Temporal variation in the effects of ophthalmic timolol on cardiovascular and respiratory functions in healthy men

An Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of Timolol Maleate 0.5% Microdrops Administered with the Nanodropper

PURPOSE

To examine if 12.5 μl timolol maleate 0.5% microdrops dispensed with the Nanodropper Adaptor provide noninferior intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction compared with conventional 28 μl drops in patients with open-angle glaucoma (OAG) and ocular hypertension (OHT).

DESIGN

Prospective, noninferiority, parallel, multicenter, single-masked, active-controlled, randomized trial.

PARTICIPANTS

Treatment-naïve subjects who were recently diagnosed with OAG and OHT at the Aravind Eye Care System.

METHODS

Both eyes of subjects received 1 commercially available drop or both eyes of subjects received 1 microdrop of timolol maleate 0.5%. We measured IOP, resting heart rate (HR), and blood pressure (BP) at baseline and 1, 2, 5, and 8 hours after timolol administration.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The IOP was the primary outcome measure. Secondary outcomes were resting HR, systolic BP (sBP), and diastolic BP (dBP).

RESULTS

Adaptor-mediated microdrops and conventional drops of timolol significantly decreased IOP compared with baseline at all timepoints. Noninferiority was established at 3 of 4 timepoints. Heart rate decreases with Nanodropper were approximately 3 beats per minute (bpm) less than with conventional drops.

CONCLUSIONS

Timolol microdrops appear to be as effective in ocular hypotensive action as conventional drops with a slightly attenuated effect on resting HR and BP.

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S)

Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.

The Effect of β-Blocker Eye Drops on Pulse Rate, Ocular Blood Flow, and Glaucoma Progression: A Retrospective Longitudinal Study

INTRODUCTION

Our study was conducted to determine factors associated with the effectiveness of a β-blocker eye drop add-on in altering pulse rate (PR) in glaucoma patients.

METHODS

This retrospective study examined 236 eyes of 138 patients who received a β-blocker eye drop add-on during follow-up. Patients were included if at least one PR measurement was available both before and after the add-on was started. We collected data on ophthalmic parameters: longitudinal PR; longitudinal choroidal blood flow, represented by laser speckle flowgraphy-measured mean blur rate (MBR); and diacron-reactive oxygen metabolites (d-ROMs). We used a multivariable linear mixed-effects model to investigate the effectiveness of the β-blocker eye drop add-on in altering PR and examined factors contributing to a larger PR alteration after the add-on was started by analyzing the effect on PR of the interaction term between the add-on and clinical factors. We used the k-means method to classify the patients.

RESULTS

The β-blocker eye drop add-on reduced PR (- 7.61 bpm, P < 0.001). Female gender, higher PR when the add-on was started, lower central corneal thickness, and a higher d-ROM level were associated with greater reduction in PR (P < 0.05). In a cluster of patients with these clinical features, choroidal MBR increased by + 3.42% when we adjusted for change over time; MD slope, which represents the speed of glaucoma progression, improved by + 0.64 dB/year (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

We identified a glaucoma subgroup in which PR decreased, choroidal blood flow increased, and glaucoma progression slowed after a β-blocker eye drop add-on was started.

A comparative study on efficacy of fixed combination timolol/brinzolamide versus travoprost monotherapy in drug-naïve open-angle glaucoma patients

Background

Glaucoma is most common irreversible cause of blindness in India. First line management of open-angle glaucoma is either beta blockers or prostaglandin analogs monotherapy. Monotherapy rarely achieves target intraocular pressure within 2 years and patients are shifted to combination medications, usually fixed-dose combination.

Objective

To compare travoprost monotherapy and timolol/brinzolamide fixed-dose combination for their intraocular pressure lowering efficacy, their effects on hemodynamic parameters and cup disc ratio reversibility in newly diagnosed drug-naïve open-angle glaucoma patients.

Material and methods

In a 12-week, prospective, randomised, single-blind study, patients were randomised to receive twice daily 0.5% timolol and 0.2% brinzolamide fixed-dose combination (n = 52) or once daily travoprost 0.004% (n = 52). Intraocular pressure, blood pressure, pulse rate and cup disc ratio were compared across treatment groups over 3 months.

Results

Significant reduction (p < 0.001) in intraocular pressure by 27.99% and 30.49% at 12th-week visit as compared with baseline was observed in monotherapy and fixed-dose combination group, respectively. Significant changes in pulse rate (9 beats/min) and systolic blood pressure (2.35 mmHg) was observed in fixed-dose combination group. No cup disc ratio reversibility was observed at the end of study. Conjunctival hyperaemia (n = 14) and transient blurring of vision (n = 16) were most commonly reported adverse drug reaction in monotherapy and fixed-dose combination, respectively.

Conclusion

The 0.5% timolol and 0.2% brinzolamide fixed-dose combination produced greater reduction in intraocular pressure than those produced by 0.004% travoprost alone in drug-naïve open-angle glaucoma patients.

Effect of preservative removal from fixed-combination bimatoprost/timolol on intraocular pressure lowering: a potential timolol dose-response phenomenon

PURPOSE

Many patients with glaucoma require combination therapies to achieve target intraocular pressure (IOP) and preserve visual function. Ocular hypotensives often contain a preservative (eg, benzalkonium chloride [BAK]), but preservative-free (PF) formulations have been developed for patients with sensitivity. A Phase III study found the efficacy of bimatoprost 0.03%/timolol 0.5% (bim/tim, Ganfort(®)) PF to be equivalent to that of preserved bim/tim, although a trend favoring bim/tim PF was observed. As BAK is a corneal penetration enhancer, this literature review aims to explain these findings by exploring the relationship between timolol concentration and its IOP-lowering effect.

METHODS

Systematic searches were performed in Scopus and PubMed for clinical trials published in English between 1960 and July 2014 using the keywords "timolol", "intraocular pressure", and the concentrations "1%, 0.5%, OR 0.25%". Articles that directly compared IOP-lowering effects of ≥2 concentrations of timolol were identified by manual screening, and cross-checked for duplication.

RESULTS

Seventeen studies that included 10-371 patients were evaluated; the majority were randomized (16/17), double-masked (14/17), and enrolled patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension (12/17). All studies investigated timolol in preserved formulations. Timolol concentrations tested ranged from 0.008% to 1.5%. Of 13 studies comparing timolol 0.25% versus 0.5%, two found the 0.25% dose to have greater IOP-lowering effects, and three reported the opposite; eight reported similar IOP lowering. Results also indicate that timolol 0.5% may be more effective than higher concentrations.

CONCLUSION

The evidence suggests that timolol may have an inverted U-shaped dose-response curve, and that its optimal IOP-lowering concentration is between 0.25% and 0.5%. Compared with bim/tim, removal of the permeability enhancer BAK in bim/tim PF could have resulted in a lower timolol concentration at the target site, bringing the effective concentration within the 0.25%-0.5% range and enhancing the efficacy of bim/tim PF.

Association between Ophthalmic Timolol and Hospitalisation for Bradycardia

Introduction. Ophthalmic timolol, a topical nonselective beta-blocker, has the potential to be absorbed systemically which may cause adverse cardiovascular effects. This study was conducted to determine whether initiation of ophthalmic timolol was associated with an increased risk of hospitalisation for bradycardia. Materials and Methods. A self-controlled case-series study was undertaken in patients who were hospitalised for bradycardia and were exposed to timolol. Person-time after timolol initiation was partitioned into risk periods: 1–30 days, 31–180 days, and >180 days. A 30-day risk period prior to initiating timolol was also included. All remaining time was considered unexposed. Results. There were 6,373 patients with at least one hospitalisation for bradycardia during the study period; 267 were exposed to timolol. Risk of bradycardia was significantly increased in the 31–180 days after timolol initiation (incidence rate ratio (IRR) = 1.93; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.00–1.87). No increased risk was observed in the first 30 days or beyond 180 days of continuous exposure (IRR = 1.40; 95% CI 0.87–2.26 and IRR = 1.21; 95% CI 0.64–2.31, resp.). Conclusion. Bradycardia is a potential adverse event following timolol initiation. Practitioners should consider patient history before choosing a glaucoma regime and closely monitor patients after treatment initiation with topical nonselective beta-blocker eye drops.

Ophthalmic timolol: plasma concentration and systemic cardiopulmonary effects

Timolol maleate is a non-selective beta-adrenoceptor antagonist currently used mainly as an ocular preparation for the treatment of glaucoma and ocular hypertension. Despite the topical administration, ophthalmic timolol causes systemic adrenergic beta-blocking because of absorption from the eye into the systemic circulation. Gel formulations of ophthalmic timolol have been developed to reduce systemic absorption and adverse effects in comparison with conventional aqueous solution formulations. Timolol is metabolized by the polymorphic cytochrome P450 2D6 enzyme (CYP2D6). The changes in heart rate (HR) are the most striking effects of the systematically absorbed fraction of ophthalmic timolol, with 0.5 % aqueous formulations presenting larger effects than 0.1 % hydrogel formulations, especially during exercise. Plasma levels of ophthalmic timolol correlate with the changes in HR. Neither 0.5 % aqueous nor 0.1 % hydrogel formulations of timolol have exerted noteworthy effects on systolic (SAP) or diastolic (DAP) arterial pressures, probably because of a compensatory increase in systemic vascular resistance due to the attenuation of HR. Ophthalmic timolol does not exert remarkable effects on pulmonary parameter peak expiratory flow (PEF) and forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) in non-asthmatic patients. CYP2D6 activity is clearly associated with the pharmacokinetic parameters, particularly when 0.5 % aqueous solution of timolol is used: peak plasma concentration, elimination half-life and area-under-the-curve are highest in CYP2D6 poor metabolizers. Finally, since there is a correlation between the plasma level of timolol and several haemodynamic effects - especially HR in the state of elevated beta-adrenergic tonus - the CYP2D6 poor metabolizers may be more prone to bradycardia during treatment with (aqueous) ophthalmic timolol.

Association between low plasma levels of ophthalmic timolol and haemodynamics in glaucoma patients

OBJECTIVES

The aims of the study were to assess the correlation between the plasma concentration of ophthalmic timolol and cardiovascular parameters, and the influence of timolol on advanced haemodynamic variables, such as stroke (SI), cardiac (CI) and systemic vascular resistance (SVRI) indices and arterial pulse wave velocity (PWV).

METHODS

Twenty-five glaucoma or ocular hypertensive patients were treated with 0.5% aqueous and 0.1% hydrogel formulations of timolol using a randomised, double-masked, crossover, multicentre design. All the patients were subjected to passive head-up tilt, electrocardiography, exercise test and measurement of plasma concentration of timolol. In the analysis, the data on the two treatments were combined, and the Spearman correlation coefficients between the plasma level of timolol and physiological effects were calculated.

RESULTS

During the head-up tilt test before rising the bed up, the resting heart rate (HR; R=-0.52, P=0.001) and PWV (R=-0.34, P=0.04) were inversely correlated with timolol level. In the upright position, ophthalmic timolol effectively suppressed the rise in HR (R=-0.36, P=0.03). The SI did not change with timolol concentration, while CI diminished as timolol concentration rose (R=-0.39, P=0.02). The SVRI correlated with timolol concentration (R=0.38, P=0.02). In the exercise test, correlation between HR and plasma level of timolol steadily grew stronger as the load increased, reaching R=-0.60 (P<0.0001) at the maximum load. Systolic and diastolic arterial pressures were not associated with the timolol concentration.

CONCLUSION

The plasma concentration of ophthalmic timolol correlates with several haemodynamic effects. As HR decreases, SVRI increases and blood pressure is kept unchanged.

The placebo effect

Placebos have been traditionally regarded as deceptive therapies and have not been understood in the broader context of social symbols and of interpersonal factors that surround the healing process itself. Although the power of inert substances to heal is well recognized, the placebo effect also influences the outcome of conventional therapies. The role of the placebo in modern medicine is poorly defined because of a lack of a common understanding of what the placebo effect is and because of the negative connotions associated with its use. The response rate to placebo varies by illness. The natural course of disease and patient or physician bias can be misinterpreted as a placebo response. In research, the placebo effect is therapeutic noise to be removed by placebo-controlled trials. Few studies are designed to measure the placebo response rate directly. Placebos are a reminder of how little is known about mind-body interaction. The placebo effect may be one of the most versatile and underused therapeutic tools at the disposal of physicians.