Implanted Microsensor Continuous IOP Telemetry Suggests Gaze and Eyelid Closure Effects on IOP-A Preliminary Study

Horizontal Gaze Tolerance and Its Effects on Visual Sensitivity in Glaucoma

Purpose

This study evaluates the effect of 6° horizontal gaze tolerance on visual field mean sensitivity (MS) in patients with glaucoma using a binocular head-mounted automated perimeter, following findings of structural changes in the posterior globe from magnetic resonance imaging and optical coherence tomography.

Methods

In this cross-sectional study, a total of 161 eyes (85 primary open-angle glaucoma [POAG] and 76 healthy) from 117 participants were included. Logistic regression and 1:1 matched analysis assessed the propensity score for glaucoma and healthy eyes, considering age, sex, and axial length as confounders. Visual field tests were performed with the imo perimeter (CREWT Medical Systems, Inc., Tokyo, Japan) at central gaze, 6° abduction, and 6° adduction positions as fixation points. A mixed-effects model was used to compare MS under all conditions.

Results

The analysis included a total of 82 eyes, with 41 POAG and 41 healthy after matching. The mean (standard deviation) age was 68.0 (11.0) years, with a mean deviation of -9.9 (6.6) dB for POAG and -1.0 (1.9) dB for healthy eyes using Humphrey field analysis 24-2. MS did not significantly differ among central gaze (27.0 [1.8] dB), abduction (27.1 [1.9] dB), and adduction (26.9 [2.2] dB) in healthy eyes (P = 0.650). However, MS was significantly lower for adduction (17.2 [5.9] dB) compared to central gaze (18.1 [5.9] dB) and abduction (17.9 [5.9] dB) in glaucoma eyes (P = 0.001 and P = 0.022, respectively).

Conclusions

Horizontal gaze, especially in adduction, significantly reduces visual sensitivity in glaucoma, suggesting a specific vulnerability associated with eye movement. This finding highlights the importance of eye positioning in glaucoma, warranting further investigation of its clinical significance.

The relationship between intraocular pressure and glaucoma: An evolving concept

Intraocular pressure (IOP) is the most important modifiable risk factor for glaucoma and fluctuates considerably within patients over short and long time periods. Our field's understanding of IOP has evolved considerably in recent years, driven by tonometric technologies with increasing accuracy, reproducibility, and temporal resolution that have refined our knowledge regarding the relationship between IOP and glaucoma risk and pathogenesis. The goal of this article is to review the published literature pertinent to the following points: 1) the factors that determine IOP in physiologic and pathologic states; 2) technologies for measuring IOP; 3) scientific and clinical rationale for measuring diverse IOP metrics in patients with glaucoma; 4) the impact and shortcomings of current standard-of-care IOP monitoring approaches; 5) recommendations for approaches to IOP monitoring that could improve patient outcomes; and 6) research questions that must be answered to improve our understanding of how IOP contributes to disease progression. Retrospective and prospective data, including that from landmark clinical trials, document greater IOP fluctuations in glaucomatous than healthy eyes, tendencies for maximal daily IOP to occur outside of office hours, and, in addition to mean and maximal IOP, an association between IOP fluctuation and glaucoma progression that is independent of mean in-office IOP. Ambulatory IOP monitoring, measuring IOP outside of office hours and at different times of day and night, provides clinicians with discrete data that could improve patient outcomes. Eye care clinicians treating glaucoma based on isolated in-office IOP measurements may make treatment decisions without fully capturing the entire IOP profile of an individual. Data linking home blood pressure monitors and home glucose sensors to dramatically improved outcomes for patients with systemic hypertension and diabetes and will be reviewed as they pertain to the question of whether ambulatory tonometry is positioned to do the same for glaucoma management. Prospective randomized controlled studies are warranted to determine whether remote tonometry-based glaucoma management might reduce vision loss and improve patient outcomes.

Effect of eyelid muscle action and rubbing on telemetrically obtained intraocular pressure in patients with glaucoma with an IOP sensor implant

BACKGROUND

Patients with glaucoma on topical glaucoma medication are often affected by dry eye symptoms and thus likely to rub or squeeze their eyelids. Here, we telemetrically measure peak intraocular pressure (IOP) during eyelid manoeuvres and eyelid rubbing.

METHODS

Eleven patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) previously implanted with a telemetric IOP sensor (Eyemate-IO) were instructed to look straight ahead for 1 min as a baseline measurement. Next, 6 repeats of blinking on instruction with 10 s intervals in between were performed. In addition, 5 repeats of eyelid closure (n=9), eyelid squeezing and eyelid rubbing (n=7) were performed with 15 s intervals in between. IOP was recorded via an external antenna placed around the study eye. Average peak IOP increases from baseline were analysed and tested against zero (no change) with one-sample t-tests.

RESULTS

For eyelid rubbing, the average peak ∆ IOP increase (mean±SEM) was 59.1±9.6 mm Hg (p<0.001) from baseline. It was 42.2±5.8 mm Hg (p<0.0001) for eyelid squeezing, 3.8±0.6 mm Hg (n=9, p<0.01) for eyelid closure and 11.6±2.4 mm Hg (p<0.001) for voluntary blinking. No IOP change except for a short irregularity in the ocular pulse was observed during involuntary blinking.

CONCLUSION

Eyelid manoeuvres in patients with POAG elicited brief increases in IOP that were particularly large with squeezing and rubbing. Further investigation of the potential implications for glaucoma progression is warranted.

Biomechanical homeostasis in ocular diseases: A mini-review

Diabetes mellitus-induced hyperglycemia is responsible for multiple pathological ocular alternations from vasculopathy to biomechanical dyshomeostasis. Biomechanical homeostasis is crucial to maintain the normal physiological condition of the eyes. Biomechanical features vary in eye tissues regarding different anatomical positions, tissue components, and cellular functions. The disturbance in biomechanical homeostasis may result in different ocular diseases. In this review, we provide a preliminary sketch of the latest evidence on the mechano-environment of the eyeball and its possible influencing factors, thereby underscoring the relationship between the dyshomeostasis of ocular biomechanics and common eye diseases (e.g., diabetic retinopathy, keratoconus, glaucoma, spaceflight-associated neuro-ocular syndrome, retinal vein occlusion and myopia, etc.). Together with the reported evidence, we further discuss and postulate the potential role of biomechanical homeostasis in ophthalmic pathology. Some latest strategies to investigate the biomechanical properties in ocular diseases help unveil the pathological changes at multiple scales, offering references for making new diagnostic and treatment strategies targeting mechanobiology.

Intraocular pressure at different gaze positions in patients with highly myopic strabismus

PURPOSE

To evaluate intraocular pressure (IOP) at different gaze positions in patients with highly myopic strabismus (HMS).

STUDY DESIGN

Nonrandomized, prospective, observational study.

METHODS

This study included 18 eyes of 14 patients with HMS and 51 eyes of 51 age-matched controls without strabismus; these were further divided into two groups based on refractive errors: > -6.00 diopter (D) (n = 22 eyes) and ≤ -6.00 D (n = 29 eyes). IOP was measured in primary and side gazes and compared within and among groups. The relationships between IOPs and axial length, angle of globe dislocation measured on magnetic resonance imaging, strabismus angle, and degree of abduction deficit were studied.

RESULTS

The HMS group showed higher IOP in abduction (19.3 ± 4.9 mmHg) than in the primary (12.5 ± 4.3 mmHg) and adducting positions (13.0 ± 3.3 mmHg), (p < 0.001). The IOP in the adducting position in the HMS group (13.0 ± 3.3 mmHg) was lower than in the control groups both with (17.6 ± 3.5 mmHg) and without (16.9 ± 4.1 mmHg) high myopia, ; (p < 0.001 and = 0.003). The difference in IOP between abduction and adduction was significantly larger in the HMS group (6.4 ± 4.6 mmHg) compared to others (p < 0.001) and positively correlated with the strabismus angle and the angle of globe dislocation and negatively with abduction deficit.

CONCLUSION

The IOP of patients with HMS changes dramatically on side gazes, therefore, care should be taken while measuring IOP.