1
|
Hassanzadeh E, Moradi G, Arasteh M, Moradi Y. The effect of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale-17 criterion in patients with major depressive disorder without psychotic features: a systematic review and meta-analysis of intervention studies. BMC Psychol 2024; 12:480. [PMID: 39256851 PMCID: PMC11389065 DOI: 10.1186/s40359-024-01981-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2023] [Accepted: 09/03/2024] [Indexed: 09/12/2024] Open
Abstract
AIM In line with the publication of clinical information related to the therapeutic process of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and the updating of relevant treatment guidelines, the present meta-analysis study was designed and conducted to determine the effect of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale-17 (HDRS-17) criterion in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) without psychotic features. METHODS In this study, a systematic search was conducted in electronic databases such as PubMed [Medline], Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, Ovid, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials. gov using relevant keywords. The search period in this study was from January 2000 to January 2022, which was updated until May 2023. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that determined the effect of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale-17 (HDRS-17) criterion in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) without psychotic features were included in the analysis. The quality of the included RCTs was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias checklist. Statistical analyses were performed using STATA (Version 16) and RevMan (Version 5). RESULTS Following the combination of results from 16 clinical trial studies in the present meta-analysis, it was found that the mean Hamilton Depression Rating Scale-17 (HDRS-17) in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) decreases by an average of 1.46 units (SMD: -1.46; % 95 CI: -1.65, -1.27, I square: 45.74%; P heterogeneity: 0.56). Subgroup analysis results indicated that the standardized mean difference of Hamilton Depression Rating Scale-17 (HDRS-17) varied based on the number of treatment sessions: patients receiving 10 or fewer repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) sessions showed a mean Hamilton Depression Rating Scale-17 (HDRS-17) reduction of 2.60 units (SMD: -2.60; % 95 CI: -2.86, -2.33, I square: 55.12%; P heterogeneity: 0.55), while those receiving 11 to 20 sessions showed a mean Hamilton Depression Rating Scale-17 (HDRS-17) reduction of 0.28 units (SMD: -0.28; % 95 CI: -0.65, -0.09, I square: 39.91%; P heterogeneity: 0.89). CONCLUSION In conclusion, our meta-analysis demonstrates the efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in reducing depressive symptoms in major depressive disorder (MDD) patients. The complex results of subgroup analysis revealed insight on the possible benefits of a more focused strategy with fewer sessions, as well as the impact of treatment session frequency. These findings add to our understanding of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) as a therapeutic intervention for the treatment of major depressive illnesses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elham Hassanzadeh
- Research Committee, Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences, Sanandaj, Iran
| | - Ghobad Moradi
- Social Determinants of the Health Research Center, Research Institute for Health Development, Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences, Sanandaj, Iran
| | - Modabber Arasteh
- Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences, Sanandaj, Iran
| | - Yousef Moradi
- Social Determinants of the Health Research Center, Research Institute for Health Development, Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences, Sanandaj, Iran.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Eliason M, Kalbande PP, Saleem GT. Is non-invasive neuromodulation a viable technique to improve neuroplasticity in individuals with acquired brain injury? A review. Front Hum Neurosci 2024; 18:1341707. [PMID: 39296918 PMCID: PMC11408216 DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2024.1341707] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2023] [Accepted: 07/22/2024] [Indexed: 09/21/2024] Open
Abstract
Objective This study aimed to explore and evaluate the efficacy of non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) as a standalone or coupled intervention and understand its mechanisms to produce positive alterations in neuroplasticity and behavioral outcomes after acquired brain injury (ABI). Data sources Cochrane Library, Web of Science, PubMed, and Google Scholar databases were searched from January 2013 to January 2024. Study selection Using the PICO framework, transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) randomized controlled trials (RCTs), retrospective, pilot, open-label, and observational large group and single-participant case studies were included. Two authors reviewed articles according to pre-established inclusion criteria. Data extraction Data related to participant and intervention characteristics, mechanisms of change, methods, and outcomes were extracted by two authors. The two authors performed quality assessments using SORT. Results Twenty-two studies involving 657 participants diagnosed with ABIs were included. Two studies reported that NIBS was ineffective in producing positive alterations or behavioral outcomes. Twenty studies reported at least one, or a combination of, positively altered neuroplasticity and improved neuropsychological, neuropsychiatric, motor, or somatic symptoms. Twenty-eight current articles between 2020 and 2024 have been studied to elucidate potential mechanisms of change related to NIBS and other mediating or confounding variables. Discussion tDCS and TMS may be efficacious as standalone interventions or coupled with neurorehabilitation therapies to positively alter maladaptive brain physiology and improve behavioral symptomology resulting from ABI. Based on postintervention and follow-up results, evidence suggests NIBS may offer a direct or mediatory contribution to improving behavioral outcomes post-ABI. Conclusion More research is needed to better understand the extent of rTMS and tDCS application in affecting changes in symptoms after ABI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle Eliason
- Rehabilitation Science Department, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, United States
| | | | - Ghazala T Saleem
- Rehabilitation Science Department, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, United States
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Brown R, Cherian K, Jones K, Wickham R, Gomez R, Sahlem G. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for post-traumatic stress disorder in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2024; 8:CD015040. [PMID: 39092744 PMCID: PMC11295260 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd015040.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/04/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The estimated lifetime prevalence of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in adults worldwide has been estimated at 3.9%. PTSD appears to contribute to alterations in neuronal network connectivity patterns. Current pharmacological and psychotherapeutic treatments for PTSD are associated with inadequate symptom improvement and high dropout rates. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), a non-invasive therapy involving induction of electrical currents in cortical brain tissue, may be an important treatment option for PTSD to improve remission rates and for people who cannot tolerate existing treatments. OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in adults. SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Common Mental Disorders Controlled Trials Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, three other databases, and two clinical trials registers. We checked reference lists of relevant articles. The most recent search was January 2023. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the efficacy and safety of rTMS versus sham rTMS for PTSD in adults from any treatment setting, including veterans. Eligible trials employed at least five rTMS treatment sessions with both active and sham conditions. We included trials with combination interventions, where a pharmacological agent or psychotherapy was combined with rTMS for both intervention and control groups. We included studies meeting the above criteria regardless of whether they reported any of our outcomes of interest. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently extracted data and assessed the risk of bias in accordance with Cochrane standards. Primary outcomes were PTSD severity immediately after treatment and serious adverse events during active treatment. Secondary outcomes were PTSD remission, PTSD response, PTSD severity at two follow-up time points after treatment, dropouts, and depression and anxiety severity immediately after treatment. MAIN RESULTS We included 13 RCTs in the review (12 published; 1 unpublished dissertation), with 577 participants. Eight studies included stand-alone rTMS treatment, four combined rTMS with an evidence-based psychotherapeutic treatment, and one investigated rTMS as an adjunctive to treatment-as-usual. Five studies were conducted in the USA, and some predominantly included white, male veterans. Active rTMS probably makes little to no difference to PTSD severity immediately following treatment (standardized mean difference (SMD) -0.14, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.54 to 0.27; 3 studies, 99 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). We downgraded the certainty of evidence by one level for imprecision (sample size insufficient to detect a difference of medium effect size). We deemed one study as having a low risk of bias and the remaining two as having 'some concerns' for risk of bias. A sensitivity analysis of change-from-baseline scores enabled inclusion of a greater number of studies (6 studies, 252 participants). This analysis yielded a similar outcome to our main analysis but also indicated significant heterogeneity in efficacy across studies, including two studies with a high risk of bias. Reported rates of serious adverse events were low, with seven reported (active rTMS: 6; sham rTMS: 1). The evidence is very uncertain about the effect of active rTMS on serious adverse events (odds ratio (OR) 5.26, 95% CI 0.26 to 107.81; 5 studies, 251 participants; very low-certainty evidence [Active rTMS: 23/1000, sham rTMS: 4/1000]). We downgraded the evidence by one level for risk of bias and two levels for imprecision. We rated four of five studies as having a high risk of bias, and the fifth as 'some concerns' for bias. We were unable to assess PTSD remission immediately after treatment as none of the included studies reported this outcome. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Based on moderate-certainty evidence, our review suggests that active rTMS probably makes little to no difference to PTSD severity immediately following treatment compared to sham stimulation. However, significant heterogeneity in efficacy was detected when we included a larger number of studies in sensitivity analysis. We observed considerable variety in participant and protocol characteristics across studies included in this review. For example, studies tended to be weighted towards inclusion of either male veterans or female civilians. Studies varied greatly in terms of the proportion of the sample with comorbid depression. Study protocols differed in treatment design and stimulation parameters (e.g. session number/duration, treatment course length, stimulation intensity/frequency, location of stimulation). These differences may affect efficacy, particularly when considering interactions with participant factors. Reported rates of serious adverse events were very low (< 1%) across active and sham conditions. It is uncertain whether rTMS increases the risk of serious adverse event occurrence, as our certainty of evidence was very low. Studies frequently lacked clear definitions for serious adverse events, as well as detail on tracking/assessment of data and information on the safety population. Increased reporting on these elements would likely aid the advancement of both research and clinical recommendations of rTMS for PTSD. Currently, there is insufficient evidence to meta-analyze PTSD remission, PTSD treatment response, and PTSD severity at different periods post-treatment. Further research into these outcomes could inform the clinical use of rTMS. Additionally, the relatively large contribution of data from trials that focused on white male veterans may limit the generalizability of our conclusions. This could be addressed by prioritizing recruitment of more diverse participant samples.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Randi Brown
- Clinical Psychology, Palo Alto University, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - Kirsten Cherian
- Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Katherine Jones
- Sheffield Centre for Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Robert Wickham
- Department of Psychological Sciences, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, USA
| | - Rowena Gomez
- Clinical Psychology, Palo Alto University, Palo Alto, CA, USA
- Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Gregory Sahlem
- Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Khosravi MH, Louras M, Martens G, Kaux JF, Thibaut A, Lejeune N. A Scoping Review on the Use of Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation Techniques for Persistent Post-Concussive Symptoms. Biomedicines 2024; 12:450. [PMID: 38398052 PMCID: PMC10887310 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines12020450] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2024] [Revised: 02/02/2024] [Accepted: 02/11/2024] [Indexed: 02/25/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In the context of managing persistent post-concussive symptoms (PPCS), existing treatments like pharmacotherapy, cognitive behavioral therapy, and physical rehabilitation show only moderate effectiveness. The emergence of neuromodulation techniques in PPCS management has led to debates regarding optimal stimulation parameters and their overall efficacy. METHODS this scoping review involved a comprehensive search of PubMed and ScienceDirect databases, focusing on controlled studies examining the therapeutic potential of non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) techniques in adults with PPCS. RESULTS Among the 940 abstracts screened, only five studies, encompassing 103 patients (12 to 29 per study), met the inclusion criteria. These studies assessed the efficacy of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), or repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), applied to specific brain regions (i.e., the left dorsolateral pre-frontal cortex (DLPFC) or left motor cortex (M1)) for addressing cognitive and psychological symptoms, headaches, and general PPCSs. The results indicated improvements in cognitive functions with tDCS. In contrast, reductions in headache intensity and depression scores were observed with rTMS, while no significant findings were noted for general symptoms with rTMS. CONCLUSION although these pilot studies suggest promise for rTMS and tDCS in PPCS management, further research with larger-scale investigations and standardized protocols is imperative to enhance treatment outcomes for PPCS patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohammad Hossein Khosravi
- Coma Science Group, GIGA Consciousness, University of Liège, 4000 Liège, Belgium
- Centre du Cerveau², University Hospital of Liège, 4000 Liège, Belgium
| | - Mélanie Louras
- Coma Science Group, GIGA Consciousness, University of Liège, 4000 Liège, Belgium
- Centre du Cerveau², University Hospital of Liège, 4000 Liège, Belgium
| | - Géraldine Martens
- Coma Science Group, GIGA Consciousness, University of Liège, 4000 Liège, Belgium
- Sport & Trauma Applied Research Lab, University of Montréal, Montréal, QC H4J 1C5, Canada
| | - Jean-François Kaux
- Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine and Sport Traumatology Department, University Hospital of Liège, University of Liège, 4000 Liège, Belgium
| | - Aurore Thibaut
- Coma Science Group, GIGA Consciousness, University of Liège, 4000 Liège, Belgium
- Centre du Cerveau², University Hospital of Liège, 4000 Liège, Belgium
| | - Nicolas Lejeune
- Coma Science Group, GIGA Consciousness, University of Liège, 4000 Liège, Belgium
- CHN William Lennox, 1340 Ottignies, Belgium
- Institute of NeuroScience, Université Catholique de Louvain, 1200 Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Galimberti A, Tik M, Pellegrino G, Schuler AL. Effectiveness of rTMS and tDCS treatment for chronic TBI symptoms: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 2024; 128:110863. [PMID: 37709126 DOI: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2023.110863] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2023] [Revised: 08/18/2023] [Accepted: 09/09/2023] [Indexed: 09/16/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a major cause of long-term disability with conventional treatments frequently falling short to restore a good quality-of-life. Non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) techniques have shown potential as therapeutic options for neuropsychiatric conditions, including TBI sequelae. This study aims at providing a systematic review and meta-analysis on the effectiveness of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on post-TBI symptoms. METHODS Fifteen randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on adult TBI patients that examined the effects of multiple treatment sessions of NIBS techniques were selected from five databases. Symptoms were clustered into four categories: depression, anxiety, headache and cognitive dysfunctions. Meta-analysis was performed using correlated and hierarchical effects models. RESULTS There were only few and heterogeneous studies with generally small sample sizes. Most studies targeted the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC). Overall, the effects of NIBS were small. However, there was a significant effect for overall symptoms (0.404, p = 0.031). Moreover, subgroup analyses revealed significant overall effects for anxiety (0.195, p = 0.020) and headache (0.354, p = 0.040). CONCLUSIONS To date, there is limited evidence supporting the effectiveness of NIBS concerning treatment for TBI sequelae. The observed effect sizes were modest, suggesting subtle improvements rather than drastic changes. While NIBS techniques remain promising for treating neuropsychiatric conditions, larger RCT studies with longer follow-ups, optimized stimulation parameters and standardized methodology are required to establish their efficacy in addressing TBI sequelae.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Martin Tik
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, USA; Center for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Giovanni Pellegrino
- Epilepsy Program, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Anna-Lisa Schuler
- Lise Meitner Research Group Cognition and Plasticity, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany; IRCCS San Camillo Hospital, Venice, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Sultana T, Hasan MA, Kang X, Liou-Johnson V, Adamson MM, Razi A. Neural mechanisms of emotional health in traumatic brain injury patients undergoing rTMS treatment. Mol Psychiatry 2023; 28:5150-5158. [PMID: 37414927 DOI: 10.1038/s41380-023-02159-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2022] [Revised: 06/16/2023] [Accepted: 06/22/2023] [Indexed: 07/08/2023]
Abstract
Emotional dysregulation such as that seen in depression, are a long-term consequence of mild traumatic brain injury (TBI), that can be improved by using neuromodulation treatments such as repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS). Previous studies provide insights into the changes in functional connectivity related to general emotional health after the application of rTMS procedures in patients with TBI. However, these studies provide little understanding of the underlying neuronal mechanisms that drive the improvement of the emotional health in these patients. The current study focuses on inferring the effective (causal) connectivity changes and their association with emotional health, after rTMS treatment of cognitive problems in TBI patients (N = 32). Specifically, we used resting state functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) together with spectral dynamic causal model (spDCM) to investigate changes in brain effective connectivity, before and after the application of high frequency (10 Hz) rTMS over left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. We investigated the effective connectivity of the cortico-limbic network comprised of 11 regions of interest (ROIs) which are part of the default mode, salience, and executive control networks, known to be implicated in emotional processing. The results indicate that overall, among extrinsic connections, the strength of excitatory connections decreased while that of inhibitory connections increased after the neuromodulation. The cardinal region in the analysis was dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (dACC) which is considered to be the most influenced during emotional health disorders. Our findings implicate the altered connectivity of dACC with left anterior insula and medial prefrontal cortex, after the application of rTMS, as a potential neural mechanism underlying improvement of emotional health. Our investigation highlights the importance of these brain regions as treatment targets in emotional processing in TBI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tajwar Sultana
- Department of Computer and Information Systems Engineering, NED University of Engineering & Technology, Karachi, 75270, Pakistan
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, NED University of Engineering & Technology, Karachi, 75270, Pakistan
- Neurocomputation Laboratory, National Centre of Artificial Intelligence, Peshawar, Pakistan
| | - Muhammad Abul Hasan
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, NED University of Engineering & Technology, Karachi, 75270, Pakistan
- Neurocomputation Laboratory, National Centre of Artificial Intelligence, Peshawar, Pakistan
| | - Xiaojian Kang
- WRIISC-WOMEN, VA Palo Alto Healthcare System, Palo Alto, CA, 94304, USA
- Rehabilitation Service, Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Healthcare System (VAPAHCS), 3801 Miranda Avenue, Palo Alto, CA, 94304, USA
| | - Victoria Liou-Johnson
- Rehabilitation Service, Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Healthcare System (VAPAHCS), 3801 Miranda Avenue, Palo Alto, CA, 94304, USA
- Clinical Excellence Research Center, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94304, USA
| | - Maheen Mausoof Adamson
- WRIISC-WOMEN, VA Palo Alto Healthcare System, Palo Alto, CA, 94304, USA
- Rehabilitation Service, Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Healthcare System (VAPAHCS), 3801 Miranda Avenue, Palo Alto, CA, 94304, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94304, USA
| | - Adeel Razi
- Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, 3800, Australia.
- Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, University College London, WC1N 3AR, London, United Kingdom.
- CIFAR Azrieli Global Scholars Program, CIFAR, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Caloc'h T, Le Saout E, Litaneur S, Suarez A, Durand S, Lefaucheur JP, Nguyen JP. Treatment of cognitive and mood disorders secondary to traumatic brain injury by the association of bilateral occipital nerve stimulation and a combined protocol of multisite repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and cognitive training: A case report. Front Neurol 2023; 14:1195513. [PMID: 38020613 PMCID: PMC10662304 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1195513] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2023] [Accepted: 10/23/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose Cognitive impairment secondary to traumatic brain injury (TBI) is difficult to treat and usually results in severe disability. Method A 48-year-old man presented with chronic refractory headaches and persistent disabling cognitive impairment after TBI. He was first treated with occipital nerve stimulation (ONS) implanted bilaterally to relieve headaches (8 years after the head trauma). Two years later, he was treated with a 6-week protocol combining repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) delivered to multiple cortical sites (prefrontal cortex, language areas, and areas involved in visuo-spatial functions) and computerized cognitive training (CogT) (targeting memory, language, and visuo-spatial functions) to improve cognitive performance. Results Executive and cognitive functions (attention, ability to perform calculations, and verbal fluency) improved in association with pain relief after ONS (33-42% improvement) and then improved even more after the rTMS-CogT protocol with an additional improvement of 36-40% on apathy, depression, and anxiety, leading to a significant reduction in caregiver burden. The functional improvement persisted and even increased at 6 months after the end of the rTMS-CogT procedure (10 years after the onset of TBI and 2 years after ONS implantation). Conclusion This is the first observation describing sustained improvement in post-TBI refractory headache, depression, and cognitive impairment by the association of bilaterally implanted ONS and a combined procedure of multisite rTMS and CogT to target various brain functions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tiphanie Caloc'h
- Unité de stimulation transcrânienne, Clinique Bretéché, Groupe Elsan, Nantes, France
| | - Estelle Le Saout
- Unité de stimulation transcrânienne, Clinique Bretéché, Groupe Elsan, Nantes, France
| | - Séverine Litaneur
- Unité de stimulation transcrânienne, Clinique Bretéché, Groupe Elsan, Nantes, France
| | - Alcira Suarez
- Unité de stimulation transcrânienne, Clinique Bretéché, Groupe Elsan, Nantes, France
| | - Sylvain Durand
- Unité de stimulation transcrânienne, Clinique Bretéché, Groupe Elsan, Nantes, France
| | - Jean-Pascal Lefaucheur
- EA 4391, équipe ENT (Excitabilité Nerveuse et Thérapeutique), Université Paris-Est Créteil, Créteil, France
- Unité de Neurophysiologie Clinique, Hôpital Henri Mondor, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Créteil, France
| | - Jean-Paul Nguyen
- Unité de stimulation transcrânienne, Clinique Bretéché, Groupe Elsan, Nantes, France
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
McNerney MW, Gurkoff GG, Beard C, Berryhill ME. The Rehabilitation Potential of Neurostimulation for Mild Traumatic Brain Injury in Animal and Human Studies. Brain Sci 2023; 13:1402. [PMID: 37891771 PMCID: PMC10605899 DOI: 10.3390/brainsci13101402] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2023] [Revised: 09/25/2023] [Accepted: 09/28/2023] [Indexed: 10/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Neurostimulation carries high therapeutic potential, accompanied by an excellent safety profile. In this review, we argue that an arena in which these tools could provide breakthrough benefits is traumatic brain injury (TBI). TBI is a major health problem worldwide, with the majority of cases identified as mild TBI (mTBI). MTBI is of concern because it is a modifiable risk factor for dementia. A major challenge in studying mTBI is its inherent heterogeneity across a large feature space (e.g., etiology, age of injury, sex, treatment, initial health status, etc.). Parallel lines of research in human and rodent mTBI can be collated to take advantage of the full suite of neuroscience tools, from neuroimaging (electroencephalography: EEG; functional magnetic resonance imaging: fMRI; diffusion tensor imaging: DTI) to biochemical assays. Despite these attractive components and the need for effective treatments, there are at least two major challenges to implementation. First, there is insufficient understanding of how neurostimulation alters neural mechanisms. Second, there is insufficient understanding of how mTBI alters neural function. The goal of this review is to assemble interrelated but disparate areas of research to identify important gaps in knowledge impeding the implementation of neurostimulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M. Windy McNerney
- Mental Illness Research Education and Clinical Center (MIRECC), Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA; (M.W.M.); (C.B.)
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Gene G. Gurkoff
- Department of Neurological Surgery, and Center for Neuroscience, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA 95817, USA;
- Department of Veterans Affairs, VA Northern California Health Care System, Martinez, CA 94553, USA
| | - Charlotte Beard
- Mental Illness Research Education and Clinical Center (MIRECC), Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA; (M.W.M.); (C.B.)
- Program in Neuroscience and Behavioral Biology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA
| | - Marian E. Berryhill
- Programs in Cognitive and Brain Sciences, and Integrative Neuroscience, Department of Psychology, University of Nevada, Reno, NV 89557, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Chang CH, Chou PH, Chuang HY, Yao CY, Chen WJ, Tsai HC. Efficacy of Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation for Treating Depression in Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury: A Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression of Randomized Controlled Trials. J Clin Med 2023; 12:6030. [PMID: 37762970 PMCID: PMC10531948 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12186030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2023] [Revised: 08/31/2023] [Accepted: 09/13/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This meta-analysis aimed to ascertain the efficacy of non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS)-comprising repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)-for depression in traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients. METHODS Comprehensive searches were conducted in PubMed, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials up to 28 January 2023. Random-effects models assessed the treatment effects, and heterogeneity was evaluated through I2 statistics and funnel plot inspection. RESULTS From 10 trials (234 participants; 8 rTMS, 2 tDCS), NIBS was found significantly more effective than sham in alleviating depressive symptoms (SMD: 0.588, 95% CI: 0.264-0.912; p < 0.001). rTMS, specifically, showed higher efficacy (SMD: 0.707, 95% CI: 0.306-1.108; p = 0.001) compared to sham, whereas tDCS outcomes were inconclusive (SMD: 0.271, 95% CI: -0.230 to 0.771; p = 0.289). Meta-regression found no correlation with the number of sessions, treatment intensity, or total dose. Notably, while post-treatment effects were significant, they diminished 1-2 months post intervention. Adverse events associated with NIBS were minimal, with no severe outcomes like seizures and suicide reported. CONCLUSIONS rTMS emerged as a potent short-term intervention for depression in TBI patients, while tDCS findings remained equivocal. The long-term efficacy of NIBS is yet to be established, warranting further studies. The low adverse event rate reaffirms NIBS's potential safety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chun-Hung Chang
- Institute of Clinical Medical Science, China Medical University, Taichung 406040, Taiwan;
- Department of Psychiatry & Brain Disease Research Center, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung 404327, Taiwan
- An Nan Hospital, China Medical University, Tainan 709204, Taiwan; (C.-Y.Y.); (W.-J.C.)
| | - Po-Han Chou
- Department of Psychiatry, China Medical University Hsinchu Hospital, China Medical University, Hsinchu 302056, Taiwan
- Department of Psychiatry, China Medical University Hospital, China Medical University, Taichung 404327, Taiwan
| | - Hao-Yu Chuang
- Department of Neurosurgery, An Nan Hospital, China Medical University, Tainan 709204, Taiwan;
| | - Chi-Yu Yao
- An Nan Hospital, China Medical University, Tainan 709204, Taiwan; (C.-Y.Y.); (W.-J.C.)
| | - Wei-Jen Chen
- An Nan Hospital, China Medical University, Tainan 709204, Taiwan; (C.-Y.Y.); (W.-J.C.)
| | - Hsin-Chi Tsai
- Department of Psychiatry, Tzu-Chi General Hospital, Hualien 970473, Taiwan
- Institute of Medical Sciences, Tzu Chi University, Hualien 970473, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Evancho A, Tyler WJ, McGregor K. A review of combined neuromodulation and physical therapy interventions for enhanced neurorehabilitation. Front Hum Neurosci 2023; 17:1151218. [PMID: 37545593 PMCID: PMC10400781 DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2023.1151218] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2023] [Accepted: 06/30/2023] [Indexed: 08/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Rehabilitation approaches for individuals with neurologic conditions have increasingly shifted toward promoting neuroplasticity for enhanced recovery and restoration of function. This review focuses on exercise strategies and non-invasive neuromodulation techniques that target neuroplasticity, including transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), vagus nerve stimulation (VNS), and peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS). We have chosen to focus on non-invasive neuromodulation techniques due to their greater potential for integration into routine clinical practice. We explore and discuss the application of these interventional strategies in four neurological conditions that are frequently encountered in rehabilitation settings: Parkinson's Disease (PD), Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI), stroke, and Spinal Cord Injury (SCI). Additionally, we discuss the potential benefits of combining non-invasive neuromodulation with rehabilitation, which has shown promise in accelerating recovery. Our review identifies studies that demonstrate enhanced recovery through combined exercise and non-invasive neuromodulation in the selected patient populations. We primarily focus on the motor aspects of rehabilitation, but also briefly address non-motor impacts of these conditions. Additionally, we identify the gaps in current literature and barriers to implementation of combined approaches into clinical practice. We highlight areas needing further research and suggest avenues for future investigation, aiming to enhance the personalization of the unique neuroplastic responses associated with each condition. This review serves as a resource for rehabilitation professionals and researchers seeking a comprehensive understanding of neuroplastic exercise interventions and non-invasive neuromodulation techniques tailored for specific diseases and diagnoses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandra Evancho
- Department of Physical Therapy, School of Health Professions, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States
| | - William J. Tyler
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Heersink School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Heersink School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States
| | - Keith McGregor
- Department of Clinical and Diagnostic Studies, School of Health Professions, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Philip NS, Ramanathan D, Gamboa B, Brennan MC, Kozel FA, Lazzeroni L, Madore MR. Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Depression and Posttraumatic Stress Disorder in Veterans With Mild Traumatic Brain Injury. Neuromodulation 2023; 26:878-884. [PMID: 36737300 PMCID: PMC10765323 DOI: 10.1016/j.neurom.2022.11.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2022] [Revised: 11/18/2022] [Accepted: 11/25/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) is a signature injury of military conflicts and is prevalent in veterans with major depressive disorder (MDD) and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Although therapeutic transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) can reduce symptoms of depression and PTSD, whether traumatic brain injury (TBI) affects TMS responsiveness is not yet known. We hypothesized mTBI would be associated with higher pretreatment symptom burden and poorer TMS response. MATERIALS AND METHODS We investigated a registry of veterans (N = 770) who received TMS for depression across the US Veterans Affairs system. Of these, 665 (86.4%) had data on TBI and lifetime number of head injuries while 658 had complete data related to depression outcomes. Depression symptoms were assessed using the nine-item Patient Health Questionnaire and PTSD symptoms using the PTSD Checklist for DSM-5. Linear mixed effects models and t-tests evaluated whether head injuries predicted symptom severity before treatment, and how TBI status affected clinical TMS outcomes. RESULTS Of the 658 veterans included, 337 (50.7%) reported previous mTBI, with a mean of three head injuries (range 1-20). TBI status did not predict depressive symptom severity or TMS-associated changes in depression (all p's > 0.1). TBI status was associated with a modest attenuation of TMS-associated improvement in PTSD (in patients with PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 scores > 33). There was no correlation between the number of head injuries and TMS response (p > 0.1). CONCLUSIONS Contrary to our hypothesis, presence of mTBI did not meaningfully change TMS outcomes. Veterans with mTBI had greater PTSD symptoms, yet neither TBI status nor cumulative head injuries reduced TMS effectiveness. Limitations include those inherent to retrospective registry studies and self-reporting. Although these findings are contrary to our hypotheses, they support the safety and effectiveness of TMS for MDD and PTSD in patients who have comorbid mTBI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Noah S Philip
- Veterans Affairs Rehabilitation Research & Development Center for Neurorestoration and Neurotechnology, Providence Veterans Affairs Healthcare System, Providence, RI, USA; Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Dhakshin Ramanathan
- Center of Excellence for Stress and Mental Health, Veterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA, USA; Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Bruno Gamboa
- Mental Illness Research, Education, and Clinical Center, Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Healthcare System, Palo Alto, CA, USA; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - McKenna C Brennan
- Veterans Affairs Rehabilitation Research & Development Center for Neurorestoration and Neurotechnology, Providence Veterans Affairs Healthcare System, Providence, RI, USA; Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Frank Andrew Kozel
- Department of Behavioral Sciences and Social Medicine, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, USA
| | - Laura Lazzeroni
- Mental Illness Research, Education, and Clinical Center, Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Healthcare System, Palo Alto, CA, USA; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Michelle R Madore
- Mental Illness Research, Education, and Clinical Center, Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Healthcare System, Palo Alto, CA, USA; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Olsson SE, Singh H, Kerr MS, Podlesh Z, Chung J, Tjan A. The role of transcranial magnetic stimulation in treating depression after traumatic brain injury. Brain Stimul 2023; 16:456-457. [PMID: 36773778 DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2023.02.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2023] [Revised: 02/03/2023] [Accepted: 02/06/2023] [Indexed: 02/11/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Sofia Eva Olsson
- Texas Christian University, School of Medicine, 2800 South University Dr, Fort Worth, TX, 76129, USA.
| | - Harpreet Singh
- Mind and Body Pain Clinic, 6010 Hellyer Ave., Ste. 150, San Jose, CA, 95138, USA
| | - Marcel Satsky Kerr
- University of North Texas Health Science Center, School of Biomedical Sciences, 3500 Camp Bowie Blvd. Fort Worth, TX, 76107, USA
| | - Zachary Podlesh
- Colorado State University, Department of Biology, 1878 Campus Dr., Fort Collins, CO, 80523, USA
| | - Jacline Chung
- Mind and Body Pain Clinic, 6010 Hellyer Ave., Ste. 150, San Jose, CA, 95138, USA
| | - Amanda Tjan
- Mind and Body Pain Clinic, 6010 Hellyer Ave., Ste. 150, San Jose, CA, 95138, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Huntley JH, Rezvani Habibabadi R, Vaishnavi S, Khoshpouri P, Kraut MA, Yousem DM. Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and its Imaging Features in Patients With Depression, Post-traumatic Stress Disorder, and Traumatic Brain Injury. Acad Radiol 2023; 30:103-112. [PMID: 35437218 DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2022.03.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2022] [Revised: 03/07/2022] [Accepted: 03/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/01/2022]
Abstract
Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a type of noninvasive neurostimulation used increasingly often in clinical medicine. While most studies to date have focused on TMS's ability to treat major depressive disorder, it has shown promise in several other conditions including post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and traumatic brain injury (TBI). As different treatment protocols are often used across studies, the ability to predict patient outcomes and evaluate immediate and long-term changes using imaging becomes increasingly important. Several imaging features, such as thickness, connectedness, and baseline activity of a variety of cortical and subcortical areas, have been found to be correlated with a greater response to TMS therapy. Intrastimulation imaging can reveal in real time how TMS applied to superficial areas activates or inhibits activity in deeper brain regions. Functional imaging performed weeks to months after treatment can offer an understanding of how long-term effects on brain activity relate to clinical improvement. Further work should be done to expand our knowledge of imaging features relevant to TMS therapy and how they vary across patients with different neurological and psychiatric conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph H Huntley
- Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland.
| | - Roya Rezvani Habibabadi
- Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Sandeep Vaishnavi
- MindPath Care Centers Clinical Research Institute, Raleigh, North Carolina
| | - Parisa Khoshpouri
- Department of Radiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Michael A Kraut
- Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - David M Yousem
- Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Neuropathic Pain and Neuropsychiatric Symptoms in Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Neural Plast 2022; 2022:2036736. [PMID: 35945967 PMCID: PMC9357260 DOI: 10.1155/2022/2036736] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2022] [Revised: 06/05/2022] [Accepted: 07/06/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Neuropathic pain and neuropsychiatric symptoms are common complications reported by the traumatic brain injury (TBI) population. Although a growing body of research has indicated the effectiveness of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for the management of neurological and psychiatric disorders, little evidence has been presented to support the effects of rTMS on neuropathic pain and neuropsychiatric symptoms in patients with TBI in all age groups. In addition, a better understanding of the potential factors that might influence the therapeutic effect of rTMS is necessary. The objective of this preregistered systematic review and meta-analysis was to quantify the effects of rTMS on physical and psychological symptoms in individuals with TBI. We systematically searched six databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of rTMS in TBI patients reporting pain and neuropsychiatric outcomes published until March 20, 2022. The mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) was estimated separately for outcomes to understand the mean effect size. Twelve RCTs with 276 TBI patients were ultimately selected from 1605 records for systematic review, and 11 of the studies were included in the meta-analysis. Overall, five of the included studies showed a low risk of bias. The effects of rTMS on neuropathic pain were statistically significant (
, 95% CI -1.76 to -0.25,
), with high heterogeneity (
). A significant advantage of 1 Hz rTMS over the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) in improving depression (
, 95% CI -11.58 to -1.46,
) was shown, and a significant improvement was noted in the Rivermead Post-Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire-13 (RPQ-13) scores of mild TBI patients after rTMS (
, 95% CI -10.63 to -1.11,
). However, no significance was found in cognition measurement. No major adverse events related to rTMS were reported. Moderate evidence suggests that rTMS can effectively and safely improve neuropathic pain, while its effectiveness on depression, postconcussion symptoms, and cognition is limited. More trials with a larger number of participants are needed to draw firm conclusions. This trial is registered with PROSPERO (PROSPERO registration number: CRD42021242364.
Collapse
|
15
|
Lindsey A, Ellison RL, Herrold AA, Aaronson AL, Kletzel SL, Stika MM, Guernon A, Bender Pape T. rTMS/iTBS and Cognitive Rehabilitation for Deficits Associated With TBI and PTSD: A Theoretical Framework and Review. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci 2022; 35:28-38. [PMID: 35872613 DOI: 10.1176/appi.neuropsych.21090227] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
Rehabilitation of cognitive and psychosocial deficits resulting from traumatic brain injury (TBI) continues to be an area of concern in health care. Commonly co-occurring psychiatric disorders, such as major depressive disorder and posttraumatic stress disorder, create additional hurdles when attempting to remediate cognitive sequelae. There is increased need for procedures that will yield consistent gains indicative of recovery of function. Intermittent theta-burst stimulation (iTBS), a form of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, has potential as an instrument that can be tailored to aid cognitive processes and support functional gains. The use of iTBS enables direct stimulation of desired neural systems. iTBS, performed in conjunction with behavioral interventions (e.g., cognitive rehabilitation, psychotherapy), may result in additive success in facilitating cognitive restoration and adaptation. The purpose of this theoretical review is to illustrate how the technical and physiological aspects of iTBS may enhance other forms of neurorehabilitation for individuals with TBI. Future research on combinatorial iTBS interventions has the potential to translate to other complex neuropsychiatric conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- André Lindsey
- Research Service (Lindsey, Ellison, Herrold, Kletzel, Guernon, Pape), Center for Innovation for Complex Chronic Healthcare (Herrold, aronson, Kletzel, Pape), and Spinal Cord Injury/Disorder Service (Stika), Edward Hines, Jr., Veterans Affairs (VA) Hospital, Hines, IL; School of Education, Nevada State College, Henderson (Lindsey); Department of Psychology, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago (Ellison); Departments of Psychiatry and Behavioral Medicine (Herrold, Aaronson) and Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (Pape), Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago; Speech-Language Pathology Program, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Lewis University, Romeoville, IL (Guernon)
| | - Rachael L Ellison
- Research Service (Lindsey, Ellison, Herrold, Kletzel, Guernon, Pape), Center for Innovation for Complex Chronic Healthcare (Herrold, aronson, Kletzel, Pape), and Spinal Cord Injury/Disorder Service (Stika), Edward Hines, Jr., Veterans Affairs (VA) Hospital, Hines, IL; School of Education, Nevada State College, Henderson (Lindsey); Department of Psychology, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago (Ellison); Departments of Psychiatry and Behavioral Medicine (Herrold, Aaronson) and Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (Pape), Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago; Speech-Language Pathology Program, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Lewis University, Romeoville, IL (Guernon)
| | - Amy A Herrold
- Research Service (Lindsey, Ellison, Herrold, Kletzel, Guernon, Pape), Center for Innovation for Complex Chronic Healthcare (Herrold, aronson, Kletzel, Pape), and Spinal Cord Injury/Disorder Service (Stika), Edward Hines, Jr., Veterans Affairs (VA) Hospital, Hines, IL; School of Education, Nevada State College, Henderson (Lindsey); Department of Psychology, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago (Ellison); Departments of Psychiatry and Behavioral Medicine (Herrold, Aaronson) and Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (Pape), Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago; Speech-Language Pathology Program, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Lewis University, Romeoville, IL (Guernon)
| | - Alexandra L Aaronson
- Research Service (Lindsey, Ellison, Herrold, Kletzel, Guernon, Pape), Center for Innovation for Complex Chronic Healthcare (Herrold, aronson, Kletzel, Pape), and Spinal Cord Injury/Disorder Service (Stika), Edward Hines, Jr., Veterans Affairs (VA) Hospital, Hines, IL; School of Education, Nevada State College, Henderson (Lindsey); Department of Psychology, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago (Ellison); Departments of Psychiatry and Behavioral Medicine (Herrold, Aaronson) and Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (Pape), Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago; Speech-Language Pathology Program, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Lewis University, Romeoville, IL (Guernon)
| | - Sandra L Kletzel
- Research Service (Lindsey, Ellison, Herrold, Kletzel, Guernon, Pape), Center for Innovation for Complex Chronic Healthcare (Herrold, aronson, Kletzel, Pape), and Spinal Cord Injury/Disorder Service (Stika), Edward Hines, Jr., Veterans Affairs (VA) Hospital, Hines, IL; School of Education, Nevada State College, Henderson (Lindsey); Department of Psychology, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago (Ellison); Departments of Psychiatry and Behavioral Medicine (Herrold, Aaronson) and Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (Pape), Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago; Speech-Language Pathology Program, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Lewis University, Romeoville, IL (Guernon)
| | - Monica M Stika
- Research Service (Lindsey, Ellison, Herrold, Kletzel, Guernon, Pape), Center for Innovation for Complex Chronic Healthcare (Herrold, aronson, Kletzel, Pape), and Spinal Cord Injury/Disorder Service (Stika), Edward Hines, Jr., Veterans Affairs (VA) Hospital, Hines, IL; School of Education, Nevada State College, Henderson (Lindsey); Department of Psychology, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago (Ellison); Departments of Psychiatry and Behavioral Medicine (Herrold, Aaronson) and Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (Pape), Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago; Speech-Language Pathology Program, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Lewis University, Romeoville, IL (Guernon)
| | - Ann Guernon
- Research Service (Lindsey, Ellison, Herrold, Kletzel, Guernon, Pape), Center for Innovation for Complex Chronic Healthcare (Herrold, aronson, Kletzel, Pape), and Spinal Cord Injury/Disorder Service (Stika), Edward Hines, Jr., Veterans Affairs (VA) Hospital, Hines, IL; School of Education, Nevada State College, Henderson (Lindsey); Department of Psychology, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago (Ellison); Departments of Psychiatry and Behavioral Medicine (Herrold, Aaronson) and Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (Pape), Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago; Speech-Language Pathology Program, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Lewis University, Romeoville, IL (Guernon)
| | - Theresa Bender Pape
- Research Service (Lindsey, Ellison, Herrold, Kletzel, Guernon, Pape), Center for Innovation for Complex Chronic Healthcare (Herrold, aronson, Kletzel, Pape), and Spinal Cord Injury/Disorder Service (Stika), Edward Hines, Jr., Veterans Affairs (VA) Hospital, Hines, IL; School of Education, Nevada State College, Henderson (Lindsey); Department of Psychology, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago (Ellison); Departments of Psychiatry and Behavioral Medicine (Herrold, Aaronson) and Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (Pape), Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago; Speech-Language Pathology Program, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Lewis University, Romeoville, IL (Guernon)
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Chan V, Toccalino D, Omar S, Shah R, Colantonio A. A systematic review on integrated care for traumatic brain injury, mental health, and substance use. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0264116. [PMID: 35239715 PMCID: PMC8893633 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0264116] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2021] [Accepted: 02/03/2022] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Traumatic brain injuries (TBI) and mental health or substance use disorders (MHSU) are global public health concerns due to their prevalence and impact on individuals and societies. However, care for individuals with TBI and MHSU remains fragmented with a lack of appropriate services and supports across the continuum of healthcare. This systematic review provided an evidence-based foundation to inform opportunities to mobilize and adapt existing resources to integrate care for individuals with TBI and MHSU by comprehensively summarizing existing integrated activities and reported barriers and facilitators to care integration. MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Sociological Abstracts, and Dissertations & Theses Global were independently reviewed by two reviewers based on pre-determined eligibility criteria. Data on the integration activity, level and type of integration, reported barriers and facilitators, and the strategies aligning with the World Health Organization’s (WHO) Framework on Integrated Person-Centred Care were extracted to form the basis for a narrative synthesis. Fifty-nine peer-reviewed articles were included, describing treatments (N = 49), programs (N = 4), or screening activities (N = 7). Studies discussing clinical integration at the micro- (N = 38) and meso- (N = 10) levels, service integration at the micro- (N = 6) and meso- (N = 5) levels, and functional integration at the meso-level (N = 1) were identified. A minority of articles reported on facilitators (e.g., cognitive accommodations in treatment plans; N = 7), barriers (e.g., lack of education on cognitive challenges associated with TBI; N = 2), or both (N = 6), related to integrating care. This review demonstrated that integrated TBI and MHSU care already exists across a range of levels and types. Given the finite and competing demands for healthcare resources, cognitive accommodations across treatment plans to facilitate integrated TBI and MHSU care should be considered. Multidisciplinary teams should also be explored to provide opportunities for education among health professionals so they can be familiar with TBI and MHSU. Trial registration: Prospero Registration: CRD42018108343.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vincy Chan
- KITE-Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Rehabilitation Sciences Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- * E-mail:
| | - Danielle Toccalino
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Samira Omar
- Rehabilitation Sciences Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Riya Shah
- Department of Health and Society, University of Toronto Scarborough, Scarborough, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Psychology, University of Toronto Scarborough, Scarborough, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Occupational Science & Occupational Therapy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Angela Colantonio
- KITE-Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Rehabilitation Sciences Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Occupational Science & Occupational Therapy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Mollica A, Greben R, Oriuwa C, Siddiqi SH, Burke MJ. Neuromodulation Treatments for Mild Traumatic Brain Injury and Post-concussive Symptoms. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep 2022; 22:171-181. [PMID: 35175543 DOI: 10.1007/s11910-022-01183-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) can result in prolonged post-concussive symptoms (e.g., depression, headaches, cognitive impairment) that are debilitating and difficult to treat. This article reviews recent research on neuromodulation for mTBI. RECENT FINDINGS Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is the most studied neuromodulation approach for mTBI (four studies for depression, four for headache, one for cognitive impairment, and two for global post-concussive symptoms) with promising results for post-concussive depression and headache. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has also been evaluated (one study for post-traumatic headache, and three for cognitive impairment), with more mixed results overall. TMS appears to be a potentially promising neuromodulation treatment strategy for post-concussive symptoms; however, integration into clinical practice will require larger sham-controlled randomized trials with longer and more consistent follow-up periods. Future studies should also explore new stimulation protocols, personalized approaches, and the role of placebo effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adriano Mollica
- Neuropsychiatry Program, Department of Psychiatry, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, 2075 Bayview Avenue, FG26, Toronto, ON, M4N 3M5, Canada
- Harquail Centre for Neuromodulation and Hurvitz Brain Sciences Program, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Rachel Greben
- Neuropsychiatry Program, Department of Psychiatry, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, 2075 Bayview Avenue, FG26, Toronto, ON, M4N 3M5, Canada
- Harquail Centre for Neuromodulation and Hurvitz Brain Sciences Program, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Chika Oriuwa
- Neuropsychiatry Program, Department of Psychiatry, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, 2075 Bayview Avenue, FG26, Toronto, ON, M4N 3M5, Canada
- Harquail Centre for Neuromodulation and Hurvitz Brain Sciences Program, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Shan H Siddiqi
- Center for Brain Circuit Therapeutics, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Matthew J Burke
- Neuropsychiatry Program, Department of Psychiatry, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, 2075 Bayview Avenue, FG26, Toronto, ON, M4N 3M5, Canada.
- Harquail Centre for Neuromodulation and Hurvitz Brain Sciences Program, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada.
- Division of Cognitive Neurology, Department of Neurology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Treatment of Psychiatric Problems After Traumatic Brain Injury. Biol Psychiatry 2022; 91:508-521. [PMID: 34511181 DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2021.07.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2021] [Revised: 06/14/2021] [Accepted: 07/06/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Psychiatric sequelae of traumatic brain injury (TBI) can cause significant and often chronic impairment in functioning and quality of life; however, their phenomenological and mechanistic complexities continue to present significant treatment challenges. The clinical presentation is often an amalgam of syndromes and co-occurring symptoms that require a highly nuanced and systematic approach to treatment. Although few randomized controlled trials have tested treatments for psychiatric problems after TBI and the synthesis of results continues to be compromised by the heterogeneity of study populations, small samples, and differing inclusion criteria and outcome measures, an increasing body of literature supports evidence-based treatment strategies. We provide a narrative review of pharmacological, psychoeducational/behavioral, and neuromodulation treatments for psychiatric conditions in adults with TBI and discuss known or postulated mechanisms of action for these treatment approaches. Where data are available, we focus on randomized controlled trials and large case series in which a psychiatric condition provides both a selection criterion and a primary or secondary outcome. We conclude by proposing directions for future research, particularly the need for novel neuropharmacological, behavioral, and neurophysiological studies and pragmatic trials of multicomponent and adaptive models that will increase understanding of the mechanisms underlying post-TBI psychiatric disorders and accelerate dissemination and implementation of effective person-centered care.
Collapse
|
19
|
Eapen BC, Bowles AO, Sall J, Lang AE, Hoppes CW, Stout KC, Kretzmer T, Cifu DX. The management and rehabilitation of post-acute mild traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj 2022; 36:693-702. [DOI: 10.1080/02699052.2022.2033848] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Blessen C. Eapen
- Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Service Va Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Amy O. Bowles
- Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Brooke Army Medical Center, Fort Sam Houston, Texas, USA
| | - James Sall
- Clinical Quality Program Specialist, Quality and Patient Safety, Veterans Administration Central Office, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| | - Adam Edward Lang
- Department of Primary Care, McDonald Army Health Center, Fort Eustis, Virginia, USA
| | - Carrie W. Hoppes
- Army-Baylor University Doctoral Program in Physical Therapy, Army Medical Center of Excellence, Fort Sam Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Katharine C. Stout
- Defense Health Agency Research and Development (J-9), Director of Clinical Affairs Division Traumatic Brain Injury Center of Excellence, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA
| | - Tracy Kretzmer
- Neuropsychology, Mental Health and Behavioral Sciences Inpatient Polytrauma, Rehabilitation, Post-Deployment Rehabilitation and Evaluation Program (PREP), James A. Haley Veterans’ Hospital, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - David X. Cifu
- Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Senior TBI Specialist, Department of Veterans Affairs Associate Dean of Innovation and System Integration, Richmond, VA, USA
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, Virginia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Chen GW, Hsu TW, Ching PY, Pan CC, Chou PH, Chu CS. Efficacy and Tolerability of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Suicidal Ideation: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front Psychiatry 2022; 13:884390. [PMID: 35599760 PMCID: PMC9120615 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.884390] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2022] [Accepted: 04/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in treating suicidal ideation in patients with mental illness. METHOD We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Major electronic databases were systematically searched from the time of their inception until July 22, 2021. The primary outcome was the mean change in the scores for suicidal ideation. The secondary outcome was the mean change in depression severity. RESULTS Ten randomized controlled trials were eligible with 415 participants in the active treatment group (mean age = 53.78 years; mean proportion of women = 54.5%) and 387 participants in the control group (mean age = 55.52 years; mean proportion of women = 51.78%). rTMS significantly reduced suicidal ideation (k = 10, n = 802, Hedges' g = -0.390, 95% confidence interval [CI] = -0.193 to -0.588, p <.001) and severity of depressive symptoms (k = 9, n = 761, Hedges' g = -0.698, 95% CI = -1.023 to -0.372, p < 0.001) in patients with major mental disorders. In the subgroup analysis, rTMS reduced suicidal ideation among patients with non-treatment-resistant depression (non-TRD) (-0.208) but not in those with TRD. rTMS as combination therapy had a larger effect than did monotherapy (-0.500 vs. -0.210). Suicidal ideation significantly reduced in patients receiving more than ten treatment sessions (-0.255). Importantly, the rTMS group showed favorable tolerability without major adverse events. CONCLUSION The study showed that rTMS was effective and well-tolerated in reducing suicidal ideation and depression severity in patients with major mental disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guan-Wei Chen
- Department of Psychiatry, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Tien-Wei Hsu
- Department of Psychiatry, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Pao-Yuan Ching
- Department of Psychiatry, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Chih-Chuan Pan
- Department of Psychiatry, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Po-Han Chou
- Department of Psychiatry, China Medical University Hsinchu Hospital, China Medical University, Hsinchu, Taiwan
| | - Che-Sheng Chu
- Department of Psychiatry, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.,Center for Geriatric and Gerontology, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.,Non-invasive Neuromodulation Consortium for Mental Disorders, Society of Psychophysiology, Taipei, Taiwan.,Graduate Institute of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Dickerson MR, Murphy SF, Urban MJ, White Z, VandeVord PJ. Chronic Anxiety- and Depression-Like Behaviors Are Associated With Glial-Driven Pathology Following Repeated Blast Induced Neurotrauma. Front Behav Neurosci 2021; 15:787475. [PMID: 34955781 PMCID: PMC8703020 DOI: 10.3389/fnbeh.2021.787475] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2021] [Accepted: 11/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Long-term neuropsychiatric impairments have become a growing concern following blast-related traumatic brain injury (bTBI) in active military personnel and Veterans. Neuropsychiatric impairments such as anxiety and depression are common comorbidities that Veterans report months, even years following injury. To understand these chronic behavioral outcomes following blast injury, there is a need to study the link between anxiety, depression, and neuropathology. The hippocampus and motor cortex (MC) have been regions of interest when studying cognitive deficits following blast exposure, but clinical studies of mood disorders such as major depressive disorder (MDD) report that these two regions also play a role in the manifestation of anxiety and depression. With anxiety and depression being common long-term outcomes following bTBI, it is imperative to study how chronic pathological changes within the hippocampus and/or MC due to blast contribute to the development of these psychiatric impairments. In this study, we exposed male rats to a repeated blast overpressure (~17 psi) and evaluated the chronic behavioral and pathological effects on the hippocampus and MC. Results demonstrated that the repeated blast exposure led to depression-like behaviors 36 weeks following injury, and anxiety-like behaviors 2-, and 52-weeks following injury. These behaviors were also correlated with astrocyte pathology (glial-fibrillary acid protein, GFAP) and dendritic alterations (Microtubule-Associated Proteins, MAP2) within the hippocampus and MC regions at 52 weeks. Overall, these findings support the premise that chronic glial pathological changes within the brain contribute to neuropsychiatric impairments following blast exposure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle R. Dickerson
- Department of Biomedical Engineering and Mechanics, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, United States
| | - Susan F. Murphy
- Department of Biomedical Engineering and Mechanics, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, United States
| | - Michael J. Urban
- Department of Biomedical Engineering and Mechanics, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, United States
| | - Zakar White
- Department of Biomedical Engineering and Mechanics, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, United States
| | - Pamela J. VandeVord
- Department of Biomedical Engineering and Mechanics, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, United States
- Salem VA Medical Center, Salem, VA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Godi SM, Spoorthy MS, Purushotham A, Tikka SK. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and its role in suicidality - A systematic review. Asian J Psychiatr 2021; 63:102755. [PMID: 34284199 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajp.2021.102755] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2021] [Revised: 06/28/2021] [Accepted: 07/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) as a brain stimulation modality is approved for the treatment of resistant depression and its efficacy in depression is also well supported in several studies. However, its effect on suicidality is still unclear, unlike electroconvulsive therapy. METHODOLOGY This paper provides a systematic review of the literature published till June 2021. Studies that used rTMS as either monotherapy or adjunctive treatment in patients with suicidality, irrespective of their diagnosis, were included. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines was followed. A total of 20 studies (N = 1584) were included for the qualitative synthesis. The quality of studies was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool for Randomised control trials (RCT) and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale tool for Non-Randomised studies (NRS). RESULTS Of the 20 articles selected for qualitative synthesis, 11 were RCTs and 9 were NRS. The results are categorized in domains of type of the study, size of population, type of population, diagnosis, assessment scales, mode of rTMS, stimulus parameters, safety and efficacy. CONCLUSIONS The high frequency rTMS at left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex as an adjunct to antidepressant medication is promising in reducing suicidal behaviour in treatment resistant depression. However, role of TMS targeting other areas of stimulation in mitigating suicide risk in other disorders could not be established due to scarcity of such studies. The results should be interpreted cautiously as considerable risk of bias was present in the reviewed studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sangha Mitra Godi
- Department of Psychiatry, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Raipur, India.
| | | | - A Purushotham
- Department of Psychiatry, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Raipur, India.
| | - Sai Krishna Tikka
- Department of Psychiatry, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bibinagar, Hyderabad, India.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Tsai PY, Chen YC, Wang JY, Chung KH, Lai CH. Effect of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on depression and cognition in individuals with traumatic brain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep 2021; 11:16940. [PMID: 34417481 PMCID: PMC8379199 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-95838-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2021] [Accepted: 07/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is an FDA-approved therapy in major depressive disorder. However, its treatment efficacy on depression after traumatic brain injury (TBI) remains inconclusive. We conducted a meta-analysis to assess the effectiveness of executing rTMS over dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) on depression, cognitive impairment and post-concussion syndrome in individuals with traumatic brain injury. This study contained seven randomized controlled trials that published before April 5, 2020 in PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases. The rTMS had significant anti-depressant effect (SMD = 1.03, p = 0.02), but the effects dissipated at 1-month follow-up (SMD = 0.39, p = 0.62). In the subgroup analysis, only applying rTMS to left DLPFC area of post-TBI patients showed significant anti-depressant effect (SMD = 0.98, p = 0.04). Moreover, current data observed that rTMS on post-TBI patients possessed substantial improvement in visuospatial memory (SMD = 0.39, p < 0.0001), but wasn't in processing speed (SMD = - 0.18, p = 0.32) and selective attention (SMD = 0.21, p = 0.31). In addition, the effect of rTMS is not superior to sham on postconcussion syndrome. In conclusion, the short-term antidepressant effect of left DLPFC rTMS in patients with TBI was significant. However, the effectiveness of rTMS on cognition and postconcussion syndrome in patients with post-TBI depression was limited.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ping-Yen Tsai
- School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Yang-Ching Chen
- Department of Family Medicine, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
- Department of Family Medicine, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Jia-Yi Wang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
- Neuroscience Research Center, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Kuo-Hsuan Chung
- Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychiatric Research Center, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Chien-Hung Lai
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Taipei Medical University Hospital, No. 252, Wu-Hsing St., Taipei City, 110, Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Miuli A, Sepede G, Stigliano G, Mosca A, Di Carlo F, d’Andrea G, Lalli A, Spano MC, Pettorruso M, Martinotti G, di Giannantonio M. Hypomanic/manic switch after transcranial magnetic stimulation in mood disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Psychiatry 2021; 11:477-490. [PMID: 34513609 PMCID: PMC8394688 DOI: 10.5498/wjp.v11.i8.477] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2021] [Revised: 03/24/2021] [Accepted: 07/20/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Nowadays there is an increasing use of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) both in neurological and psychiatric fields. After Food and Drug Administration approval of TMS for the therapy of treatment-resistant depression, TMS has been widely used in the context of mood disorders (MD). However, growing reports regarding the possibility of developing hypomanic/manic switch (HMS) have generated concern regarding its use in MDs.
AIM To investigate the actual risk of developing HMS due to TMS in the treatment of MD.
METHODS We led our research on PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science on March 22, 2020, in accordance to the PRISMA guidelines for systematic review. Only double blind/single blind studies, written in English and focused on the TMS treatment of MD, were included. A meta-analysis of repetitive TMS protocol studies including HMS was conducted using RevMan 5.4 software. The assessment of Risk of Bias was done using Cochrane risk of bias tool. This protocol was registered on PROSPERO with the CRD42020175811 code.
RESULTS Twenty-five studies were included in our meta-analysis: Twenty-one double blind randomized controlled trials (RCT) and four single blind-RCT (no. of subjects involved in active stimulation = 576; no. of subjects involved in sham protocol = 487). The most frequently treated pathology was major depressive episode/major depressive disorder, followed by resistant depression, bipolar depression and other MD. The majority of the studies used a repetitive TMS protocol, and the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex was the main target area. Side effects were reported in eight studies and HMS (described as greater energy, insomnia, irritability, anxiety, suicidal attempt) in four studies. When comparing active TMS vs sham treatment, the risk of developing HMS was not significantly different between conditions.
CONCLUSION Applying the most usual protocols and the appropriate precautionary measures, TMS seems not to be related to HMS development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Miuli
- Department of Neuroscience, Imaging and Clinical Sciences, “G. d'Annunzio” University of Chieti, Chieti 66100, Italy
| | - Gianna Sepede
- Department of Neuroscience, Imaging and Clinical Sciences, “G. d'Annunzio” University of Chieti, Chieti 66100, Italy
| | - Gianfranco Stigliano
- Department of Neuroscience, Imaging and Clinical Sciences, “G. d'Annunzio” University of Chieti, Chieti 66100, Italy
| | - Alessio Mosca
- Department of Neuroscience, Imaging and Clinical Sciences, “G. d'Annunzio” University of Chieti, Chieti 66100, Italy
| | - Francesco Di Carlo
- Department of Neuroscience, Imaging and Clinical Sciences, “G. d'Annunzio” University of Chieti, Chieti 66100, Italy
| | - Giacomo d’Andrea
- Department of Neuroscience, Imaging and Clinical Sciences, “G. d'Annunzio” University of Chieti, Chieti 66100, Italy
| | - Aliseo Lalli
- Department of Neuroscience, Imaging and Clinical Sciences, “G. d'Annunzio” University of Chieti, Chieti 66100, Italy
| | - Maria Chiara Spano
- Department of Psychiatry Affective Neuropsychiatry, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Göteborg 40530, Sweden
| | - Mauro Pettorruso
- Department of Neuroscience, Imaging and Clinical Sciences, “G. d'Annunzio” University of Chieti, Chieti 66100, Italy
| | - Giovanni Martinotti
- Department of Neuroscience, Imaging and Clinical Sciences, “G. d'Annunzio” University of Chieti, Chieti 66100, Italy
- Department of Pharmacy, Clinical Science, University of Hertfordshire, Herts AL10 9AB, Italy
| | - Massimo di Giannantonio
- Department of Neuroscience, Imaging and Clinical Sciences, “G. d'Annunzio” University of Chieti, Chieti 66100, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Kucuker MU, Almorsy AG, Sonmez AI, Ligezka AN, Doruk Camsari D, Lewis CP, Croarkin PE. A Systematic Review of Neuromodulation Treatment Effects on Suicidality. Front Hum Neurosci 2021; 15:660926. [PMID: 34248523 PMCID: PMC8267816 DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.660926] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2021] [Accepted: 05/17/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Neuromodulation is an important group of therapeutic modalities for neuropsychiatric disorders. Prior studies have focused on efficacy and adverse events associated with neuromodulation. Less is known regarding the influence of neuromodulation treatments on suicidality. This systematic review sought to examine the effects of various neuromodulation techniques on suicidality. Methods: A systematic review of the literature from 1940 to 2020 following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guideline was conducted. Any reported suicide-related outcome, including suicidal ideation, suicide intent, suicide attempt, completed suicide in reports were considered as a putative measure of treatment effect on suicidality. Results: The review identified 129 relevant studies. An exploratory analysis of a randomized controlled trial comparing the effects of sertraline and transcranial direct-current stimulation (tDCS) for treating depression reported a decrease in suicidal ideation favoring tDCS vs. placebo and tDCS combined with sertraline vs. placebo. Several studies reported an association between repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and improvements in suicidal ideation. In 12 of the studies, suicidality was the primary outcome, ten of which showed a significant improvement in suicidal ideation. Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) and magnetic seizure therapy was also shown to be associated with lower suicidal ideation and completed suicide rates. There were 11 studies which suicidality was the primary outcome and seven of these showed an improvement in suicidal ideation or suicide intent and fewer suicide attempts or completed suicides in patients treated with ECT. There was limited literature focused on the potential protective effect of vagal nerve stimulation with respect to suicidal ideation. Data were mixed regarding the potential effects of deep brain stimulation on suicidality. Conclusions: Future prospective studies of neuromodulation that focus on the primary outcome of suicidality are urgently needed. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=125599, identifier: CRD42019125599.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mehmet Utku Kucuker
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - Ammar G. Almorsy
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - Ayse Irem Sonmez
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States
| | - Anna N. Ligezka
- Department of Clinical Genomics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - Deniz Doruk Camsari
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - Charles P. Lewis
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States
| | - Paul E. Croarkin
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Ahorsu DK, Adjaottor ES, Lam BYH. Intervention Effect of Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation on Cognitive Functions among People with Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Brain Sci 2021; 11:brainsci11070840. [PMID: 34202739 PMCID: PMC8301762 DOI: 10.3390/brainsci11070840] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2021] [Revised: 06/14/2021] [Accepted: 06/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
This systematic review and meta-analysis aggregated and examined the treatment effect of non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) (transcranial direct current stimulation and transcranial magnetic stimulation) on cognitive functions in people with traumatic brain injury (TBI). A systematic search was conducted using databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, PsycINFO, EMBASE) for studies with keywords related to non-randomized and randomized control trials of NIBS among people with TBI. Nine out of 1790 NIBS studies with 197 TBI participants (103 active vs. 94 sham) that met the inclusion and exclusion criteria of the present study were finally selected for meta-analysis using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software (version 3). Results showed that the overall effect of NIBS on cognition in people with TBI was moderately significant (g = 0.304, 95% CI = 0.055 to 0.553) with very low heterogeneity across studies (I2 = 0.000, Tau = 0.000). Specifically, significant and marginally significant moderate effect sizes were found for cognitive sub-domains including attention, memory, and executive function. The present findings suggest that NIBS is moderately effective in improving cognitive functions among people with TBI. In particular, NIBS may be used as an alternative and/or an adjunct treatment to the traditional approach in rehabilitating cognitive functions in people with TBI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Kwasi Ahorsu
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China;
| | - Emma Sethina Adjaottor
- Department of Behavioural Sciences, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Ashanti, Ghana;
| | - Bess Yin Hung Lam
- Department of Psychiatry, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Nousia A, Martzoukou M, Liampas I, Siokas V, Bakirtzis C, Nasios G, Dardiotis E. The Effectiveness of Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation Alone or Combined with Cognitive Training on the Cognitive Performance of Patients With Traumatic Brain Injury: Α Systematic Review. Arch Clin Neuropsychol 2021; 37:497-512. [PMID: 34155517 DOI: 10.1093/arclin/acab047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The present study reviewed published evidence on the effectiveness of non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) on the cognitive performance of patients with Traumatic brain injury (TBI). METHOD A systematic search of the PubMed and Google Scholar databases was carried out. Randomized Controlled Studies published before March 2020 were included. Methodological evaluation was performed based on the Risk of Bias Cochrane tool. A total of 10 placebo-controlled studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were involved in the qualitative analysis, two assessing NIBS combined with cognitive training (CT) and eight evaluating NIBS alone. RESULTS All but one retrieved article were appraised as of high-risk of bias (one paper was assessed as of unclear-risk owing to considerable underreporting). With the potential exception of attention, our findings were not indicative of a superior efficacy of NIBS-CT to CT alone, regarding the improvement of any of the rest assessed cognitive deficits. Executive function, processing speed, attention, working, and visuospatial memory were only occasionally found to benefit from NIBS alone compared to sham therapy (only one study reported relevant benefits per neuropsychological outcome). Verbal memory and verbal fluency (phonemic-semantic) were consistently found not to benefit from NIBS. Depression measures were the only outcomes associated with a beneficial effect of NIBS in more than one article. CONCLUSION Our findings did not provide sufficient high-quality evidence to support the exclusive use of NIBS or combined NIBS-CT to improve any impaired cognitive function in TBI patients. Owing to the suboptimum methodological quality of published studies, additional research is of potential value.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anastasia Nousia
- Department of Speech and Language Therapy, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece
| | - Maria Martzoukou
- Department of Speech and Language Therapy, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece
| | - Ioannis Liampas
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Larissa, Greece.,Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Thessaly, Larissa, Greece
| | - Vasileios Siokas
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Larissa, Greece.,Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Thessaly, Larissa, Greece
| | - Christos Bakirtzis
- B' Department of Neurology, AHEPA University Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Grigorios Nasios
- Department of Speech and Language Therapy, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece
| | - Efthimios Dardiotis
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Larissa, Greece.,Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Thessaly, Larissa, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
du Plessis S, Oni IK, Lapointe AP, Campbell C, Dunn JF, Debert CT. Treatment of Persistent Post-Concussion Syndrome with Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Using Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy as a Biomarker of Response: A Randomized Sham-Controlled Clinical Trial Protocol (Preprint). JMIR Res Protoc 2021; 11:e31308. [PMID: 35315783 PMCID: PMC8984821 DOI: 10.2196/31308] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2021] [Revised: 09/29/2021] [Accepted: 01/25/2022] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Approximately one-third of all concussions lead to persistent postconcussion syndrome (PPCS). Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a form of noninvasive brain stimulation that has been extensively used to treat refractory major depressive disorder and has a strong potential to be used as a treatment for patients with PPCS. Functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) has already been used as a tool to assess patients with PPCS and may provide insight into the pathophysiology of rTMS treatment in patients with PPCS. Objective The primary objective of this research is to determine whether rTMS treatment improves symptom burden in patients with PPCS compared to sham treatment using the Rivermead postconcussion symptom questionnaire. The secondary objective is to explore the neuropathophysiological changes that occur following rTMS in participants with PPCS using fNIRS. Exploratory objectives include determining whether rTMS treatment in participants with PPCS will also improve quality of life, anxiety, depressive symptoms, cognition, posttraumatic stress, and function secondary to headaches. Methods A total of 44 adults (18-65 years old) with PPCS (>3 months to 5 years) will participate in a double-blind, sham-controlled, concealed allocation, randomized clinical trial. The participants will engage in either a 4-week rTMS treatment protocol or sham rTMS protocol (20 treatments). The left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex will be located through Montreal Neurologic Institute coordinates. The intensity of the rTMS treatment over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex will be 120% of resting motor threshold, with a frequency of 10 Hz, 10 trains of 60 pulses per train (total of 600 pulses), and intertrain interval of 45 seconds. Prior to starting the rTMS treatment, participant and injury characteristics, questionnaires (symptom burden, quality of life, depression, anxiety, cognition, and headache), and fNIRS assessment will be collected. Repeat questionnaires and fNIRS will occur immediately after rTMS treatment and at 1 month and 3 months post rTMS. Outcome parameters will be analyzed by a 2-way (treatment × time) mixed analysis of variance. Results As of May 6, 2021, 5 participants have been recruited for the study, and 3 have completed the rTMS protocol. The estimated completion date of the trial is May 2022. Conclusions This trial will expand our knowledge of how rTMS can be used as a treatment option of PPCS and will explore the neuropathophysiological response of rTMS through fNIRS analysis. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04568369; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04568369 International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID) DERR1-10.2196/31308
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sané du Plessis
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
- Hotchkiss Brain Institute, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Ibukunoluwa K Oni
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
- Hotchkiss Brain Institute, Calgary, AB, Canada
- Department of Radiology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Andrew P Lapointe
- Hotchkiss Brain Institute, Calgary, AB, Canada
- Department of Radiology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Christina Campbell
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Jeff F Dunn
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
- Hotchkiss Brain Institute, Calgary, AB, Canada
- Department of Radiology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Chantel T Debert
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
- Hotchkiss Brain Institute, Calgary, AB, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Serafini G, Canepa G, Aguglia A, Amerio A, Bianchi D, Magnani L, Dell'Osso B, Pompili M, Fitzgerald PB, Amore M. Effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on suicidal behavior: A systematic review. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 2021; 105:109981. [PMID: 32485190 DOI: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2020.109981] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2020] [Revised: 05/20/2020] [Accepted: 05/20/2020] [Indexed: 01/29/2023]
Abstract
The efficacy and tolerability of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in major depression is well-known and documented by existing studies. However, whether rTMS may be effective on suicidal behavior is unclear and needs to be further investigated. This systematic review is aimed to investigate the available literature about the effects of rTMS on suicidal behavior and provide a comprehensive overview of the available evidence. A systematic search regarding the association between rTMS and suicidal behavior was carried out. All relevant articles concerning this association were comprehensively searched on PubMed, Scopus, Science Direct, and PsycInfo databases. After a careful search, 16 articles (7 sham-controlled studies, 5 uncontrolled studies, 4 case-series) met inclusion criteria and were selected in this systematic review. Overall, the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) was identified as the most frequent stimulation target by most studies. Unfortunately, actually it is not clear whether suicidal behavior reduction may be mediated, at least in some cases, by depression attenuation. While some methodological heterogeneity was found in terms of stimulation parameters (e.g., frequency, number of sessions, intensity of stimulation), most of the analyzed articles showed that rTMS is a safe, applicable, well tolerated and reproducible method in treating suicidal behavior. The most effective treatment seems to be the bilateral rTMS as well as the combination with antidepressants. Further longitudinal studies are required in order to replicate the mentioned study results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gianluca Serafini
- Department of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health, Section of Psychiatry, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy; IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy.
| | - Giovanna Canepa
- Department of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health, Section of Psychiatry, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy; IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Andrea Aguglia
- Department of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health, Section of Psychiatry, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy; IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Andrea Amerio
- Department of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health, Section of Psychiatry, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy; IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy; Mood Disorders Program, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA 02111, USA
| | - Davide Bianchi
- Department of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health, Section of Psychiatry, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy; IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Luca Magnani
- Department of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health, Section of Psychiatry, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy; IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Bernardo Dell'Osso
- Department of Mental Health, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Luigi Sacco Hospital, ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco, University of Milan, Milan, Italy; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Bipolar Disorders Clinic, Stanford University, CA, USA; CRC "Aldo Ravelli" Center for Neurotechnology and Brain Therapeutic, University of Milan, Milan, Italy; Centro per lo studio dei meccanismi molecolari alla base delle patologie neuro-psico-geriatriche, University of Milan, Italy
| | - Maurizio Pompili
- Department of Neurosciences, Suicide Prevention Center, Sant'Andrea Hospital, University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Paul B Fitzgerald
- Epworth Centre for Innovation in Mental Health, Epworth Healthcare and Monash Universitty Department of Psychiatry, Camberwell, VIC, Australia
| | - Mario Amore
- Department of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health, Section of Psychiatry, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy; IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
The effects of non-invasive brain stimulation on sleep disturbances among different neurological and neuropsychiatric conditions: A systematic review. Sleep Med Rev 2021; 55:101381. [DOI: 10.1016/j.smrv.2020.101381] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2020] [Revised: 04/17/2020] [Accepted: 06/09/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
|
31
|
Homan S, Muscat W, Joanlanne A, Marousis N, Cecere G, Hofmann L, Ji E, Neumeier M, Vetter S, Seifritz E, Dierks T, Homan P. Treatment effect variability in brain stimulation across psychiatric disorders: A meta-analysis of variance. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2021; 124:54-62. [PMID: 33482243 DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.11.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2020] [Revised: 10/26/2020] [Accepted: 11/29/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Noninvasive brain stimulation methods such as transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) are promising add-on treatments for a number of psychiatric conditions. Yet, some of the initial excitement is wearing off. Randomized controlled trials (RCT) have found inconsistent results. This inconsistency is suspected to be the consequence of variation in treatment effects and solvable by identifying responders in RCTs and individualizing treatment. However, is there enough evidence from RCTs that patients respond differently to treatment? This question can be addressed by comparing the variability in the active stimulation group with the variability in the sham group. We searched MEDLINE/PubMed and included all double-blinded, sham-controlled RCTs and crossover trials that used TMS or tDCS in adults with a unipolar or bipolar depression, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia spectrum disorder, or obsessive compulsive disorder. In accordance with the PRISMA guidelines to ensure data quality and validity, we extracted a measure of variability of the primary outcome. A total of 130 studies with 5748 patients were considered in the analysis. We calculated variance-weighted variability ratios for each comparison of active stimulation vs sham and entered them into a random-effects model. We hypothesized that treatment effect variability in TMS or tDCS would be reflected by increased variability after active compared with sham stimulation, or in other words, a variability ratio greater than one. Across diagnoses, we found only a minimal increase in variability after active stimulation compared with sham that did not reach statistical significance (variability ratio = 1.03; 95% CI, 0.97, 1.08, P = 0.358). In conclusion, this study found little evidence for treatment effect variability in brain stimulation, suggesting that the need for personalized or stratified medicine is still an open question.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie Homan
- University Hospital of Psychiatry Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; University Hospital of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
| | - Whitney Muscat
- Center for Psychiatric Neuroscience, Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, Manhasset, NY, USA; Division of Psychiatry Research, Zucker Hillside Hospital, Northwell Health, New York, NY, USA; Department of Psychiatry, Zucker School of Medicine at Northwell/Hofstra, Hempstead, NY, USA
| | - Andrea Joanlanne
- Center for Psychiatric Neuroscience, Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, Manhasset, NY, USA; Division of Psychiatry Research, Zucker Hillside Hospital, Northwell Health, New York, NY, USA; Department of Psychiatry, Zucker School of Medicine at Northwell/Hofstra, Hempstead, NY, USA
| | | | - Giacomo Cecere
- University Hospital of Psychiatry Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Lena Hofmann
- University Hospital of Psychiatry Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Ellen Ji
- University Hospital of Psychiatry Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Maria Neumeier
- University Hospital of Psychiatry Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Stefan Vetter
- University Hospital of Psychiatry Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Erich Seifritz
- University Hospital of Psychiatry Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Thomas Dierks
- University Hospital of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Philipp Homan
- University Hospital of Psychiatry Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; Center for Psychiatric Neuroscience, Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, Manhasset, NY, USA; Division of Psychiatry Research, Zucker Hillside Hospital, Northwell Health, New York, NY, USA; Department of Psychiatry, Zucker School of Medicine at Northwell/Hofstra, Hempstead, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Meek BP, Hill S, Modirrousta M. Accelerated repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in the treatment of post-concussion symptoms due to mild traumatic brain injury: a pilot study. Brain Inj 2020; 35:48-58. [PMID: 33297788 DOI: 10.1080/02699052.2020.1857837] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the feasibility, tolerability, and efficacy of twice-daily, low frequency (LF) repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) over the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) in the reduction of chronic post-concussion symptoms (PCS) in patients who have suffered a mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI).Methods: 15 patients with mTBI received 30 sessions of twice-daily LF rTMS (1 Hz) over the right DLPFC. Post-concussion symptoms, pain, disability, fatigue, apathy, agitation, and mood were assessed by a psychiatrist pre- and post-treatment. Cognitive testing was also performed pre-, mid-, and post-rTMS.Results: All participants completed treatment with no serious adverse events. Significant improvements were observed in overall post-concussion symptoms, disability and pain ratings, as well as depression and anxiety symptoms. There was no significant change in overall executive functioning, fatigue severity, apathy, or agitation. Cognitive testing revealed improvements in verbal fluency, working memory, selective attention, and cognitive processing speed.Conclusions: This small-sample pilot study suggests that twice-daily, LF rTMS over the right DLPFC can be safely and tolerably applied and has the potential to improve post-concussion symptoms as well as elements of mood and cognition in patients with mTBI. Larger, sham-controlled studies will be important to confirm these observations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin P Meek
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| | - Scott Hill
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Mollica A, Safavifar F, Fralick M, Giacobbe P, Lipsman N, Burke MJ. Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for the Treatment of Concussion: A Systematic Review. Neuromodulation 2020; 24:803-812. [PMID: 33184973 DOI: 10.1111/ner.13319] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2020] [Revised: 10/11/2020] [Accepted: 10/26/2020] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Post-concussive symptoms (PCSs) are common, disabling, and challenging to manage. Evolving models of concussion pathophysiology suggest evidence of brain network dysfunction that may be amenable to neuromodulation. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) has emerged as a potential novel treatment option for PCSs. OBJECTIVES To systematically review rTMS trials for the treatment of symptoms following concussion/mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). MATERIALS AND METHODS We conducted a systematic review of Pubmed/Medline, Embase, and PsychINFO databases were searched up to May 19, 2020. Studies were included if they were prospective rTMS treatment studies of patients with mTBI/concussion. Variables including patient demographics, study design, rTMS protocol parameters, primary outcome measures, and efficacy data were extracted and qualitatively synthesized. rTMS methodology and study quality were also evaluated. RESULTS Of the 342 studies identified, 11 met eligibility criteria and were included for synthesis. Forty-one percent of patients were female and age ranged from 18 to 65 (average age = 38.5 years). Post-concussive depression (seven studies) and headache (four studies) were the most commonly investigated symptoms. The majority of trials were sham-controlled with randomized control trial (RCT) designs, but all were small pilot samples (n < 30). Methodological heterogeneity and a low number of identified trials precluded quantitative meta-analysis. Regarding rTMS for post-concussive depression, positive results were found in two out of four studies with depression as a primary outcome, and all three studies that assessed depression as a secondary outcome. All four rTMS studies for post-concussive headache reported positive results. CONCLUSIONS rTMS for the treatment of concussion/mTBI shows promising preliminary results for post-concussive depression and headache, symptoms that otherwise have limited effective treatment options. More studies with larger sample sizes are needed to further establish potential efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adriano Mollica
- Harquail Centre for Neuromodulation and Hurvitz Brain Sciences Program, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Neuropsychiatry Program, Department of Psychiatry, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Farnaz Safavifar
- Harquail Centre for Neuromodulation and Hurvitz Brain Sciences Program, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Neuropsychiatry Program, Department of Psychiatry, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Michael Fralick
- Department of Medicine, Sinai Health System, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Peter Giacobbe
- Harquail Centre for Neuromodulation and Hurvitz Brain Sciences Program, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Neuropsychiatry Program, Department of Psychiatry, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Nir Lipsman
- Harquail Centre for Neuromodulation and Hurvitz Brain Sciences Program, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Matthew J Burke
- Harquail Centre for Neuromodulation and Hurvitz Brain Sciences Program, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Neuropsychiatry Program, Department of Psychiatry, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Berenson-Allen Center for Noninvasive Brain Stimulation, Department of Neurology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Sex Differences in Neuromodulation Treatment Approaches for Traumatic Brain Injury: A Scoping Review. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2020; 35:412-429. [PMID: 33165154 DOI: 10.1097/htr.0000000000000631] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Neuromodulatory brain stimulation interventions for traumatic brain injury (TBI)-related health sequelae, such as psychiatric, cognitive, and pain disorders, are on the rise. Because of disproportionate recruitment and epidemiological reporting of TBI-related research in men, there is limited understanding of TBI development, pathophysiology, and treatment intervention outcomes in women. With data suggesting sex-related variances in treatment outcomes, it is important that these gaps are addressed in emerging, neuromodulatory treatment approaches for TBI populations. METHODS Four research databases (PubMED, EMBASE, CINAHL, and PsycINFO) were electronically searched in February 2020. DESIGN This PRISMA Scoping Review (PRISMA-ScR)-guided report contextualizes the importance of reporting sex differences in TBI + neuromodulatory intervention studies and summarizes the current state of reporting sex differences when investigating 3 emerging interventions for TBI outcomes. RESULTS Fifty-four studies were identified for the final review including 12 controlled trials, 16 single or case series reports, and 26 empirical studies. Across all studies reviewed, 68% of participants were male, and only 7 studies reported sex differences as a part of their methodological approach, analysis, or discussion. CONCLUSION This review is hoped to update the TBI community on the current state of evidence in reporting sex differences across these 3 neuromodulatory treatments of post-TBI sequelae. The proposed recommendations aim to improve future research and clinical treatment of all individuals suffering from post-TBI sequelae.
Collapse
|
35
|
Use of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in the Treatment of Neuropsychiatric and Neurocognitive Symptoms Associated With Concussion in Military Populations. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2020; 35:388-400. [PMID: 33165152 DOI: 10.1097/htr.0000000000000628] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Since the year 2000, over 342 000 military service members have experienced a concussion, often associated with chronic neuropsychiatric and neurocognitive symptoms. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) protocols have been developed for many of these symptoms in the general population. OBJECTIVE To conduct a scoping review of the literature on rTMS for neuropsychological and neurocognitive symptoms following concussion. METHODS PubMed and Google Scholar search engines identified 9 articles, written in English, corresponding to the search terms TBI or concussion; and TMS or rTMS; and depression, PTSD, or cognition. Studies that were not therapeutic trials or case reports, did not have neuropsychiatric or neurocognitive primary outcome measures, or described samples where 80% or more of the cohort did not have a TBI were excluded. RESULTS There were no reports of seizures nor difference in the frequency or quality of other adverse events as compared with the broader rTMS literature, supporting the safety of rTMS in this population. Support for the efficacy of rTMS for the treatment of neuropsychiatric and neurocognitive symptoms, in this population, is limited. CONCLUSIONS Large-scale, innovative, neuroscience-informed protocols are recommended to elucidate the potential utility of rTMS for the complex neuropsychiatric and neurocognitive symptoms associated with military concussions.
Collapse
|
36
|
Bozzay ML, Primack J, Barredo J, Philip NS. Transcranial magnetic stimulation to reduce suicidality - A review and naturalistic outcomes. J Psychiatr Res 2020; 125:106-112. [PMID: 32251917 PMCID: PMC7197489 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2020.03.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2019] [Revised: 02/14/2020] [Accepted: 03/26/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Although there is growing interest in the use of repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) as a treatment for suicidality, efficacy data in this area, and knowledge of potential treatment mechanisms, remains limited. The first objective of this study was to systematically review clinical trial data examining the effectiveness of TMS as a treatment for suicidal ideation. Our secondary objective was to investigate the extent to which changes in suicidality are independent of improvements in depression in a clinical sample of veterans who received TMS treatment. In Study 1, we searched the Pubmed and biRxiv databases from inception until July 2019 to identify studies that examined the efficacy of TMS for suicidal thoughts and/or behaviors. Data regarding sample characteristics, treatment parameters, and results were synthesized from six randomized controlled trials and five unblinded trials (total n = 593). Our systematic review indicated that while TMS was consistently associated with reduced depression, its impact on suicidality is unclear. Interpretation of results related to suicidality were complicated by study design elements and modest sample sizes. In Study 2, we conducted a retrospective analysis of 43 patients who received care for depression in a neuromodulation clinic at a Veteran's Affairs hospital. Results found significant decreases in suicidal ideation, and depressive symptom change did not always account for improvements in ideation. Taken together, our literature review and clinic study indicate preliminary promise of TMS for suicide, and underscore the need for more fine-grained, suicide-specific TMS research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melanie L Bozzay
- Department of Psychiatry & Human Behavior, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence RI USA
- VA RR&D Center for Neurorestoration and Neurotechnology, Providence VA Medical Center, Providence RI USA
| | - Jennifer Primack
- Department of Psychiatry & Human Behavior, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence RI USA
- VA RR&D Center for Neurorestoration and Neurotechnology, Providence VA Medical Center, Providence RI USA
- Address correspondence to: Noah S. Philip, M.D. ; Telephone: + 1 (401) 273-7100 x2369. Providence VA Medical Center, 830 Chalkstone Boulevard, Providence, Rhode Island 02908, United States
| | - Jennifer Barredo
- Department of Psychiatry & Human Behavior, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence RI USA
- VA RR&D Center for Neurorestoration and Neurotechnology, Providence VA Medical Center, Providence RI USA
- Address correspondence to: Noah S. Philip, M.D. ; Telephone: + 1 (401) 273-7100 x2369. Providence VA Medical Center, 830 Chalkstone Boulevard, Providence, Rhode Island 02908, United States
| | - Noah S. Philip
- Department of Psychiatry & Human Behavior, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence RI USA
- VA RR&D Center for Neurorestoration and Neurotechnology, Providence VA Medical Center, Providence RI USA
- Address correspondence to: Noah S. Philip, M.D. ; Telephone: + 1 (401) 273-7100 x2369. Providence VA Medical Center, 830 Chalkstone Boulevard, Providence, Rhode Island 02908, United States
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Narapareddy BR, Narapareddy L, Lin A, Wigh S, Nanavati J, Dougherty J, Nowrangi M, Roy D. Treatment of Depression After Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review Focused on Pharmacological and Neuromodulatory Interventions. PSYCHOSOMATICS 2020; 61:481-497. [PMID: 32660873 DOI: 10.1016/j.psym.2020.04.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2020] [Revised: 04/16/2020] [Accepted: 04/16/2020] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Depression is the most common psychiatric sequela after traumatic brain injury (TBI) and poses a variety of treatment challenges. There is a lack of clinical trials focused on biological interventions used to manage TBI depression. OBJECTIVE The aim of this systematic review is to summarize the current evidence of psychotropic and neuromodulatory interventions used to treat TBI depression and to provide directions for future research. METHODS Key words were used to describe the following search terms: "traumatic brain injury", "depression", "pharmacological/drug therapy", and "neuromodulation". Studies focused on pharmacotherapy or neuromodulation in TBI depression were identified in 5 databases: Medline (PubMed), EMBASE (Embase.com), the Cochrane Library (Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Methodology Register), PsycINFO (EbscoHost), and Web of Science. Article inclusion/exclusion using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA)-based systematic protocol of extraction and evaluation was applied. Level of evidence for each study was determined using the American Academy of Neurology criteria. RESULTS The initial search provided 1473 citations. Twenty-two studies met inclusion criteria. Sixteen studies explored pharmacological interventions with emphasis on serotonergic agents. Results between studies were conflicting, and interventions did not always outperform placebos, although sertraline provided the highest level of evidence for treatment of TBI depression. Six studies examining neuromodulatory interventions show preliminary evidence of efficacy with a range of interventions and modes of delivery used. CONCLUSIONS Additional research including large-sample randomized-controlled trials using pharmacological, neuromodulation, or combination treatment is needed. These studies should incorporate premorbid psychosocial functioning, preinjury psychiatric disease, cognitive deficits, and functional recovery when examining outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bharat R Narapareddy
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA
| | - Laren Narapareddy
- Nell Hodgson Woodruff School of Nursing, Emory University, Atlanta, GA
| | | | - Shreya Wigh
- University of New Mexico, College of Arts and Sciences, Albuquerque, NM
| | - Julie Nanavati
- Welch Medical Library, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | | | - Milap Nowrangi
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Durga Roy
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Nardone R, Sebastianelli L, Versace V, Brigo F, Golaszewski S, Manganotti P, Saltuari L, Trinka E. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in traumatic brain injury: Evidence from animal and human studies. Brain Res Bull 2020; 159:44-52. [PMID: 32251693 DOI: 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2020.03.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/26/2019] [Revised: 03/16/2020] [Accepted: 03/23/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
We provide here the first systematic review on the studies dealing with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for traumatic brain injury (TBI) in animals and humans. Several experimental studies in animal models have explored with promising results the use of rTMS to enhance neuroprotection and recovery after TBI. However, there are surprisingly few studies that have obtained substantial evidence regarding effects of rTMS in humans with TBI, many of them are case reports investigating the heterogeneous conditions linked to TBI. The most studies have investigated the effects of rTMS in subjects with post-traumatic depression and variable effects have been observed. rTMS has been proposed as an experimental approach for the treatment of disorders of consciousness (DOC), but in subjects with TBI therapeutic effects on DOC have also been variously documented. Beneficial effects have been reported in subjects with cognitive/emotional disturbances and auditory dysfunction (tinnitus and hallucinations), although the results are somewhat conflicting. rTMS applied over the left prefrontal cortex may relieve, at least transiently, post-traumatic headache. Isolated rTMS studies have been performed in TBI patients with motor impairment, chronic dizziness or pain. Especially whether provided in combination, rTMS and neurorehabilitation may be synergistic in the potential to translate experimental findings in the clinical practice. In order to reach definitive conclusions, well-designed randomized controlled studies with larger patient samples, improved design and optimized rTMS setup, are warranted to verify and corroborate the initial promising findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raffaele Nardone
- Department of Neurology, Franz Tappeiner Hospital, Merano, Italy; Department of Neurology, Christian Doppler Klinik, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria; Spinal Cord Injury and Tissue Regeneration Center, Salzburg, Austria; Karl Landsteiner Institut für Neurorehabilitation und Raumfahrtneurologie, Salzburg, Austria.
| | - Luca Sebastianelli
- Department of Neurorehabilitation, Hospital of Vipiteno, Vipiteno, Italy; Research Unit for Neurorehabilitation South Tyrol, Bolzano, Italy
| | - Viviana Versace
- Department of Neurorehabilitation, Hospital of Vipiteno, Vipiteno, Italy; Research Unit for Neurorehabilitation South Tyrol, Bolzano, Italy
| | - Francesco Brigo
- Department of Neurology, Franz Tappeiner Hospital, Merano, Italy; Department of Neuroscience, Biomedicine and Movement Science, University of Verona, Italy
| | - Stefan Golaszewski
- Department of Neurology, Christian Doppler Klinik, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria; Karl Landsteiner Institut für Neurorehabilitation und Raumfahrtneurologie, Salzburg, Austria
| | | | - Leopold Saltuari
- Department of Neurorehabilitation, Hospital of Vipiteno, Vipiteno, Italy; Research Unit for Neurorehabilitation South Tyrol, Bolzano, Italy
| | - Eugen Trinka
- Department of Neurology, Christian Doppler Klinik, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria; Centre for Cognitive Neurosciences Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria; University for Medical Informatics and Health Technology, UMIT, Hall in Tirol, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Liu Q, Li R, Qu W, Li B, Yang W, Cui R. Pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions of depression after traumatic brain injury: A systematic review. Eur J Pharmacol 2019; 865:172775. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2019.172775] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2019] [Revised: 10/26/2019] [Accepted: 11/01/2019] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
|