Sequential TPF chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced head and neck cancer--a retrospective analysis of toxicity and outcomes

Feasibility of concurrent chemoradiotherapy with high-dose cisplatin after induction TPF chemotherapy in head and neck cancer: a critical review of the literature and the experience of the European Institute of Oncology

Many concerns are related to the idea that the acute toxicity of induction chemotherapy (IC) performed with TPF (docetaxel, cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil) could reduce the ability to deliver the subsequent standard concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in head and neck cancer patients. We performed a critical review of the literature on the toxicity profile of the standard CRT administered after the IC with TPF. A total of 13 papers (including 950 patients) were selected. Results showed that most patients were treated with an adequate radiation total dose although a significant proportion of them (from 15 to 30%) completed the planned treatment with a delay of more than 5 days. A minority of patients were able to be treated with three cycles of concurrent cisplatin, but only few papers reported how many of patients reached the cumulative total dose of almost 200 mg/m² cisplatin. The rate of deaths due to treatment-related toxicity varied from 0 to 9% (median and mean 2%). Two prospective trials stopped patient enrollment due to acute treatment-related toxicity and because a low number of patients were able to undergo the planned full schedule of cisplatin during the CRT, respectively. Retrospective analysis of 45 patients treated at our institute showed that this schedule was feasible with manageable side effects. In conclusion, the literature data did not provide homogeneous information on the feasibility of the standard CRT after induction TPF. A more uniform data collection of treatment-related toxicity will be helpful in better selecting the patients who might adequately tolerate this multimodality strategy.

Study of diffusion weighted MRI as a predictive biomarker of response during radiotherapy for high and ntermediate risk squamous cell cancer of the oropharynx: The MeRInO study

Introduction and background

A significant proportion of patients with intermediate and high risk squamous cell cancer of the oropharynx (OPSCC) continue to relapse locally despite radical chemoradiotherapy (CRT). The toxicity of the current combination of intensified dose per fraction radiotherapy and platinum based chemotherapy limits further uniform intensification. If a predictive biomarker for outcomes from CRT can be identified during treatment then individualised and adaptive treatment strategies may be employed.

Methods/design

The MeRInO study is a prospective observational imaging study of patients with intermediate and high risk, locally advanced OPSCC receiving radical RT or concurrent CRT Patients undergo diffusion weighted MRI prior to treatment (MRI_1) and during the third week of RT (MRI_2). Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurements will be made on each scan for previously specified target lesions (primary and lymph nodes) and change in ADC calculated. Patients will be followed up and disease status for each target lesion noted. The primary aim of the MeRInO study is to determine the threshold change in ADC from baseline to week 3 of RT that may identify the sub-group of non-responders during treatment.

Discussion

The use of DW-MRI as a predictive biomarker during RT for SCC H&N is in its infancy but studies to date have found that response to treatment may indeed be predicted by comparison of DW-MRI carried out before and during treatment. However, previous studies have included all sub-sites and biological sub-types. Establishing ADC thresholds that predict for local failure is an essential step towards using DW-MRI to improve the therapeutic ratio in treating SCC H&N. This would be done most robustly in a specific H&N sub-site and in sub-types with similar biological behaviour. The MeRInO study will help establish these thresholds in OPSCC.

[Observance and results of concurrent chemoradiotherapy after induction chemotherapy by docetaxel, cisplatin and 5-fluoro-uracil for locally advanced head and neck cancers]

PURPOSE

Retrospectively evaluate the safety, feasibility and efficacy of concomitant chemoradiotherapy after induction chemotherapy by docetaxel, cisplatin and 5-fluoro-uracil for locally advanced head and neck cancers.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients' data from three radiotherapy centres in South of France, with locally advanced head and neck cancers, and treated between December 2007 and July 2013 by concomitant chemoradiotherapy, after induction chemotherapy by docetaxel, cisplatin and 5-fluoro-uracil, were analysed. Adverse effects were graduated according to CTCAE v3.0 criteria. Overall survival and disease-free survival were calculated according to Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

One hundred and sixty-eight patients, mostly oropharynx (38%) T4 (46%) N2 (54%) tumors, received, after induction chemotherapy by docetaxel, cisplatin and 5-fluoro-uracil, a concomitant chemoradiotherapy with platin or cetuximab, which delivered 66 to 70Gy. Grade 3-4 adverse effects were less frequent in the group of patients who received cisplatin (with or withour 5-fluoro-uracil) at 100mg/m(2) each 21 days compared to cetuximab (radiomucositis: 32.5% vs 61%, P=0.018; radioepithelitis: 13% vs 61 %, P<0.0001). Chemopotentiation was incomplete for 21% of patients without impacting survival. Two years overall survival and disease-free survival were respectively of 81% and 64%. Lymph nodes status and WHO status significantly influenced these survivals (overall survival 84% if N<3 vs 56% if N3, P=0.017 and 85 % if WHO status ≤ 1 vs 50% if WHO status>1, P=0.006; disease-free survival 66% if N<3 vs 47% if N3, P=0.046).

CONCLUSION

The association of induction chemotherapy by docetaxel, cisplatin and 5-fluoro-uracil and concomitant chemoradiotherapy shows satisfying results with an acceptable toxicity. The terms of the chemopotentiation and its superiority to a single concomitant chemoradiotherapy treatment still remain to be clarified.

Treatment outcome for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma in a developing country: University Malaya Medical Centre, Malaysia from 2003-2010

BACKGROUND

Head and neck cancer (HNC) is the eighth most common cancer as estimated from worldwide data. The incidence of HNC in Peninsular Malaysia was reported as 8.5 per 100,000 population. This study was aimed to determine the treatment outcomes for HNC patients treated in the Oncology Unit of University Malaya Medical Centre (UMMC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All newly diagnosed patients with squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck (HNSCC) referred for treatment to the Oncology Unit at UMMC from 2003-2010 were retrospectively analyzed. Treatment outcomes were 5-year overall survival (OS), cause specific survival (CSS), loco-regional control (LRC) and radiotherapy (RT) related side effects. Kaplan-Meier and log rank analyses were used to determine survival outcomes, stratified according to American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage.

RESULTS

A total of 130 cases were analysed. Most cases (81.5%) were at late stage (AJCC III-IVB) at presentation. The 5-year OS for the whole study population was 34.4% with a median follow up of 24 months. The 5-year OS according to AJCC stage was 100%, 48.2%, 41.4% and 22.0% for stage I, II, III and IVA-B, respectively. The 5-year overall CSS and LCR were 45.4% and 55.4%, respectively. Late effects of RT were documented in 41.4% of patients. The most common late effect was xerostomia.

CONCLUSIONS

The treatment outcome of HNSCC at our centre is lagging behind those of developed nations. Efforts to increase the number of patients presenting in earlier stages, increase in the use of combined modality treatment, especially concurrent chemoradiotherapy and implementation of intensity modulated radiotherapy, may lead to better outcomes for our HNC patients.

Efficacy and safety of a cisplatin and paclitaxel induction regimen followed by chemoradiotherapy for patients with locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this phase II trial was to evaluate the tolerability, safety, and efficacy of a non-5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-based induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for patients with locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC).

METHODS

Sixty patients with stage III to IV HNSCC were treated with induction paclitaxel and cisplatin (TP; paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2) and cisplatin 80 mg/m(2) , 3 cycles) followed by CRT (cisplatin 100 mg/m(2) ; D1, 22, and 43 of radiotherapy).

RESULTS

Fifty-six patients (93.3%) completed 3 cycles of induction TP (no treatment-related deaths), 52 (86.7%) completed definitive CRT per protocol (adverse event [AE] grade ≥2 in 53.3%). The overall response rate after induction TP was 82.5% for patients with resectable disease and 55.5% for unresectable disease (p = .023), and complete response (CR) rate after CRT was 70.0% for patients with resectable disease and 30.0% for unresectable disease (p = .005).

CONCLUSION

Induction TP followed by cisplatin based-CRT was well-tolerated, safe, and had high overall response rate in selected patients with locally advanced HNSCC. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck 38: E970-E980, 2016.