Contemporary practice and short-term outcomes after liver resections in a complete national cohort

BACKGROUND

Improved outcome after liver resections have been reported in several series, but outcomes from national cohorts are scarce. Our aim was to evaluate nationwide practice and short-term outcomes after liver surgery in a universal healthcare system.

METHODS

A complete 5-year cohort of all liver resections from the Norwegian Patient Registry (NPR). Short-term outcomes were aggregated length of stay (a-LoS), reoperation and 90-day mortality.

RESULTS

Of 2118 liver resections, 605 (28.6%) were major, median age was 65 years and 1184 (55%) were male. Most common indication was metastatic disease (n = 1554; 73.4%) and primary malignancy (n = 328; 15.3%). Laparoscopy was performed in 513 (33.9%) of minor and 37 (6.1%) of major liver resections and increased over time to 39.1% of minor resections in 2016. Median a-LoS was 12 days for major resections, 8 days for open minor and 3 days for laparoscopic minor resections. Reoperation was reported for 159 (7.4%) and 90-day mortality for 44 (2.1%). Primary malignancy, male gender, elderly patients and major resections were associated with poorer outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

In a national cohort, laparoscopy is used for a substantial proportion of minor resections and was associated with reduced a-LoS. Risk factors for reoperation and mortality were male gender, increased age and major resection for primary malignancy.

[Technical aspects of laparoscopic liver surgery : Transfer from open to laparoscopic liver surgery]

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic surgery has become the standard for most visceral surgery procedures in many hospitals. Now, liver resections are also being increasingly carried out laparoscopically. The advantages of the laparoscopic technique have been demonstrated in numerous case series and in a recent randomized controlled trial.

AIMS

The aim of this review article is to present the available techniques for laparoscopic liver surgery (LLS).

METHODS

The technical variations reported in the literature as well as the own experience with LLS are reported.

RESULTS

Optimal patient and trocar positions are crucial for successful LLS and they are chosen according to the planned type of liver surgery: the literature offers several options in particular for surgery of the cranial and dorsal liver segments. As for open liver surgery, a restrictive volume management and the application of the Pringle maneuver are helpful to reduce intraoperative blood loss in LLS. In addition, several dissection techniques have been adopted from open liver surgery. The Cavitron Ultrasound Surgical Aspirator (CUSA™) is particularly suitable for parenchymal dissection close to major vascular structures, since it guarantees a meticulous parenchymal dissection with minimal vascular injuries.

CONCLUSION

The developments of minimally invasive surgery nowadays allow complex liver resections, which can mostly be performed comparable to open liver surgery. Hopefully, minimally invasive liver surgery will further develop in Germany in the near future, since it offers several advantages over open liver surgery.