Rates and Determinants of Eyecare Utilization and Eyeglass Affordability Among Individuals With Visual Impairment in a Multi-Ethnic Population-Based Study in Singapore

Evaluating the Correlation between Eyeglass-Type Wearable Device Measurements and Subjective Physical Activity Assessments

Introduction Wearable trackers are instrumental in monitoring various health indicators, notably daily physical activity, which is crucial for managing chronic diseases and improving overall health. This study examined the relationship between physical activity levels measured using JINS MEME, an eyeglass-type wearable device equipped with motion sensors, and subjective activity assessments reported through the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ). Methods Healthy volunteers aged 20-60 were recruited for an observational study. Participants wore the JINS MEME throughout the day for one week, and data on walking activity were collected and analyzed alongside IPAQ responses to evaluate subjective physical activity levels. The correlation between the two sets of data was evaluated using the nonparametric Spearman's rho (ρ) correlation coefficient for both the assessed metabolic equivalents (METs) score of the JINS MEME and the IPAQ. Similarly, the relationship between the IPAQ questionnaire items and the measurements from the JINS MEME. Results The study included 42 participants and revealed a strong correlation (R=0.719, P<0.01) between the metabolic equivalents (METs) calculated from the JINS MEME and IPAQ scores, especially for walking activities. Similarly, a significant association was found between the IPAQ data and walking speed (R=0.129, P=0.02). METs showed significant relationships with all physical activities, except sitting or reclining time. Conclusion This study validated the use of eyeglass-type wearable devices, such as the JINS MEME, to accurately assess physical activity levels, demonstrating a strong correlation with subjective assessments using the IPAQ. This highlights the potential of wearable devices in comprehensive health monitoring and management strategies.

Social and Health Care Utilization Factors Associated With Ophthalmic Visit Nonadherence in Glaucoma: An All of Us Study

PRCIS

In a diverse nationwide cohort, lower education and income levels, cost saving on medications, fewer past-year medical/specialist visits, and concerns regarding dissimilarity with health care providers were risk factors for ophthalmic visit nonadherence among glaucoma patients.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to characterize social and health care utilization factors associated with nonadherence with ophthalmic visits among patients with glaucoma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Glaucoma patients in the All of Us database who completed the Healthcare Access and Utilization Survey were included and categorized into "visit" and "nonvisit" groups based on visit adherence, defined by self-reported past-year encounters with eyecare providers (yes/no). Data regarding potential factors affecting ophthalmic visit adherence, including past-year medical visits, inabilities to afford health care, and self-reported reasons for delayed care, were extracted. χ 2 tests and logistic regression were used to compare the 2 groups. Odds ratios (ORs) of visit adherence were analyzed for potential risk factors.

RESULTS

Of 5739 glaucoma patients, 861 (15%) were in the nonvisit group. More participants in the visit group reported past-year general doctor/specialist visits (94%/65%; vs. nonvisit group: 89%/49.3%; P <0.05). The nonvisit group reported greater difficulty in affording medical care and learning about medical conditions, and higher rates of delayed/missed health care access for various concerns ( P <0.05). Older age (OR=1.02, 1.01-1.03), higher education (OR=1.25, 1.13-1.40), and income level (OR=1.06, 1.01-1.11), not employed for wages (OR=1.28, 1.08-1.53), and higher health care utilization in general medical/specialist visits (ORs range:1.08-1.90) were associated with visit adherence ( P <0.05). Visit nonadherence was associated with cost saving on medication (OR=0.62, 0.40-0.97) and delaying/avoiding seeing health care providers because of dissimilarity (OR=0.84, 0.71-0.99) ( P <0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

This study builds on prior literature by identifying potentially modifiable factors associated with visit nonadherence and underutilization of eyecare in glaucoma. These may inform strategies to improve real-world ophthalmic visit adherence and identify patients who might benefit from additional support.

Association Between Visual Impairment and Health Care Use

PURPOSE

To determine the association between visual impairment (VI) and medical care use.

DESIGN

Population-based cohort study.

METHODS

The study cohort included individuals from 2007 to 2017. The Disability Registry was used to identify all patients aged ≥20 years who newly developed visual disability. All patients were observed until they became visually impaired (case group). They were then matched with 2 control groups: (1) people with nonvisual disability and (2) people without any disability. The main outcome measures were (1) ophthalmic outpatient and inpatient use and (2) nonophthalmic outpatient and inpatient use.

RESULTS

Compared with people with nonvisual disability, those with visual disability demonstrated a lower nonophthalmic outpatient costs (-NT$42,841, P < .001) and outpatient visits (-2.8 times). However, the opposite was noted for ophthalmic use, where people with visual disability used more medical care compared with people with other types of disability and people without disability. An age-stratified analysis revealed that visual disabilities had an age-related dose-response effect on the reception of nonophthalmic care and a slight nonlinear effect on the receipt of ophthalmic care.

CONCLUSIONS

Studies investigating the effect of VI on medical use should differentiate aggregate use into different types. Use of ophthalmic and nonophthalmic care for people with VI should be compared with that of people with other types of disability and people without disability.

Medication Adherence in Patients With Glaucoma and Disability

Importance

People with disabilities tend to have lower medication adherence. Glaucoma medication adherence has been scantly studied for people with disability.

Objective

To determine whether disability leads to reduced glaucoma medication adherence and whether this decrease varies by type of disability.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This population-based case-control study enrolled individuals with glaucoma and without disability, who were followed up until they received disability certification. All patients in Taiwan with confirmed glaucoma in 1 or both eyes were identified using National Health Insurance claims data. All patients with glaucoma who required glaucoma medication adherence (confirmed glaucoma, suspected glaucoma, and patients with ocular hypertension) and had newly obtained disability status after December 31, 2013, were identified and matched to counterparts without disability based on age and sex. The study period was January 1, 1997, to December 31, 2017. Data were analyzed from May 2021 to August 2021.

Exposures

All patients were followed up until they obtained confirmed disability status, which was identified using the National Disability Registry in Taiwan.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Secondary adherence was measured using frequencies of glaucoma medication refills and outpatient visits at 1-year and 2-year intervals.

Results

A total of 46 468 patients with glaucoma (23 234 with disability and 23 234 without disability; 24 508 men [52.7%]; 21 960 women [47.3%] mean [SD] age, 72.5 [14.3] years) were included in the study. Overall, the frequency of glaucoma outpatient visits was higher in people with disabilities than those without disabilities both before the index dates (difference, 0.64 [95% CI, 0.57-0.72]; P < .001) and after the index dates (difference, 0.34 [95% CI, 0.27-0.41]; P < .001) when using 1-year intervals. However, when stratified by the type of disability, having limb disability, being in a vegetative state, and having dementia were associated with fewer outpatient visits and lower medication adherence (at a maximum of 17.60 [95% CI, 8.90-26.30] percentage points lower; P < .001) compared with people without disability. Adjusted regression results revealed that people with visual disability had a mean of 2.50 (95% CI, 2.34-2.67) times more glaucoma outpatient visits than their matches who were disability free (P < .001).

Conclusions and Relevance

Certain types of disability can reduce glaucoma medication adherence by up to 17.60%. Policies targeting medication adherence should consider these disability types.

Frequency and source of prescription eyewear insurance coverage in Ontario: a repeated population-based cross-sectional study using survey data

BACKGROUND

Insurance coverage may reduce cost barriers to obtain vision correction. Our aim was to determine the frequency and source of prescription eyewear insurance to understand how Canadians finance optical correction.

METHODS

We conducted a repeated population-based cross-sectional study using 2003, 2005 and 2013-2014 Canadian Community Health Survey data from respondents aged 12 years or older from Ontario, Canada. In this group, the cost of prescription eyewear is not covered by the government unless one is registered with a social assistance program or belongs to a specific population. We determined the frequency and source of insurance coverage for prescription eyewear in proportions. We used survey weights provided by Statistics Canada in all analyses to account for sample selection, a complex survey, and adjustments for seasonal effect, poststratification, nonresponse and calibration. We compared unadjusted proportions and adjusted prevalence ratios (PRs) of having insurance.

RESULTS

Insurance covered all or part of the costs of prescription eyewear for 62% of Ontarians in all 3 survey years. Of those insured, 84.1%-86.0% had employer-sponsored coverage, 9.0%-10.3% had government-sponsored coverage, and 5.7%-6.8% had private plans. Employer-sponsored coverage remained constant for those in households with postsecondary graduation but decreased significantly for those in households with less than secondary school graduation, from 67.0% (95% confidence interval [CI] 63.2%-70.8%) (n = 175 000) in 2005 to 54.6% (95% CI 50.1%-59.2%) (n = 123 500) in 2013-2014. Government-sponsored coverage increased significantly for those in households with less than secondary school graduation, from 29.2% (95% CI 25.5%-32.9%) (n = 76 400) in 2005 to 41.7% (95% CI 37.2%-46.1%) (n = 93 900) in 2013-2014. In 2013-2014, Ontarians in households with less than secondary school graduation were less likely than those with secondary school graduation to report employer-sponsored coverage (adjusted PR 0.79, 95% CI 0.75-0.84) but were more likely to have government-sponsored coverage (adjusted PR 1.27, 95% CI 1.06-1.53).

INTERPRETATION

Sixty-two percent of Ontarians had prescription eyewear insurance in 2003, 2005 and 2013-2014; the largest source of insurance was employers, primarily covering those with higher education levels, whereas government-sponsored insurance increased significantly among those with lower education levels. Further research is needed to elucidate barriers to obtaining prescription eyewear and the degree to which affordability impairs access to vision correction.