Use of Adenosine to Facilitate Localization and Repair of Internal Carotid Artery Injury during Skull Base Surgery: A Case Report and Literature Review

Neuroanesthesiological management of carotid rupture in the endoscopic endonasal approach to the skull base

The medical literature on perioperative anesthesiological care of carotid artery rupture in endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery is practically non-existent. This type of neurovascular injury combines a relatively low incidence with a non-negligible morbidity and mortality. It also requires coordinated multidisciplinary treatment to minimize brain injury induced by inadequate therapeutic management. This article presents a series of clinical recommendations and an algorithm for perioperative neuroanesthesiological care of this serious complication. To prepare them, a group consisting of five neuroanesthesiologists, a neurosurgeon, an otorhinolaryngologist, a neuroradiologist, and a haematologist reviewed the limited literature on anesthesiological care of this complication. In addition, they adapted anesthesiological care in neurosurgical scenarios similar to the treatment of carotid artery rupture during endoscopic skull base surgery.

Internal Carotid Artery Injury During the Endoscopic Transsphenoidal Surgery of Pituitary Adenoma: Case Illustration, Introspection, and Systematic Review

Advances in endoscopic technology have made the endoscopic transsphenoidal approach the preferred approach for most surgeries of pituitary adenoma. The goal of these surgeries is to achieve cure, efficacy, and safety. Ample research has deliberated on the complications of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak, meningitis, visual deterioration and nasal crusting after endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery. Among these, injury to the internal carotid artery (ICA) is not common in transsphenoidal pituitary surgery and has an incidence that ranges from 0.1% to 1%. Though it is rare, the effects are devastating and associated with a high risk of mortality and morbidity. As a result, iatrogenic ICA injury is every neurosurgeon's nightmare. Available literature primarily consists of case reports on these injuries. The literature is lacking on preventive and management options. We present an unusual case of a patient who had a nonfunctioning pituitary macroadenoma and an unexpected injury to the internal carotid artery (ICA) during endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery. We share our successful experience with its management via emergency endovascular treatment with parent vessel occlusion for an iatrogenic ICA injury. We present the article to address the pragmatic questions and challenges faced by neurosurgeons experiencing this complication for the first time.

Internal carotid artery injury during endoscopic transsphenoidal pituitary surgery: risk factors, management

BACKGROUND

Transsphenoidal surgeons should try to avoid internal carotid artery (ICA) injury but also be prepared to manage it. We analyzed our experience with ICA injury during endoscopic transsphenoidal pituitary surgery and present associated risk factors and a management protocol.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed and analyzed the medical records of 1596 patients who underwent endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery for pituitary tumor resection in our institution from January 2009 to October 2022.

RESULTS

Six patients experienced an ICA injury. All received timely and effective hemostasis with immediate direct tamponade followed by endovascular treatment. No serious postoperative complications occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

We proposed a treatment plan for ICA injuries encountered during endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery and described our hemostasis process, methods of endovascular treatment, and means of postoperative follow-up in detail.

Endoscopic endonasal pituitary surgery: How we do it. Consensus statement on behalf of the EANS skull base section

Introduction and research question

The use of an endoscope in skull base surgery provides a panoramic close-up view over the intracranial structures from multiple angles with excellent illumination, thus permitting greater extent of resection of tumors arising at sellar area, mostly represented by PitNet - Pituitary neuroendocrine tumors, with higher likelihood of preserving vital/intact gland tissue. For this refined specialty of neurosurgery, unique skills need to be acquired along a steep learning curve.

Material and methods

EANS (European Association of Neurosurgical Societies) skull base section panelists were enrolled and 11 completed the survey: the goal was to provide a consensus statement of the endoscopic endonasal approach for pituitary adenoma surgery.

Results

The survey consisted of 44 questions covering demographics data (i.e., academic/non-academic center, case load, years of experience), surgical techniques (i.e., use of neuronavigation, preoperative imaging), and follow-up management.

Discussion and conclusions

In this paper we identified a series of tips and tricks at different phases of an endoscopic endonasal pituitary surgery procedure to underline the crucial steps to perform successful surgery and reduce complications: we took in consideration the principles of the surgical technique, the knowledge of the anatomy and its variations, and finally the importance of adjoining specialties experts.

The surgical management of intraoperative intracranial internal carotid artery injury in open skull base surgery-a systematic review

Intraoperative internal carotid artery (ICA) injury during open skull base surgery is a catastrophic complication. Multiple techniques and management strategies have been reported for endoscopic skull base surgery; however, the literature on managing this complication in open skull base surgery is limited. To perform a systematic review and give an overview of the different techniques described to manage this complication intraoperatively, a systematic review was conducted in PubMed, Ovid Medline, Ovid Embase and Scopus for literature published until July 2021. Titles and abstracts were screened. Studies meeting prespecified inclusion criteria were reviewed in full. PRISMA guidelines were strictly adhered to. Out of 4492 articles, only 12 articles could be included, reflecting an underreporting of open skull base ICA injuries. Multiple techniques can be used depending on the location and size of the injury as well as the surgeon's experience. Described techniques include the following: a primary repair via a micro-suture or nonpenetrating clips; wrapping or plugging; coating; occlusion of the parent artery with or without a bypass; packing with further endovascular management. A treatment algorithm is proposed.

Identifying Best Practices for Managing Internal Carotid Artery Injury During Endoscopic Endonasal Surgery by Consensus of Expert Opinion

BACKGROUND

Injury to the internal carotid artery (ICA) is a potentially devastating complication of endoscopic endonasal surgery (EES) that as many as 20% of skull base surgeons will experience at least once during their careers. Managing these injuries is difficult given the small operative field and poor visibility created by high-flow hemorrhage, and, at present, there is no consensus regarding best practices.

OBJECTIVE

This study seeks to consolidate the practices and opinions of experienced skull base surgeons from high-volume tertiary care centers into a single consensus statement regarding the best practices for managing ICA injuries during EES.

METHODS

A panel of 23 skull base surgeons (15 neurosurgeons and 8 otolaryngologists) completed a 3-round Delphi survey that assessed experiences and opinions regarding various aspects of ICA injury management. Mean (SD) years since fellowship completion was 15.6 (8.1) and all but 3 surgeons had experienced an ICA injury at least once.

RESULTS

The final consensus statement included 36 guidelines all of which were grouped under 1 of 4 categories: 11 statements concerned preoperative management and equipment for high-risk patients; 14 statements concerned hemorrhage control; 4 statements concerned definitive management; 7 statements concerned pharmacologic treatment, blood pressure, and neurophysiologic monitoring.

CONCLUSIONS

There are numerous decisions that a surgeon must make when facing a carotid artery injury. In our estimation, many questions can be grouped under 1 of the 4 categories outlined in our consensus statement and can be addressed by these findings.

When is a multidisciplinary surgical approach required in sinonasal tumours with cranial involvement?

The term “sinonasal tumours” includes a large spectrum of diseases, which are characterized by heterogeneous biological behavior and prognosis, and located in a critical anatomic area. Diagnosis and treatment of sinonasal tumours require the contribution of different disciplines. A narrative review was performed to highlight the role of surgeons in contributing to a multidisciplinary approach to sinonasal tumours. Diagnosis and staging of sinonasal tumours is challenging and requires collaboration between surgeons, radiologists, and pathologists. The identification and management of critical extensions (orbital or intracranial encroachment, vascular abutment or encasement) is fundamental for successful treatment. Most cases of advanced sinonasal tumours can undergo surgical intervention by an adequately trained otorhinolaryngological team. The contribution of neurosurgeons and oculoplastic surgeons is required in selected scenarios. In rare circumstances, multidisciplinary reconstructive strategies can be indicated for complex tissue defects. Furthermore, a multidisciplinary approach is pivotal in the management of perioperative complications. While surgery remains the mainstay of treatment, the role of non-surgical adjuvant or even exclusive treatments is constantly expanding.