Progressive Thinning of Regional Macular Thickness After Epiretinal Membrane Surgery

Effect of Macular Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling on Single Surgery Success Rates of Vitrectomy for Uncomplicated, Primary Macula-Off Retinal Detachment

Purpose: To determine the anatomic and visual outcomes of pars plana vitrectomy for uncomplicated, primary macula-off rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) with and without internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling. Methods: This retrospective chart review comprised 129 patients with uncomplicated, primary macula-off RRD presenting between January 1, 2016, and May 31, 2021. Thirty-six patients (27.9%) had ILM peeling and 93 (72.0%) did not. The primary outcome was the rate of recurrent RRD. Secondary outcomes included preoperative and postoperative best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), epiretinal membrane (ERM) formation, and macular thickness. Results: No significant difference was found in the risk for recurrent RRD between patients who had ILM peeling and those who did not (2.8% [1/36] and 5.4% [5/93], respectively) (P = 1.00). The final postoperative BCVA was better in eyes that did not have ILM peeling (P< .001). No ERM occurred in the group with ILM peeling, whereas ERM occurred in 27 patients (29.0%) who did not have ILM peeling. The temporal macular retina was thinner in eyes in which ILM peeling was performed. Conclusions: The risk for recurrent RRD was not statistically lower in eyes having ILM peeling of the macula in uncomplicated, primary macula-off RRD. Despite a reduction in postoperative ERM formation, eyes having macular ILM peeling had worse postoperative VA.

Effect of internal limiting membrane peeling for idiopathic epiretinal membrane

Purpose

To further evaluate the necessity of internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling for patients with idiopathic epiretinal membrane (iERM).

Method

We searched PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library, and CNKI from their inception up to August 24, 2021. Eligible meta-analyses comparing iERM removal with and without ILM peeling were included. AMSTAR and GRADE classification was used to assess the methodological quality of each study and the quality for each outcome, respectively. The primary outcomes were best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central macular thickness (CMT), and recurrence.

Results

10 meta-analyses were included. 75.9% of studies revealed no statistically significant difference in BCVA between the groups, while only 10.3% showed better BCVA favorable to additional ILM peeling. 54.2% reported no significant difference in CMT between the groups, followed by 41.7% showing thicker CMT due to additional ILM peeling. Compared to iERM removal alone, additional ILM peeling provided a lower recurrence rate in 66.7% of studies.

Conclusion

ILM peeling could significantly reduce recurrence rate, but not significantly improve the recovery of visual outcome or decrease the thickness of central macula.

Functional and anatomic changes between early postoperative recovery and long-term follow-up after combined epiretinal and internal limiting membrane peeling

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate short- and long-term changes in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and retinal layer thicknesses after combined epiretinal membrane (ERM) and internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling for macular holes and symptomatic ERMs.

DESIGN

Retrospective observational case series.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients with ERMs or with macular holes and ERMs treated with combined ERM and ILM peeling.

METHODS

Study eyes (n = 36) and healthy fellow eyes (n = 17) were evaluated using the automated segmentation of retinal layers performed by SPECTRALIS software that automatically calculated the average central retinal thickness and the average thickness in each of the individual retinal layers. The analysis was performed at 6-18 months after surgery and after 60 months.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Changes in BCVA and retinal layer thicknesses determined by automated segmentation at the first and last follow-up visits.

RESULTS

BCVA improved from a baseline 0.48 ± 0.25 logMAR (20/60 Snellen) to 0.18 ± 0.18 logMAR (20/30 Snellen) at the short-term postoperative examination (p < 0.0001). Between first and last follow-up visit, 5 eyes (14%) were classified as better, 28 (78%) as stable, and 3 (8%) as worse. BCVA of the control fellow eyes remained stable during the follow-up. The thicknesses of retinal layers decreased significantly (p < 0.009). At the last follow-up, the ganglion cell layer was thinner and the inner nuclear layer was thicker in the operated eyes compared with the healthy fellow eyes.

CONCLUSION

Combined ERM and ILM peeling may improve BCVA in some patients. However, over a long follow-up period, it can be associated with progressive ganglion cell layer thinning that could affect BCVA stability.

En Face OCT Detects Preretinal Abnormal Tissues Before and After Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling in Eyes with Macular Hole

PURPOSE

To assess preretinal abnormal tissue (PAT) using en face OCT in eyes with idiopathic macular holes (MHs).

DESIGN

Retrospective, observational study.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients with MH who received 6 × 6-mm spectral-domain-OCT scans.

METHODS

Preretinal abnormal tissue was detected by en face OCT images with a custom slab, defined with an anterior boundary of 6 μm anterior to the internal limiting membrane (ILM) and a posterior boundary at 3 μm posterior to the ILM. The PAT was defined as any abnormal tissues observed in en face OCT.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Characteristics of preoperative and postoperative PAT.

RESULTS

Sixty eyes with MH from 60 patients were included. Fifty-one eyes underwent preoperative analysis, and 46 eyes underwent postoperative examination. Before surgery, 48 (94%) eyes had a mean (standard deviation [SD]) PAT of 6.6 (9.8) mm². The corresponding cross-sectional OCT showed PAT consisting of epiretinal proliferation, epivascular glia, and a preretinal hyperreflective band. Preretinal abnormal tissue was contiguous to the hole (peri-MH PAT) in 12 eyes (24%), whereas others (36 eyes, 76%) had a scattered distribution (extrafoveal PAT). The area of PAT was greater in eyes with a peri-MH PAT than in eyes with an extrafoveal PAT (P < 0.0001). Compared to the eyes with the extrafoveal PAT, the eyes with the peri-MH PAT were associated with men (P = 0.0059) and worse baseline visual acuity (VA) (P = 0.0002). In eyes with ILM peeling (42 eyes), postoperative PAT proliferation was observed from the edge of the ILM peeling toward the periphery over a 1-year follow-up. The mean (SD) area of PAT at 2 weeks after surgery was 3.4 (3.6) mm² and increased to 12.1 (6.4) mm² at 12 months (P < 0.0001). However, no PAT increase was observed in 4 eyes that underwent vitrectomy without ILM peeling. The postoperative PAT size was not associated with the postoperative VA.

CONCLUSIONS

En face OCT revealed PAT in most eyes with MHs. Peri-MH PAT was associated with worse VA and was seen more frequently in male patients. Postoperative PAT proliferation may be triggered by ILM peeling, but it is not associated with worse VA.

Effect of vitrectomy with silicone oil tamponade and internal limiting membrane peeling on eyes with proliferative diabetic retinopathy

We investigated the combined effect of silicone tamponade and the internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling and investigated whether timing of peeling of the ILM affects the outcomes of vitrectomy with silicone oil tamponade in eyes with proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR). Here, we examined 63 eyes (58 patients) with PDR, which underwent vitrectomy with silicone oil tamponade and stepwise removal of silicone oil. ILM peeling was performed just before oil injection (group 1; 33 eyes, 30 patients) or after oil removal (group 2; 30 eyes, 28 patients). Visual acuity and retinal and choroidal thicknesses were compared between the groups. Thinning of the inner retina, including the ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer and macular retinal nerve fiber layer, was evident at 1 year after surgery in both groups. Thinning of the total retina (P = 0.019) and inner retina (P = 0.008) was significantly correlated with final visual acuity. There was no considerable between-group difference observed in final visual acuity, intraocular pressure, or retinal or choroidal thickness at 1 year after surgery. The incidence of epiretinal membrane was higher during silicone endo-tamponade in group 2 (P = 0.033). Visual recovery and macular configuration in eyes with PDR are not affected by whether the ILM is peeled before or after silicone oil tamponade.

WITH OR WITHOUT INTERNAL LIMITING MEMBRANE PEELING FOR IDIOPATHIC EPIRETINAL MEMBRANE: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

PURPOSE

To clarify whether internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling provides better outcomes for patients with idiopathic epiretinal membrane.

METHODS

Randomized controlled trials comparing epiretinal membrane removal with and without ILM peeling were searched in Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and CNKI before April 15, 2020. The pooled mean difference (MD) for best-corrected visual acuity, central macular thickness, and odds ratio for recurrence were calculated.

RESULTS

Eight randomized controlled trials involving 422 eyes were included. No significant difference in best-corrected visual acuity (final follow-up: MD, 0.03 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution [1.5 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters]; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.04 to 0.09 [-4.5 to 2 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters]; P = 0.40) or recurrence rate (odds ratio, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.04-1.05; P = 0.06) between the groups was observed. However, patients with ILM peeling presented thicker central macular thickness at 3 months (MD, 16.36; 95% CI, 1.26-31.46; P = 0.03), 6 months (MD, 22.64; 95% CI, 10.29-34.98; P = 0.0003) and the final follow-up (MD, 25.87; 95% CI, 13.96-37.79; P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

The study showed that ILM peeling did not significantly improve the postoperative visual outcome or decrease recurrence, but result in thicker central macular thickness, indicating that it is inessential for idiopathic epiretinal membrane.

Tomographic Structural Changes of the Inner Retina after Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling for Idiopathic Epiretinal Membrane

Purpose

To investigate the tomographic structural changes in the retinal layers after internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling for idiopathic epiretinal membrane (ERM).

Methods

Sixty-nine eyes treated with vitrectomy and ILM peeling for idiopathic ERM were analyzed. Parafoveal retinal thickness was measured at baseline and 6 months after surgery.

Results

Total retinal thickness decreased significantly in the nasal and temporal subfields after surgery (p < 0.001), whereas the inner nuclear layer and outer nuclear layer showed nasal thickening (all, p < 0.001). The postoperative temporal/nasal subfield thickness ratio of each layer was significantly lower than that of fellow eyes. Eyes with larger ILM peeling showed a significantly lower temporal/nasal subfield thickness ratio (p = 0.033) than those with smaller sizes.

Conclusions

The retinal thickness of each layer showed anatomical changes from ILM peeling and ERM removal. Nasal parafoveal thickening and temporal thinning occurred in the inner retinal architecture, which might be affected by ILM peeling size.

Inner retinal structure and visual function after idiopathic epiretinal membrane surgery with and without brilliant blue G

PURPOSE

Vital dyes are frequently used to visualize the internal limiting membrane (ILM) of the neuroretina. This study evaluated and compared the microstructure of the inner retina and visual function with and without brilliant blue G (BBG) staining for ILM peeling during idiopathic epiretinal membrane (ERM) surgery.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective, consecutive, interventional case series.

METHODS

Fifty-five patients (55 eyes) with ERM underwent ILM peeling without dyes (non-dye group) and 55 patients (55 eyes) underwent ILM peeling with BBG staining (BBG group). The logMAR visual acuity (VA) and ganglion cell complex (GCC) thickness were measured using optical coherence tomography at baseline and 12 months after surgery.

RESULTS

LogMAR VA improved significantly in both groups at 12 months and the BBG group tended to be better than the non-dye group but with no significant difference between the groups (unpaired t-test, P = 0.490). The average GCC thickness significantly decreased in both groups; however, there was no difference in the rates of change in GCC thickness between the groups. The ratio of GCC thickness to total retinal thickness (%) was significantly higher in the BBG group in the superior quadrant at 12 months postoperatively (P = 0.010).

CONCLUSION

BBG-assisted ERM surgery resulted in better visual improvement and fewer structural changes in the inner retinal layers. BBG-assisted ILM peeling is safe both functionally and anatomically.

Comparison of Anatomical and Functional Results of Surgeries Performed with Nitinol Flex Loop or Forceps in Primary Epiretinal Membrane

Purpose: To compare surgery's effect with nitinol flex loop (NFL) or forceps on retinal layers and functional outcomes in the primary epiretinal membrane (ERM).Methods: The operations were classified according to the use of the NFL or forceps. Automatic segmentation of the individual inner retinal layers was performed by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography software, and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) before surgery and at the last follow-up visit postoperatively were compared.Results: Forty-two eyes of 42 patients were included with a mean age of 66.9 ± 5.7 years. 45.2% of the surgeries were NFL assisted, 54.8% were forceps assisted. The mean follow-up duration was 9.8 ± 1.3 months. The mean BCVA was 0.79 ± 0.42 vs 0.77 ± 0.39 logMAR in the preoperative period and 0.42 ± 0.27 vs. 0.40 ± 0.21 logMAR at last follow-up in the NFL vs forceps group respectively (p= .403). The retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL)(32.5% vs. 50.1%, p= .009), ganglion cell layer (18.1% vs. 41.4%, p= .021), inner plexiform layer (13.5% vs. 32.7%, p= .031) and inner nuclear layer (15.5% vs. 30.3%, p= .011) thickness decreased significantly more in the forceps group. The mean surgical time was not significantly different (45.2 ± 5.1 vs. 51.1 ± 6.1 minutes) in the NFL vs. forceps groups, respectively (p= .331).Conclusion: Following primary ERM surgery, the inner retinal layers become thinner; RNFL impacted the most, which was found higher in forceps assisted surgeries. This result shows that the NFL can be used safely in macular surgery.

Functional and Morphological Results of Epiretinal Membrane Surgery in Idiopathic versus Diabetic Epiretinal Membranes

PURPOSE

Idiopathic and diabetic epiretinal membranes (ERM) are different in terms of pathophysiology, etiology, and macular morphology, and thus might respond to surgical treatment differently. We aimed to compare the surgical results of two groups.

METHODS

Retrospective case series study of 71 eyes of 66 patients who underwent pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) due to idiopathic or diabetic ERM with at least 1-year follow-up. Examinations were performed before, and 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery. The average macular thicknesses in nine sectors described by the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) were measured with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (OCT), and BCVA was evaluated. ERM recurrence rates were investigated.

RESULTS

In both idiopathic and diabetic groups, retinal thickness (RT) changes occurred as long as 12 months after vitrectomy surgery for ERM. However, in the idiopathic group, significant changes were mainly seen in the first 6 months, while in the diabetic group changes slowed considerably between the third and sixth months, but again accelerated (becoming significant) during the last 6 months.

CONCLUSIONS

According to the findings of this study, as compared to those with idiopathic ERM, diabetic patients would likely see continuing benefits from ERM surgery 6 to 12 months post surgery. The BCVA changes of the two groups were similar. ILM peeling decreased ERM recurrence in the idiopathic group but not in the diabetic group.

Comparison of Individual Retinal Layer Thicknesses after Epiretinal Membrane Surgery with or without Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling

Purpose

To compare changes in the retinal layer thickness and visual outcomes in patients undergoing epiretinal membrane (ERM) surgery with or without internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling.

Methods

Seventy-six eyes of 76 patients who underwent ERM surgery from January 2013 to March 2015 at the Department of Ophthalmology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea, were analyzed. While ERM removal with ILM peeling was performed in ILM peeling (P) group (n=39), ILM peeling was not performed in non-ILM peeling (NP) group (n=37). Retinal layer segmentation was performed using optical coherence tomography images. Individual retinal layer thicknesses before and at 6 months after ERM surgery were compared. The postoperative best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was also compared.

Results

In the P group, the thicknesses of retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL), ganglion cell layer (GCL), and inner plexiform layer (IPL) were significantly reduced. In the NP group, significant decreases in the RNFL, GCL, IPL, inner nuclear layer, and outer plexiform layer were observed. The P group manifested a greater mean postoperative GCL (35.56 ± 1.53 µm vs 29.86 ± 2.16 µm; p=0.033) and less loss of GCL (−10.26 ± 1.91 µm vs −19.86 ± 2.74 µm; p=0.004) compared to the NP group. No statistically significant differences were observed when comparing the changes in BCVA.

Conclusions

This study demonstrates that ILM peeling for ERM surgery may result in better preservation of GCL compared to no ILM peeling.

Diagnostic Electron Microscopy of Retina

The electron microscopy techniques were used in various fields as an analytical technique under in vitro conditions, which provides the sufficient resolution for better visualization and interpretation. This review gives a brief overview of the analytical application of transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) techniques and critical findings in different retinal pathologies. This review article aims to improvise understanding of retinal microstructures for clinicians which will help to improve the interpretation of the current advanced imaging techniques.

Increase in average foveal thickness after internal limiting membrane peeling

PURPOSE

To report the findings in three cases in which the average foveal thickness was increased after a thin epiretinal membrane (ERM) was removed by vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling.

METHODS

The foveal contour was normal preoperatively in all eyes. All cases underwent successful phacovitrectomy with ILM peeling for a thin ERM. The optical coherence tomography (OCT) images were examined before and after the surgery. The changes in the average foveal (1 mm) thickness and the foveal areas within 500 μm from the foveal center were measured. The postoperative changes in the inner and outer retinal areas determined from the cross-sectional OCT images were analyzed.

RESULTS

The average foveal thickness and the inner and outer foveal areas increased significantly after the surgery in each of the three cases. The percentage increase in the average foveal thickness relative to the baseline thickness was 26% in Case 1, 29% in Case 2, and 31% in Case 3. The percentage increase in the foveal inner retinal area was 71% in Case 1, 113% in Case 2, and 110% in Case 3, and the percentage increase in foveal outer retinal area was 8% in Case 1, 13% in Case 2, and 18% in Case 3.

CONCLUSION

The increase in the average foveal thickness and the inner and outer foveal areas suggests that a centripetal movement of the inner and outer retinal layers toward the foveal center probably occurred due to the ILM peeling.