1
|
Bertolazzi A, Bongelli R, Riccioni I. Health Risk Communication During COVID-19 Emergency in Italy: The Impact of Medical Experts' Debate on Twitter. HEALTH COMMUNICATION 2024; 39:1616-1627. [PMID: 37349881 DOI: 10.1080/10410236.2023.2227436] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/24/2023]
Abstract
The COVID-19 emergency underlined the importance of an effective public health communication to limit the spread of the outbreak. Physicians as "public experts" can play a crucial part in health risk communication, even if their role is challenged by transformations into the information system. Therefore, the major objective of this study was to investigate public perception of medical experts' opinions regarding the COVID-19 emergency. The Italian public debate involving medical experts in the Twitter sphere during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has particularly been examined. A content analysis was performed on 2,040 randomly selected tweets. The results of content analysis show that the medical experts who tend to mitigate the risk received a higher number of tweets supporting their positions when compared to the experts whose statements were aimed at intensifying the risk. Since a public expert is a communicator, but also an advisor who can affect how laypersons perceive and react to risk events, this study can provide more knowledge about the public perception of different communication strategies incorporated by medical experts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessia Bertolazzi
- Department of Political Science, Communication and International Relations, University of Macerata
| | - Ramona Bongelli
- Department of Political Science, Communication and International Relations, University of Macerata
| | - Ilaria Riccioni
- Department of Education, Cultural Heritage and Tourism, University of Macerata
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Martínez-Rodríguez A, Martínez-Faneca L, Fabrellas N. Construction of nursing knowledge in commodified contexts: Views and experiences of nurses regarding primary care. Nurs Inq 2023; 30:e12579. [PMID: 37427491 DOI: 10.1111/nin.12579] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2023] [Revised: 06/17/2023] [Accepted: 06/23/2023] [Indexed: 07/11/2023]
Abstract
The commodification of health care, particularly primary care, presents challenges to care and knowledge development. The purpose of this study is to examine how nurses perceive and develop their knowledge in a commodified context. A mixed-methods study was conducted that included a closed-question survey and in-depth interviews with nurses in public primary care in Catalonia. There were 104 valid responses to the questionnaire and 10 in-depth interviews. The main findings of the survey were related to workload and limited time for nursing care. Six themes emerged from the in-depth interviews: (1) limited time for nursing, (2) feelings of burnout, (3) awareness of patient and family satisfaction, (4) organizational factors that favor nurses' needs, (5) organizational factors that hinder nurses' needs, and finally (6) public administration requirements. Participants perceive excessive workload and time constraints and feel that this affects their nursing care and their physical and mental health. However, nurses purposefully use knowledge patterns to cope with the problems associated with commodification. Nurses have multidimensional, contextualized, and integrated knowledge that allows them to optimize their care based on the needs of their patients. This research examines many challenges related to nursing practice and the nursing discipline and opens the door for further research that encompasses all areas of nursing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana Martínez-Rodríguez
- Departament d'infermeria fonamental i mèdicoquirúrgica, Facultat de Medicina i Ciències de la Salut, Escola d'Infermeria, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- August Pi i Sunyer Campus Hospital Clínic, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Laura Martínez-Faneca
- August Pi i Sunyer Campus Hospital Clínic, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Núria Fabrellas
- Departament d'infermeria fonamental i mèdicoquirúrgica, Facultat de Medicina i Ciències de la Salut, Escola d'Infermeria, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Tariq B, Phillips S, Biswakarma R, Talaulikar V, Harper JC. Women's knowledge and attitudes to the menopause: a comparison of women over 40 who were in the perimenopause, post menopause and those not in the peri or post menopause. BMC Womens Health 2023; 23:460. [PMID: 37648988 PMCID: PMC10469514 DOI: 10.1186/s12905-023-02424-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2022] [Accepted: 05/09/2023] [Indexed: 09/01/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To evaluate women's knowledge and attitudes towards the menopause by comparing three groups of women: perimenopause, post menopause and those women not in either the peri or post menopause (other). METHODS A 35 question online survey was advertised on social media to evaluate women's attitudes and knowledge of the menopause. Three groups of women were compared: perimenopause, post menopause and those women not in either the peri or post menopause (other). RESULTS Most women were completely uninformed or only had some knowledge of the menopause before the age of 40. Most women thought that the menopause should be taught at school, but over 80% had received no menopause education at school themselves. The most popular sources of menopause information were independent websites and friends. Perimenopausal women were significantly more likely than postmenopausal women to use online resources for menopause information. The perimenopausal and postmenopausal groups had more positive attitudes towards the menopause than the other group. 57.5% of postmenopausal women found the menopause difficult or very difficult. Most women were happy about no longer menstruating, although some expressed sadness regarding fertility loss. CONCLUSIONS Most women had limited knowledge and negative attitudes towards the menopause, leaving them unprepared to cope with the physical and psychological changes associated with this stage of life. Improved menopause education is required to improve quality of life during the menopausal transition and a most positive narrative of life postmenopause.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bisma Tariq
- Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK
| | | | - Rina Biswakarma
- Institute for Education, University College London, London, UK
| | | | - Joyce C Harper
- Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Skirbekk H, Magelssen M, Conradsen S. Trust in healthcare before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. BMC Public Health 2023; 23:863. [PMID: 37170208 PMCID: PMC10173918 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-023-15716-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2022] [Accepted: 04/20/2023] [Indexed: 05/13/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Public trust is often advantageous for health authorities during crises such as the COVID-19 pandemic. Norwegian health authorities used the public´s high trust to control the pandemic, resulting in relatively few casualties. METHODS We wanted to describe and compare the Norwegian public trust in GPs, public healthcare, information and treatment in hospitals before and during the early phases of the COVID-19 pandemic. Further, we wanted to investigate the relationship between somatic or mental illness, and trust in GPs and public health information, and to develop a theoretical understanding of the relationship between trust in healthcare institutions, generalised trust and the societal situation caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. We performed two surveys, the first in December 2019; the second in May 2020, thus providing two snapshots of the Norwegian public's trust in healthcare and healthcare actors before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. RESULTS There was statistically significant increased trust in public healthcare, in treatment at hospital and in information at hospital after the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic. There was a non-significant rise in trust in GPs. We found that trust in public health information was not related to mental health nor having a chronic, somatic disease. CONCLUSION The findings confirm that the Norwegian public's trust in healthcare and healthcare actors is high. The trust levels are also relatively stable, and even show an increase during the early phases of the pandemic. We suggest that there is a dynamic relationship between trust in public health information, healthcare institutions, generalised trust and a societal crisis situation such as the COVID-19 pandemic. However, the GP-patient trust seems less affected by a crisis situation, than the public´s trust in healthcare institutions. This difference may be explained by the relative stability caused by mandates of trust obtained from the patient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helge Skirbekk
- Department of Nursing and Health Promotion, Faculty of Health Sciences, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway.
- Department of Undergraduate Studies, Lovisenberg Diaconal University College, Oslo, Norway.
- Department of Health Management and Health Economics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
| | - Morten Magelssen
- Centre for Medical Ethics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- MF Norwegian School of Theology, Religion and Society, Oslo, Norway
| | - Stein Conradsen
- Faculty of Humanities and Education, Volda University College, Volda, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Psychometric properties of public trust in Covid-19 control and prevention policies questionnaire. BMC Public Health 2022; 22:1959. [PMID: 36280814 PMCID: PMC9589749 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-022-14272-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2022] [Revised: 09/14/2022] [Accepted: 09/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Public trust is a crucial concept in the COVID-19 pandemic, which determines public adherence with preventive rules as a success factor for disease management. This study aimed to develop and validate a tool to measure public trust in COVID-19 control and prevention policies (COV-Trust tool). Methods This is a psychometric study that was conducted in 2020 (March-August). A primary tool was developed through literature review, in-depth interviews with experts and expert panel meetings. Content and construct validity was evaluated using content validity index (CVI) and content validity ratio (CVR) indexes and exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, respectively. Cronbach α coefficient was calculated to determine the internal consistency. Results A 28-item questionnaire with seven factors was developed. Factors included macro policy-making and management of pandemic, pandemic control policies implementing at all levels and their effectiveness, providing protective equipment and medicine for hospitals and public, prevention of negative socio-economic consequences of the pandemic, public participation, informing and public education and public behavior. The questionnaire reliability was calculated to be α = 0.959. Based on the experts’ opinion, tool content validity was estimated to be CVR = 0.73, CVI = 0.89. RMSEA = 0.07 revealed a good model fit as the confirmatory factor analysis results for the tool. Conclusion COV-Trust tool is a well-fit tool to be used during this pandemic for improving policies effectiveness and could be used in similar situations as it determines the success of public health interventions. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-022-14272-9. Investigating public trust during the outbreak of Covid-19 is of utmost important for both research and policy making perspectives. COV-Trust tool (Seven factors and 31 items) was developed and validated. COV-Trust tool comprehensively assesses public trust in various aspects of policies and their determinants and can provide valuable information for promoting the effectiveness of policies.
Collapse
|
6
|
Vassileva J, Zewde NT, Reim M, Holmberg O, Rehani MM. Communication of radiation risk from imaging studies: an IAEA-coordinated international survey. JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION : OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY FOR RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION 2022; 42:021524. [PMID: 35320786 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6498/ac6047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2022] [Accepted: 03/23/2022] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
The purpose of this IAEA-coordinated international study was to understand aspects related to the communication of radiation risk from imaging studies, such as how often imaging department personnel and referring physicians are asked about radiation risks in diagnostic imaging, who asks about these risks, how often professionals are able to provide satisfactory answers using qualitative metrics and how often quantitative risk estimates are needed. A web-based questionnaire with ten questions was completed by 386 healthcare professionals from 63 countries from all four continents, including clinicians/referring physicians (42.5%), radiologists or nuclear medicine physicians (26.7%), medical physicists (23.1%), radiographers/radiological technologists (6.2%) and others (1.6%). The results indicate that radiation risk-related questions are largely asked by patients (73.1%) and parents of child patients (38.6%), and 78% of the professionals believe they are able to answer those questions using qualitative metrics such as very small/minimal, small, medium rather than number of cancers likely occurring. The vast majority, with over three times higher frequency, indicated the purpose of knowing previous radiological exams as 'both clinical information and radiation exposure history' rather than 'only clinical information'. Nearly two-thirds of the clinicians/referring physicians indicated that knowing the radiation exposure history of the patient will affect their decision-making for the next exam, as against only about one-fifth who said 'no, it will not affect their decision-making'. The same question, when addressed to radiologists, resulted in a slightly larger fraction of about three-quarters who said 'yes', as opposed to a smaller fraction of about 12% who said 'no, it will not affect their decision-making'. Mapping the present situation of communication of benefits and risks for patients is important and may be the basis of further analysis, regular monitoring and possibly a target for clinical audits. Further studies focused on specific professional groups might help in obtaining á deeper understanding of the need for practical communication tools.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jenia Vassileva
- Radiation Protection of Patients Unit, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria
| | | | | | - Ola Holmberg
- Radiation Protection of Patients Unit, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria
| | - Madan M Rehani
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Willis E, Delbaere M. Patient Influencers: The Next Frontier in Direct-to-Consumer Pharmaceutical Marketing. J Med Internet Res 2022; 24:e29422. [PMID: 35230241 PMCID: PMC8924782 DOI: 10.2196/29422] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2021] [Revised: 07/22/2021] [Accepted: 12/16/2021] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Social media influencers are becoming an increasingly popular strategic communication tactic used across industry verticals, including entertainment, fashion, and beauty, to engage directly with consumers. Pharmaceutical companies have also recently entered the social media marketing arena and—within the bounds of governmental regulations—have found ways to build relationships directly with patients using covert persuasion tactics like partnering with social media influencers. Due to consumers’ negative perceptions of pharmaceutical companies, it makes sense that new marketing tactics are being used to establish and improve relationships with consumers. Previous research well documents the ethical dilemmas of direct-to-consumer advertising, and there is recent burgeoning literature on online covert marketing tactics. The academic and medical literature, however, is behind in regard to social media influencers used in health and medicine. This paper highlights and defines terms used in industry practice, and also calls for more investigation and sets forward a research agenda. As consumers spend more time online and patients continue to consult social media for health information, it is important that this new marketing trend does not go unnoticed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erin Willis
- Department of Advertising, Public Relations, and Media Design, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, United States
| | - Marjorie Delbaere
- Edwards School of Business, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Trust in the Healthcare System and Physicians in Croatia: A Survey of the General Population. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 19:ijerph19020993. [PMID: 35055815 PMCID: PMC8796022 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19020993] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2021] [Revised: 01/08/2022] [Accepted: 01/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Trust in healthcare systems and physicians is considered important for the delivery of good healthcare. A cross-sectional survey was conducted on a random three-stage sample of the general population of Croatia (N = 1230), stratified by regions. Of respondents, 58.7% displayed a high or very high level of trust in the healthcare system, 65.6% in physicians, and 78.3% in their family physician. Respondents’ views regarding patients’ roles in the discussion of treatment options, confidence in physicians’ expertise, and underlying motives of physicians were mixed. Respondents with a lower level of education, those with low monthly incomes, and those from smaller settlements had lower levels of trust in physicians and the healthcare system. Trust in other institutions, religiosity and religious beliefs, tolerance of personal choice, and experience of caring for the seriously ill and dying were predictors of trust in healthcare and physicians. Our findings suggest that levels of healthcare-related trust in Croatia are increasing in comparison with previous research, but need improvement. Levels of trust are lowest in populations that are most vulnerable and most in need of care and protection.
Collapse
|
9
|
Rockwell MS, Michaels KC, Epling JW. Does de-implementation of low-value care impact the patient-clinician relationship? A mixed methods study. BMC Health Serv Res 2022; 22:37. [PMID: 34991573 PMCID: PMC8733793 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-021-07345-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2021] [Accepted: 11/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The importance of reducing low-value care (LVC) is increasingly recognized, but the impact of de-implementation on the patient-clinician relationship is not well understood. This mixed-methods study explored the impact of LVC de-implementation on the patient-clinician relationship. Methods
Adult primary care patients from a large Virginia health system volunteered to participate in a survey (n = 232) or interview (n = 24). Participants completed the Patient-Doctor Relationship Questionnaire (PDRQ-9) after reading a vignette about a clinician declining to provide a low-value service: antibiotics for acute sinusitis (LVC-antibiotics); screening EKG (LVC-EKG); screening vitamin D test (LVC-vitamin D); or an alternate vignette about a high-value service, and imagining that their own primary care clinician had acted in the same manner. A different sample of participants was asked to imagine that their own primary care clinician did not order LVC-antibiotics or LVC-EKG and then respond to semi-structured interview questions. Outcomes data included participant demographics, PDRQ-9 scores (higher score = greater relationship integrity), and content analysis of transcribed interviews. Differences in PDRQ-9 scores were analyzed using one-way ANOVA. Data were integrated for analysis and interpretation. Results Although participants generally agreed with the vignette narrative (not providing LVC), many demonstrated difficulty comprehending the broad concept of LVC and potential harms. The topic triggered memories of negative experiences with healthcare (typically poor-quality care, not necessarily LVC). The most common recommendation for reducing LVC was for patients to take greater responsibility for their own health. Most participants believed that their relationship with their clinician would not be negatively impacted by denial of LVC because they trusted their clinician’s guidance. Participants emphasized that trusted clinicians are those who listen to them, spend time with them, and offer understandable advice. Some felt that not providing LVC would actually increase their trust in their clinician. Similar PDRQ-9 scores were observed for LVC-antibiotics (38.9), LVC-EKG (37.5), and the alternate vignette (36.4), but LVC-vitamin D was associated with a significantly lower score (31.2) (p < 0.05). Conclusions In this vignette-based study, we observed minimal impact of LVC de-implementation on the patient-clinician relationship, although service-specific differences surfaced. Further situation-based research is needed to confirm study findings. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-021-07345-9.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle S Rockwell
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine, 1 Riverside Circle, Suite 102, Roanoke, VA, 24016, USA.
| | - Kenan C Michaels
- Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine, 2 Riverside Circle, VA, 24016, Roanoke, USA
| | - John W Epling
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine, 1 Riverside Circle, Suite 102, Roanoke, VA, 24016, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Belanger HG, Winsberg M. Exploring social determinants of health: Comparing lower and higher income individuals participating in telepsychiatric care for depression. Front Psychiatry 2022; 13:1026361. [PMID: 36683980 PMCID: PMC9849930 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.1026361] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2022] [Accepted: 12/14/2022] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Telemental health may increase access to care; there has been little research on efficacy with those at the lower end of the income distribution. The purpose of this study was to determine whether lower vs. higher income patients receiving telepsychiatric care for depression achieve: (1) effective symptom reduction and (2) similar outcomes. METHODS Data utilized were obtained from a national mental health telehealth company and consisted of 5,426 U.S.-based patients receiving psychiatric care for moderate to severe depression between October, 2018 and January, 2022. Propensity matching was used to create lower and higher income samples (n = 379 in each) using 22 covariates. These samples were then compared using repeated measures ANOVA on Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) scores at start of treatment, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, and 16 weeks. RESULTS Both lower and higher income groups made significant improvement over time, with groups averaging mild symptom severity by week 16. There was a significant group x time interaction, such that the lower income group had significantly greater depression severity at the last two timepoints. CONCLUSION Lower and higher income groups both made significant improvement in depression symptom severity over time following initiation of psychiatric treatment via a telehealth platform, though higher income individuals, all else being equal besides employment, tend to do better. These findings suggest that when lower income individuals do participate in care, good outcomes can be achieved. Further research is needed to better understand the role social determinants of health (SDOH) play in outcome disparities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heather G Belanger
- Brightside Health Inc., Oakland, CA, United States.,Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, United States
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
The Attitude of Patients from a Romanian Tertiary Cardiology Center Regarding Participation in Biomarker-Based Clinical Trials. Medicina (B Aires) 2021; 57:medicina57111180. [PMID: 34833398 PMCID: PMC8625162 DOI: 10.3390/medicina57111180] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2021] [Revised: 10/28/2021] [Accepted: 10/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and Objectives: biomarker-based studies are the cornerstone of precision medicine, providing key data for tailored medical care. Enrollment of the planned number of patients is a critical determinant of a successful clinical trial. Moreover, for inclusive medical care, patients from different socio-demographic backgrounds must be recruited. Still, a significant number of trials fail to reach these prerequisites. Designing the informed consent forms based on the patients’ feedback could optimize accrual. We aimed to explore the attitudes of patients from a Romanian tertiary cardiology center towards participation in biomarker-based clinical trials. Materials and Methods: three hundred forty inpatients were interviewed based on a semi-structured questionnaire which included four sections: demographics, personal medical history, attitudes and trust. Results: Roughly, 62.5% of the respondents were interested in enrolling, while altruistic reasons were the most frequently expressed. Clear exposure of the possible risks was most valued (37.78%), followed by the possibility of directly communicating with the research team (23.78%). The most frequently chosen answer by acutely ill patients was improvement of their health, whereas chronically ill individuals indicated the possibility of withdrawal without affecting the quality of medical care. Importantly, the participation rate could be improved if the invitation to enrollment were made by both the current physician and the study coordinator (p = 0.0001). The level of trust in researchers was high in more than 50% of the respondents, and was correlated with therapeutic compliance and with the desire to join a biomarker study. Conclusions: the information gained will facilitate a tailored approach to patient enrollment in future biomarker-based studies in our clinic.
Collapse
|
12
|
Crowley R, Atiq O, Hilden D. Financial Profit in Medicine: A Position Paper From the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med 2021; 174:1447-1449. [PMID: 34487452 DOI: 10.7326/m21-1178] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
The steady growth of corporate interest and influence in the health care sector over the past few decades has created a more business-oriented health care system in the United States, helping to spur for-profit and private equity investment. Proponents say that this trend makes the health care system more efficient, encourages innovation, and provides financial stability to ensure access and improve care. Critics counter that such moves favor profit over care and erode the patient-physician relationship. American College of Physicians (ACP) underscores that physicians are permitted to earn a reasonable income as long as they are fulfilling their fiduciary responsibility to provide high-quality, appropriate care within the guardrails of medical professionalism and ethics. In this position paper, ACP considers the effect of mergers, integration, private equity investment, nonprofit hospital requirements, and conversions from nonprofit to for-profit status on patients, physicians, and the health care system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan Crowley
- American College of Physicians, Washington, DC (R.C.)
| | - Omar Atiq
- University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas (O.A.)
| | - David Hilden
- Hennepin Healthcare, Minneapolis, Minnesota (D.H.)
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Tur-Sinai A, Barnea R, Tal O. Analyzing patient trust through the lens of hospitals managers-The other side of the coin. PLoS One 2021; 16:e0250626. [PMID: 33901238 PMCID: PMC8075209 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250626] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2021] [Accepted: 04/10/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Trust is an essential element in patient-physician relationships, yet trust is perceived differently among providers and customers exist. During January-February 2020 we examined the standpoints of medical managers and administrative directors from the private and public health hospitals on patient-physician trust, using a structured questionnaire. Thirty-six managers in public and private hospitals (24 from the public sector and 12 from the private sector) responded to the survey. Managers in the private sector rated trust higher in comparison to managers in the public sector, including trust related to patient satisfaction, professionalism and accountability. Managers from public hospitals gave higher scores to the need for patient education and shared responsibility prior to medical procedures. Administrative directors gave higher scores to various dimensions of trust and autonomy while medical managers gave higher scores to economic considerations. Trust is a fundamental component of the healthcare system and may be used to improve the provision and quality of care by analyzing standpoints and comparable continuous monitoring. Differences in position, education and training influence the perception of trust among managers in the health system. This survey may allow policy makers and opinion leaders to continue building and maintaining trust between patients and care providers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aviad Tur-Sinai
- Department of Health Systems Management, The Max Stern Yezreel Valley College, Yezreel Valley, Israel
- School of Nursing, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, United States of America
- * E-mail:
| | - Royi Barnea
- Assuta Health Services Research Institute, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Orna Tal
- Shamir Medical Center (Assaf Harofeh), Be’er Ya’akov, Israel
- Israeli Center for Emerging Technologies (ICET), Tel Aviv, Israel
- Department of Management, Bar Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
How Public Trust in Health Care Can Shape Patient Overconsumption in Health Systems? The Missing Links. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2021; 18:ijerph18083860. [PMID: 33916992 PMCID: PMC8067686 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18083860] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2021] [Revised: 04/01/2021] [Accepted: 04/04/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Overconsumption of health care is an ever-present and complex problem in health systems. It is especially significant in countries in transition that assign relatively small budgets to health care. In these circumstances, trust in the health system and its institutions is of utmost importance. Many researchers have studied interpersonal trust. Relatively less attention, however, has been paid to public trust in health systems and its impact on overconsumption. Therefore, this paper seeks to identify and examine the link between public trust and the moral hazard experienced by the patient with regard to health care consumption. Moreover, it explores the mediating role of patient satisfaction and patient non-adherence. For these purposes, quantitative research was conducted based on a representative sample of patients in Poland. Interesting findings were made on the issues examined. Patients were shown not to overconsume health care if they trusted the system and were satisfied with their doctor-patient relationship. On the other hand, nonadherence to medical recommendations was shown to increase overuse of medical services. The present study contributes to the existing knowledge by identifying phenomena on the macro (public trust in health care) and micro (patient satisfaction and non-adherence) scales that modify patient behavior with regard to health care consumption. Our results also provide valuable knowledge for health system policymakers. They can be of benefit in developing communication plans at different levels of local government.
Collapse
|
15
|
Fraser S. Family physicians can counter misinformation: Lessons from Motherisk to mask wearing. CANADIAN FAMILY PHYSICIAN MEDECIN DE FAMILLE CANADIEN 2021; 67:227. [PMID: 33853898 PMCID: PMC8324150 DOI: 10.46747/cfp.6704227] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
|
16
|
Storz MA. When the Desire for Lifestyle Medicine Counseling Remains Unfulfilled: A Case Report. J Patient Exp 2021; 8:2374373521996949. [PMID: 34179371 PMCID: PMC8205339 DOI: 10.1177/2374373521996949] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
More and more patients are suffering from multiple concomitant chronic conditions, which
are often associated with an unhealthy lifestyle, including inadequate physical activity
and poor nutrition. Patients increasingly seek thorough advice on lifestyle counseling,
however, many physicians encounter this development with a pharmacotherapy-centered
strategy—thereby paying insufficient attention to lifestyle modifications. This case
report attempts to capture the concerning experience of a particular patient, who was
hospitalized for uncontrolled type-2-diabetes in an American hospital. Despite curiosity
and a great interest in lifestyle modifications, his desire for lifestyle medicine
counseling was not addressed during a long inpatient stay. This case illustrates that
patients wish to make sustainable lifestyle changes but apparently receive insufficient
support from their physicians. This applies for both, dietary and exercise counseling. To
address the patients’ needs and the increasing burden from chronic diseases, physicians
must practice lifestyle medicine now. Appropriate educational resources for physicians are
provided.
Collapse
|
17
|
Nikitara M, Constantinou CS, Andreou E, Latzourakis E, Diomidous M. Facilitators and barriers to the provision of type 1 diabetes inpatient care: An interpretive phenomenological analysis. Nurs Open 2021; 8:908-919. [PMID: 33570292 PMCID: PMC7877146 DOI: 10.1002/nop2.699] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2020] [Revised: 08/07/2020] [Accepted: 09/03/2020] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
AIM The aim and objective of this study was to understand how non-specialized nurses understand the possible barriers and facilitators of inpatient care for type 1 diabetes. DESIGN An interpretative phenomenology approach was conducted. METHODS The sample consisted of non-specialized nurses (N = 24) working in medical, surgical and nephrology wards in the state hospitals in Cyprus. The data were collected during 2016-2018 from one focus group with nurses (N = 6) and individual semi-structured interviews with nurses (N = 18) conducted. The Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research checklist used to ensure the quality of the study. RESULTS It is evident from the study findings that nurses experience several barriers in diabetes inpatient care reported which are of great concern since this could have adverse effects on patients' outcomes. Only one facilitator has been reported by few nurses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monica Nikitara
- Department of Life & Health SciencesUniversity of NicosiaNicosiaCyprus
| | | | - Eleni Andreou
- Department of Life & Health SciencesUniversity of NicosiaNicosiaCyprus
| | | | - Marianna Diomidous
- Department of Public HealthNational and Kapodistrian University of AthensAthensGreece
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Gregory PAM, Austin Z. Understanding the psychology of trust between patients and their community pharmacists. Can Pharm J (Ott) 2021; 154:120-128. [PMID: 33868523 PMCID: PMC8020281 DOI: 10.1177/1715163521989760] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pharmacists need patients to trust them in order to support best possible health outcomes. There has been little empirical work to test the widely stated claim that pharmacists are the "most trusted" health care professional. This study was undertaken to characterize the factors that shape public trust of individual pharmacists and the profession as a whole. METHODS An exploratory qualitative study was undertaken. Semistructured interviews with 13 patients from 5 different community pharmacies were completed. Interview data were transcribed, coded and categorized to identify trust-enhancing and trust-diminishing factors influencing patients' perceptions of pharmacists. RESULTS Four trust-diminishing factors were identified, including the business context within which community pharmacy is practised, lack of transparency regarding pharmacists' remuneration, lack of awareness of how pharmacists qualify and are regulated and inconsistent previous experiences with pharmacists. Four trust-enhancing factors were identified, including accessibility, affability, acknowledgement and respect. DISCUSSION This study illustrates that trust-diminishing factors appear to be somewhat outside the day-to-day control of individual community pharmacists, while trust-enhancing factors are elements that pharmacists may have greater personal control over. Further research is required to better understand these factors and to develop a more generalizable understanding of how patients develop trust in their pharmacists. Can Pharm J (Ott) 2021;154:xx-xx.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul A. M. Gregory
- Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy and the Institute for
Health Policy, Management and Evaluation—Faculty of Medicine at the University
of Toronto
| | - Zubin Austin
- Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy and the Institute for
Health Policy, Management and Evaluation—Faculty of Medicine at the University
of Toronto
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Ahmed W, Jagsi R, Gutheil TG, Katz MS. Public Disclosure on Social Media of Identifiable Patient Information by Health Professionals: Content Analysis of Twitter Data. J Med Internet Res 2020; 22:e19746. [PMID: 32870160 PMCID: PMC7492977 DOI: 10.2196/19746] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2020] [Revised: 07/06/2020] [Accepted: 07/23/2020] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Respecting patient privacy and confidentiality is critical for doctor-patient relationships and public trust in medical professionals. The frequency of potentially identifiable disclosures online during periods of active engagement is unknown. Objective The objective of this study was to quantify potentially identifiable content shared on social media by physicians and other health care providers using the hashtag #ShareAStoryInOneTweet. Methods We accessed and searched Twitter’s API using Symplur software for tweets that included the hashtag #ShareAStoryInOneTweet. We identified 1206 tweets by doctors, nurses, and other health professionals out of 43,374 tweets shared in May 2018. Tweet content was evaluated in January 2019 to determine the incidence of instances where names or potentially identifiable information about patients were shared; content analysis of tweets in which information about others had been disclosed was performed. The study also evaluated whether participants raised concerns about privacy breaches and estimated the frequency of deleted tweets. The study used dual, blinded coding for a 10% sample to estimate intercoder reliability using Cohen κ statistic for identifying the potential identifiability of tweet content. Results Health care professionals (n=656) disclosing information about others included 486 doctors (74.1%) and 98 nurses (14.9%). Health care professionals sharing stories about patient care disclosed the time frame in 95 tweets (95/754, 12.6%) and included patient names in 15 tweets (15/754, 2.0%). It is estimated that friends or families could likely identify the clinical scenario described in 242 of the 754 tweets (32.1%). Among 348 tweets about potentially living patients, it was estimated that 162 (46.6%) were likely identifiable by patients. Intercoder reliability in rating the potential identifiability demonstrated 86.8% agreement, with a Cohen κ of 0.8 suggesting substantial agreement. We also identified 78 out of 754 tweets (6.5%) that had been deleted on the website but were still viewable in the analytics software data set. Conclusions During periods of active sharing online, nurses, physicians, and other health professionals may sometimes share more information than patients or families might expect. More study is needed to determine whether similar events arise frequently and to understand how to best ensure that patients’ rights are adequately respected.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wasim Ahmed
- Department of Marketing, Operations and Systems, Newcastle University Business School, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| | - Reshma Jagsi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Center for Bioethics and Social Science in Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | - Thomas G Gutheil
- Department of Psychiatry, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Mass. Mental Health Center, Harvard Medical School, Harvard University, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Matthew S Katz
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Lowell General Hospital, Lowell, MA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Nikitara M, Constantinou CS, Andreou E, Latzourakis E, Diomidous M. Views of People with Diabetes Regarding Their Experiences of the Facilitators and Barriers in Type 1 Diabetes Inpatient Care: An Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis. Behav Sci (Basel) 2020; 10:E120. [PMID: 32707985 PMCID: PMC7463672 DOI: 10.3390/bs10080120] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2020] [Revised: 07/07/2020] [Accepted: 07/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to comprehend how people with diabetes view their experiences of the possible barriers and facilitators in inpatient care for type 1 diabetes from non-specialized nurses. DESIGN An interpretative phenomenology analysis (IPA) was conducted. METHODS The sample consisted of people with type 1 diabetes 1 (n = 24) who use the services of the state hospitals in Cyprus. The data were collected in two phases: firstly, focus groups with people with diabetes (n = 2) were conducted and analysed, and then individual semi-structured interviews with people with diabetes (n = 12) were conducted. RESULTS It is evident from the findings that people with diabetes experienced several barriers in diabetes inpatient care, which is concerning since this can have adverse effects on patients' outcomes. No facilitators were reported. CONCLUSION Significant results were found in relation to the barriers to diabetes inpatient care. Crucially, the findings demonstrate that all these factors can negatively affect the quality of care of patients with diabetes, and most of these factors are related not only to diabetes care but also generally to all patients who receive inpatient care. Interestingly, no participant reported any facilitators to their care, which further affected the negative perceptions of the care received.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monica Nikitara
- Department of Life and Health Sciences/ School of Science and Engineering, University of Nicosia, Cyprus 46 Makedonitissas Avenue, P.O. Box 24005, CY-1700, Nicosia CY-2417, Cyprus; (E.A.); (E.L.)
| | - Costas S. Constantinou
- Medical School, University of Nicosia, Cyprus 46 Makedonitissas Avenue, P.O. Box 24005, CY-1700, Nicosia CY-2417, Cyprus;
| | - Eleni Andreou
- Department of Life and Health Sciences/ School of Science and Engineering, University of Nicosia, Cyprus 46 Makedonitissas Avenue, P.O. Box 24005, CY-1700, Nicosia CY-2417, Cyprus; (E.A.); (E.L.)
| | - Evangelos Latzourakis
- Department of Life and Health Sciences/ School of Science and Engineering, University of Nicosia, Cyprus 46 Makedonitissas Avenue, P.O. Box 24005, CY-1700, Nicosia CY-2417, Cyprus; (E.A.); (E.L.)
| | - Marianna Diomidous
- Nursing Department, School of Sciences, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens 10679, Greece;
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Bach RL, Wenz A. Studying health-related internet and mobile device use using web logs and smartphone records. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0234663. [PMID: 32530937 PMCID: PMC7292384 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234663] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2020] [Accepted: 05/30/2020] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Many people use the internet to seek information that will help them understand their body and their health. Motivations for such behaviors are numerous. For example, users may wish to figure out a medical condition by searching for symptoms they experience. Similarly, they may seek more information on how to treat conditions they have been diagnosed with or seek resources on how to live a healthy life. With the ubiquitous availability of the internet, searching and finding relevant information is easier than ever before and a widespread phenomenon. To understand how people use the internet for health-related information, we use data from a sample of 1,959 internet users. A unique combination of data containing four months of users' browsing histories and mobile application use on computers and mobile devices allows us to study which health websites they visited, what information they searched for and which health applications they used. Survey data inform us about users' socio-demographic background, medical conditions and other health-related behaviors. Results show that women, young users, users with a university education and nonsmokers are most likely to use the internet and mobile applications for health-related purposes. On search engines, internet users most frequently search for pharmacies, symptoms of medical conditions and pain. Moreover, users seem most interested in information on how to live a healthy life, alternative medicine, mental health and women's health. With this study, we extend the field's understanding of who seeks and consumes health information online, what users look for as well as how individuals use mobile applications to monitor their health. Moreover, we contribute to methodological research by exploring new sources of data for understanding humans, their preferences and behaviors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruben L. Bach
- Collaborative Research Center 884 Political Economy of Reforms, University of Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
- * E-mail:
| | - Alexander Wenz
- Collaborative Research Center 884 Political Economy of Reforms, University of Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
- Institute for Social and Economic Research, University of Essex, Colchester, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Martin RR. International variations in fiduciary and competence trust of physicians: A multilevel study. JOURNAL OF TRUST RESEARCH 2019. [DOI: 10.1080/21515581.2019.1684302] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Robert R. Martin
- Department of Sociology and Criminal Justice, Southeastern Louisiana University, Hammond, LA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
What Does the Chinese Public Care About with Regard to Primary Care Physicians: Trustworthiness or Competence? Medicina (B Aires) 2019; 55:medicina55080455. [PMID: 31405053 PMCID: PMC6723481 DOI: 10.3390/medicina55080455] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2019] [Revised: 08/01/2019] [Accepted: 08/06/2019] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Background and Objective: China has launched a series of reforms to enhance primary care. The aims of these reforms are to strengthen the functionality of primary care to encourage patients to use primary care. Patients’ trust in physicians is important in clinical medicine; however, little is known about how Chinese patients’ preferences relate to their trust in primary care physicians. This study’s objectives are to measure the Chinese public’s trust in primary care physicians and to characterize reasons of their preferences for health care. Materials and Methods: This quantitative study comprises a face-to-face survey with a convenience sample (n = 273) of people visiting community health centers or stations (CHCSs) in Wuhan, China. We measured the patients’ preferences for the different level of hospitals and their trust in physicians, as well as the reasons of the patients’ preferences, using a Chinese version of the Wake Forest Physician Trust Scale and other variables (such as demographics, health status, and hospital preference). Results: Approximately two thirds (68.6%) of the participants had experienced a mild or chronic disease in the year before the survey, but only 26.4% preferred to visit CHCSs in such cases. The negative factors related to this lack of preference are the physicians’ competence (odds ratio [OR] = 0.250), the medical equipment (OR = 0.301), and the popularity of hospitals (OR = 0.172). The positive factors were ease of access (OR = 2.218) and affordability (OR = 1.900). The participants expressed a moderate trust in physicians in CHCSs (score of 3.02 out of 5). There is no association between the patients’ trust and their hospital preference (r = 0.019, p = 0.859). Of the participants, 92 suggested that the physicians in CHCSs should improve in terms of their competence (n = 53), attitude (n = 35), and/or medical ethics (n = 16). Conclusions: This study’s results suggest that patients consider improving physicians’ competence to be more important and urgent than improving those physicians’ trustworthiness in terms of reconstructing Chinese primary care. Improving the physicians’ competence would not only reduce the barriers that patients experience regarding CHCSs, but would also increase their trust in the physicians.
Collapse
|
24
|
Shaya B, Al Homsi N, Eid K, Haidar Z, Khalil A, Merheb K, Honein-Abou Haidar G, Akl EA. Factors associated with the public's trust in physicians in the context of the Lebanese healthcare system: a qualitative study. BMC Health Serv Res 2019; 19:525. [PMID: 31351485 PMCID: PMC6660947 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-019-4354-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2018] [Accepted: 07/17/2019] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The Lebanese public perceives the physician-patient relationship as flawed. The objectives of this study are to assess factors associated with the public’s trust in physicians in the context of the Lebanese healthcare system and to explore potential ways to enhance it. Methods We conducted a qualitative study based on a grounded theory methodology using semi-structured interviews with members of the Lebanese public (not restricted to patients). We selected participants through convenience and maximum variation sampling approaches. The constant comparative analysis resulted in a theoretical framework that describes the factors influencing trust in physicians. Results Participants trusted an experienced, up-to-date, graduate of a North American or Western European school, working in a reputable hospital, with a high level of diagnostic skills. The personal characteristics that improved trust were physicians who are ‘non-materialistic’, have a good rapport, and have sufficient encounter time with patients. Social factors that enhance trust in the physician include: being a family member, recommended by a family member, featured in mainstream media, and/or having a good reputation. Trust increased compliance, loyalty despite occasional mistakes committed, high consultation fees, and negative attitudes towards the physician’s institution. Conversely, no trust led to severed therapeutic relationship and seeking second opinions. Conclusion The level of trust of members of the Lebanese public in physicians was affected by the personal characteristics of physicians, their practice or clinical skills, their interactions with the patient, finances, in addition to a number of social factors. Moreover, the level of trust had major implications on patients’ interactions with their physicians. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12913-019-4354-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bashir Shaya
- School of Medicine, American University of Beirut, P.O. Box: 11-0236, Riad-El-Solh Beirut, Beirut, 1107 2020, Lebanon
| | - Nadine Al Homsi
- School of Medicine, American University of Beirut, P.O. Box: 11-0236, Riad-El-Solh Beirut, Beirut, 1107 2020, Lebanon
| | - Kevin Eid
- School of Medicine, American University of Beirut, P.O. Box: 11-0236, Riad-El-Solh Beirut, Beirut, 1107 2020, Lebanon
| | - Zeinab Haidar
- School of Medicine, American University of Beirut, P.O. Box: 11-0236, Riad-El-Solh Beirut, Beirut, 1107 2020, Lebanon
| | - Ali Khalil
- School of Medicine, American University of Beirut, P.O. Box: 11-0236, Riad-El-Solh Beirut, Beirut, 1107 2020, Lebanon
| | - Kelly Merheb
- School of Medicine, American University of Beirut, P.O. Box: 11-0236, Riad-El-Solh Beirut, Beirut, 1107 2020, Lebanon
| | - Gladys Honein-Abou Haidar
- Hariri School of Nursing, American University of Beirut, P.O. Box: 11-0236, Riad-El-Solh Beirut, Beirut, 1107 2020, Lebanon
| | - Elie A Akl
- Department on Internal Medicine, American University of Beirut Medical Center, P.O. Box: 11-0236, Riad-El-Solh Beirut, Beirut, 1107 2020, Lebanon.
| |
Collapse
|