Acute Treatment of Malignant Colorectal Occlusion: Real Life Practice

Introduction

Colorectal cancer presents itself as acute bowel occlusion in 10–40% of patients. There are two main therapeutic approaches: urgent surgery and endoluminal placement self-expandable metallic stents (SEMS).

Aims and Methods

This study intended to better clarify the risk/benefit ratio of the above-mentioned approaches. We conducted a retrospective longitudinal multicenter study, including 189 patients with acute malignant colorectal occlusion, diagnosed between January 2005 and March 2013.

Results

Globally (85 patients – 35 bridge-to-surgery and 50 palliative), SEMS's technical success was of 94%. Palliative SEMS had limited clinical success (60%) and were associated with 40% of complications. SEMS occlusion (19%) was the most frequent complication, followed by migration (9%) and bowel perforation (7%). Elective surgery after stenting was associated with a higher frequency of primary anastomosis (94% vs. 76%; p = 0.038), and a lower rate of colostomy (26% vs. 55%; p = 0.004) and overall mortality (31% vs. 57%; p = 0.02). However, no significant differences were identified concerning postoperative complications. Regarding palliative treatment, no difference was found in the complications rate and overall mortality between SEMS and decompressive colostomy/ileostomy. In this SEMS subgroup, we found a higher rate of reinterventions (40% vs. 5%; p = 0.004) and a longer hospital stay (14, nine vs. seven, three days; p = 0.004).

Conclusion

SEMS placement as a bridge-to-surgery should be considered in the acute treatment of colorectal malignant occlusion, since it displays advantages regarding primary anastomosis, colostomy rate and overall mortality. In contrast, in this study, palliative SEMS did not appear to present significant advantages when compared to decompressive colostomy.

Cecal pneumatosis intestinalis in obstructing sigmoid cancer: emergency metallic stenting

An 85-year-old man presented with acute abdomen. Abdominal computed tomography revealed obstructing sigmoid colon cancer with pneumatosis intestinalis of the ascending colon. A surgeon was consulted for colonic obstruction with impending sepsis, who declined surgery considering the patient's advanced age. After discussion, the patient consented for emergent endoscopic metallic colonic stent placement. Complete obstruction of the lumen was observed at the sigmoid colon, followed by successful metallic colonic stent placement through the obstructed area. Normal stool passage was achieved after this, and the patient survived the 9-month follow-up period. Acute colonic obstruction from obstructive colon cancer requires emergency management, wherein the presence of pneumatosis intestinalis poses a high risk of cecal perforation. Emergency endoscopic colonic metallic stent placement provides an alternative therapy, particularly when surgery is not feasible, as described here.