1
|
Asghari A, Hines E, Mocharnuk J, Leis A, Wang ED. Update on the Selection Criteria of Plastic Surgery Residents: A Survey of Program Directors and Associate Program Directors. Ann Plast Surg 2024; 92:S327-S330. [PMID: 38369381 DOI: 10.1097/sap.0000000000003801] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/20/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Plastic and reconstructive surgery (PRS) is recognized as a highly competitive specialty. Since the first assessment of resident selection criteria in 2007, PRS residency programs have adopted holistic review processes and adapted to changes such as a decline in medical schools participating in the Alpha Omega Alpha Honor Medical Society as well as the recent transition to pass/fail grading for the United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) step 1 examination (Schultz et al. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open . 2020;8:e2892; Tadisina et al. Plast Reconstr Surg . 2017;139:330e-331e). This study was devised to evaluate current PRS residency criteria in light of these changes. METHODS An anonymous, 12-item, electronic survey was generated and distributed using Alchemer. An email was sent to 171 program directors (PDs) and associate program directors (APDs) of PRS residency programs. Survey questions were developed to collect data regarding respondent demographics and their desired criteria when assessing residency applicants. Complete responses were collected and analyzed with summary statistics and multivariate logistic regression using RStudio (version 1.3.109). RESULTS In total, 44 (25.7% response rate) of the 171 PDs and APDs completed the survey. Of the 16 programs (36.4%) with a USMLE cutoff score, 7 (43.8%) reported a range of 230 to 239 and 6 (37.5%) reported a range of 240 to 249. Without a score for step 1, the majority (48.8%) of respondents believe that step 2 scores will replace step 1 scores in terms of assessment criteria, and the content of recommendation letters was selected as the criterion with the greatest increase in weight (66.7%). In addition, 27.3% of programs require a step 2 score at the time of interview. The top 3 academic criteria in order of decreasing importance were the content of recommendation letters, clinical grades, and letter writers, whereas the top 3 nonacademic criteria were subinternship performance, maturity, and interview performance. CONCLUSIONS Plastic and reconstructive surgery remains a highly competitive specialty for residency applicants. Our findings suggest that Alpha Omega Alpha membership remains diminished in importance, whereas USMLE cutoff scores have increased. With recent changes in the step 1 grading system, PDs and APDs will rely more heavily on step 2 scores and the content of recommendation letters.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arya Asghari
- From the California Northstate University College of Medicine, Elk Grove
| | - Eric Hines
- Department of Plastic Surgery, University of California, Irvine, Orange, CA
| | | | - Amber Leis
- Department of Plastic Surgery, University of California, Irvine, Orange, CA
| | - Eric D Wang
- Department of Plastic Surgery, University of California, Irvine, Orange, CA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Vasan V, Cheng CP, Lerner DK, Pascual K, Mercado A, Iloreta AM, Teng MS. Machine Learning for Predictive Analysis of Otolaryngology Residency Letters of Recommendation. Laryngoscope 2024. [PMID: 38602257 DOI: 10.1002/lary.31439] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2023] [Revised: 03/06/2024] [Accepted: 03/25/2024] [Indexed: 04/12/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Letters of recommendation (LORs) are a highly influential yet subjective and often enigmatic aspect of the residency application process. This study hypothesizes that LORs do contain valuable insights into applicants and can be used to predict outcomes. This pilot study utilizes natural language processing and machine learning (ML) models using LOR text to predict interview invitations for otolaryngology residency applicants. METHODS A total of 1642 LORs from the 2022-2023 application cycle were retrospectively retrieved from a single institution. LORs were preprocessed and vectorized using three different techniques to represent the text in a way that an ML model can understand written prose: CountVectorizer (CV), Term Frequency-Inverse Document Frequency (TF-IDF), and Word2Vec (WV). Then, the LORs were trained and tested on five ML models: Logistic Regression (LR), Naive Bayes (NB), Decision Tree (DT), Random Forest (RF), and Support Vector Machine (SVM). RESULTS Of the 337 applicants, 67 were interviewed and 270 were not interviewed. In total, 1642 LORs (26.7% interviewed) were analyzed. The two best-performing ML models in predicting interview invitations were the TF-IDF vectorized DT and CV vectorized DT models. CONCLUSION This preliminary study revealed that ML models and vectorization combinations can provide better-than-chance predictions for interview invitations for otolaryngology residency applicants. The high-performing ML models were able to classify meaningful information from the LORs to predict applicant interview invitation. The potential of an automated process to help predict an applicant's likelihood of obtaining an interview invitation could be a valuable tool for training programs in the future. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE N/A Laryngoscope, 2024.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vikram Vasan
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, U.S.A
| | - Christopher P Cheng
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, U.S.A
| | - David K Lerner
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, U.S.A
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, U.S.A
| | - Karen Pascual
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, U.S.A
| | - Amanda Mercado
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, U.S.A
| | - Alfred Marc Iloreta
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, U.S.A
| | - Marita S Teng
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, U.S.A
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Salehi PP, Torabi SJ, Salehi P. In response to: Does Medical School Rank Impact Matching into Otolaryngology. Laryngoscope 2023; 133:E62. [PMID: 37477265 DOI: 10.1002/lary.30889] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2023] [Accepted: 05/17/2023] [Indexed: 07/22/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Parsa P Salehi
- Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeon, Nassif MD Plastic Surgery, Beverly Hills, California, USA
| | - Sina J Torabi
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, Irvine, Orange, California, USA
| | - Payoon Salehi
- Department of Earth and Planetary Science, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bougioukas L, Heiser A, Berg A, Polomsky M, Rokkas C, Hirashima F. Integrated cardiothoracic surgery match: Trends among applicants compared with other surgical subspecialties. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2023; 166:904-914. [PMID: 35461707 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2021.11.112] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2021] [Revised: 11/21/2021] [Accepted: 11/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to evaluate trends, qualifications, race/ethnicity, and gender of applicants to integrated cardiothoracic (CT I-6) residency programs and compare them with other competitive surgical subspecialties. METHODS Data were collected from the National Residency Matching Program, Electronic Residency Application Service, and Association of American Medical Colleges for thoracic surgery, orthopedic surgery, neurological surgery, otolaryngology (ENT), plastic surgery, and vascular surgery for 2010 t0 2020. Applicant gender, race/ethnicity, Alpha Omega Alpha (AOA) membership, United States Medical Licensing Examination scores, research productivity, and graduation from a top-40 medical school were analyzed. RESULTS From 2010 to 2020, CT I-6 experienced growth in postgraduate year 1 positions (280.0%), total applicants (62.2%), and US senior applicants (59.2%). No growth in CT I-6 positions (38) or programs (29) occurred from 2016 to 2020. CT I-6 had the lowest match rates among total applicants (31.7%) and US seniors (41.0%) in 2020. CT I-6 had fewer female applicants compared with ENT (P < .001) and plastic surgery (P < .001), but more than orthopedic surgery (P < .001). Although most CT I-6 US applicants self-identified as White (75.0%), there were more Asian applicants compared with applicants for orthopedic surgery (P < .001), ENT (P < .001), plastic surgery (P < .001), and neurological surgery (P < .01). Matched applicants averaged the highest Step 2-Clinical Knowledge scores (255.1), AOA membership (48.5%), and graduation rates from top-40 medical schools (54.5%). CONCLUSIONS Despite tremendous growth in positions, CT I-6 has consistently been the most difficult surgical subspecialty to match. CT I-6 has recently attracted an increasingly diverse applicant pool. For the 2019 to 2020 National Residency Matching Program Match Cycle, successful applicants had the highest Step 2-Clinical Knowledge scores, AOA membership rates, and graduation rates from a top-40 medical school among all surgical subspecialties examined.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lauren Bougioukas
- Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Larner College of Medicine at The University of Vermont, Burlington, Vt
| | - Alyssa Heiser
- Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Larner College of Medicine at The University of Vermont, Burlington, Vt
| | - Adrian Berg
- Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Larner College of Medicine at The University of Vermont, Burlington, Vt
| | - Marek Polomsky
- Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, The University of Vermont Medical Center, Burlington, Vt
| | - Chris Rokkas
- Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, The University of Vermont Medical Center, Burlington, Vt
| | - Fuyuki Hirashima
- Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, The University of Vermont Medical Center, Burlington, Vt.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Diaz A, Fenton D, Cardenas S, Dimitroyannis R, Singh A, Blair EA, Farnan JM, Shogan A. Advice and perspectives from navigating the couples match in otolaryngology: A qualitative pilot study. Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol 2023; 8:693-698. [PMID: 37342108 PMCID: PMC10278100 DOI: 10.1002/lio2.1058] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2022] [Revised: 03/18/2023] [Accepted: 03/31/2023] [Indexed: 06/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction There is a lack of qualitative analysis of the personal experiences within Couples Matching. In this qualitative study, we aim to record personal attitudes, reflections, and advice on experiences with the Couples Match process. Methods Our survey, consisting of two open-ended questions regarding the experience of Couples Matching, was distributed from January 2022 to March 2022 via email to 106 otolaryngology program directors across the nation. Survey responses were analyzed iteratively using the constructivist grounded theory to construct themes related to pre-match priorities, match-related stressors, and post-match satisfaction. Themes were developed inductively and refined iteratively as the dataset evolved. Results 18 Couples Match residents responded. In response to the first question: "What was the most difficult part of the process for you and/or your partner?", we identified the following themes: cost and financial burden, increased stress on the relationship, sacrificing top choices, and finalizing the match list. In response to the second question: "Using your experience as a previous applicant, what advice would you give to another couple planning on couples matching?", we identified four common themes: compromise, advocacy, dynamic conversations, and applying broadly. Conclusion We sought to understand the Couples Match process through the perspective of previous applicants. Analyzing the views and attitudes of Couples Match applicants, our study captures the most challenging aspects of the experience and highlights possible areas to improve advising for couples, including important factors to consider when applying, ranking, and interviewing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashley Diaz
- Pritzker School of MedicineUniversity of ChicagoChicagoIllinoisUSA
| | - David Fenton
- Pritzker School of MedicineUniversity of ChicagoChicagoIllinoisUSA
| | | | | | - Armaan Singh
- Pritzker School of MedicineUniversity of ChicagoChicagoIllinoisUSA
| | - Elizabeth A. Blair
- Department of Surgery, Section of OtolaryngologyUniversity of Chicago MedicineChicagoIllinoisUSA
| | | | - Andrea Shogan
- Department of Surgery, Section of OtolaryngologyUniversity of Chicago MedicineChicagoIllinoisUSA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Lewis M, Williams K, Timpe J, Corbo S, Wilbanks M, Hayes AK. The 2022 and 2023 Emergency Medicine Residency Match: A Cautionary Tale. Cureus 2023; 15:e38601. [PMID: 37284385 PMCID: PMC10239656 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.38601] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/05/2023] [Indexed: 06/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction The emergency medicine (EM) match has undergone significant shifts in 2022 and 2023. While variation in specialty fill rates is expected over time, EM programs noted a significant increase in open positions starting in 2022. Utilizing National Resident Matching Program (NRMP) data over a 10-year period, we identified significant deviations in the emergency medicine match. Methods Shewhart control charts were used to plot the match results over time. A 10-year sample was used to establish the baseline value. From this value, the upper and lower control limits were established. Residency program expansion, decreasing applicant numbers, and changing applicant types were evaluated to detect any non-random changes to the process. Results While the number of EM PGY-1 positions added over time was within the expected range, both the number of unmatched positions and the change in the number of total US MD applicants were outside of this range and are considered to be "out of control." Conclusion It is not yet clear which contributing causes may underlie this sudden change. Several potential etiologies exist, including mismatches in supply and demand for positions, changes in perceptions of the specialty, the effects of COVID-19, and changing workforce needs. Historically similar experiences affecting other specialties, including anesthesia and radiation oncology, are analyzed. Potential solutions for returning to the necessary and usual success of the emergency medicine specialty match are explored.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mary Lewis
- Emergency Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, USA
| | | | - Joshua Timpe
- Emergency Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, USA
| | - Samuel Corbo
- Emergency Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, USA
| | - Morgan Wilbanks
- Emergency Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, USA
| | - Alisa K Hayes
- Emergency Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Bourdillon AT, Salehi PP, Wride M, Salehi P, Torabi S, Heiser A, Shah HP, Azizzadeh B, Judson B, Lee YH. Trends in Residency Applicant Volume in Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery and Peer Specialties. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2022:34894221120303. [PMID: 36031814 DOI: 10.1177/00034894221120303] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the 2020 to 2021 Otolaryngology residency application cycle in the context of recent trends. STUDY DESIGN Retrospective data analysis. SETTING Disruptions caused by the COVID-19 pandemic may significantly alter trends among residency applicants, especially in highly competitive and/or smaller specialties. METHODS Applicant and residency statistics from Electronic Residency Application Service (ERAS) and National Residency Matching Program (NRMP) were extracted from the 2016 to 2021 and 2011 to 2021, respectively. Trends in Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (OHNS) were compared to peer specialties (PS) including Dermatology, Neurological Surgery, Orthopedic Surgery, and Integrated Pathway for Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery (PRS). The ratio of the number of applicants per positions (APP) was used to reflect the degree of competition. RESULTS Between 2011 and 2021, the number of OHNS programs and positions expanded less than those of PS and General Surgery. The increase in the APP ratio was significantly greater for OHNS compared to those Dermatology, Orthopedic Surgery, General Surgery and all PGY1 residency positions for both US MD and all applicants (P < .01 for each). OHNS expansion of US MD (P = .046), but not all applicants (P = .169), outgrew that of Neurosurgery. CONCLUSION The 2020 to 2021 cycle affected by the COVID-19 pandemic saw a continuation of the recent trend in the expanding OHNS applicant pool. OHNS remains one of the specialties with the highest APP ratio and has observed a significant growth compared to PS since 2018. Understanding and anticipating trends in residency application cycles is critical for designing processes to optimize the best fit between applicants and programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Parsa P Salehi
- Department of Surgery, Division of Otolaryngology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Mitchel Wride
- Yale School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Pauniz Salehi
- Department of Nutritional Sciences, College of Human Ecology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA
| | - Sina Torabi
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA
| | - Alyssa Heiser
- Larner College of Medicine, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA
| | - Hemali P Shah
- Yale School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Babak Azizzadeh
- Center for Advanced Facial Plastic Surgery, Beverly Hills, CA, USA.,Division of Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Benjamin Judson
- Department of Surgery, Division of Otolaryngology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Yan Ho Lee
- Department of Surgery, Division of Otolaryngology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| |
Collapse
|