Absorbable Steroid-Impregnated Spacer After Endoscopic Sinus Surgery to Reduce Synechiae Formation

A Comparative Study of Interventions of Middle Turbinate Medialization in Endoscopic Sinus Surgery

The shape and position of middle turbinate play an important role in ventilation and drainage of the osteomeatal complex. The preservation of middle turbinate is one of the major goals of functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS). Middle turbinate intervention is essential to prevent obliteration of osteomeatal complex. The aim of this prospective study is to postulate which middle turbinate intervention is most effective and compare the results with conventional technique. In this randomized controlled study, 60 patients were included of the age group of 15-60 years who presented to the Otorhinolaryngology OPD of our institute between November 2017 to June 2019 with symptoms of chronic sinusitis with clinical and radiological evidence and who underwent FESS. The patients were divided into three group, Group A-Bolgerization (n = 20), Group B-Vicryl-conchopexy (n = 20) and Group C-No intervention, Control group (n = 20). The patency of middle meatus and the status of middle turbinate (medialized or lateralized or neither of the two) was ascertained postoperatively. Improvement in symptoms was also evaluated. The middle turbinate was medialized in 90% of Group A and 95% of Group B cases. The middle turbinate was neither medialized nor lateralized in 70% of patients in Group C. 70% of the patients in Group A and 80% of patients in Group B had complete improvement in symptoms with no recurrence of sinusitis compared to Group C in which only 50% of the patients had improvement in symptoms due to development of synechiae. Medialization of the middle turbinate should be considered as one of the essential steps of FESS as it helps in improving the surgical outcome.

Triamcinolone impregnated bioabsorbable middle meatus packing following endoscopic sinus surgery: a prospective randomized controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

Topical steroids are a mainstay in the treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). Multiple delivery methods of topical steroids following sinus surgery have been investigated. The purpose of this trial is to evaluate the effect of triamcinolone impregnated absorbable nasal packing on healing following endoscopic sinus surgery.

METHODS

This is a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. A total of 22 subjects (14 without polyps and 8 with polyps) were enrolled and were randomized to receive triamcinolone impregnated packing in one sinus cavity and normal saline soaked packing in the contralateral sinus cavity. Endoscopic evaluation was completed at the first two post-operative visits, and Lund-Kennedy (LK) endoscopic scores and perioperative sinus endoscopy (POSE) scores were calculated at each visit.

RESULTS

The results of this study found no significant difference in the appearance of the sinuses at either post-operative visit. Mean LK scores for the triamcinolone and saline groups at the first and second post-op visits were 2.09 ± 1.23 v. 2.18 ± 1.01 (p=0.79) and 1.79 ± 1.08 v. 1.68 ± 1.16 (p = 0.77) respectively. POSE scores were 2.59 ± 1.71 v. 2.68 ± 1.62 (p = 0.86) and 1.74 ± 1.15 v. 1.95 ± 1.22 (p = 0.59).

CONCLUSION

The results of this study demonstrated no significant difference in healing, crusting, polyps, edema, or secretions between the triamcinolone treated and non-triamcinolone treated sinuses. There were no adverse effects from use of triamcinolone impregnated absorbable packing. Further studies will be necessary to determine the impact of triamcinolone impregnated absorbable packing following endoscopic sinus surgery. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Drug delivery to the pediatric upper airway

Pediatric upper airway disorders are frequently life-threatening and require precise assessment and intervention. Targeting these pathologies remains a challenge for clinicians due to the high complexity of pediatric upper airway anatomy and numerous potential etiologies; the most common treatments include systemic delivery of high dose steroids and antibiotics or complex and invasive surgeries. Furthermore, the majority of innovative airway management technologies are only designed and tested for adults, limiting their widespread implementation in the pediatric population. Here, we provide a comprehensive review of the most recent challenges of managing common pediatric upper airway disorders, describe the limitations of current clinical treatments, and elaborate on how to circumvent those limitations via local controlled drug delivery. Furthermore, we propose future advancements in the field of drug-eluting technologies to improve pediatric upper airway management outcomes.

International consensus statement on allergy and rhinology: rhinosinusitis 2021

I.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

BACKGROUND: The 5 years since the publication of the first International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Rhinosinusitis (ICAR-RS) has witnessed foundational progress in our understanding and treatment of rhinologic disease. These advances are reflected within the more than 40 new topics covered within the ICAR-RS-2021 as well as updates to the original 140 topics. This executive summary consolidates the evidence-based findings of the document.

METHODS

ICAR-RS presents over 180 topics in the forms of evidence-based reviews with recommendations (EBRRs), evidence-based reviews, and literature reviews. The highest grade structured recommendations of the EBRR sections are summarized in this executive summary.

RESULTS

ICAR-RS-2021 covers 22 topics regarding the medical management of RS, which are grade A/B and are presented in the executive summary. Additionally, 4 topics regarding the surgical management of RS are grade A/B and are presented in the executive summary. Finally, a comprehensive evidence-based management algorithm is provided.

CONCLUSION

This ICAR-RS-2021 executive summary provides a compilation of the evidence-based recommendations for medical and surgical treatment of the most common forms of RS.

Intraoperative Applications of Topical Corticosteroid Therapy for Chronic Rhinosinusitis

OBJECTIVES

To provide an overview of recent techniques and technologies for the application of topical corticosteroid therapy immediately following endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) for chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS).

METHODS

A comprehensive search in the PubMed and Google Scholar databases was conducted to identify publications between January 2000 and December 2019 detailing clinical trials that have evaluated the efficacy and safety of intraoperative applications of topical corticosteroids for CRS.

RESULTS

A total of 21 articles, all of which highlight a variety of corticosteroid-infused products, including Propel corticosteroid-eluting stents, NasoPore, Merocel, SinuBand, calcium alginate, and bioresorbable gel-type products, are included for review. Propel stents are the only devices that have achieved level 1A evidence in terms of efficacy and have data to support their safety. The remaining products have shown mixed results in terms of efficacy and safety.

CONCLUSION

A wide range of techniques and technologies have been introduced to enhance the topical delivery of corticosteroids into the neosinuses after ESS for CRS. Regarding efficacy, there is level 1A evidence to support the use of Propel stents. Most of the remaining strategies show some degree of efficacy. Direct comparisons across the different strategies are limited owing to the varied uses of delivery vectors, corticosteroid choices, and doses of corticosteroids. Propel stents and SinuBand have sufficient data to support systemic and ocular safety, whereas the remaining products have limited data to support their safety.

Efficacy and safety of steroid-impregnated implants following sinus surgery: A meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this meta-analysis was to discuss the efficacy and safety of bioabsorbable steroid-impregnated implants following endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) for chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) patients.

METHODS

PubMed, Cochrane, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were comprehensively searched for studies comparing the experimental group (bioabsorbable steroid-impregnated implants) with the control group (bioabsorbable nonsteroid-impregnated implants). Lund-Kennedy scores, Perioperative Sinus Endoscopy (POSE) scores, polyp change, significant adhesion, middle turbinate lateralization, and adverse events were extracted from the final eligible studies. RevMan 5.3 software was used to analyze the data.

RESULTS

Eight randomized controlled trials were included in our analysis. The experimental group showed no significant differences from the control group in Lund-Kennedy scores (weighted mean difference (WMD) -0.40; 95% confidence interval [confidence interval (CI)] -1.05 to -0.62; P = 0.23). The experimental group had lower POSE scores compared with the control group, and there was a significant difference (WMD -1.88; 95% CI -2.32 to -1.43, P < 0.00001). The pooled results also demonstrated significant differences in polyp change, significant adhesion, and middle turbinate lateralization between the two groups. In addition, there was no significant difference with respect to adverse events between the two groups (odds ratio (OR) 0.38; 95% CI: 0.07 to 2.03; P = 0.26).

CONCLUSION

Bioabsorbable steroid-impregnated implants following ESS are effective in improving the endoscopic appearance of the healing process, and the safety profile appears to be favorable for the treatment of CRS patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

1A Laryngoscope, 2019.

Steroid vs. antibiotic impregnated absorbable nasal packing for wound healing after endoscopic sinus surgery: a randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled study

Introduction

Endoscopic sinus surgery can lead to crusting or synechiae formation, which can affect the healing process.

Objective

The aim of our study was to compare the influence of steroid versus antibiotic versus saline solution impregnated absorbable nasal spacers on postoperative wound healing and patient satisfaction.

Methods

Eighty patients, 33 women and 47 men, were enrolled in this study. At the end of the surgery, two pieces of 4 cm biodegradable material were applied in each ethmoid cavity. One of them was impregnated with saline solution, while the second one with steroid, or with antibiotic.

Results

We observed statistically significant differences in the Lund–Kennedy score between the control and both treatment groups: for the Antibiotic-group on days 10 and 30 (p = 0.009; p = 0.009) and for the Steroid-group on day 90 (p = 0.008). The extended endoscopic appearance of nasal mucosa indicated statistically significant differences in crust formation on day 10 comparing the steroid and control dressing (p = 0.025), in secretion type on days 10 and 30 comparing the antibiotic and control dressing (p = 0.003; p = 0.016) and additionally for steroid and control on day 90 (p = 0.046). On Day 90 we observed statistically significant differences in the absence of mucosal edema in the S-group compared to controls (p = 0.007).

Conclusions

The results of this study reveal the significant positive influence of steroid- and antibiotic-impregnated biodegradable nasal packing on the postoperative healing process and patient satisfaction compared to the saline soaked dressing.

Potential risk factors associated with the development of synechiae following functional endoscopic sinus surgery

PURPOSE

Synechiae formation in the middle meatus is the most common complication of functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS). Our objectives were to determine the incidence of synechiae occurring in a cohort of patients that have undergone FESS and identify characteristics associated with the development of synechiae postoperatively.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was conducted of CRS patients, with or without nasal polyposis, that had undergone bilateral FESS in the past. All patients had received non-absorbable spacers intraoperatively that were left in situ for 6 days. Demographic and preoperative variables were analyzed to identify synechiae risk factors. A multivariable logistic regression model was constructed to estimate the probability of developing synechiae, given demographic and preoperative variables.

RESULTS

Two hundred cases of bilateral FESS were retrospectively reviewed. Thirty-eight (19.0%, 95% CI 13.6-24.4%) patients developed synechiae. Individuals receiving primary FESS and nasal septal reconstruction (NSR) were strongly associated with the development of synechiae (OR 3.5, 95% CI 1.5-8.5; OR 3.0, 95% CI 1.3-6.9). A multivariable logistic regression model adjusting for NSR, recurrent FESS, concha bullosa, requirement of anterior and posterior ethmoidectomy, Lund-Mackay CT score and gender, identified the likelihood of developing synechiae with a sensitivity of 68%, specificity of 73%, positive predictive value of 38% and likelihood ratio of 2.5.

CONCLUSION

Patients undergoing primary FESS and NSR are at greatest odds of developing postoperative synechiae. Methods of assessing risk factors and preventing synechiae formation in this population should be evaluated in future prospective investigations.