Beyond formalized plans: User involvement in support in daily living - users' and support workers' experiences

In the centre or caught in the middle? - Social workers' and healthcare professionals' views on user involvement in Coordinated Individual Plans in Sweden

Fragmentation of social service and healthcare services has been given attention in many countries and a variety of strategies and models are used in attempts to remedy the problem. In a parallel development, demands have been made that users/patients should have more influence over their own care, and research has shown that user involvement can support the recovery process. This article focuses on how professionals view user involvement in collaborative efforts in care planning, using the Coordinated Individual Plan (CIP) in Sweden as an example. Since 2009, social service and healthcare agencies are required to draw up CIPs when they are judged to be needed, with the purpose of improving the care process. An additional purpose is to increase users' involvement in their own care. Semi-structured interviews were conducted in 2019 with 20 professionals working within social service and healthcare agencies for people with mental health and/or substance abuse problems in the Stockholm region. Analysis was by qualitative content analysis. Findings show that professionals study experience ambivalence concerning user involvement in care planning. On the one hand, they support the user´s own demands of services and, on the other hand, they correct the user´s demands to fit the range of services and organisation of care. The user/patient's position is expressed as vulnerable, caught between caregivers who often safeguard their organisational duties and economical restrictions. These findings reflect the conflict predicted by Lipsky's theory of street-level bureaucracy. Professionals are expected to act as advocates for the user/patient, while at the same time exercising a controlling and gatekeeping function. The question is raised whether a model such as CIP provides sufficiently for factors which can counterbalance the power of the professionals relative to the user/patient in care planning.

Diversity, Complexity and Ordinality: Mental Health Services Outside the Institutions-Service Users' and Professionals' Experience-Based Practices and Knowledges, and New Public Management

In conjunction with the dismantling of psychiatric hospitals, social workers have been commissioned to help service users in their daily living in their homes and in the community. The consequences of these changes for experience-based knowledge and practices in their contexts remain relatively unknown. In this study, eighteen service users and the social workers they described as helpful for them were interviewed. The interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using Thematic Analysis. The following themes emerged: “Here, there and everywhere”, “Doing, being, becoming”, “Talking” and “Order, planning and improvisation” concerning the contradictions service users and professionals mentioned about their practices and the conditions imposed by managerial methods connected to New Public Management. Finally, “Spontaneous planned complexity” was chosen as our overarching theme to characterize the new knowledge and practices which have been developed. The displacement of the place for the encounter and the introduction of non-medicalized professions have allowed community-based practices and thus the co-creation and emergence of new knowledge about the service users as persons and the professionals as qualified professionals. The challenge remains for managers to have trust in their colleagues and not impose rigid rules, schematized methods, and repeated controls.