotopic pupil diameter, and average keratometry. For pupil offset X-component, significant variables were SEQ, cylinder, and scotopic pupil diameter. For pupil offset Y-component, significant variables were SEQ and scotopic pupil diameter. Mean angle kappa was 5.28 ± 1.49°, 6.14 ± 1.44°, and 5.77 ± 1.29°.

CONCLUSIONS

Contrary to common belief, a pupil offset is present in the vast majority of eyes regardless of refractive error, with the mean temporal offset of at least 0.18 mm. Confirming previous studies, the largest pupil offset was found in the hyperopic group. However, there was also a wide range of pupil offset in myopic and emmetropic eyes. Correlations with SEQ and keratometry support the theory that pupil offset is also correlated with axial length. [J Refract Surg. 2021;37(1):49-58.].

Anatomical and Visual Outcomes after LASIK Performed in Myopic Eyes with the WaveLight® Refractive Suite (Alcon® Laboratories Inc., USA)

Purpose

To evaluate changes in corneal anatomy and quality of vision following LASIK refractive surgery for mild to high myopia using the WaveLight® Refractive Suite (Alcon® Laboratories Inc., USA). Setting. Rothschild Foundation, Paris, France.

Design

Prospective interventional case series.

Methods

We examined 60 myopic eyes (average SE −4.5 D, from −9.3 to −0.75 D) of 30 patients from 21.3 to 38.7 years old. Pachymetry, keratometry, Q factor, corneal aberrations, visual acuity (VA), contrast sensitivity, dry eye assessment, and quality of vision were measured preoperatively, one day (D1), and 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively.

Results

6 months postoperatively, keratometry became flatter, and the Q factor became more oblate (from −0.18 ± 0.08 to +0.19 ± 0.06). Pachymetry decreased by 117.9 ± 62.2 µm at D1 and increased by 37.87 ± 32.6 µm between D1 and M6. Refraction was emmetropic at D1 and remained stable thereafter. Six months after surgery, VA was slightly but nonsignificantly improved (<0.05 log MAR), whereas contrast sensitivity remained unchanged. Quality of vision was not affected by surgery and was more related to dry eye symptoms than to corneal HOAs (r² = 0.49; p < 0.001 vs. r² = 0.03; p < 0.001).

Conclusions

LASIK surgery for moderate to high myopia, performed with the WaveLight® Refractive Suite, showed good postoperative outcomes, with demonstrated safety, predictability, efficiency, and stability. This is probably due to well-controlled spherical aberration and the use of large optical zones. Besides, we can assume that the patients' quality of vision depends more on the postoperative dry eye disease generated by the laser than on the induced HOAs.

Clinical outcomes of corneal refractive surgery comparing centration on the corneal vertex with the pupil center: a meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To compare the visual and refractive outcomes between centration on the corneal vertex and the pupil center in corneal refractive surgery.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted using PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library to identify relevant studies. The primary outcomes were the postoperative spherical equivalent (SE), effectiveness [uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) ≥ 20/20, eyes within ± 0.50 diopter (D) of target refraction], and safety [loss ≥ 2 lines of corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA)]. Higher-order aberrations were considered secondary outcomes.

RESULTS

Seven studies describing a total of 1964 eyes were included in this meta-analysis. A statistical significance in postoperative SE was found between the two centration methods for the correction of myopia that favor the CV-centered method (p < 0.001). No significant differences were observed in the proportion of eyes with UDVA ≥ 20/20 or loss ≥ 2 lines of CDVA postoperatively. However, the proportion of eyes within ± 0.50 D was slightly higher (p = 0.02) and the coma aberration was much lower in the corneal vertex-centered method (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Preferable visual and refractive outcomes could be achieved with either centering on the corneal vertex or pupil center in corneal refractive surgery; however, the corneal vertex-centered method has shown partial benefits in some clinical indices. In order to obtain higher quality of clinical evidences, more randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are required in further investigations.

Simultaneous aberration and aperture control using a single spatial light modulator

A method to simultaneously control aberrations and the aperture of an optical system using a single phase-only spatial light modulator was investigated. The experiment was performed using a liquid-crystal-on-silicon spatial light modulator (LCoS-SLM) within an adaptive optics system used for visual testing, although the method has broader applications in adaptive optics field. The performance of the technique was characterized through the estimation of the system's modulation transfer functions (MTFs) by using a random chart method. MTFs obtained from the phase modulation-based approach were compared with those from using a real aperture (diaphragm). The areas under the MTFs for the two conditions were similar up to 98%, confirming that the low-pass filter effect associated to the size of the entrance pupil was similar for the phase-modulated pupil and the physical pupil. As an example of application, both aberrations and pupil were controlled by a single phase-only modulator to study the through-focus visual performance in real subjects. Limitations and possible enhancements of the presented method were also discussed. The presented technique reduces complexity and cost of adaptive optics systems. It opens the door to new experiments by allowing dynamic modulation of aberrations and apertures of any shape.

Changes to Corneal Aberrations and Vision After Monovision in Patients With Hyperopia After Using a Customized Aspheric Ablation Profile to Increase Corneal Asphericity (Q-factor)

PURPOSE

To evaluate the visual outcomes and fourth-order Zernike spherical aberrations induced with a customized change in corneal asphericity (ΔQ) correction of presbyopia combined with monovision for hyperopic patients.

METHODS

Consecutive hyperopic patients who underwent presbyopic LASIK between September 2013 and July 2014 were included. For the non-dominant eyes, the aspheric ablation profile associated with a myopic refraction was planned using the Custom-Q nomogram (Alcon Laboratories, Inc., Fort Worth, TX). Uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), uncorrected near visual acuity (UNVA), spherical equivalent refraction, ΔQ, and change in corneal spherical aberration coefficient (ΔC₄⁰) were analyzed. Postoperative data were collected at 1, 3, and 6 months.

RESULTS

Sixty-five patients were included. The mean age was 56.5 ± 5.7 years (range: 47 to 70 years). At the 6-month follow-up, the spherical equivalent refraction for non-dominant and dominant eyes was -1.07 ± 0.74 and 0.32 ± 0.55 diopters (D), respectively. The mean binocular UDVA was 0.01 ± 0.04 logMAR (range: -0.12 to 0.30 logMAR); 91% of patients achieved 20/20 or better binocular UDVA and 83% of patients had Jaeger 3 (Parinaud 4) or better binocular UNVA. The ΔQ for non-dominant and dominant eyes was -0.61 ± 0.15 and -0.33 ± 0.25, respectively, for a 6-mm pupil diameter and was significantly higher for non-dominant eyes (P < .0001). The achieved ΔC₄⁰ was -0.49 ± 0.23 µm for non-dominant eyes (for a theoretical ideal value of -0.40 µm) and -0.30 ± 0.18 µm for dominant eyes. For non-dominant eyes, the attempted ΔQ (-0.60) was close to the achieved value (-0.61 ± 0.15).

CONCLUSIONS

For hyperopic patients, combining the customized corneal aspheric ablation profile with monovision is safe, effective, and reproducible, inducing intended changes in corneal spherical aberrations. [J Refract Surg. 2016;32(11):734-741.].

Method of locating the visual axis objectively

PURPOSE

To locate the visual axis of the eye objectively.

METHOD

Based on three-beam scanning laser radar microprofilometry, a technique is proposed to objectively locate the visual axis of the eye. The laser beam consists of three components, two of them being shifted relatively to the central one by differing frequencies, filtered in spatially orthogonal directions. The centre of the foveola is defined as the crossing of steepest inclinations determined in the specific beam positions on the trajectory of scanning. The position of the cornea crossing by the visual axis is designated by the optical axis of the measuring instrument.

RESULTS

Nanometer sensitivity was confirmed in a preliminary test.

CONCLUSIONS

The proposed technique can be incorporated into any clinical wavefront sensing instrument and can be used for centration-sensitive vision correction, as well as for other instances when knowing the exact position of the fovea is important.