Pharmacokinetic Interaction Study of Indinavir/Ritonavir and the Enteric-Coated Capsule Formulation of Didanosine in Healthy Volunteers

A Cohort Study of the Food Effect on Virological Failure and Treatment Discontinuation in Patients on HAART Containing Didanosine Enteric-Coated Capsules (FOODDIe Study)

BACKGROUND

Didanosine enteric-coated capsules (ddI-EC) should be taken under fasting conditions. However, the effect of food on the absorption of ddI-EC may not reduce exposure to the drug.

METHOD

We performed an observational study to assess the effect on virological failure of taking ddI-EC with food. To be included, patients had to have begun their first ddI-EC-containing HAART regimen between June 1, 2001 and June 1, 2003. Primary endpoints were virological failure or discontinuation of the ddI-EC-containing regimen.

RESULTS

668 patients were included (119 patients were naïve, 172 switched from a different regimen, and 377 were part of rescue therapy). 296 patients were taking ddI-EC with food. After 71 weeks of follow-up, 162 discontinued ddI-EC in the fasting group and 120 in the fed group. 46 patients had virological failure (19 without food vs. 27 in the group with food). Adherence to therapy >80% was 79.7%. We fitted a multivariate Cox proportional hazard model and found a significant interaction between ddI-EC intake and adherence. The multivariate model showed that when adherence to HAART was poor (<80% of prescribed pills) taking ddI-EC with food significantly increased the risk of virological failure (hazard ratio [HR] 8.32, 95% CI 1.67-41.65), but this disappeared when adherence was 80%-95% (HR 0.27, 95% CI 0.04-1.53) or >95% (HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.12-2.77).

CONCLUSION

When adherence is good (>80% of the prescribed doses), ddI-EC can be administered with food without an increase in virological failure or HAART discontinuation.

Semen Quality and Drug Concentrations in Seminal Plasma of Patients Using a Didanosine or Didanosine Plus Tenofovir Containing Antiretroviral Regimen

Data on the concentrations of didanosine (ddI) and tenofovir (TFV) in seminal plasma are sparse. Subtherapeutic drug concentrations within the lumen of the male genital tract may have implications for selection and transmission of drug-resistant HIV strains. On the other hand, sufficient penetration of these drugs into the male genital tract has potential toxic effects on the spermatozoa and their precursors. In the current study, the authors obtained paired semen and blood samples at variable time points after drug intake from 30 HIV-1-infected patients using a ddI (n = 15) or ddI + TFV (n = 15) containing an antiretroviral regimen. Didanosine and TFV concentrations were measured in seminal and blood plasma and semen quality was assessed. Both ddI and TFV penetrated well into seminal plasma. Whereas blood plasma ddI concentrations dropped to near or below the lower limit of quantification of 0.017 microg/mL 9 hours after drug intake, the ddI concentration in seminal plasma remained detectable during the whole dosing interval with a median of 0.20 and 0.21 microg/mL in the ddI and ddI + TFV groups, respectively. Tenofovir was detectable during the whole dosing interval in both blood and seminal plasma with a median concentration of 0.12 and 0.25 microg/mL, respectively, and a median seminal-to-blood-plasma ratio of 3.3. Semen quality was within the normal range according to the criteria of the World Health Organization, except for the percentage of progressively motile sperm, which was low in both groups of patients. The authors conclude that ddI and TFV penetrate well into seminal plasma and that the reduced sperm motility deserves further study.

Didanosine enteric-coated capsule: current role in patients with HIV-1 infection

Didanosine, which is a synthetic nucleoside analogue intracellularly phosphorylated to the active metabolite, inhibits the activity of HIV-1 reverse transcriptase by competing with the natural substrate. Currently, didanosine is mainly provided as an enteric-coated capsule. In vitro, the molecule is active against laboratory strains and clinical isolates of HIV-1 in resting and activated T cells and monocyte/macrophages. Didanosine may select for resistance mutations that may render the drug inactive against the virus; L74V and K65R remain as the main didanosine-related mutations. In vitro, phenotypic susceptibility to didanosine was decreased beyond a defined fold change clinical cut-off (1.7), and it is considered that genotypic resistance exists when five thymidine-associated mutations or four plus M184V are present. In vivo, clinical studies have shown that didanosine retains significant antiviral activity in patients who have up to five nucleoside analogue mutations at baseline. Didanosine is useful in patients with no previous therapy, as well as in experienced patients in whom one or more antiretroviral regimens has failed.Enteric-coated didanosine is taken once daily, its co-administration with food has been recently evaluated and a reduction of the efficacy of the antiretroviral treatment was not observed. Administered with lamivudine (or emtricitabine), it can be considered a good alternative for use in the nucleoside analogue backbone included in combination therapies for antiretroviral-naive patients. Didanosine could be used in initial treatments for patients intolerant of zidovudine, abacavir or tenofovir. It can be included in once-daily combination regimens, which are more convenient and patient friendly.Prospective, observational and open-label studies, as well as clinical trials (with durations between 24 and 96 weeks), have demonstrated the safety and efficacy of didanosine plus lamivudine (or emtricitabine) plus efavirenz (or nevirapine) in previously untreated HIV-1-infected patients. The administration of didanosine to treatment-experienced patients has been evaluated in two different contexts: patients in whom previous therapies have failed (rescue therapy) and those with controlled viraemia who are switched to a didanosine-containing regimen for simplification.Adverse events associated with the administration of didanosine have been well known since the initial clinical trials with the drug. Gastrointestinal intolerance, peripheral neuropathy and hyperamylasaemia/pancreatitis were the most frequently reported. In the highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) era, the rate of adverse events has decreased. The tolerability of didanosine has been clearly improved with the development of the enteric-coated capsule. Severe manifestations of mitochondrial toxicity, including lactic acidosis and abnormal fat distribution, are rare complications, and occur most frequently when didanosine is used in combination with stavudine.

Indinavir/ritonavir remains an important component of HAART for the treatment of HIV/AIDS, particularly in resource-limited settings

For over a decade, indinavir has been approved for the treatment of HIV/AIDS; however, following the introduction of new protease inhibitors (PIs) with improved safety and pharmacologic profiles, its use in developed countries has become almost obsolete. In contrast, in resource-limited settings where the majority of people living with HIV/AIDS reside, indinavir is part of the most affordable PI-based highly active antiretroviral treatment regimen. A major drawback of indinavir use is renal toxicity, but low-dose indinavir plus ritonavir (400/100 mg) twice daily is both efficacious and tolerable. Similar low dosing levels in children have also proven successful, but data in pregnant women remains limited. Due to its low cost and proven efficacy indinavir remains a key component of HIV/AIDS treatment in resource-limited settings.