Semisynthetic guanidino lipoglycopeptides with potent in vitro and in vivo antibacterial activity

Gram-positive bacterial infections present a major clinical challenge, with methicillin- and vancomycin-resistant strains continuing to be a cause for concern. In recent years, semisynthetic vancomycin derivatives have been developed to overcome this problem as exemplified by the clinically used telavancin, which exhibits increased antibacterial potency but has also raised toxicity concerns. Thus, glycopeptide antibiotics with enhanced antibacterial activities and improved safety profiles are still necessary. We describe the development of a class of highly potent semisynthetic glycopeptide antibiotics, the guanidino lipoglycopeptides, which contain a positively charged guanidino moiety bearing a variable lipid group. These glycopeptides exhibited enhanced in vitro activity against a panel of Gram-positive bacteria including clinically relevant methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and vancomycin-resistant strains, showed minimal toxicity toward eukaryotic cells, and had a low propensity for resistance selection. Mechanistically, guanidino lipoglycopeptides engaged with bacterial cell wall precursor lipid II with a higher binding affinity than vancomycin. Binding to both wild-type d-Ala-d-Ala lipid II and the vancomycin-resistant d-Ala-d-Lac variant was confirmed, providing insight into the enhanced activity of guanidino lipoglycopeptides against vancomycin-resistant isolates. The in vivo efficacy of guanidino lipoglycopeptide EVG7 was evaluated in a S. aureus murine thigh infection model and a 7-day sepsis survival study, both of which demonstrated superiority to vancomycin. Moreover, the minimal to mild kidney effects at supratherapeutic doses of EVG7 indicate an improved therapeutic safety profile compared with vancomycin. These findings position guanidino lipoglycopeptides as candidates for further development as antibacterial agents for the treatment of clinically relevant multidrug-resistant Gram-positive infections.

Efficacy and safety of oritavancin for the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin-structure infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of oritavancin (ORI) versus comparators for the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin-structure infections (ABSSSIs) based on available clinical studies.

METHODS

PubMed, Cochrane Library and Embase were searched from database inception to 28 July 2020 to identify clinical studies assessing the efficacy and safety of ORI and comparator antibiotics for the treatment of ABSSSIs. Primary efficacy outcome, investigator-assessed clinical cure, lesion size reduction ≥20%, additional post-treatment antibiotics, and 30-day emergency room (ER) visits and readmission were assessed as efficacy outcomes. Adverse events (AEs) and mortality were assessed as safety outcomes. I² statistic was calculated for heterogeneity, and a fixed-effects or random-effects model was used for estimation of the risk ratio (RR).

RESULTS

A total of 9213 patients from two randomised clinical trials (RCTs) and four cohort studies were included in this meta-analysis. ORI was statistically non-inferior to control agents in all efficacy and safety outcomes. Moreover, ORI significantly reduced the occurrence of 30-day readmission (RR = 0.42; P = 0.0004) and drug-related AEs (RR = 0.78; P = 0.002). In the subgroup analysis, ORI also had a lower rate of 30-day ER visits in the outpatient setting (RR = 0.34; P < 0.00001).

CONCLUSION

ORI was not inferior to comparators for the treatment of ABSSSIs. Meanwhile, it showed advantages in reducing the rate of readmission and drug-related AEs. More high-quality and large-scale RCTs are required to further confirm the efficacy and safety of ORI. [Trial registration: PROSPERO ID: CRD42020201942].

Current State and Promising Opportunities on Pharmaceutical Approaches in the Treatment of Polymicrobial Diseases

In recent years, the emergence of newly identified acute and chronic infectious disorders caused by diverse combinations of pathogens, termed polymicrobial diseases, has had catastrophic consequences for humans. Antimicrobial agents have been clinically proven to be effective in the pharmacological treatment of polymicrobial diseases. Unfortunately, an increasing trend in the emergence of multi-drug-resistant pathogens and limited options for delivery of antimicrobial drugs might seriously impact humans' efforts to combat polymicrobial diseases in the coming decades. New antimicrobial agents with novel mechanism(s) of action and new pharmaceutical formulations or delivery systems to target infected sites are urgently required. In this review, we discuss the prospective use of novel antimicrobial compounds isolated from natural products to treat polymicrobial infections, mainly via mechanisms related to inhibition of biofilm formation. Drug-delivery systems developed to deliver antimicrobial compounds to both intracellular and extracellular pathogens are discussed. We further discuss the effectiveness of several biofilm-targeted delivery strategies to eliminate polymicrobial biofilms. At the end, we review the applications and promising opportunities for various drug-delivery systems, when compared to conventional antimicrobial therapy, as a pharmacological means to treat polymicrobial diseases.

Bacterial Biofilm Eradication Agents: A Current Review

Most free-living bacteria can attach to surfaces and aggregate to grow into multicellular communities encased in extracellular polymeric substances called biofilms. Biofilms are recalcitrant to antibiotic therapy and a major cause of persistent and recurrent infections by clinically important pathogens worldwide (e.g., Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Escherichia coli, and Staphylococcus aureus). Currently, most biofilm remediation strategies involve the development of biofilm-inhibition agents, aimed at preventing the early stages of biofilm formation, or biofilm-dispersal agents, aimed at disrupting the biofilm cell community. While both strategies offer some clinical promise, neither represents a direct treatment and eradication strategy for established biofilms. Consequently, the discovery and development of biofilm eradication agents as comprehensive, stand-alone biofilm treatment options has become a fundamental area of research. Here we review our current understanding of biofilm antibiotic tolerance mechanisms and provide an overview of biofilm remediation strategies, focusing primarily on the most promising biofilm eradication agents and approaches. Many of these offer exciting prospects for the future of biofilm therapeutics for a large number of infections that are currently refractory to conventional antibiotics.

Electrocardiographic Effects of a Supratherapeutic Dose of Oritavancin

The purpose of this study was to measure oritavancin's electrocardiographic effects at a supratherapeutic dose of 1600 mg given intravenously (IV) over 3 hours. A cohort of 150 healthy volunteers were randomized to receive placebo, oritavancin, or oral moxifloxacin 400 mg in a parallel designed thorough QT study. A supratherapeutic mean maximum oritavancin concentration (C_max ) of 232 μg/mL was achieved. There was no significant effect on baseline and placebo corrected (dd) QTcF, QRS, or heart rate; ddPR was slightly increased at most time points, with a maximum mean change of 7.7 milliseconds 1 hour after infusion. Linear PK-PD modeling predicted a 3.2-millisecond change in the PR interval for the C_max (138 μg/mL) observed in pivotal phase 3 studies after 1200 mg of oritavancin. Moxifloxacin produced the expected increase in ddQTcF, validating assay sensitivity. At plasma concentrations above the clinical exposures of oritavancin, no clinically or statistically significant effect on QTcF, QRS, or heart rate was observed. The increase in PR is considered clinically insignificant, given the rapid decline in initial plasma concentration of oritavancin after infusion and the expected lower C_max in patients. A therapeutic 1200-mg single dose of oritavancin is not anticipated to cause any clinically significant effect on cardiac electrophysiology.

Clinical ECG Assessment

With the adoption of the ICH E14 guidance, the thorough QT/QTc (TQT) study has become the focus of clinical assessment of an NCE's effects on ECG parameters. The TQT study is used as a guide to the liability of a drug to cause proarrhythmias on the basis of delayed cardiac repolarization. Around 300 TQT studies have been performed since 2005 and through interactions between sponsors and regulators, especially FDA's Interdisciplinary Review Team (IRT) for QT studies. These studies can today be performed more effectively and with great confidence in the generated data. This chapter will discuss technical features and the design and analysis of TQT studies, how assay sensitivity is demonstrated, and examples from recently conducted studies. ECG assessment for drugs that cannot be safely given to healthy volunteers is also addressed, and examples from studies in cancer patients and in healthy volunteers with tyrosine kinase inhibitors are discussed. The TQT study is resource intensive and designed to solely evaluate whether an NCE prolongs the QTc interval. If data with similar confidence can be generated from other studies that are routinely performed as part of the clinical development, this would represent a more optimal use of human resources. Methods and approaches to increase the confidence in ECG data derived from "early QT assessment" in single-ascending/multiple-ascending dose studies are therefore discussed, and a path toward replacing the TQT study using these approaches will be outlined.