Physiologically based pharmacokinetic modelling of treprostinil after intravenous injection and extended-release oral tablet administration in healthy volunteers: An extrapolation to other patient populations including patients with hepatic impairment

AIMS

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is characterized by increased pulmonary arterial pressure, resulting in right ventricular overload, right heart failure and eventually death. Treprostinil is a prostacyclin analogue that is used in the treatment of PAH. As an orphan drug, limited information is available regarding its disposition and its use in special populations such as elderly, paediatric and pregnant patients. The objective of the current study was to develop a robust physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model for treprostinil intravenous injection and extended-release tablet as the first step to optimize treprostinil pharmacotherapy in patients.

METHODS

PBPK model was built using Simcyp simulator which integrated physicochemical properties, observed or predicted parameters for drug absorption, distribution and elimination for treprostinil, and population specific physiological characteristics. Three clinical trials after intravenous infusion and nine studies after oral administration of treprostinil extended-release tablet in healthy volunteers were used to develop and validate the model. The simulated PK profiles were compared with the observed data. Extrapolation of the model to patient populations including patients with hepatic impairment was conducted to validate the predictions.

RESULTS

Most of the observed data were within the 5^th and 95^th percentile interval of the prediction. Most of the percentage error in the PK parameters were within ±50% of the corresponding observed parameters. The developed model predicted the lung exposure of treprostinil to be approximately 0.17 times of concentration in plasma.

CONCLUSION

Predicted absorption, distribution, and metabolic enzyme kinetics gave an insight into the disposition of treprostinil in humans. Extrapolation of the established model to patient populations with hepatic impairment successfully documented the model reliability. The developed model has the potential to be used in the PK predictions in other special patient populations with different demographic, physiological and pathological characteristics.

Endothelin receptor antagonists for pulmonary arterial hypertension

BACKGROUND

Pulmonary arterial hypertension is a devastating disease that leads to right heart failure and premature death. Endothelin receptor antagonists have shown efficacy in the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy of endothelin receptor antagonists (ERAs) in pulmonary arterial hypertension.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, Embase, and the reference sections of retrieved articles. The searches are current as of 4 November 2020.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised trials and quasi-randomised trials involving participants with pulmonary arterial hypertension.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two of five review authors selected studies, extracted data and assessed study quality according to established criteria. We used standard methods expected by Cochrane. The primary outcomes were exercise capacity (six-minute walk distance, 6MWD), World Health Organization (WHO) or New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class, Borg dyspnoea scores and dyspnoea-fatigue ratings, and mortality.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 17 randomised controlled trials involving a total of 3322 participants. Most trials were of relatively short duration (12 weeks to six months). Sixteen trials were placebo-controlled, and of these nine investigated a non-selective ERA and seven a selective ERA.   We evaluated two comparisons in the review: ERA versus placebo and ERA versus phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5) inhibitor. The abstract focuses on the placebo-controlled trials only and presents the pooled results of selective and non-selective ERAs. After treatment, participants receiving ERAs could probably walk on average 25.06 m (95% confidence interval (CI) 17.13 to 32.99 m; 2739 participants; 14 studies; I2 = 34%, moderate-certainty evidence) further than those receiving placebo in a 6MWD. Endothelin receptor antagonists probably improved more participants' WHO functional class (odds ratio (OR) 1.41, 95% CI 1.16 to 1.70; participants = 3060; studies = 15; I2 = 5%, moderate-certainty evidence) and probably lowered the odds of functional class deterioration (OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.26 to 0.72; participants = 2347; studies = 13; I2 = 40%, moderate-certainty evidence) compared with placebo. There may be a reduction in mortality with ERAs (OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.58, 1.07; 2889 participants; 12 studies; I2 = 0%, low-certainty evidence), and pooled data suggest that ERAs probably improve cardiopulmonary haemodynamics and may reduce Borg dyspnoea score in symptomatic patients. Hepatic toxicity was not common, but may be increased by ERA treatment from 37 to 67 (95% CI 34 to 130) per 1000 over 25 weeks of treatment (OR 1.88, 95% CI 0.91 to 3.90; moderate-certainty evidence). Although ERAs were well tolerated in this population, several cases of irreversible liver failure caused by sitaxsentan have been reported, which led the licence holder for sitaxsentan to withdraw the product from all markets worldwide.  As planned, we performed subgroup analyses comparing selective and non-selective ERAs, and with the exception of mean pulmonary artery pressure, did not detect any clear subgroup differences for any outcome.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

For people with pulmonary arterial hypertension with WHO functional class II and III, endothelin receptor antagonists probably increase exercise capacity, improve WHO functional class, prevent WHO functional class deterioration, result in favourable changes in cardiopulmonary haemodynamic variables compared with placebo. However, they are less effective in reducing dyspnoea and mortality. The efficacy data were strongest in those with idiopathic pulmonary hypertension. The irreversible liver failure caused by sitaxsentan and its withdrawal from global markets emphasise the importance of hepatic monitoring in people treated with ERAs. The question of the effects of ERAs on pulmonary arterial hypertension has now likely been answered.. The combined use of ERAs and phosphodiesterase inhibitors may provide more benefit in pulmonary arterial hypertension; however, this needs to be confirmed in future studies.

Pharmacokinetics of Oral Treprostinil in Children With Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension

As part of a clinical trial, this study examined the pharmacokinetics (PK) of oral treprostinil (TRE) in children with pulmonary arterial hypertension. The trial consisted of the following 3 cohorts: transition from parenteral (cohort 1) or inhaled (cohort 2) TRE, or de novo addition (cohort 3). Oral TRE was dosed 3 times daily. PK samples were obtained before an oral TRE dose, and at 2, 4, 6, and 8 hours thereafter. The PK parameters were calculated using noncompartmental analysis. Thirty-two children (n = 10 in cohorts 1 and 2, n = 12 in cohort 3) were enrolled; the median age was 12 years (range 7-17 years), and the median weight was 42.2 kg (range 19.3-78 kg). The median oral TRE dose for all subjects was 3.8 mg (5.9, 3.5, and 4.0 mg for cohorts 1, 2, and 3, respectively). The TRE concentration versus time profile demonstrated a peak concentration at a median of 3.8 hours with wide variability. In cohort 1, oral dosing led to higher peak (5.9 ng/mL) and lower trough (1 ng/mL) concentrations than parenteral (peak 5.4 ng/mL and trough 4.2 ng/mL), but a lower mean concentration (3.61 vs. 4.46 ng/mL), likely due to variable metabolism and noncomparable dosing. Both the area under the curve and average concentration were linearly correlated with oral TRE dose and dose normalized to body weight, but not with weight or age alone. In pediatric patients, an increased oral TRE dose or dose frequency may be required to minimize PK variability and achieve greater correlation with parenteral dosing.

A Comprehensive Review of Treprostinil Pharmacokinetics via Four Routes of Administration

Treprostinil is available in three different formulations and four different routes of administration: Remodulin^® (treprostinil sodium, intravenous and subcutaneous administration), Tyvaso^® (treprostinil sodium, inhaled administration), and Orenitram^® (treprostinil diolamine, oral administration) for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Pharmacokinetic studies have been performed in healthy volunteers and patients with PAH. The intent of this review is to outline pharmacokinetic considerations of the three treprostinil formulations and provide clinicians with a resource that may support clinical decisions in treating patients with PAH.

Recommendations for the use of oral treprostinil in clinical practice: a Delphi consensus project pulmonary circulation

Oral treprostinil was recently labeled for treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension. Similar to the period immediately after parenteral treprostinil was approved, there is a significant knowledge gap for practicing physicians who might prescribe oral treprostinil. Despite its oral route of delivery, use of the drug is challenging because of the requirement for careful titration and management of drug-related adverse effects. We aimed to create a consensus document combining available evidence with expert opinion to provide guidance for use of oral treprostinil. Following a methodology commonly used in business and social sciences (the 'Delphi Process'), two investigators from the oral treprostinil (Freedom) studies created a series of statements based on available evidence and the package insert. The set of 'best practice' statements was circulated to nine other Freedom trial investigators. Their comments were incorporated into the document as new line items for further vote and comment. The subsequent document was put to vote line by line (scale of -5 to +5) and a final statement was drafted. Consensus recommendations include initial therapy with 0.125 mg for treatment naÿ patients, three times daily dosing, aggressive use of antidiarrheal medication, and a strong preference for use of the drug in combination with other approved PAH therapies. This process was particularly valuable in providing guidance for the management of adverse events (where essentially no data is available). The Delphi process was useful to codify investigator experience and subsequently develop investigator consensus about practical issues for physicians who may wish to prescribe oral treprostinil.

Clinical use of extended-release oral treprostinil in the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension

The development of parenteral prostacyclin therapy marked a dramatic breakthrough in the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Intravenous (IV) epoprostenol was the first PAH specific therapy and to date, remains the only treatment to demonstrate a mortality benefit. Because of the inherent complexities and risks of treating patients with continuous infusion IV therapy, there is great interest in the development of an oral prostacyclin analog that could mimic the benefits of IV therapy. Herein, we highlight the development of oral prostacyclin therapy, focusing on oral treprostinil, the only US Food and Drug Administration approved oral prostacyclin. Recent Phase III clinical trials have shown the drug to improve exercise tolerance in treatment-naïve PAH patients, but not patients on background oral therapy. Oral treprostinil appears to be most efficacious at higher doses, but its side effect profile and complexities with dosing complicate its use. While oral treprostinil’s current therapeutic role in PAH remains unclear, ongoing studies of this class of medication should help clarify their role in the treatment of PAH.

Extended-release oral treprostinil for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is characterized by an increase in pulmonary vascular resistance ultimately resulting in progressive right heart failure. Although new specific treatments have demonstrated improvements in various end points including morbidity/mortality, prognosis remains unfavorable with an on-treatment yearly mortality rate of 10%. Due to complex delivery systems, the use of parenteral prostanoids has been limited to patients with advanced disease. While inhaled prostanoids have had little effect, an oral prostacyclin analog is a desired initial treatment for PAH patients. To that end, UT-15C was synthesized as a sustained-release tablet. FREEDOM-M in treatment-naïve PAH patients resulted in significant improvements of 6-min walk distance supporting the use of oral treprostinil as initial monotherapy in PAH patients with class II or III symptoms. A further study targeting patients on combination treatments is currently exploring a morbidity/mortality end point in a large patient population.

Pharmacokinetics of oral treprostinil sustained release tablets during chronic administration to patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a progressive vascular disease that ultimately leads to right ventricular failure and death. Treprostinil diolamine is an oral prostacyclin analogue; sustained release tablets of oral treprostinil are currently being evaluated for efficacy and safety as a potential therapy in patients with PAH. Previous attempts at developing an oral prostanoid have been limited by rapid absorption and short plasma half-life; thus, the aim of this study was to characterize the pharmacokinetic profile of treprostinil diolamine in PAH patients after chronic dosing. The study enrolled 74 PAH patients who had been taking treprostinil diolamine for a minimum of 4 weeks (range: 0.5-16 mg). We collected plasma samples over 12 hours and estimated pharmacokinetic parameters using noncompartmental methods. Seventy patients had complete data. After chronic twice-daily oral dosing of treprostinil diolamine, mean area under the curve (AUC0-12) of treprostinil increased from 5244 to 20,4086 pg·hr-·mL- and mean maximum observed plasma concentration (Cmax) increased from 1383 to 33588 pg/mL. The apparent clearance (CL/F) was similar across all doses, indicating a linear dose-exposure relationship after twice-daily dosing. We conclude that twice-daily oral treprostinil provides sustained and proportional treprostinil concentrations over a wide range of doses during chronic administration to PAH patients.

Optimal use of treprostinil in pulmonary arterial hypertension: a guide to the correct use of different formulations

Treprostinil is a synthetic prostacyclin analogue with antiplatelet and vasodilatory properties. It is the only prostacyclin analogue with different options of delivery, i.e. subcutaneous, intravenous, inhaled or oral. Subcutaneous treprostinil has been shown in short- and long-term studies to improve exercise capacity, functional class, haemodynamics and survival in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Pain at the infusion site has been a major drawback of subcutaneous treprostinil, hampering dose titration, and ultimately leading to increased discontinuation rates. The additional clinical interest in treprostinil as an alternative intravenous prostacyclin has developed due to its favourable properties, including longer half-life, chemical stability, the possibility of intravenous infusion without the need for ice packs, and easy drug preparation. Intravenous treprostinil improves exercise capacity, functional class and haemodynamics in patients with PAH, over the period of 12 weeks. If patients are switched to intravenous treprostinil, they usually need to double the dose to attain the same efficacy. Whether the effect of intravenous treprostinil remains clinically relevant beyond 12 weeks is not known, and a longer follow-up would be required to investigate this. Inhaled treprostinil is an efficacious treatment in PAH patients who are moderately symptomatic on background oral therapy. Oral treprostinil on top of background therapy did not lead to an improvement in 6-minute walking distance after 16 weeks of treatment.

Open label study of escalating doses of oral treprostinil diethanolamine in patients with systemic sclerosis and digital ischemia: pharmacokinetics and correlation with digital perfusion

Introduction

Treprostinil diethanolamine is an innovative salt form of the prostacyclin analogue, treprostinil sodium, developed as an oral sustained release (SR) osmotic tablet. The availability of a formulation permitting convenient systemic delivery might have applicability to scleroderma vascular complications. We evaluated pharmacokinetics and perfusion in scleroderma patients with digital ischemia following escalating twice-daily doses of treprostinil diethanolamine SR.

Methods

Scleroderma patients with digital ulcers were enrolled in this dual-center, open-label, phase I pharmacokinetic study. Drug concentrations and perfusion, quantified by laser Doppler imaging, were measured over 12 hours at the 2 mg and 4 mg (or maximally tolerated) doses. Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined from individual plasma concentration versus time profiles using non-compartmental analysis methods. Digital perfusion and skin temperature were modeled as a function of log-transformed drug concentration and other covariates by performing repeated measures analyses using random effects models.

Results

Nineteen scleroderma patients (84% female, 53% limited scleroderma) received treprostinil diethanolamine SR with dose titration up to 4 mg twice daily as tolerated. Peak concentrations (mean maximum plasma concentration (C_max) = 1,176 and 2,107 pg/mL) occurred approximately 3.6 hours after dose administration, and overall exposure (under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to 12 hours post dose (AUC_0-12) = 7,187 and 12,992 hr*pg/mL) was linear between the 2 mg and 4 mg doses. Perfusion and digital skin temperature were positively associated with log-transformed plasma concentration at the 4 mg dose (P = 0.015 and P = 0.013, respectively). The most frequent adverse events were similar to those seen with prostacyclin analogues.

Conclusions

Oral treprostinil diethanolamine was effectively absorbed in patients with scleroderma. Drug administration was temporally associated with improved cutaneous perfusion and temperature. Treprostinil diethanolamine may provide a new therapeutic option for Raynaud's phenomenon and the peripheral vascular disease of scleroderma.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00848939.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/ar4216) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Endothelin receptor antagonists for pulmonary arterial hypertension

BACKGROUND

Pulmonary arterial hypertension is a devastating disease, which leads to right heart failure and premature death. Recent evidence suggests that endothelin receptor antagonists may be promising drugs in the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy of endothelin receptor antagonists in pulmonary arterial hypertension.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CENTRAL (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials), MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the reference section of retrieved articles. Searches are current as of January 2012.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised trials (RCTs) and quasi-randomised trials involving patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Five review authors independently selected studies, assessed study quality and extracted data.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 12 randomised controlled trials involving 1471 patients. All the trials were of relatively short duration (12 weeks to six months). After treatment, patients treated with endothelin receptor antagonists could walk on average 33.71 metres (95% confidence interval (CI) 24.90 to 42.52 metres) further than those treated with placebo in a six-minute walk test. Endothelin receptor antagonists improved more patients' World Health Organization/New York Heart Association (WHO/NYHA) functional class status than placebo (odds ratio (OR) 1.60; 95% CI 1.20 to 2.14), and reduced the odds of functional class deterioration compared with placebo (OR 0.26; 95% CI 0.16 to 0.42). There was a reduction in mortality that did not reach statistical significance on endothelin receptor antagonists (OR 0.57; 95% CI 0.26 to 1.24), and limited data suggest that endothelin receptor antagonists improve the Borg dyspnoea score and cardiopulmonary haemodynamics in symptomatic patients. Hepatic toxicity was not common, and endothelin receptor antagonists were well tolerated in this population. However, several cases of irreversible liver failure caused by sitaxsentan have been reported that led to license holder for sitaxsentan to withdraw the product from all markets worldwide.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Endothelin receptor antagonists can increase exercise capacity, improve WHO/NYHA functional class, prevent WHO/NYHA functional class deterioration, reduce dyspnoea and improve cardiopulmonary haemodynamic variables in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension with WHO/NYHA functional class II and III. However, there was only a trend towards endothelin receptor antagonists reducing mortality in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension. Efficacy data are strongest in those with idiopathic pulmonary hypertension. The irreversible liver failure caused by sitaxsentan and its withdrawal from global markets emphasise the importance of hepatic monitoring in patients treated with endothelin receptor antagonists.

Efficacy and Safety of Oral Treprostinil Monotherapy for the Treatment of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension

Background—

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a progressive, fatal disease with no cure. Parenteral and inhaled prostacyclin analogue therapies are effective for the treatment of PAH, but complicated administration requirements can limit the use of these therapies in patients with less severe disease. This study was designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the oral prostacyclin analogue treprostinil diolamine as initial treatment for de novo PAH.

Methods and Results—

Three hundred forty-nine patients (intent-to-treat population) not receiving endothelin receptor antagonist or phosphodiesterase type-5 inhibitor background therapy were randomized (treprostinil, n=233; placebo, n=116). The primary analysis population (modified intent-to-treat) included 228 patients (treprostinil, n=151; placebo, n=77) with access to 0.25-mg treprostinil tablets at randomization. The primary end point was change from baseline in 6-minute walk distance at week 12. Secondary end points included Borg dyspnea index, clinical worsening, and symptoms of PAH. The week 12 treatment effect for 6-minute walk distance (modified intent-to-treat population) was 23.0 m ( P =0.0125). For the intent-to-treat population, 6-minute walk distance improvements were observed at peak (26.0 m; P =0.0001) and trough (17.0 m; P =0.0025) plasma study drug concentrations. Other than an improvement in the combined 6-minute walk distance/Borg dyspnea score, there were no significant changes in secondary end points. Oral treprostinil therapy was generally well tolerated; the most common adverse events (intent-to-treat) were headache (69%), nausea (39%), diarrhea (37%), and pain in jaw (25%).

Conclusions—

Oral treprostinil improves exercise capacity in PAH patients not receiving other treatment. Oral treprostinil could provide a convenient, first-line prostacyclin treatment option for PAH patients not requiring more intensive therapy.

Clinical Trial Registration:—

URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT00325403 .

WHO Group 1 pulmonary arterial hypertension: current and investigative therapies

Major advances have been made in the treatment of World Health Organization Group 1 pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Since the mid-1990s, nine medications have become available in the United States to target three key pathophysiologic derangements in PAH - the prostacyclin, endothelin, and nitric oxide pathways. As a group, these agents have led to improvements in functional capacity, symptoms, hemodynamics, and survival. Most patients with mild to moderate PAH are started on orally active agents such as endothelin receptor antagonists or phosphodiesterase inhibitors. Patients with more severe disease, particularly those with evidence of right heart failure, should be treated with continuous prostacyclin infusion or a combination of a prostacyclin and oral therapy. Each medication has unique properties and clinical considerations, and the selection of an appropriate therapy must be tailored to the individual patient. None of the currently available WHO Group 1 PAH therapies are curative, however, and it is the hope that new therapies in development may halt or reverse disease progression. This review will discuss the major therapeutic classes of presently available medications and their role in managing the patient with PAH. We will also review data supporting the use of combination therapy, adjuvant background therapy, and new agents currently under investigation.

Inhaled treprostinil for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension

Treprostinil is a prostacyclin derivative approved for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension by intravenous, subcutaneous and inhalational administration. Unlike its precursor epoprostenol, treprostinil is chemically stable at room temperature and neutral pH, and its plasma half-life is longer. In addition to promoting smooth muscle relaxation in the pulmonary vasculature, treprostinil has suppressive effects on platelet aggregation, smooth muscle proliferation and inflammation. A Phase III study, investigating the addition of inhaled treprostinil to oral bosentan or sildenafil, confirmed significant improvements in exercise capacity and quality of life. This review examines the pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, clinical efficacy and safety of inhaled treprostinil for use in pulmonary arterial hypertension.

Inhaled treprostinil: a therapeutic review

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a life-threatening disease which, if untreated, leads to right ventricular failure and often death. Several effective therapies are now available for PAH, including endothelin receptor antagonists, phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors, and prostacyclin analogs. The prostacyclin analog treprostinil has proven efficacious when delivered by subcutaneous or intravenous infusion, and most recently by inhalation. Inhaled treprostinil has been shown to be 64%-72% bioavailable in healthy volunteers. Pilot clinical studies have elucidated the acute hemodynamic effects and relative pulmonary selectivity of this agent, as well as established target dosing in PAH and nonoperable chronic thromboembolic PAH. Likewise, chronically administered inhaled treprostinil resulted in clinical and hemodynamic improvement. Both pilot studies confirmed a satisfactory safety profile in patients with PAH. The pivotal Phase III trial, TRIUMPH-I, demonstrated the efficacy and safety of inhaled treprostinil (target dose of 54 μg four times daily) in PAH patients added to background therapies of bosentan or sildenafil, as assessed by improvements in the primary endpoint, peak six-minute walk distance (median placebo-corrected treatment effect of 20 m), as well as select secondary endpoints. Inhaled treprostinil is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for patients with World Health Organization Group I PAH to improve exercise ability. Studies establishing effectiveness included predominately patients with New York Heart Association functional class III symptoms and etiologies of idiopathic or heritable PAH (56%) or PAH associated with connective tissue diseases (33%).