High risk of ultrashort noninvasive opiate detoxification

A systematic review of the effectiveness of naltrexone in the maintenance treatment of opioid and alcohol dependence

This systematic review summarises evidence of the effectiveness of naltrexone (NTX) and the added value of psychosocial treatment in the maintenance treatment of opioid and alcohol dependence. Studies were selected through a literature search conducted in March 2004. Seven opioid and seventeen alcohol studies were identified. When possible, meta-(regression) analyses were performed. There is lack of evidence about the effectiveness of NTX in the maintenance treatment of opioid dependence. There is evidence for the effectiveness and applicability of NTX in the management of alcohol dependence. The opioid studies combined NTX with a variety of psychosocial interventions, which plagued the evaluation of their value. Concomitant psychosocial interventions used in the alcohol studies were mainly cognitive behavioural, which seems to be more effective than NTX combined with supportive therapy. Available data do not allow firm conclusions regarding the added effect of psychosocial interventions. However, the data suggest that a combination of naltrexone with cognitive behavioural relapse prevention therapy is beneficial in alcohol dependent patients.

Treatment of heroin (diamorphine) addiction: current approaches and future prospects

New pharmacological treatments for heroin (diamorphine) addiction include drugs that reduce opiate withdrawal symptoms and agents that are given during the maintenance phase of treatment. A variety of different types of pharmacological agents (opioid agonists, partial opioid agonists, opioid antagonists and alpha(2)-adrenoreceptor agonists) are reviewed and the evidence of their use during managed withdrawal and maintenance are presented. Experimental approaches attempting to reduce the time of opiate withdrawal and to accelerate the transition to abstinence are being developed. The combination tablet of buprenorphine and naloxone that is to be introduced for office-based maintenance is currently undergoing intense evaluation in the US. This new approach may facilitate the expansion of treatment while reducing the potential for medication diversion and intravenous use.

Opioid antagonists under heavy sedation or anaesthesia for opioid withdrawal

BACKGROUND

Withdrawal (detoxification) is necessary prior to drug-free treatment. It may also represent the end point of long-term opioid replacement treatment such as methadone maintenance. The availability of managed withdrawal is essential to an effective treatment system.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effectiveness of interventions involving the administration of opioid antagonists to induce opioid withdrawal with concomitant heavy sedation or anaesthesia.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Multiple electronic databases (including MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycLIT, Australian Medical Index, Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, and CINAHL) were systematically searched. Reference lists of retrieved studies, reviews and conference abstracts were handsearched.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised or quasi-randomised controlled trials that compared the administration of opioid antagonists under heavy sedation or anaesthesia with another form of treatment.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

One reviewer assessed studies for inclusion and undertook data extraction. Inclusion decisions and the overall process were confirmed by consultation between all three reviewers.

MAIN RESULTS

As yet, no studies have been published comparing treatment regimes involving the administration of opioid antagonists under heavy sedation or anaesthesia with other approaches to detoxification. Treatment regimes for the studies considered for this review varied in the opioid antagonist used, the dose and mode of administration, the anaesthetic agent, duration of anaesthesia and adjunct medications employed. More detailed monitoring of withdrawal is required before any conclusions can be drawn as to what comprises a typical pattern of withdrawal and what factors might influence the pattern. There is only very limited information on referral to ongoing treatment, and relapse to opioid use. Together with the lack of adequate comparisons, this makes it impossible to draw any conclusions about the long-term effectiveness, or the cost-effectiveness, of withdrawal induced by opioid antagonists under heavy sedation or anaesthesia.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

Considerably more research evidence will be needed before any conclusions can be drawn regarding the effectiveness of managing withdrawal by administration of opioid antagonists under heavy sedation or anaesthesia. The risk of vomiting during sedation, respiratory depression and cardiac irregularities point to the approach being limited to facilities equipped for intubation, assisted ventilation and a high level of monitoring, and with the capacity to respond to adverse events that might occur. The approach must be regarded as experimental with both risks and benefits remaining uncertain.

Ultrarapid opioid detoxification: effects on cardiopulmonary physiology, stress hormones and clinical outcomes

This study explored the acute and long-term consequences of ultrarapid opioid detoxification (URD) in individuals with opioid dependence. In an open case series, seven patients underwent URD and subsequent treatment with daily naltrexone. Structured interviews, integrated rehabilitation and hair sampling were employed in the 12-week course of longitudinal follow-up. Cardiac and pulmonary physiology did not change significantly during the anesthesia phase of URD, but plasma ACTH and cortisol levels increased 15- and 13-fold, respectively. Marked withdrawal and tachypnea in all patients and respiratory distress in one patient occurred during the acute post-anesthesia phase. Withdrawal scores were significantly elevated for 3 weeks compared with baseline in the face of minimal self-reported craving for opioids. Anxiety, depression and vegetative symptoms improved gradually. Four patients remained abstinent of opioid use, two reported a brief period of opioid intake and one relapsed into daily opioid consumption. Given its effect on breathing and stress hormones, this procedure should be conducted by experienced anesthesiologists. The fact that URD and subsequent naltrexone treatment appears to cause a dissociation effect in the usual relationship between withdrawal and craving has implications for behavioral pharmacology. Further research is needed on the efficacy, safety, mechanisms and neurobiological sequelae of the procedure.

Pharmacologic treatment of heroin-dependent patients

Patients with heroin dependence frequently present to internists and other physicians for heroin-related medical, psychiatric, and behavioral health problems and often seek help with reducing their heroin use. Thus, physicians should be familiar with the identification and diagnosis of heroin dependence in their patients and be able to initiate treatment of heroin dependence both directly and by referral. Recent research has provided much information concerning effective pharmacologically based treatment approaches for managing opioid withdrawal and helping patients to remain abstinent Methadone maintenance and newer approaches using L-alpha acetylmethadol and buprenorphine seem to be particularly effective in promoting relapse prevention. Although these treatments are currently provided in special drug treatment settings, recent and ongoing research indicates that the physician's office may be an effective alternative site for these treatments.

Safety, efficacy, and long-term results of a modified version of rapid opiate detoxification under general anaesthesia: a prospective study in methadone, heroin, codeine and morphine addicts

BACKGROUND

In the present study a method of rapid opiate detoxification under general anaesthesia has been evaluated regarding the safety, the efficacy in preventing withdrawal symptoms, and the long-term results. In addition, it was investigated whether the profile and severity of withdrawal symptoms depend on the type of opiate abused (methadone, heroin, codeine, morphine).

METHODS

Seventy-two opiate addicts were detoxified in an intensive care unit (ICU). Anaesthesia was induced and maintained using propofol infusion. Patients were endotracheally intubated. The opiate receptor antagonist naltrexon was administered into the stomach via a nasogastric tube. Withdrawal symptoms before and after the detoxification treatment were assessed using an objective and a subjective opiate withdrawal scale (OOWS, SOWS). After detoxification patients entered a long-term naltrexone maintenance programme as well as a supportive psychotherapy programme. Vital organ function was monitored using haemodynamic and respiratory parameters as well as body temperature.

RESULTS

Organ function parameters were stable during the whole treatment in all patients and no anaesthetic complications were registered. Minor side effects such as bradycardia or hypotension were observed in 20 patients. Compared to patients with pre-existing heroin, codeine, or morphine abuse respectively, patients from the methadone maintenance programme had significantly higher (P<0.01) OOWS as well as SOWS values after the treatment. Twelve months after the detoxification 49 patients (68%) were abstinent from opiates whereas 17 patients had relapsed during the period of follow-up. Six patients were lost during follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Rapid opiate detoxification under general anaesthesia is a safe and efficient method to suppress withdrawal symptoms. This treatment may be of benefit in patients who particularly suffer from severe withdrawal symptoms during detoxification and who have failed repeatedly to complete conventional withdrawal. Methadone patients have more withdrawal symptoms than other opiate addicts.

Electrocardiographic abnormalities during recovery from ultra-short opiate detoxification

The aim of this study was to detect electrocardiographic abnormalities during recovery from ultra-short opiate detoxification, using a retrospective study design conducted at a university hospital. Twenty-two consecutive patients (mean±SD, age 30.0±6.3 years) receiving daily oral methadone underwent ultrashort opiate detoxification under general anaesthesia. In the post-anaesthetic stages they received oral clonidine and naltrexone, and in some cases trimipramine was dispensed. Heart rate, rate-corrected QT interval (msec) and repolarization abnormalities of 12-lead electrocardiographic recordings before and after detoxification were examined. The serum electrolyte concentrations (mmol/l) including Na⁺, K⁺ and Ca2⁺ were assessed. Eighty-one ECGs were evaluated in total. Compared to the initial values, heart rate was significantly lowered in the first two tracings after detoxification (median values 60.0/min. vs. 52,5/min; p=0.0006). The lowest heart rate measured after detoxification was 44/min. The cQT interval was significantly lengthened (median value 420 msec vs. 453 msec after detoxification). In 16 tracings (20%) taken from 10 patients (45%) cQT rose above 460 msec and in two tracings (2%) it topped 500 msec. Modest hypokalaemia (2.9-3.5 mmol/l) was linked to cQT prolongation (460 msec) in 10 ECG tracings. Spearman's correlation coefficient indicated that prolonged cQT intervals correlated with decreased potassium values. Twelve tracings (15%) taken from 10 patients (45%) after detoxification showed T-wave inversion and in two cases sinus rhythm was turned into a rhythm arising from the atrioventricular node. Serum potassium was significantly lowered (median values 4.3 v.s 3.8 mmol/l, p=0.0001). The Ca2⁺ concentration fell significantly (2.4 vs. 2.2 mmol/l, p=0.0001) but not below the normal range. It was concluded that ultra-short opiate detoxification carries the risk of QT prolongation and bradycardia. These side effects are reversible and can be explained by hypokalaemia and clonidine medication, the effects of which might reinforce each other. To avoid arrhythmic complications, ECG tracings should be carried out regularly during recovery, i.e. at least daily, for a span of 3 days after discharge from the intensive care unit.

Ultra-rapid opiate detoxification using deep sedation with oral midazolam: short and long-term results

The present study describes an ultra-rapid opiate detoxification method using direct transition from heroin or methadone to oral naltrexone after deep sedation with oral midazolam in conjunction with ondansetron and clonidine treatment. Twenty patients were detoxified with the method. No serious events occurred, but two out of three patients vomited during the acute phase of deep sedation, which involves some risks. Withdrawal symptoms were still present 24 h after detoxification and 80% of the patients relapsed during a 6-month follow-up.

Ultra-rapid, antagonist-precipitated opiate detoxification under general anaesthesia or sedation

Ultra-rapid opiate withdrawal precipitated by naloxone or naltrexone during general anaesthesia or varying degrees of sedation, usually with the addition of α-2 adrenergic agonists, is an increasingly popular technique. As with anaesthesia or effective analgesia for dentistry or obstetrics, it can be justified on general humane principles. It also simplifies and speeds the transition to treatment programmes involving naltrexone. This paper reviews its development and the current range of techniques, including the use of octreotide to prevent diarrhoea. The prospect of avoiding or shortening the worst discomforts of withdrawal may encourage more opiate addicts to attempt detoxification and opiate-free management, including patients who have been successfully rehabilitated on long-term methadone maintenance treatment (MMT). Despite good motivation and preparation, a significant minority of MMT patients consistently fail to complete conventional withdrawal programmes because of increasing physical discomfort. It is emphasized that there is usually more to the treatment of opiate dependence than withdrawal.