State policy and funding of services to families of adults with serious and persistent mental illness

The Effectiveness of Psychoeducational Interventions Focused on Sexuality in Cancer

BACKGROUND

Although sexual health is a common concern for oncology patients, no practical guidelines to sexual intervention exist, perhaps because of a lack of systematic reviews or meta-analyses.

OBJECTIVES

The objectives of this study were to determine the effect size for psychoeducational intervention focused on sexuality and to compare effect sizes according to intervention outcomes and characteristic.

METHODS

We explored quantitative evidence for the effects of sexual intervention for cancer patients or partners by using the electronic databases. Among them, we considered 15 eligible articles.

RESULTS

The meta-analysis provided 133 effect sizes from 15 primary studies. The analysis revealed significant improvements after intervention, with a random-effects standardized mean difference of 0.75. Psychoeducational interventions focused on sexuality after cancer diagnosis were effective for compliance (2.40), cognitive aspect (1.29), and psychological aspect (0.83). Individual-based interventions (0.85) were more effective in improving outcomes than group approach and group combined with individual intervention. With regard to intervention providers, registered nurse only (2.22) and team approach including the registered nurse (2.38) had the highest effect size. Face-to-face intervention combined with telephone or the Internet (1.04) demonstrated a higher effect size than face-to-face (0.62) and telephone (0.58) independently.

CONCLUSION

We conducted an analysis of data from various subgroups of preexisting studies, obtained an overall estimate of the effectiveness of the intervention, and compared its effectiveness across variables that affect intervention outcomes.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

These results provide empirical data for evidence-based practice and inform the development of useful intervention programs through a comprehensive review and meta-analysis of the results.

Benefits and changes for family to family graduates

Family members of people with serious mental illnesses (SMI) need information and support to cope with the considerable stresses they experience. The Family to Family Education Program (FtF) is a structured, peer-led, 12-week information and support self-help class for such individuals. Previous research by Dixon et al. (2004) shows reduced subjective burden and increased empowerment among graduates. The present study sought to understand what processes take place during FtF participation that might lead to these benefits, as a first step in building a conceptual model of how FtF causes its effects, using semi-structured interviews with 31 FtF graduates. Qualitative data analysis suggested that new factual and emotional information from FtF shifts interviewees' understanding of their situation and that skills acquired through FtF then allow participants to incorporate these new perspectives into more adaptive behaviors. These changes led to both proximal and distal benefits for the FtF participants interviewed. The results are discussed in the context of self-help, stress-and-coping, and trauma recovery theories.

Getting "to the point": the experience of mothers getting assistance for their adult children who are violent and mentally ill

BACKGROUND

If individuals with mental illness become violent, mothers are most often victims, yet there is little available research addressing how, when, and from whom mothers seek help for themselves or their children when they become victims of this form of familial violence.

OBJECTIVES

To describe how mothers understood violence their adult children with mental illness exhibited toward them and to articulate the process mothers used to get assistance and access mental health treatment when this violence occurred.

METHOD

: Grounded theory methods were used to explore and analyze mothers' experiences of violence perpetrated by their adult children with mental illness. Eight mothers of adult children who are violent with a diagnosed Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders Axis I disorder participated in one to two open-ended interviews. Mothers were of diverse ethnic backgrounds.

RESULTS

Getting immediate assistance involved a period of living on high alert, during which mothers waited in frustration for their children to meet criteria for involuntary hospitalization. This was a chaotic and fearful period. Fear and uncertainty eventually outweighed mothers' abilities to manage their children's behavior, at which time they called the police or psychiatric evaluation teams who served as gatekeepers to mental health treatment. Mothers accepted the consequences of being responsible for their children's involuntary hospitalization or of being left home with their children if the gatekeepers did not initiate involuntary hospitalization.

DISCUSSION

Mothers can identify signs of decompensation in their children who are ill and recognize their need for hospitalization. They cannot, however, always access mental health treatment due to their children's refusal or failure to meet legal criteria for involuntary hospitalization. Mothers' inability to intervene early sometimes results in their own violent victimization.

Psychotic-spectrum illness and family-based treatments: a case-based illustration of the underuse of family interventions

Psychotic-spectrum illnesses (PSIs) are a significant cause of relational dysfunction and vocational disability, and result in substantial economic costs to society. The impact of family process, particularly "expressed emotion," on influencing the relapse rate of PSIs is now well documented. Over the last two decades, evidence has emerged supporting family-based treatments that decrease family stress (e.g., psychoeducation, training in problem solving, and improved communication), reduce the relapse rate, and improve medication adherence and social functioning among patients with PSIs. Family interventions are now included in the Expert Consensus Guidelines and the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research/National Institute of Mental Health (AHCPR/NIMH) Schizophrenia Patient Outcomes Research Team (PORT) recommendations for the treatment of schizophrenia. Nevertheless, family-based treatments are underused in the care of PSI patients. Building upon a case example, this article explores the barriers to implementing family interventions in the acute and outpatient treatment of these patients. The case discussion highlights the convergence of problems in the mental health care system with clinicians' typical capacities and practices, difficulties intrinsic to the nature of PSI itself, and the burden and stigmatization of families of the severely mentally ill. Taken together, these factors undercut the implementation of evidence-based family interventions.

Integrative model of caregiving: how macro and micro factors affect caregivers of adults with severe and persistent mental illness

The study tested an integrative model of caregiving by examining the effects of sociocultural characteristics, interpersonal relations, mental health service structure, consumers' symptoms, objective burden, and evaluation of service systems on the subjective experiences of caregivers. The sample consisted of 428 caregivers of adults with severe and persistent mental illness. Results from multiple regression analyses indicated that ethnicity was the most significant sociocultural factor on caregivers' worry, personal growth, and benefits. Caregivers enrolled in managed care plans worried more about their consumers' welfare and felt less gratified by their experiences than their counterparts from fee-for-service plans. Implications to and partnerships among caregivers and mental health service systems were discussed.

Sibling perspectives on severe mental illness: reflections on self and family

Through focus group interviews, participants were asked to describe the impact over time of having a sibling with severe mental illness. Transcript content was then organized into categories and overarching themes using grounded-theory analysis. Respondents' personal and interpersonal experiences are presented, along with suggestions for professional outreach and further research.

Strategies for leading the implementation of evidence-based practices

Many mental health authority and program administrators would like to implement behavioral health practices that have been demonstrated to be effective. Leading practice implementation involves promoting behavior change in health care providers. Reviews of the general medical literature on practice change conclude that education alone has little impact on practitioner behavior and that intensive, multifaceted interventions that attend to local circumstances have the greatest likelihood of affecting change. This article briefly reviews the literature on health care practice change and offers some strategy suggestions for administrators who are leading evidence-based practice implementation initiatives.

Family psychoeducation and schizophrenia: a review of the literature

Family psychoeducation has emerged as a treatment of choice for schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, major depression, and other disorders. More than 30 randomized clinical trials have demonstrated reduced relapse rates, improved recovery of patients, and improved family well-being among participants. Interventions common to effective family psychoeducation programs have been developed, including empathic engagement, education, ongoing support, clinical resources during periods of crisis, social network enhancement, and problem-solving and communication skills. Application of family psychoeducation in routine settings where patients having these disorders are usually treated has been limited, reflecting attitudinal, knowledge, practical, and systemic implementation obstacles. Through consensus among patient and family advocacy organizations, clinician training, and ongoing technical consultation and supervision, this approach has been implemented in routine clinical settings.

How siblings of those with severe mental illness perceive services and support

This study examines the complex and varied effects associated with having a brother or sister with a severe and persistent mental illness (SPMI) on the lives of adult siblings without chronic disability. Through five focus group interviews, 19 participants were asked to describe the impact that having a brother or sister with mental illness had on their lives. Codes and categories derived from the text of the transcribed interviews were grouped into broad themes. The respondents described the manifestations and challenges of contending with the SPMI of an adult sibling. They focused on gaps in services and communication with mental health providers, particularly with regard to timing of interventions and identifying readiness for treatment, as well as their own mental health needs. The article concludes with a discussion of the increased need for exchange of information and clarity of communication among family members and providers, following best practice guidelines that are well documented but not well implemented.

Family involvement: the key to opening locked wards and closed minds

Treatment under the traditional medical model has largely ignored the family's knowledge, expertise and potential therapeutic effects on hospitalized mentally ill people. This paper reviews the family's role as caregiver. It reports on an evaluation of services by caregivers. Its findings reflect views stated in other surveys in identifying the need for improvement in education and social support for families, greater family involvement in the patient's care and improvement in staff attitudes towards families. The study concludes by describing the development of a family support project in a Nursing Practice Development Unit in a secure ward and offers a blueprint for mental health nurses in facilitating the more active involvement of families in the recovery of their family members.

Patient and family support organization services should be included as part of treatment for the severely mentally ill

Patient and family support organizations for Axis I disorders have grown exponentially and expanded their services over the past two decades. However, psychiatrists generally have not referred patients and families to these organizations. The goal of this paper is to change clinicians' behavior so that they more commonly include support organization services in treatment plans for patients and families. We performed a literature review focusing on the changing needs of patients and their families as they relate to mental health teams, changes in the family therapy field, and concerns of both healthcare providers and related organizations about referral. Abundant anecdotal evidence and some scientific data suggest that patients and families are satisfied with these support organizations and the services they provide. However, support organizations need clinician referrals in order for their services to be integrated into a multi-modal quality treatment plan to achieve full treatment efficacy.