Aphasia: Associated Disturbances in Affect, Behavior, and Cognition in the Setting of Speech and Language Difficulties

Neuropsychiatric outcomes and caregiver distress in primary progressive aphasia

BACKGROUND

In this study, we aimed to outline the neuropsychiatric consequences of primary progressive aphasia (PPA) and to understand how neuropsychiatric symptomatology affects distress in caregivers.

METHODS

The Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) including the distress index (NPI-Distress) was used. Additional information about the caregiver burden was obtained using Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI). NPI, NPI-Distress, and ZBI data from 17 patients with a clinical diagnosis of PPA were compared with 10 stroke aphasia patients. Neuropsychiatric symptomatology was investigated based on three clusters; Mood, Frontal/Comportmental, and Psychotic/Disruptive. Additionally, the Activities of Daily Living Questionnaire (ADLQ) was used to outline the functional impairment. Twelve healthy controls were included to compare the neurocognitive test scores with PPA and stroke aphasia groups.

RESULTS

A greater number of neuropsychiatric symptoms were observed in the PPA group compared to the stroke aphasia group. The number of symptoms in Mood, and Frontal/Comportmental clusters were greater than the number of symptoms in Psychotic/Disruptive clusters in the PPA group, whereas no significant relationship between the number of symptoms and symptom clusters was found in the stroke aphasia group. In the PPA group, a strong correlation was found between the NPI-Frequency × Severity scores and the NPI-Distress scores. Moreover, the NPI-Distress scores in the PPA group strongly correlated with the ZBI scores. Scores for anxiety, irritability/lability, and apathy had a stronger correlation with the NPI-Distress scores compared to the other NPI symptoms. The Communication subscale was the most impaired domain in the PPA group. Travel, and Employment and Recreation subscales showed greater functional impairment in the stroke aphasia group compared to the PPA group.

CONCLUSIONS

Neuropsychiatric symptoms in PPA in our study were more frequent than previously reported. Furthermore, the distress index of the NPI was not only correlated with the severity of the neuropsychiatric symptoms but also reflected the overall burden on the caregivers in the PPA group.

Differentiating psychosis versus fluent aphasia

Following a stroke, a patient may present with varying degrees of neurological impairment, depending on the area of the brain which is damaged. Specifically, damage to the left cortical hemisphere may result in aphasia. The characteristic speech in a patient with an aphasia caused by a stroke can be similar to the speech in some patients with schizophrenia or other psychotic disorders. In a new patient without a reliable history who presents with suspected aphasia, it is important to include psychotic disorders as part of the differential diagnosis. Failure to differentiate psychotic disorders from aphasia could result in either a lack of treatment that would improve the patient's thought process, thought content, or language, or in a delayed treatment for a stroke, respectively. While a number of psychotic disorders exist and must be differentiated from one another in accordance with DSM-IV guidelines, speech abnormalities in patients with schizophrenia are well described in the literature. For this reason, schizophrenia is the psychotic disorder of focus in this paper. This case report illustrates a clinical situation where a patient required both a psychiatric and neurological consultation in order to determine the etiology of his language disorder. The purpose of this paper is to emphasize the need to consider both psychiatric disorders and aphasia in patients with unknown histories who present with language abnormalities, and to help the clinician critically examine the patient's speech so that, in conjunction with other clinical data, the correct diagnosis can be made and appropriate treatment initiated.