1
|
Purdy R, John M, Bray A, Clare AJ, Copland DA, Chan YK, Henderson RH, Nerinckx F, Leroy BP, Yang P, Pennesi ME, MacLaren RE, Fischer MD, Dick AD, Xue K. Gene Therapy-Associated Uveitis (GTAU): Understanding and mitigating the adverse immune response in retinal gene therapy. Prog Retin Eye Res 2025; 106:101354. [PMID: 40090458 DOI: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2025.101354] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2024] [Revised: 03/04/2025] [Accepted: 03/14/2025] [Indexed: 03/18/2025]
Abstract
Retinal gene therapy using adeno-associated viral (AAV) vectors has been a groundbreaking step-change in the treatment of inherited retinal diseases (IRDs) and could also be used to treat more common retinal diseases such as age-related macular degeneration and diabetic retinopathy. The delivery and expression of therapeutic transgenes in the eye is limited by innate and adaptive immune responses against components of the vector product, which has been termed gene therapy-associated uveitis (GTAU). This is clinically important as intraocular inflammation could lead to irreversible loss of retinal cells, deterioration of visual function and reduced durability of treatment effect associated with a costly one-off treatment. For retinal gene therapy to achieve an improved efficacy and safety profile for treating additional IRDs and more common diseases, the risk of GTAU must be minimised. We have collated insights from pre-clinical research, clinical trials, and the real-world implementation of AAV-mediated retinal gene therapy to help understand the risk factors for GTAU. We draw attention to an emerging framework, which includes patient demographics, vector construct, vector dose, route of administration, and choice of immunosuppression regime. Importantly, we consider efforts to date and potential future strategies to mitigate the adverse immune response across each of these domains. We advocate for more targeted immunomodulatory approaches to the prevention and treatment of GTAU based on better understanding of the underlying immune response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan Purdy
- Nuffield Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Molly John
- Nuffield Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | | | - Alison J Clare
- Academic Unit of Ophthalmology, Translational Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK; University College London (UCL) Institute of Ophthalmology, London, UK; NIHR Biomedical Research Centre of Ophthalmology, Moorfields Eye Hospital, London, UK
| | - David A Copland
- Academic Unit of Ophthalmology, Translational Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK; University College London (UCL) Institute of Ophthalmology, London, UK; NIHR Biomedical Research Centre of Ophthalmology, Moorfields Eye Hospital, London, UK
| | - Ying Kai Chan
- Academic Unit of Ophthalmology, Translational Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK; Wyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA; Cirrus Therapeutics, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Robert H Henderson
- University College London (UCL) Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK; Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Fanny Nerinckx
- Chirec Delta Hospital, Brussels, Belgium; Department of Ophthalmology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Bart P Leroy
- Department of Ophthalmology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium; Center for Medical Genetics Ghent (CMGG), Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium; Department of Head & Skin, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Paul Yang
- Casey Eye Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, USA
| | - Mark E Pennesi
- Casey Eye Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, USA; Retina Foundation of the Southwest, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Robert E MacLaren
- Nuffield Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - M Dominik Fischer
- Nuffield Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Andrew D Dick
- Academic Unit of Ophthalmology, Translational Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK; University College London (UCL) Institute of Ophthalmology, London, UK; NIHR Biomedical Research Centre of Ophthalmology, Moorfields Eye Hospital, London, UK
| | - Kanmin Xue
- Nuffield Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK; Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Li J, Nagasaka Y, Shen H, Zhou X, Ma J, Trevisan-Silva D, Sherman NE, Ambati J, Gelfand BD, Guo LW. TMEM97 governs partial epithelial-mesenchymal transition of retinal pigment epithelial cells via the CTNND2-ADAM10 axis. MOLECULAR THERAPY. NUCLEIC ACIDS 2025; 36:102460. [PMID: 39995975 PMCID: PMC11848774 DOI: 10.1016/j.omtn.2025.102460] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2024] [Accepted: 01/17/2025] [Indexed: 02/26/2025]
Abstract
Epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) is associated with retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) dysfunction in degenerative retinal diseases. However, the role of partial EMT (pEMT), a hybrid state exhibiting both epithelial and mesenchymal markers, remains poorly understood in this context. Our previous research demonstrated that TMEM97 ablation in mice worsens photoreceptor loss in an oxidant-induced RPE damage model. Here, we link TMEM97 to pEMT in RPE cells and explore the underlying molecular mechanisms. We found that re-expressing TMEM97 in the RPE of TMEM97-knockout mice, via subretinal lentiviral delivery, mitigated oxidant (NaIO3)-induced photoreceptor loss. Interestingly, TMEM97 knockout in ARPE19 cells in vitro led to upregulation of cadherin/adhesion-binding pathways, even without oxidant exposure. Integrated proteomic, transcriptomic, segmentation, and immunoblot analyses revealed that TMEM97 ablation induces pEMT, marked by the concurrent expression of epithelial E-cadherin and mesenchymal N-cadherin, a process reversed upon TMEM97 re-expression. Furthermore, TMEM97 negatively regulated CTNND2 protein (catenin δ-2), but not the known EMT driver β-catenin, and CTNND2 was found to promote ADAM10, which sustains both E- and N-cadherin protein levels. These findings identify TMEM97 as a novel regulator of RPE-cell pEMT through the CTNND2-ADAM10 axis, highlighting potential new targets for therapeutic intervention in RPE-related pathophysiology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jing Li
- Division of Surgical Sciences, Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22903, USA
| | - Yosuke Nagasaka
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22903, USA
| | - Hongtao Shen
- Division of Surgical Sciences, Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22903, USA
| | - Xinyu Zhou
- Division of Surgical Sciences, Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22903, USA
| | - Jianjie Ma
- Division of Surgical Sciences, Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22903, USA
| | - Dilza Trevisan-Silva
- School of Medicine Core Facilities, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22903, USA
| | - Nicholas E. Sherman
- School of Medicine Core Facilities, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22903, USA
| | - Jayakrishna Ambati
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22903, USA
| | - Bradley D. Gelfand
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22903, USA
| | - Lian-Wang Guo
- Division of Surgical Sciences, Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22903, USA
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22903, USA
- Department of Molecular Physiology and Biological Physics, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22903, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Boyd RF, Petersen‐Jones SM. Techniques for subretinal injections in animals. Vet Ophthalmol 2025; 28:506-518. [PMID: 38700998 PMCID: PMC11911964 DOI: 10.1111/vop.13219] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/26/2023] [Revised: 04/03/2024] [Accepted: 04/05/2024] [Indexed: 05/05/2024]
Abstract
Subretinal injections are not commonly performed during clinical treatment of animals but are frequently used in laboratory animal models to assess therapeutic efficacy and safety of gene and cell therapy products. Veterinary ophthalmologists are often employed to perform the injections in the laboratory animal setting, due to knowledge of comparative ocular anatomy between species and familiarity with operating on non-human eyes. Understanding the different approaches used for subretinal injection in each species and potential complications that may be encountered is vital to achieving successful and reproducible results. This manuscript provides a summary of different approaches to subretinal injections in the most common animal model species, along with information from published literature and experience of the authors to educate novice or experienced surgeons tasked with performing these injections for the first time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Simon M. Petersen‐Jones
- Department of Small Animal Clinical SciencesMichigan State UniversityEast LansingMichiganUSA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Jamil MU, Waheed NK. Gene therapy for geographic atrophy in age-related macular degeneration: current insights. Eye (Lond) 2025; 39:274-283. [PMID: 39578546 PMCID: PMC11751089 DOI: 10.1038/s41433-024-03463-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2024] [Revised: 10/07/2024] [Accepted: 11/04/2024] [Indexed: 11/24/2024] Open
Abstract
Geographic atrophy (GA) is the advanced stage of non-neovascular (dry) age-related macular degeneration, defined by the presence of sharply demarcated atrophic lesions of the outer retina. The complement system is integral to the body's natural immune response, and hence its overactivation can lead to tissue damage and inflammation. It has been shown to play a significant role in GA lesion development and progression, and therefore, complement inhibition is emerging as a promising avenue for therapeutic intervention. With the recent approval by the Food and Drug Administration of drugs like SYFOVRE™ (pegcetacoplan injection) and IZERVAY™ (avacincaptad pegol intravitreal solution), there is hope for the development of interventions capable of slowing down or arresting the progression of GA. In particular, gene therapy intervention is gaining traction for halting GA atrophy at the source of our genes. The concept is to insert a gene into the eye that will act as an ocular "bio-factory," producing a desired protein. This can either lead to overproduction of an already available protein or produce a substance not typically generated in the eye. This review aims to provide an overview of the present understanding of GA, encompassing risk factors, prevalence, pathophysiology, and genetic associations. It will also highlight the current landscape of GA treatment, with particular emphasis on gene therapy intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Nadia K Waheed
- New England Eye Center, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, 02116, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Du X, Butler AG, Chen HY. Cell-cell interaction in the pathogenesis of inherited retinal diseases. Front Cell Dev Biol 2024; 12:1332944. [PMID: 38500685 PMCID: PMC10944940 DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2024.1332944] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2023] [Accepted: 02/06/2024] [Indexed: 03/20/2024] Open
Abstract
The retina is part of the central nervous system specialized for vision. Inherited retinal diseases (IRD) are a group of clinically and genetically heterogenous disorders that lead to progressive vision impairment or blindness. Although each disorder is rare, IRD accumulatively cause blindness in up to 5.5 million individuals worldwide. Currently, the pathophysiological mechanisms of IRD are not fully understood and there are limited treatment options available. Most IRD are caused by degeneration of light-sensitive photoreceptors. Genetic mutations that abrogate the structure and/or function of photoreceptors lead to visual impairment followed by blindness caused by loss of photoreceptors. In healthy retina, photoreceptors structurally and functionally interact with retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) and Müller glia (MG) to maintain retinal homeostasis. Multiple IRD with photoreceptor degeneration as a major phenotype are caused by mutations of RPE- and/or MG-associated genes. Recent studies also reveal compromised MG and RPE caused by mutations in ubiquitously expressed ciliary genes. Therefore, photoreceptor degeneration could be a direct consequence of gene mutations and/or could be secondary to the dysfunction of their interaction partners in the retina. This review summarizes the mechanisms of photoreceptor-RPE/MG interaction in supporting retinal functions and discusses how the disruption of these processes could lead to photoreceptor degeneration, with an aim to provide a unique perspective of IRD pathogenesis and treatment paradigm. We will first describe the biology of retina and IRD and then discuss the interaction between photoreceptors and MG/RPE as well as their implications in disease pathogenesis. Finally, we will summarize the recent advances in IRD therapeutics targeting MG and/or RPE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Holly Y. Chen
- Department of Cell, Developmental and Integrative Biology, Heersink School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Huang P, Narendran S, Pereira F, Fukuda S, Nagasaka Y, Apicella I, Yerramothu P, Marion KM, Cai X, Sadda SR, Gelfand BD, Ambati J. Subretinal injection in mice to study retinal physiology and disease. Nat Protoc 2022; 17:1468-1485. [PMID: 35418688 PMCID: PMC11146522 DOI: 10.1038/s41596-022-00689-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2021] [Accepted: 02/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Subretinal injection (SRI) is a widely used technique in retinal research and can be used to deliver nucleic acids, small molecules, macromolecules, viruses, cells or biomaterials such as nanobeads. Here we describe how to undertake SRI of mice. This protocol was adapted from a technique initially described for larger animals. Although SRI is a common procedure in eye research laboratories, there is no published guidance on the best practices for determining what constitutes a 'successful' SRI. Optimal injections are required for reproducibility of the procedure and, when carried out suboptimally, can lead to erroneous conclusions. To address this issue, we propose a standardized protocol for SRI with 'procedure success' defined by follow-up examination of the retina and the retinal pigmented epithelium rather than solely via intraoperative endpoints. This protocol takes 7-14 d to complete, depending on the reagent delivered. We have found, by instituting a standardized training program, that trained ophthalmologists achieve reliable proficiency in this technique after ~350 practice injections. This technique can be used to gain insights into retinal physiology and disease pathogenesis and to test the efficacy of experimental compounds in the retina or retinal pigmented epithelium.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peirong Huang
- Center for Advanced Vision Science, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA, USA
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA, USA
- Department of Ophthalmology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Siddharth Narendran
- Center for Advanced Vision Science, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA, USA
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA, USA
- Aravind Eye Care System, Madurai, India
| | - Felipe Pereira
- Center for Advanced Vision Science, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA, USA
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA, USA
- Departamento de Oftalmologia e Ciências Visuais, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Shinichi Fukuda
- Center for Advanced Vision Science, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA, USA
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA, USA
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan
| | - Yosuke Nagasaka
- Center for Advanced Vision Science, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA, USA
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Ivana Apicella
- Center for Advanced Vision Science, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA, USA
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Praveen Yerramothu
- Center for Advanced Vision Science, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA, USA
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | | | - Xiaoyu Cai
- Center for Advanced Vision Science, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA, USA
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Srinivas R Sadda
- Doheny Eye Institute, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Department of Ophthalmology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Bradley D Gelfand
- Center for Advanced Vision Science, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA, USA
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA, USA
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Jayakrishna Ambati
- Center for Advanced Vision Science, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
- Department of Pathology, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
- Department of Microbiology, Immunology, and Cancer Biology, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|