The health service contact patterns of people with psychotic and non-psychotic forms of severe mental illness in New South Wales, Australia: A record-linkage study

Supports that help me to live well in the community: experiences of people living with schizophrenia

INTRODUCTION

People with schizophrenia are more likely to be hospitalised than any other psychiatric diagnosis. Occupational therapists working in mental health are often required to assess and recommend supports that will assist people with schizophrenia to live successfully in the community. There is little research exploring consumer perspectives regarding the support they find useful to stay out of the hospital. The aim of this study was to explore what supports people living with schizophrenia identify as helping them to live in the community and stay out of the hospital.

METHOD

Qualitative data were collected via semi-structured interviews with adult consumers (N = 18) diagnosed with schizophrenia. Data were thematically analysed using constant comparative analysis methods. Inductive analysis was followed by a deductive phase of analysis.

FINDINGS

Participants highlighted personal-, occupational- and environmental-focused supports. Person-focused supports addressed cognitive and psychological needs. Occupation-focused supports included assisting people to manage daily life with a mental illness; engage in social activities; and engage in meaningful activities. Environment-focused supports included access to financial security; accommodation security; and community of choice. In addition to types of support, participants highlighted the importance of quality of support including the need for flexible; timely; and non-judgemental support.

CONCLUSION

These results emphasise the multifaceted nature of support required by people living with schizophrenia to stay out of the hospital. Both type and quality of support are important. People in this study were able to clearly articulate the types and qualities of support that were important to them. Occupational therapists may benefit from greater collaboration with consumers during assessments of support needs and the development of recommendations. Further exploration of how occupational therapists identify people's multifaceted support needs is required.

The tertiary service for psychosis: Holistic recommendations for people with complex psychosis

OBJECTIVE

To describe (i) the clinical characteristics of individuals referred to the Tertiary Referral Service for Psychosis (TRSP) and (ii) the recommendations TRSP made for future treatment across psychopharmacological and other intervention domains.

METHOD

Retrospective audit of clinical data collected during the assessment process of individuals who accessed TRSP between 02/06/2020 and 31/12/2022. Categories of recommendations made following collaborative care planning comprised psychopharmacological, neuropsychological, psychological, psychosocial, physical health, substance misuse and other domains.

RESULTS

Eighty-two individuals were included, with diagnoses most commonly of schizophrenia (54.9%) and schizoaffective disorder (30.5%). The median PANSS score was 88.0 (73-100). Social occupational functioning was very poor (SOFAS M = 37.0, SD = 15.1). Cognitive functioning was poor (RBANS: M = 74.6; SD: 15.0). 67.1% had physical health comorbidities, with high prevalence of smoking (52.4%) and substance misuse (25.6%). Psychopharmacological recommendations (made for 81.7%) included clozapine trial (25.6%), clozapine dose change/augmentation (22.0%) and rationalisation of polypharmacy (12.2%). Neuropsychological (73.2%), psychological (39.0%) and psychosocial (85.4%) recommendations included access to cognitive remediation, psychological therapy and disability support. Physical health and substance misuse interventions were recommended for 91.5% and 20.7%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Individuals referred to the TRSP had marked clinical and functional impairments. Holistic collaborative care planning complemented psychopharmacological interventions with psychological, psychosocial and physical healthcare recommendations.

Hospital service utilisation of people previously hospitalised with different subtypes of psychotic disorder: A record linkage study

OBJECTIVE

Little research has examined the physical and mental comorbidities, and health service use patterns, of people diagnosed with psychotic disorder subtypes other than schizophrenia spectrum disorders. This study aims to examine the physical and mental comorbidities, and subsequent hospital service use patterns, of individuals previously hospitalised with various psychotic disorder subtypes using linked health service data.

METHODS

We included individuals hospitalised with a psychotic disorder in New South Wales, Australia, between 1 July 2002 and 31 December 2014 (N = 63,110). We examined the demographic profile of the cohort and rates of subsequent acute hospital care and ambulatory mental health service use. We compared the rates of subsequent hospital admissions, emergency department presentations and ambulatory mental health treatment days of people hospitalised with different psychotic disorder subtypes to people hospitalised with schizophrenia spectrum disorders using Poisson regression.

RESULTS

People most recently hospitalised with mood/affective disorders and psychotic symptoms had a higher rate of subsequent hospital admissions than those most recently hospitalised with schizophrenia spectrum and delusional disorders (adjusted incident rate ratio = 1.06; 95% confidence interval = [1.02, 1.10]), while people most recently hospitalised with drug-induced and other organic (adjusted incident rate ratio = 1.19; 95% confidence interval = [1.12, 1.27]) and acute psychotic disorders (adjusted incident rate ratio = 1.10; 95% confidence interval = [1.03, 1.18]) had more subsequent emergency department presentations than those most recently hospitalised with schizophrenia spectrum and delusional disorders. All three groups had fewer subsequent mental health ambulatory days than those most recently hospitalised with schizophrenia spectrum and delusional disorders (adjusted incident rate ratios = 0.85-0.91).

CONCLUSION

The health profiles and subsequent hospital service use patterns of people previously hospitalised with different psychotic disorder subtypes are heterogeneous, and research is needed to develop targeted health policies to meet their specific health needs.