Contemporary Issues in Cardiac Rehabilitation: Implications for Occupational Therapists

Since the acceptance of the beneficial effects of early mobilisation for patients after myocardial infarction, cardiac rehabilitation has undergone dramatic change. Highly structured and inflexible exercise programmes have given way to flexible and comprehensive modern programmes, which embrace the use of education, counselling and risk factor modification principles. Contemporary skills required by occupational therapists include being able to adapt services to a vast array of cardiac conditions, foster risk factor modification, enhance compliance, tailor education to learning and coping styles, assess the patient's level of risk and need for rehabilitation, and provide accelerated and alternate programmes. This article discusses the principles, directions and benefits of modern cardiac rehabilitation and the implications for occupational therapists.

Early mobilization and discharge of patients with acute myocardial infarction. A prospective study using risk indicators and early exercise tests

Consecutive patients (n=184) surviving 48 hours in a coronary care unit were divided into one rapidly (RM) (n=55, 30%) and one conventionally mobilized (CM) group (n=129, 70%). The selection of RM patients was based on the absence of five early risk indicators (RI), reflecting electrical and mechanical heart dysfunction. During after-care, five late RIs were evaluated, including a submaximal bicycle exercise test to 50 W, which excluded nine (16%) additional patients from the RM group. After excluding four patients for non-cardiac reasons, the remaining 42 RM patients were rapidly mobilized and discharged after a mean of nine days, in contrast to a mean of 19 days in the CM group, comprising 121 patients. No RM patient dies in hospital and only one patient died during a six-month follow-up, compared to 17 (p less than 0.01) and 28 (p less than 0.01) patients respectively, in the CM group. Both reinfarction and mortality increased with the number of positive RIs. The early exercise test excluded four patients from the RM group. Altogether 22 of 45 patients showed some abnormality during exercise. Half of these 22 patients were readmitted due to cardiac complications during the follow-up period. These findings indicate that it is possible to identify a group of patients with AMI suitable for early discharge, and that an early exercise test in selected good risk patients is safe and identifies a group prone to complications during the early follow-up period.

Effects of end-of-month admission on length of stay and quality of care among inpatients with myocardial infarction

PURPOSE

We studied whether transfer of care when house staff and faculty switch services affects length of stay or quality of care among hospitalized patients.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis in 976 consecutive patients admitted with myocardial infarction from 1995 to 1998. Patients who were admitted within 3 days of change in staff were denoted end-of-month patients.

RESULTS

Of 782 eligible patients, 690 (88%) were admitted midmonth and 92 (12%) at the end of the month. The median length of stay was 7 days for midmonth and 8 days for end-of-month patients (P = 0.06). End-of-month admission was an independent predictor of length of stay in multivariate models. In addition, a significant difference in length of stay was noted between patients admitted at the beginning and end of the academic year. There were no statistically significant differences in the use of aspirin, beta-blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, or lipid-lowering agents at discharge between midmonth and end-of-month patients. Mortality and in-hospital adverse events did not differ between the two groups, with the possible exception of a greater incidence of acute renal failure in the end-of-month patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Although admission during the last 3 days of the month is an independent predictor of length of stay, it does not have a large effect on quality of care among patients with myocardial infarction.

Length of hospital stay after acute myocardial infarction in the Myocardial Infarction Triage and Intervention (MITI) Project registry

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to identify current trends in length of stay in patients with an acute myocardial infarction and to evaluate which demographic, clinical, procedural and hospital-related factors explain the variation and reduction in length of stay observed during the study period.

BACKGROUND

Hospital length of stay is an important contribution to cost of care. Previous studies of length of stay after acute myocardial infarction have been performed largely on administrative data bases and do not reflect current practice patterns.

METHODS

We used univariate and multivariate models to evaluate which demographic, clinical and administrative factors influenced length of stay in 11,932 patients with acute myocardial infarction admitted to 19 Seattle-area hospitals between 1988 and 1994.

RESULTS

Length of hospital stay decreased from (mean +/- SD) 8.5 +/- 8.2 to 6.0 +/- 5.8 days during the study period. Demographic and clinical characteristics known at the time of admission explained only 6% of variation in length of stay, whereas hospital complications, procedure use and type of admitting hospital explained an additional 27% of variation. The use of primary angioplasty and early diagnostic coronary angiography predicted a shorter length of stay; however, none of the measured variables explained the 29% reduction in length of stay that occurred between 1988 and 1994.

CONCLUSIONS

Although hospital complications, procedure use and hospital characteristics are important predictors of length of hospital stay, none of these factors explains the 29% reduction in length of stay observed in postmyocardial infarction patients between 1988 and 1994. It is likely that unmeasured economic and administrative factors play important roles in influencing hospital length of stay.

The use and misuse of performance testing

It is important to consider what performance testing can tell us and what it cannot. A performance test is a "snapshot" which says something about the ability of a patient to execute a specific task. This snapshot is reflective of only that moment in time. If there are no other available tests or there are no normative data from which to formulate a sound clinical plan, the test is at best misleading and at worst completely useless. The drive to utilize performance testing has resulted from an increased demand for accountability and objectivity. It is valuable to keep in mind, however, that if the correct questions are asked and the appropriate equipment and staff are available, performance testing can have an important place in rehabilitation of the spine.

Issues in contemporary cardiac rehabilitation: a historical perspective

Cardiac rehabilitation consists of exercise, psychosocial support and education and is prescribed most often for patients with coronary heart disease. Its purpose is to facilitate readaptation to normal life through the achievement of maximal functional capability and to reduce heart disease risk factors. It began historically with progressive ambulation after myocardial infarction and by 1980 became a standardized inpatient therapy performed according to a stepped procedure. Predischarge exercise testing was added and has become a meaningful contribution to the concept of risk stratification after an acute coronary event. Rehabilitation has subsequently become part of the outpatient environment and is delivered by multiple models. Meta-analyses have shown that rehabilitation reduces overall and cardiovascular deaths by about 20% and sudden death by about 37% during the year after an acute myocardial infarction. The significance of this, however, must now be modulated by the dynamic role of aggressive coronary intervention. Selection for such intervention has become an important adjunctive aspect of rehabilitation. Newer findings suggest that those stratified at low risk will benefit most by the modification of coronary risk factors, and that patients previously thought to be poor candidates for rehabilitation (such as those with significant left ventricular dysfunction and low work capacity) may experience substantial relative functional benefit. Beyond risk stratification, important contemporary issues include surveillance of patients after angioplasty, the effectiveness of rehabilitation in the attenuation or reversal of both native and vein graft atherosclerosis and consideration of such currently emphasized end points as quality of life and economic evaluation.

Length of hospital stay after acute myocardial infarction

A number of trials show that long stay in hospital after an acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is not necessary for many patients and that stays of three-ten days may be adequate. All patients aged under 70 years with a diagnosis of AMI admitted to the seven public hospitals in the Lower Hunter Region of New South Wales are monitored as part of the WHO MONICA Study. Between August 1984 and December 1985 of 438 hospitalised patients with a 'definite' AMI according to MONICA criteria and a clinical discharge diagnosis of AMI, 386 (88%) patients were discharged alive from hospital. Four patients had lengths of stay between 46 and 77 days and have been omitted from further analysis. The mean length of hospital stay was 13.6 days (95% confidence intervals 12.9 to 14.3 days); 74% of all patients stayed in hospital for more than ten days. The mean length of stay in the Coronary Care Unit (CCU) was 4.5 days (95% confidence intervals 4.2 to 4.8 days) with 60% staying longer than three days. Mean hospital stay varied from 10.5 to 17.4 days among the seven hospitals, although most of this variation was accounted for by three hospitals with few patients. Restricting analysis to the four hospitals with 90% of all the patients, multiple regression analysis showed that the CK enzyme levels, the evolution of Q waves on ECG, the presence of an anterior AMI and the use of nitrates and digoxin during hospitalisation were all associated with increased length of stay in hospital.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Effect of rapid mobilization on ejection fractions and ventricular volumes after acute myocardial infarction

Despite the current practice of early mobilization and early hospital discharge after uncomplicated acute myocardial infarction (AMI), physicians are reluctant to permit normal physical and social activity for several weeks after the AMI "to allow the heart to heal." This study tested whether it was possible to identify a low risk group of patients on day 3 after AMI, and whether vigorous early mobilization from days 4 through 7 affected left ventricular function and volumes (studied by gated blood pool scan on days 4 and 14). There was 1 death in 3 months in 45 patients with uncomplicated AMI suitable for randomization to activity (group A) compared with 11 deaths in 55 patients unsuitable for rapid early mobilization (group B) (p less than 0.01). Early vigorous mobilization in 24 of the group A patients compared with sedentary care in 20 did not affect change in ejection fraction, end-diastolic volume, end systolic-volume, stroke volume, heart rate or cardiac output between days 4 and 14. A very low risk group suitable for early vigorous mobilization can be defined on day 3 after AMI; further, vigorous early mobilization does not affect left ventricular function or volumes. Early return to physical, social and occupational activity after uncomplicated AMI should result in marked reduction in direct and indirect costs of AMI.

Early discharge and return to work following myocardial infarction

Individuals who have experienced a myocardial infarction (MI) account for the largest component of all hospitalization costs and foregone earnings due to cardiac disease. Early return to full employment and premorbid activity level should be the focus of cost-effective rehabilitative programs. Yet the economic benefits of vocational rehabilitation have not been directly researched. Therefore, issues of import regarding activity after MI include the timing of ambulation, discharge and return to work. Studies of early mobilization and discharge are contrasted in terms of methodology and outcome. These cite economic, social and psychological advantages, yet these factors are examined in isolation of other variables. A review of the literature reveals that there is a reluctance by many health professionals to institute such practices based in part on the dilemma surrounding selection of specific indicators and risk factors. Yet analysis reveals that the contention surrounding these exclusion criteria is perhaps unfounded, as the variance is less than is commonly assumed. Recurrent themes likewise emerge regarding the multiplicity of variables associated with the timing of resumption of employment, which is considered to be the most precise index of recovery following an MI. Of these, only early intense rehabilitation, directed at attitudinal and behavioural change, is amenable to modification by health professionals. Related research endeavours have examined employment following aortocoronary bypass surgery, risk factors in the work environment and work stressors which occur following MI. Controversy arises regarding the correlation of age and personality factors with return to work. Discrepancies in research findings are attributed to the diverse approaches to data collection, obstacles encountered in measuring psychological states, lack of operational definitions, differences in degree of rehabilitation and length of follow-up and the absence of controlled trials. Clearly, experimental research focusing on the job-related economic and human cost impact of specific rehabilitation programs must be conducted.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Shortened cardiac rehabilitation: a three year experience

One-hundred-and-twenty-four (19%) of patients with acute myocardial infarction seen in a three year period from 1975 to 1978 were considered low risk patients suitable for rapid mobilisation, early discharge, and early exercise testing. Their mean long term Norris Prognostic Index was 3.2; the mean date of discharge was 9.6 days, and the mean date of exercise testing was 10.5 days. There were seven deaths and nine non-fatal recurrent myocardial infarctions in a mean follow up time of 14.2 months. These events were best predicted by a history of angina prior to myocardial infarction or radiological cardiomegaly detected in the CCU. Altogether 98 (80%) of the patients returned to work at a median time of six weeks after their infarct. The nett effect of the team activity has been to reduce the need for referral to the National Heart Foundation Assessment Centre from an average of 15 patients per year to an average of two per year.

Randomised multicentre trial of early mobilisation after uncomplicated myocardial infarction

In a multicentre trial 742 patients in 13 hospitals in Wales were randomly allocated on the fifth day after uncomplicated myocardial infarction to be mobilised on the fifth or the tenth day. The trial shows no difference in first year mortality, nor in morbidity assessed after a median period of 13 months. Follow-up after one year suggests an unexplained lower mortality during the second and third years in the late mobilisation group.

Hospital discharge one week after acute myocardial infarction

Sixty-seven consecutive patients who had suffered an acute myocardial infarction but no serious complications during the first to fourth hospital days were considered for a trial of hospital discharge at one week. Thirty-three of the 67 patients were discharged at one week, the remainder having a mean hospital stay of 11 +/- 2 days. The incidence of late complications and recurrent infarctions, as well as mortality and functional status, were determined in all patients six months after discharge. No serious complications occurred in either subgroup within three weeks after discharge. There were no deaths in either subgroup and no difference in functional status at six months. Patients without serious complications during the four days after an acute myocardial infarction can be spared the economic costs and psychologic stress of prolonged hospitalization.

Lack of effect of bed rest and cigarette smoking on development of deep venous thrombosis after myocardial infarction

In a prospective study of patients admitted to a coronary care unit, the incidence of isotopically diagnosed deep venous thrombosis was found to be related to the severity of illness rather than to the duration of bed rest. In addition, no negative correlation was found between cigarette smoking and deep venous thrombosis.

Duration of hospitalization in "uncomplicated completed acute myocardial infarction". An Ad Hoc Committee review

The clinical and laboratory findings diagnostic of acute myocardial infarction include at least two of the following: (1) a history of pain consistent with myocardial ischemia, (2) electorcardiographic findings consistent with infarction, and (3) a rise in the serum level of specific cardiac enzymes. By the 4th or 5th day of illness, specific criteria can be applied to assign certain patients to a subset with "uncomplicated completed acute myocardial infarction." These criteria include the absence of evidence of (1) continuing cardiac ischemia, (2) left ventricular failure, (3) shock, (4) important cardiac arrhythmias, (5) conduction disturbances, and (6) other serious illnesses in patients with an established acute myocardial infarction. In terms of prognosis and management, patients in this subset should be regarded as substantively different from patients in other subsets. They should respond favorably to short periods of immobilization and hospitalization than those generally used. They may remain at bed rest (modified in regard to sitting and the use of a commode) for 4 days. Subsequently, mobilization with a program of progressive activity over the ensuing 5 to 10 days should reduce the duration of hospitalization to less than the current average of 17.5 to 20.8 days for patients with acute myocardial infarction. Nine to 14 days should suffice in most instances. Current and future trials may indicate that still earlier mobilization and shorter hospitalization periods can be applied to certain patient groups, but the evidence on this point is incomplete. For the individual patient, many factors will determine the optimal duration of bed rest and hospital stay. The patient's physician must consider the therapeutic benefits that may attend earlier mobilization and shorter hospitalization while weighing potential disadvantages. When the responsible physician does not regularly care for the patient, consultation with an experienced cardiologist is desirable. Patients whose condition is classified as "uncomplicated" may manifest deterioration during their illness and require assignment to a subset with a different prognosis and requiring different forms of treatment. For patients with uncomplicated acute myocardial infarction, as well as those in other subsets, absolute rules for therapy are unwise and application of broader principles by the alert physician is more likely to be beneficial.

Value of early ambulation in patients with and without complications after acute myocardial infarction

A prospective, controlled, randomized study was done to compare the effect of early and late ambulation in hospitalized patients with acute myocardial infarction. All patients surviving longer than the first five days were studied; 64 patients were mobilized on day six and discharged on day 12, and 65 were mobilized on day 13 and discharged on day 19. Follow-up observation lasted from six to 52 weeks. Of patients without complications until day six, eight out of 32 in the early and 16 of 35 in the late groups manifested complications during the follow-up period (p smaller than 0.05). Of those who had complications before day six, seven of 32 and 26 of 30 still had or acquired new complications until last seen (p small than 0.0001). The number of serious complications in the two groups was eight and 24 respectively (p smaller than 0.001). We conclude that early ambulation is beneficial irrespective of complications on admission.

The course of acute myocardial infarction. Feasibility of early discharge of the uncomplicated patient

This report represents our experience with 522 consecutive patients with acute myocardial infarction admitted directly to the Duke Coronary Care Unit. Fifty items of information were used to characterize the patients, their hospital course and follow-up. Serious complications included death, ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation, second- or third-degree heart block, pulmonary edema, cardiogenic shock, persistent sinus tachycardia or hypotension, atrial flutter or fibrillation, and extension of infarction. Forty-nine percent of the patients (252 of 522) experienced a serious complication. All patients who experienced any serious complications had at least one of the above during the first four days of hospitalization. Patients who survived through day 4 were subgrouped on the basis of the occurrence (complicated) or lack of occurrence (uncomplicated) of the above on day 5. Complicated patients had a subsequent hospital mortality of 14% and an incidence of late serious complications of 51%. Patients who were uncomplicated through day 4 had a subsequent hospital mortality of zero and an incidence of late serious complications of zero. These data suggest that it would be feasible and ethically justified to conduct a prospective clinical trial of early discharge (7th day) in patients who meet the above criteria for uncomplicated. The potential economic savings through earlier discharge in uncomplicated patients are of major significance.

Differential psychological effects of early and late mobilisation after myocardial infarction

Two groups of male patients who had survived an acute myocardial infarction and who were treated by alternative regimes of early or late mobilisation were given psychological tests on leaving hospital and at follow-up approximately one year later.

Test scores on neuroticism, extroversion and lying from the Eysenck Personality Inventory were analysed showing that: (1) both groups studied increased their neuroticism scores and decreased their extroversion scores over the follow-up period; (2) the earlier mobilised group had lower neuroticism scores on leaving hospital; and (3) at the end of the follow-up period there was no significant difference between early and late mobilised groups in extroversion and neuroticism scores.

It is suggested that the initial advantages of earlier mobilisation in producing optimism in the patient may be lost when the patient is returned to his home environment.

Coronary care in a General Hospital. Results and observations on the first year's work in the unit in the Southern General Hospital, Glasgow

The establishment, staffing and structure and observations made in the first year of the existence of coronary care in an intensive care unit in a general hospital are recorded. Two hundred and twenty eight patients were admitted during the year in whom the diagnosis of myocardial infarction was confirmed. There were 29 deaths in the unit and 14 deaths occurred in the wards of the hospital after discharge from the unit. 49.1 per cent of the patients were admitted within 4 hours of the onset of symptoms and the mean duration of stay in the unit was 86.5 hours. The type of arrhythmia detected in the unit, and the treatment given to the patients both before and after admission to the intensive care unit are described.

Cardiac aneurysm after myocardial infarction

Ten cases of post-infarction cardiac aneurysm have been described in detail. Many of the patients had survived for several years after the infarction which was held to be responsible for the formation of the aneurysm. It is suggested that in most cases the diagnosis can be made on the basis of a PA chest radiograph combined with careful cardiac fluoroscopy. If surgery is contemplated because of cardiac failure which does not respond to medical treatment or because of embolic phenomena not controlled by anticoagulant therapy, left heart angiography and coronary arteriography are indicated.