Goal-Directed Fluid Therapy and Postoperative Outcomes in an Enhanced Recovery Program for Colorectal Surgery: A Propensity Score-Matched Multicenter Study

Perioperative Fluid Management

The medical complexity of the geriatric patients has been steadily rising. Still, as outcomes of surgical procedures in the elderly are improving, centers are pushing boundaries. There is also a growing appreciation of the importance of perioperative fluid management on postoperative outcomes, especially in the elderly. Optimal fluid management in this cohort is challenging due to the combination of age-related physiological changes in organ function, increased comorbid burden, and larger fluid shifts during more complex surgical procedures. The current state-of-the-art approach to fluid management in the perioperative period is outlined.

The effect of intraoperative goal-directed fluid therapy combined with enhanced recovery after surgery program on postoperative complications in elderly patients undergoing thoracoscopic pulmonary resection: a prospective randomized controlled study

BACKGROUND

To investigate the effect of intraoperative goal-directed fluid therapy (GDFT) combined with enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program on postoperative complications in elderly patients undergoing thoracoscopic pulmonary resection.

METHODS

Patients, more than 60 years old, undergoing thoracoscopic pulmonary resection for non-small cell lung cancer were randomly divided into GDFT group and restrictive fluid therapy (RFT) group. ERAS program was implemented in all patients. In GDFT group, the intraoperative fluid management was guided by stroke volume variation (SVV), cardiac index (CI), and mean arterial pressure (MAP) and maintained the SVV < 13%, CI > 2.5 L/min/m², and MAP > 65 mmHg. In RFT group, fluid maintenance with 2 ml/kg/h of balanced crystalloid solution, norepinephrine was used to maintain MAP > 65 mmHg. The incidence of postoperative acute kidney injury (AKI) and pulmonary and cardiac complications was compared.

RESULTS

Two-hundred seventy-six patients were enrolled and randomly divided into two groups (138 in each group). Compared to RFT group, the total intraoperative infusion volume, colloids infusion volume, and urine output were more; the dosage of norepinephrine was lower in GDFT group. Although there were no significant differences of postoperative AKI (GDFT vs RFT; 4.3% vs 8%; P = 0.317) and composite postoperative complications (GDFT vs RFT; 66 vs 70) between groups, but the postoperative increase degree of serum creatinine was lower in GDFT group than that in RFT group (GDFT vs RFT; 91.9 ± 25.2 μmol/L vs 97.1 ± 17.6 μmol/L; P = 0.048).

CONCLUSIONS

Under ERAS program, there was no significant difference of AKI incidence between GDFT and RFT in elderly patients undergoing thoracoscopic pulmonary resection. But postoperative increase degree of serum creatinine was lower in GDFT group.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04302467 on 26 February 2020.

Goal-Directed Fluid Therapy Does Not Impact Renal Outcomes in an Enhanced Recovery Program

BACKGROUND

Goal-directed fluid therapy (GDFT) has been proposed as a cornerstone for Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) programs, particularly among high-risk patients undergoing high-risk surgery. However, due to the increased advocacy of euvolemia before surgery, the utility of GDFT in the context of ERAS is being questioned. Our primary objective was to determine whether GDFT has any impact on daily postoperative renal outcomes among high-risk patients undergoing thoracic surgery in an ERAS program.

METHODS

All patients included in this study were high-risk with a baseline GFR below 90 mL/min/1.73m² and classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists status III/IV. Patients were categorized into two groups according to the intraoperative use of GDFT. Both groups were matched in a 1:1 fashion using propensity scores. Our renal outcomes included changes in daily glomerular filtration rates (GFRs) from post-anesthesia care unit through postoperative day 5.

RESULTS

In total 451 matched pairs were included in this analysis. Both groups had similar demographics and clinical characteristics. Patients treated with GDFT received more ephedrine (5mg [0-15] vs 0mg [0-15], P=0.03) and less volume of fluids (1163±484mL vs 1246±626mL, P=0.03) compared to those in the standard group. The incidence of AKI was similar in both groups (5.1% in the GDFT group vs 7.1% in non-GDFT group, P=0.57). Mixed effect analysis showed no significant differences in the trajectory of postoperative GFRs between both groups (P=0.59).

CONCLUSIONS

GDFT does not impact postoperative renal function compared to standard of care among high-risk patients in an ERAS program for thoracic pulmonary surgery.

Perioperative screening and management in elective complex hepatobiliary surgery

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Preoperative optimization and structured evidence-based perioperative care of a patient undergoing complex hepatobiliary (HPB) surgery are essential components in their management. Apart from advances in surgical technique, these perioperative measures have resulted in substantial reductions in morbidity and mortality. There hence, remains a continued need to have evidence-based updation in their management algorithm to ensure optimal outcomes.

RECENT FINDINGS

We present an evidence-based overview of the preoperative screening, optimization and perioperative management of patients undergoing complex HPB surgery.

SUMMARY

Perioperative care of these fragile patients is an evidence-based dynamic process. Optimal patient management undergoing HPB surgery requires risk assessment and stratification, and meticulous attention to the correction of underlying conditions. Despite this, postoperative morbidity remains relatively high and requires a cohesive multidisciplinary approach to minimize complications.