Precipitants of violence in a psychiatric inpatient setting

Relationship between antipsychotic medication and aggressive events in patients with a psychotic disorder hospitalized for treatment

BACKGROUND

Disruptive and aggressive behavior is frequent in patients with a psychotic disorder; furthermore, it is a recurrent reason for compulsory admission. Even during treatment, many patients continue to show aggressive behavior. Antipsychotic medication is posed to have anti-aggressive properties; its prescription is a common strategy for the treatment (and prevention) of violent behavior. The present study aims to investigate the relation between the antipsychotic class, according to the dopamine D2-Receptor binding affinity (i.e., "loose" - "tight binding"), and aggressive events perpetrated by hospitalized patients with a psychotic disorder.

METHODS

We conducted a four-year retrospective analysis of legally liable aggressive incidents perpetrated by patients during hospitalization. We extracted patients' basic demographic and clinical data from electronic health records. We used the Staff Observation Aggression Scale (SOAS-R) to grade the severity of an event. Differences between patients with a "loose" or "tight-binding" antipsychotic were analyzed.

RESULTS

In the observation period, there were 17,901 direct admissions; and 61 severe aggressive events (an incidence of 0.85 for every 1,000 admissions year). Patients with a psychotic disorder perpetrated 51 events (incidence of 2.90 for every 1,000 admission year), with an OR of 15.85 (CI: 8.04-31.25) compared to non-psychotic patients. We could identify 46 events conducted by patients with a psychotic disorder under medication. The mean SOAS-R total score was 17.02 (2.74). The majority of victims in the "loose-binding" group were staff members (73.1%, n = 19), while the majority of victims in the "tight-binding" group were fellow patients (65.0%, n = 13); (X²(3,46) = 19.687; p < 0.001). There were no demographic or clinical differences between the groups and no differences regarding dose equivalents or other prescribed medication.

CONCLUSIONS

In aggressive behaviors conducted by patients with a psychotic disorder under antipsychotic medication, the dopamine D2-Receptor affinity seems to have a high impact on the target of aggression. However, more studies are needed to investigate the anti-aggressive effects of individual antipsychotic agents.

Interfacility ambulance transport of mental health patients

The transportation of mental health patients between facilities by emergency medical services personnel poses a unique risk to both patients and their providers. Increasingly, common injuries are occurring and difficulties are arising during this transition in care. Proximal causes exist that could be addressed to help mitigate many of the complexities that occur during this shift in care. Patient safety, quality of care, and provider safety are all at risk if improvements are not made and problems not identified or rectified.

Physical injury and workplace assault in UK mental health trusts: An analysis of formal reports

Workplace violence is a significant problem for health service personnel, with National Health Service (NHS) workers subject to 68 683 physical assaults between 2013 and 2014. Almost 70% of assaults occur in the mental health sector, and although serious, non-fatal injury is rare, the individual and economic impact can be substantial. In the present study, we analysed mandatory incident reports from a national database to examine whether there were identifiable precursors to incidents leading to staff injury, and whether staff characteristics were associated with injury. In line with previous descriptions, we found injury occurred either as a direct result of patient assault or during physical interventions employed by staff to contain aggression. Importantly, we found little evidence from staff reports that patients' symptoms were driving aggression, and we found less evidence of patient perspectives among reports. We make several recommendations regarding the reporting of these events that could inform policy and interventions aimed at minimizing the likelihood of injury.

Opinions of forensic schizophrenia patients on the use of restraints: controversial legislative issues

The use of restraints is a controversial issue even though legal regulations may seem straightforward. Our aims were to evaluate the forensic patients' opinions on certain aspects of restraining and to compare these opinions with the current legal norms. Inpatients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder at the Department of Forensic Psychiatry in Popovača, Croatia, were asked the following questions about the use of mechanical restraints: (a) Should the patients' family be informed about the use of restraints? (b) Should the physician ask the patient whether to inform the family about the use of restraints? (c) Can the use of restraints be a kind of punishment for intentionally aggressive behavior toward people in their environment? and (d) Should restraints be used if the patient requests to be restrained? The patients were assessed according to the Temperament and character inventory and Positive and Negative Symptom Scale. Fifty-four forensic patients with a history of serious offences were included in the study. Their average age was 44.7 (± 8.39) years and the mean duration of their treatment was 6.6 (± 5.08) years. There was no predominant opinion on sharing the information with the family, but there was a relationship between the opinions and psychopathology and personality. Regardless of the patients' mental state and personality, the opinions on the voluntary use of restraints and the use of restraints as punishment for intentionally aggressive behavior were mainly positive. The patients' opinions suggest a need for the implementation of more specific guidelines in the area of forensic psychiatry.

The association for behavior analysis international position statement on restraint and seclusion

A task force authorized by the Executive Council of the Association for Behavior Analysis International (ABAI) generated the statement below concerning the techniques called restraint and seclusion. Members of the task force independently reviewed the scientific literature concerning restraint and seclusion and agreed unanimously to the content of the statement. The Executive Council accepted the statement, and it was subsequently approved by a two-thirds majority vote of the general membership. It now constitutes official ABAI policy. The position statement is posted on the ABAI Web site (www.abainternational.org/ABA/statements/RestraintSeclusion.asp). The purpose of the position statement is to provide guidance to behavior analysts and other professionals interested in the position of ABAI on these controversial topics. In extreme cases, abuses of procedures erroneously used in the name of behavior analysis are not defensible. On the other hand, behavior analysts acting ethically and in good faith are provided with guidelines for sound and acceptably safe practice. To the extent that behavior-analytic positions influence public policy and law, this statement can be presented to officials and lawmakers to guide informed decision making. At the conclusion of the document, a bibliography is provided of articles and presentations considered by one or more task force members in developing the position statement.

ASSAULTIVE BEHAVIOR: Know the Risks

1. Violence in our society is an increasing national concern, and violence in health-care settings reflects this trend. Assaultive episodes continue to increase in health-care settings due to various cultural, sociological, and political factors. 2. Present administrative and educational solutions to the problems of assault have failed to decrease the incidence and, in fact, may contribute to the increasing number of assaultive episodes. 3. Psychiatric staff can reduce incidence of assault by recognizing the risk factors and designing styles and interventions with these factors in mind. 4. Risks most often associated with assault are history of assault, diagnosis of dementia or organic brain disorder, intoxication from drugs or alcohol, and from the characteristics of the milieu and treatment itself.