1
|
Burge J, Bonnen K. Continuous psychophysics: past, present, future. Trends Cogn Sci 2025; 29:481-493. [PMID: 39966014 PMCID: PMC12058397 DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2025.01.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2024] [Revised: 01/16/2025] [Accepted: 01/17/2025] [Indexed: 02/20/2025]
Abstract
Continuous target-tracking psychophysics is an innovative experimental paradigm that has emerged as a powerful tool for studying perception, cognition, and visually guided behavior. This review outlines how continuous psychophysics complements traditional forced-choice methods by facilitating rapid data collection, providing insights into the real-time dynamics of perception and action, and enabling studies with special subject populations such as infants and patients. With its efficiency, conceptual simplicity, and ability to reveal temporal signatures of processing and performance, continuous psychophysics is poised to drive important advances across perception and cognitive science.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johannes Burge
- Neuroscience and Bioengineering Graduate Groups, Department of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
| | - Kathryn Bonnen
- School of Optometry, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Li L, Shen X, Kuai S. Distinct detection and discrimination sensitivities in visual processing of real versus unreal optic flow. Psychon Bull Rev 2025:10.3758/s13423-024-02616-y. [PMID: 39810018 DOI: 10.3758/s13423-024-02616-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/03/2024] [Indexed: 01/16/2025]
Abstract
We examined the intricate mechanisms underlying visual processing of complex motion stimuli by measuring the detection sensitivity to contraction and expansion patterns and the discrimination sensitivity to the location of the center of motion (CoM) in various real and unreal optic flow stimuli. We conducted two experiments (N = 20 each) and compared responses to both "real" optic flow stimuli containing information about self-movement in a three-dimensional scene and "unreal" optic flow stimuli lacking such information. We found that detection sensitivity to contraction surpassed that to expansion patterns for unreal optic flow stimuli, whereas this trend was reversed for real optic flow stimuli. Furthermore, while discrimination sensitivity to the CoM location was not affected by stimulus duration for unreal optic flow stimuli, it showed a significant improvement when stimulus duration increased from 100 to 400 ms for real optic flow stimuli. These findings provide compelling evidence that the visual system employs distinct processing approaches for real versus unreal optic flow even when they are perfectly matched for two-dimensional global features and local motion signals. These differences reveal influences of self-movement in natural environments, enabling the visual system to uniquely process stimuli with significant survival implications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Li Li
- Shanghai Frontiers Science Center of Artificial Intelligence and Deep Learning, Division of Arts and Sciences, NYU, New York University Shanghai, Shanghai, China.
- NYU-ECNU Institute of Brain and Cognitive Science, New York University Shanghai, Shanghai, China.
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Brain Functional Genomics, School of Psychology and Cognitive Science, East China Normal University, Shanghai, China.
- ECNU-NYU Joint Research Center of Brain Imaging, East China Normal University, Shanghai, China.
- Faculty of Arts and Science, New York University Shanghai, Shanghai, China.
| | - Xuechun Shen
- NYU-ECNU Institute of Brain and Cognitive Science, New York University Shanghai, Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Brain Functional Genomics, School of Psychology and Cognitive Science, East China Normal University, Shanghai, China
- ECNU-NYU Joint Research Center of Brain Imaging, East China Normal University, Shanghai, China
| | - Shuguang Kuai
- NYU-ECNU Institute of Brain and Cognitive Science, New York University Shanghai, Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Brain Functional Genomics, School of Psychology and Cognitive Science, East China Normal University, Shanghai, China
- ECNU-NYU Joint Research Center of Brain Imaging, East China Normal University, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lapsansky AB, Kreyenmeier P, Spering M, Wylie DR, Altshuler DL. Hummingbirds use compensatory eye movements to stabilize both rotational and translational visual motion. Proc Biol Sci 2025; 292:20242015. [PMID: 39809307 PMCID: PMC11732407 DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2024.2015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2024] [Revised: 10/18/2024] [Accepted: 11/15/2024] [Indexed: 01/16/2025] Open
Abstract
To maintain stable vision, behaving animals make compensatory eye movements in response to image slip, a reflex known as the optokinetic response (OKR). Although OKR has been studied in several avian species, eye movements during flight are expected to be minimal. This is because vertebrates with laterally placed eyes typically show weak OKR to nasal-to-temporal motion (NT), which simulates typical forward locomotion, compared with temporal-to-nasal motion (TN), which simulates atypical backward locomotion. This OKR asymmetry is also reflected in the pretectum, wherein neurons sensitive to global visual motion also exhibit a TN bias. Hummingbirds, however, stabilize visual motion in all directions through whole-body movements and are unique among vertebrates in that they lack a pretectal bias. We therefore predicted that OKR in hummingbirds would be symmetrical. We measured OKR in restrained hummingbirds by presenting gratings drifting across a range of speeds. OKR in hummingbirds was asymmetrical, although the direction of asymmetry varied with stimulus speed. Hummingbirds moved their eyes largely independently of one another. Consistent with weak eye-to-eye coupling, hummingbirds also exhibited disjunctive OKR to visual motion simulating forward and backward translation. This unexpected oculomotor behaviour, previously unexplored in birds, suggests a potential role for compensatory eye movements during flight.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anthony B. Lapsansky
- Salish Sea Research Center, Northwest Indian College, Bellingham, WA98226, USA
- Department of Zoology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British ColumbiaV6T 1Z4, Canada
| | - Philipp Kreyenmeier
- Department of Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British ColumbiaV5Z 3N9, Canada
| | - Miriam Spering
- Department of Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British ColumbiaV5Z 3N9, Canada
- Djavad Mowafaghian Centre for Brain Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British ColumbiaV6T 1Z3, Canada
| | - Douglas R. Wylie
- Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AlbertaT6G 2R3, Canada
| | - Douglas L. Altshuler
- Department of Zoology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British ColumbiaV6T 1Z4, Canada
- Djavad Mowafaghian Centre for Brain Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British ColumbiaV6T 1Z3, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Jörges B, Bansal A, Harris LR. Precision and temporal dynamics in heading perception assessed by continuous psychophysics. PLoS One 2024; 19:e0311992. [PMID: 39392815 PMCID: PMC11469512 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0311992] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2024] [Accepted: 09/27/2024] [Indexed: 10/13/2024] Open
Abstract
It is a well-established finding that more informative optic flow (e.g., faster, denser, or presented over a larger portion of the visual field) yields decreased variability in heading judgements. Current models of heading perception further predict faster processing under such circumstances, which has, however, not been supported empirically so far. In this study, we validate a novel continuous psychophysics paradigm by replicating the effect of the speed and density of optic flow on variability in performance, and we investigate how these manipulations affect the temporal dynamics. To this end, we tested 30 participants in a continuous psychophysics paradigm administered in Virtual Reality. We immersed them in a simple virtual environment where they experienced four 90-second blocks of optic flow where their linear heading direction (no simulated rotation) at any given moment was determined by a random walk. We asked them to continuously indicate with a joystick the direction in which they perceived themselves to be moving. In each of the four blocks they experienced a different combination of simulated self-motion speeds (SLOW and FAST) and density of optic flow (SPARSE and DENSE). Using a Cross-Correlogram Analysis, we determined that participants reacted faster and displayed lower variability in their performance in the FAST and DENSE conditions than in the SLOW and SPARSE conditions, respectively. Using a Kalman Filter-based analysis approach, we found a similar pattern, where the fitted perceptual noise parameters were higher for SLOW and SPARSE. While replicating previous results on variability, we show that more informative optic flow can speed up heading judgements, while at the same time validating a continuous psychophysics as an efficient method for studying heading perception.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Björn Jörges
- Center for Vision Research, York University, North York, Canada
| | - Ambika Bansal
- Center for Vision Research, York University, North York, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Hermann A, Benke C, Blecker CR, de Haas B, He Y, Hofmann SG, Iffland JR, Jengert-Stahl J, Kircher T, Leinweber K, Linka M, Mulert C, Neudert MK, Noll AK, Melzig CA, Rief W, Rothkopf C, Schäfer A, Schmitter CV, Schuster V, Stark R, Straube B, Zimmer RI, Kirchner L. Study protocol TransTAM: Transdiagnostic research into emotional disorders and cognitive-behavioral therapy of the adaptive mind. BMC Psychiatry 2024; 24:657. [PMID: 39369190 PMCID: PMC11456249 DOI: 10.1186/s12888-024-06108-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2024] [Accepted: 09/23/2024] [Indexed: 10/07/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Emotional disorders such as depression and anxiety disorders share substantial similarities in their etiology and treatment. In recent decades, these commonalities have been increasingly recognized in classification systems and treatment programs crossing diagnostic boundaries. METHODS To examine the prospective effects of different transdiagnostic markers on relevant treatment outcomes, we plan to track a minimum of N = 200 patients with emotional disorders during their routine course of cognitive behavioral therapy at two German outpatient clinics. We will collect a wide range of transdiagnostic markers, ranging from basic perceptual processes and self-report measures to complex behavioral and neurobiological indicators, before entering therapy. Symptoms and psychopathological processes will be recorded before entering therapy, between the 20th and 24th therapy session, and at the end of therapy. DISCUSSION Our results could help to identify transdiagnostic markers with high predictive power, but also provide deeper insights into which patient groups with which symptom clusters are less likely to benefit from therapy, and for what reasons. TRIAL REGISTRATION The trial was preregistered at the German Clinical Trial Register (DRKS-ID: DRKS00031206; 2023-05-09).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Hermann
- Department of Psychotherapy and Systems Neuroscience, Justus Liebig University of Giessen, Giessen, Germany.
- Center for Mind, Brain and Behavior (CMBB), Philipps University of Marburg and Justus Liebig University of Giessen, Marburg, Germany.
| | - Christoph Benke
- Department of Clinical Psychology, Experimental Psychopathology and Psychotherapy, Philipps University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Carlo R Blecker
- Justus Liebig University of Giessen, Bender Institute of Neuroimaging, Giessen, Germany
| | - Benjamin de Haas
- Experimental Psychology, Justus Liebig University of Giessen, Giessen, Germany
- Center for Mind, Brain and Behavior (CMBB), Philipps University of Marburg and Justus Liebig University of Giessen, Marburg, Germany
| | - Yifei He
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Philipps University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Stefan G Hofmann
- Department of Psychology, Philipps University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany
- Center for Mind, Brain and Behavior (CMBB), Philipps University of Marburg and Justus Liebig University of Giessen, Marburg, Germany
| | - Jona R Iffland
- Center of Psychiatry, Justus Liebig University of Giessen, Giessen, Germany
| | - Johanna Jengert-Stahl
- Department of Psychotherapy and Systems Neuroscience, Justus Liebig University of Giessen, Giessen, Germany
| | - Tilo Kircher
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Philipps University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany
- Center for Mind, Brain and Behavior (CMBB), Philipps University of Marburg and Justus Liebig University of Giessen, Marburg, Germany
| | - Katrin Leinweber
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Philipps University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Marcel Linka
- Experimental Psychology, Justus Liebig University of Giessen, Giessen, Germany
| | - Christoph Mulert
- Center of Psychiatry, Justus Liebig University of Giessen, Giessen, Germany
- Center for Mind, Brain and Behavior (CMBB), Philipps University of Marburg and Justus Liebig University of Giessen, Marburg, Germany
| | - Marie K Neudert
- Department of Psychotherapy and Systems Neuroscience, Justus Liebig University of Giessen, Giessen, Germany
| | - Ann-Kathrin Noll
- Department of Psychotherapy and Systems Neuroscience, Justus Liebig University of Giessen, Giessen, Germany
| | - Christiane A Melzig
- Department of Clinical Psychology, Experimental Psychopathology and Psychotherapy, Philipps University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany
- Center for Mind, Brain and Behavior (CMBB), Philipps University of Marburg and Justus Liebig University of Giessen, Marburg, Germany
| | - Winfried Rief
- Department of Clinical Psychology, Philipps University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany
- Center for Mind, Brain and Behavior (CMBB), Philipps University of Marburg and Justus Liebig University of Giessen, Marburg, Germany
| | - Constantin Rothkopf
- Institute of Psychology, Centre for Cognitive Science, Technical University of Darmstadt, Darmstadt, Germany
- Center for Mind, Brain and Behavior (CMBB), Philipps University of Marburg and Justus Liebig University of Giessen, Marburg, Germany
| | - Axel Schäfer
- Justus Liebig University of Giessen, Bender Institute of Neuroimaging, Giessen, Germany
- Center for Mind, Brain and Behavior (CMBB), Philipps University of Marburg and Justus Liebig University of Giessen, Marburg, Germany
| | - Christina V Schmitter
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Philipps University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Verena Schuster
- Department of Psychology, Philipps University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Rudolf Stark
- Department of Psychotherapy and Systems Neuroscience, Justus Liebig University of Giessen, Giessen, Germany
- Justus Liebig University of Giessen, Bender Institute of Neuroimaging, Giessen, Germany
- Center for Mind, Brain and Behavior (CMBB), Philipps University of Marburg and Justus Liebig University of Giessen, Marburg, Germany
| | - Benjamin Straube
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Philipps University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany
- Center for Mind, Brain and Behavior (CMBB), Philipps University of Marburg and Justus Liebig University of Giessen, Marburg, Germany
| | - Raphaela I Zimmer
- Department of Psychotherapy and Systems Neuroscience, Justus Liebig University of Giessen, Giessen, Germany
| | - Lukas Kirchner
- Department of Clinical Psychology, Philipps University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Souchet AD, Lourdeaux D, Burkhardt JM, Hancock PA. Design guidelines for limiting and eliminating virtual reality-induced symptoms and effects at work: a comprehensive, factor-oriented review. Front Psychol 2023; 14:1161932. [PMID: 37359863 PMCID: PMC10288216 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1161932] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2023] [Accepted: 05/16/2023] [Indexed: 06/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Virtual reality (VR) can induce side effects known as virtual reality-induced symptoms and effects (VRISE). To address this concern, we identify a literature-based listing of these factors thought to influence VRISE with a focus on office work use. Using those, we recommend guidelines for VRISE amelioration intended for virtual environment creators and users. We identify five VRISE risks, focusing on short-term symptoms with their short-term effects. Three overall factor categories are considered: individual, hardware, and software. Over 90 factors may influence VRISE frequency and severity. We identify guidelines for each factor to help reduce VR side effects. To better reflect our confidence in those guidelines, we graded each with a level of evidence rating. Common factors occasionally influence different forms of VRISE. This can lead to confusion in the literature. General guidelines for using VR at work involve worker adaptation, such as limiting immersion times to between 20 and 30 min. These regimens involve taking regular breaks. Extra care is required for workers with special needs, neurodiversity, and gerontechnological concerns. In addition to following our guidelines, stakeholders should be aware that current head-mounted displays and virtual environments can continue to induce VRISE. While no single existing method fully alleviates VRISE, workers' health and safety must be monitored and safeguarded when VR is used at work.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexis D. Souchet
- Heudiasyc UMR 7253, Alliance Sorbonne Université, Université de Technologie de Compiègne, CNRS, Compiègne, France
- Institute for Creative Technologies, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Domitile Lourdeaux
- Heudiasyc UMR 7253, Alliance Sorbonne Université, Université de Technologie de Compiègne, CNRS, Compiègne, France
| | | | - Peter A. Hancock
- Department of Psychology, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, United States
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Mei Chow H, Spering M. Eye movements during optic flow perception. Vision Res 2023; 204:108164. [PMID: 36566560 DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2022.108164] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2022] [Revised: 11/22/2022] [Accepted: 12/07/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Optic flow is an important visual cue for human perception and locomotion and naturally triggers eye movements. Here we investigate whether the perception of optic flow direction is limited or enhanced by eye movements. In Exp. 1, 23 human observers localized the focus of expansion (FOE) of an optic flow pattern; in Exp. 2, 18 observers had to detect brief visual changes at the FOE. Both tasks were completed during free viewing and fixation conditions while eye movements were recorded. Task difficulty was varied by manipulating the coherence of radial motion from the FOE (4 %-90 %). During free viewing, observers tracked the optic flow pattern with a combination of saccades and smooth eye movements. During fixation, observers nevertheless made small-scale eye movements. Despite differences in spatial scale, eye movements during free viewing and fixation were similarly directed toward the FOE (saccades) and away from the FOE (smooth tracking). Whereas FOE localization sensitivity was not affected by eye movement instructions (Exp. 1), observers' sensitivity to detect brief changes at the FOE was 27 % higher (p <.001) during free-viewing compared to fixation (Exp. 2). This performance benefit was linked to reduced saccade endpoint errors, indicating the direct beneficial impact of foveating eye movements on performance in a fine-grain perceptual task, but not during coarse perceptual localization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hiu Mei Chow
- Dept. of Psychology, St. Thomas University, Fredericton, Canada; Dept. of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
| | - Miriam Spering
- Dept. of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada; Djavad Mowafaghian Center for Brain Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada; Institute for Computing, Information and Cognitive Systems, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Straub D, Rothkopf CA. Putting perception into action with inverse optimal control for continuous psychophysics. eLife 2022; 11:e76635. [PMID: 36173094 PMCID: PMC9522207 DOI: 10.7554/elife.76635] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2021] [Accepted: 08/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Psychophysical methods are a cornerstone of psychology, cognitive science, and neuroscience where they have been used to quantify behavior and its neural correlates for a vast range of mental phenomena. Their power derives from the combination of controlled experiments and rigorous analysis through signal detection theory. Unfortunately, they require many tedious trials and preferably highly trained participants. A recently developed approach, continuous psychophysics, promises to transform the field by abandoning the rigid trial structure involving binary responses and replacing it with continuous behavioral adjustments to dynamic stimuli. However, what has precluded wide adoption of this approach is that current analysis methods do not account for the additional variability introduced by the motor component of the task and therefore recover perceptual thresholds that are larger compared to equivalent traditional psychophysical experiments. Here, we introduce a computational analysis framework for continuous psychophysics based on Bayesian inverse optimal control. We show via simulations and previously published data that this not only recovers the perceptual thresholds but additionally estimates subjects' action variability, internal behavioral costs, and subjective beliefs about the experimental stimulus dynamics. Taken together, we provide further evidence for the importance of including acting uncertainties, subjective beliefs, and, crucially, the intrinsic costs of behavior, even in experiments seemingly only investigating perception.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dominik Straub
- Centre for Cognitive Science, Technical University of DarmstadtDarmstadtGermany
- Institute of Psychology, Technical University of DarmstadtDarmstadtGermany
| | - Constantin A Rothkopf
- Centre for Cognitive Science, Technical University of DarmstadtDarmstadtGermany
- Institute of Psychology, Technical University of DarmstadtDarmstadtGermany
- Frankfurt Institute for Advanced Studies, Goethe University FrankfurtFrankfurtGermany
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Developmental changes in gaze patterns in response to radial optic flow in toddlerhood and childhood. Sci Rep 2022; 12:11566. [PMID: 35799054 PMCID: PMC9262903 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-15730-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2021] [Accepted: 06/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
A large field visual motion pattern (optic flow) with a radial pattern provides a compelling perception of self-motion; a radially expanding/contracting optic flow generates the perception of forward/backward locomotion. Moreover, the focus of a radial optic flow, particularly an expansive flow, is an important visual cue to perceive and control the heading direction during human locomotion. Previous research has shown that human gaze patterns have an “expansion bias”: a tendency to be more attracted to the focus of expansive flow than to the focus of contractive flow. We investigated the development of the expansion bias in children (N = 240, 1–12 years) and adults (N = 20). Most children aged ≥ 5 years and adults showed a significant tendency to shift their gaze to the focus of an expansive flow, whereas the youngest group (1-year-old children) showed a significant but opposing tendency; their gaze was more attracted to the focus of contractive flow than to the focus of expansive flow. The relationship between the developmental change from the “contraction bias” in early toddlerhood to the expansion bias in the later developmental stages and possible factors (e.g., global visual motion processing abilities and locomotor experiences) are discussed.
Collapse
|