Targeted Oral Naltrexone for Mild to Moderate Alcohol Use Disorder Among Sexual and Gender Minority Men: A Randomized Trial

Alcohol Use Disorder Diagnoses Among Individuals Who Take HIV Preexposure Prophylaxis

Importance

Alcohol use disorder (AUD) may negatively affect preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) adherence and continuation, reducing PrEP effectiveness.

Objective

To estimate the prevalence of and and factors associated with AUD diagnoses among commercially insured individuals who take PrEP.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This retrospective cohort study used US health care claims data to identify individuals aged 16 to 64 years who received at least 1 new PrEP prescription between January 1, 2014, to December 31, 2021. Data were analyzed from June 2024 to February 2025.

Exposure

Sociodemographic characteristics included patient age, sex, geographic location, employment status, and type of health insurance. Clinical characteristics included sexually transmitted infection (STI) diagnosis and testing, use of psychotherapy services, and diagnosis of other mental health conditions.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The main outcome was an AUD diagnosis within 6 months before or after the date of PrEP initiation. Among individuals with an AUD diagnosis, receipt of medications for AUD (MAUDs), including Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved MAUDs (acamprosate, disulfiram, and oral and injectable naltrexone) and non-FDA-approved MAUDs (baclofen, gabapentin, and topiramate) was determined.

Results

The study cohort included 43 913 individuals receiving PrEP (mean [SD] age, 35.8 [10.94] years; 35 027 [90.1%] male assigned at birth). There were 6274 individuals (14.29%) who had an AUD diagnosis, with 1245 (2.84%) and 5029 (11.45%) receiving their diagnosis before and after PrEP initiation, respectively. The sociodemographic and clinical factors that were associated with an AUD diagnosis were similar whether AUD was diagnosed before or after PrEP initiation, including male sex assigned at birth (before: adjusted odds ratio [aOR], aOR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.52-0.73; after: aOR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.73-0.90) and the presence of other mental health diagnoses such as depression (before: aOR, 3.26; 95% CI, 2.78-3.84; after: aOR, 3.17; 95% CI, 2.88-3.49), anxiety (before: aOR, 2.16; 95% CI, 1.83-2.55; after: aOR, 2.24; 95% CI, 2.04-2.46), and any substance use disorder (before: aOR, 14.54; 95% CI, 12.46-16.96; after: aOR, 13.09; 95% CI, 11.82-14.49). There were 531 individuals with AUD diagnosis (8.46%) who received an FDA-approved MAUD and 883 (14.07%) who had a claim for a non-FDA-approved MAUD.

Conclusions and Relevance

This population-based cohort study found that nearly 15% of individuals who took PrEP had an AUD diagnosis within 6 months of PrEP initiation; individuals with an AUD diagnosis were more likely to have co-occurring mental health conditions, and less than 9% received any FDA-approved MAUD. These findings suggest that interventions are needed to improve AUD services among individuals who take PrEP.

Naltrexone blocks alcohol-induced effects on kappa-opioid receptors in the plasma membrane

Naltrexone (NTX), a homolog of the opiate antidote naloxone, is an orally active long-acting general opioid receptor antagonist used in the treatment of opiate dependence. NTX is also found to relieve craving for alcohol and is one of few FDA-approved medications for treatment of alcohol use disorder (AUD). While it was early on established that NTX acts by blocking the binding of endogenous opioid peptide ligands released by alcohol, experimental evidence emerged that could not be fully accounted for by this explanation alone, suggesting that NTX may have additional modes of action. Mu- and kappa-opioid receptors (MOP and KOP, respectively) are structurally related G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), but they are anatomically differently distributed and functionally distinct, often mediating opposite responses, with MOP typically promoting euphoria and reward, while KOP is associated with dysphoria and aversive states. While the actions of NTX on MOP are extensively characterized, the interactions with KOP are not. Here, we used sensitive fluorescence-based methods with single-molecule sensitivity to study in live cells the influence of alcohol (ethanol, EtOH) on KOP and the interaction between KOP and NTX. Our data show that alcohol, at relevant concentrations (10-40 mM), alters KOP interactions with the lipid environment in the plasma membrane. The counteracting effects of NTX are exerted by both its canonical action on KOP and its hitherto unrevealed effects on the lateral dynamics and organization of lipids in the plasma membrane. The KOP-specific antagonist LY2444296, in clinical trial for major depressive disorder (MDD), blocks KOP but does not show the full action profile of NTX. The therapeutic effect of NTX treatment in AUD may in part be due to direct actions on KOP and in part due to its effect on the surrounding lipid environment.

Quadruple pharmacotherapy for alcohol use disorder tolerable yet insufficient: a case report

BACKGROUND

Combinations of alcohol use disorder (AUD) medications have been investigated, but few if any reports describe patients maintained on more than two options at the same time.

CASE PRESENTATION

We report a case of a middle-aged man hospitalized with gastrointestinal bleeding and acute kidney injury who had been maintained on four AUD medications (naltrexone, acamprosate, disulfiram, and gabapentin) and multiple psychiatric medications simultaneously as an outpatient. Direct quotations of his experiences with each AUD medication are included, revealing some deviations from what was prescribed as well as nuanced perceptions of effects. Overall, he tolerated the regimen well, but its AUD effects were insufficient to prevent several episodes of returning to alcohol use. He had very high hospital utilization. This prompted the initiation of an involuntary commitment, which began a period of at least six months of sobriety.

CONCLUSIONS

Quadruple pharmacotherapy for AUD may be well tolerated and supportive of recovery for an extended period of time. However, for our patient the regimen ultimately failed to prevent multiple episodes of returning to alcohol use and serious medical complications. In refractory cases like this, more intensive interventions such as involuntary commitment can be considered.

Reductions in WHO risk drinking levels correlate with alcohol craving among individuals with alcohol use disorder

BACKGROUND

Abstinence has historically been considered the preferred goal of alcohol use disorder (AUD) treatment. However, most individuals with AUD do not want to abstain and many are able to reduce their drinking successfully. Craving is often a target of pharmacological and behavioral interventions for AUD, and reductions in craving may signal recovery. Whether reductions in drinking during AUD treatment are associated with reductions in craving has not been well examined.

METHODS

We conducted secondary analyses of data from three AUD clinical trials (N's= 1327, 346, and 200). Drinking reductions from baseline to the end of treatment were measured as changes in World Health Organization (WHO) risk drinking levels; alcohol craving was measured using validated self-report measures. Regression analyses tested whether drinking reductions were associated with end-of-treatment craving reductions; moderation analyses tested whether associations between drinking reduction and end-of-treatment craving differed across AUD severity.

RESULTS

Reductions of at least 1 or at least 2 WHO risk drinking levels were associated with lower craving (all p's < 0.05). Results were substantively similar after removing abstainers at the end-of-treatment. Associations between drinking reductions and craving were generally not moderated by AUD severity.

CONCLUSIONS

Individuals with WHO risk drinking level reductions reported significantly lower craving, as compared to those who did not achieve meaningful reductions in drinking. The results demonstrate the utility of WHO risk drinking levels as AUD clinical trial endpoints and provide evidence that drinking reductions mitigate craving.

The Roles of Endogenous D2R Dopamine and μ-opioid Receptors of the Brain in Alcohol use Disorder

Alcohol use disorder (AUD) affects millions of people worldwide. It is characterized by a strong physiological and psychological craving to consume large amounts of alcohol despite adverse consequences. Alcohol use disorder carries a large health and economic burden on society. Despite its prevalence, AUD is still severely undertreated. The precise molecular mechanisms of how alcohol addiction forms are yet unknown. However, previous studies on animal models show that along with the μ-opioid receptors, the D2R dopamine receptors may also be involved in alcohol craving and reward pathways. Currently, there is a limited number of treatment strategies for alcohol use disorder, which include several medications and therapy. By understanding the limitations of current treatment options and exploring new potential targets, it could be possible to find more effective ways of treating AUD in the future.

Endogenous opiates and behavior: 2022

This paper is the forty-fifth consecutive installment of the annual anthological review of research concerning the endogenous opioid system, summarizing articles published during 2022 that studied the behavioral effects of molecular, pharmacological and genetic manipulation of opioid peptides and receptors as well as effects of opioid/opiate agonists and antagonists. The review is subdivided into the following specific topics: molecular-biochemical effects and neurochemical localization studies of endogenous opioids and their receptors (1), the roles of these opioid peptides and receptors in pain and analgesia in animals (2) and humans (3), opioid-sensitive and opioid-insensitive effects of nonopioid analgesics (4), opioid peptide and receptor involvement in tolerance and dependence (5), stress and social status (6), learning and memory (7), eating and drinking (8), drug abuse and alcohol (9), sexual activity and hormones, pregnancy, development and endocrinology (10), mental illness and mood (11), seizures and neurologic disorders (12), electrical-related activity and neurophysiology (13), general activity and locomotion (14), gastrointestinal, renal and hepatic functions (15), cardiovascular responses (16), respiration and thermoregulation (17), and immunological responses (18).

Naltrexone blocks alcohol-induced effects on kappa-opioid receptors in the plasma membrane

Naltrexone (NTX), a homologue of the opiate antidote naloxone, is an orally active long-acting mu-opioid receptor (MOP) antagonist used in the treatment of opiate dependence. NTX is also found to relieve craving for alcohol and is one of the few FDA-approved drugs for alcohol use disorder (AUD). Reports that NTX blocks the actions of endogenous opioids released by alcohol are not convincing, suggesting that NTX interferes with alcohol actions by affecting opioid receptors. MOP and kappa-opioid receptor (KOP) are structurally related but functionally different. MOP is mainly located in interneurons activated by enkephalins while KOP is located in longer projections activated by dynorphins. While the actions of NTX on MOP are well established, the interaction with KOP and addiction is not well understood. We used sensitive fluorescence-based methods to study the influence of alcohol on KOP and the interaction between KOP and NTX. Here we report that alcohol interacts with KOP and its environment in the plasma membrane. These interactions are affected by NTX and are exerted both on KOP directly and on the plasma membrane (lipid) structures ("off-target"). The actions of NTX are stereospecific. Selective KOP antagonists, recently in early clinical trials for major depressive disorder, block the receptor but do not show the full action profile of NTX. The therapeutic effect of NTX treatment in AUD may be due to direct actions on KOP and the receptor environment.

Medications for treating alcohol use disorder: A narrative review

Chronic heavy alcohol use impacts all major neurotransmitter systems and is associated with multiple medical, psychiatric, and social problems. Available evidence-based medications to treat alcohol use disorder (AUD) are underutilized in clinical practice. These medications promote abstinence or reduce alcohol consumption, though there are questions regarding their optimal dosage, length of treatment, and utility in combination with one another. Pharmacogenetic approaches, which use a patient's genetic make-up to inform medication selection, have garnered great interest but have yet to yield results robust enough to incorporate them in routine clinical care. This narrative review summarizes the evidence both for medications approved by the Food and Drug Administration (disulfiram, oral naltrexone, acamprosate, and extended-release naltrexone) and those commonly used off-label (e.g., gabapentin, baclofen, and topiramate) for AUD treatment. We discuss these drugs' mechanisms of action, clinical use, pharmacogenetic findings, and treatment recommendations. We conclude that the most consistent evidence supporting the pharmacotherapy of AUD is for the opioid antagonists, naltrexone and nalmefene (which is not approved in the United States), and topiramate. These medications demonstrate consistent small or moderate effects in reducing the frequency of drinking and/or heavy drinking. Lastly, we make suggestions for research needed to refine and expand the current literature on effective pharmacotherapy for AUD.

Treatment of Acute Pain in Patients on Naltrexone: A Narrative Review

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The tissue damage and trauma associated with surgery almost always result in acute postoperative pain. The intensity of postoperative pain can range from mild to severe. Naltrexone is suitable for patients who do not wish to be on an agonist treatment such as methadone or buprenorphine. However, naltrexone has been shown to complicate postoperative pain management.

RECENT FINDINGS

Multiple studies have found that the use of naltrexone can increase the opioid requirement for postoperative pain control. Other modalities exist that can help outside of opioids such as ketamine, lidocaine/bupivacaine, duloxetine, and non-pharmacological management can help manage pain. Multimodal pain regiments should also be employed in patients. In addition to traditional methods for postoperative pain management, other methods of acute pain control exist that can help mitigate opioid dependence and help control pain in patients who use naltrexone for their substance use disorders.